Single-dose pharmacokinetics of temocillin in plasma and soft tissues of healthy volunteers after intravenous and subcutaneous administration: a randomized crossover microdialysis trial

BACKGROUND

The antibiotic temocillin has recently been rediscovered as a promising therapeutic option against MDR Gram-negative bacteria. However, some aspects of the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the drug are still to be elucidated: subcutaneous administration of temocillin might be of interest as an alternative to the intravenous route in selected patients. Similarly, information on the penetration of temocillin into human soft tissues is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility and plasma PK of subcutaneous dosing as well as soft tissue PK of temocillin after intravenous administration to healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Eight healthy volunteers received 2 g of temocillin both as intravenous and subcutaneous infusion in a randomized two-period crossover study. Concentration-time profiles of total temocillin in plasma (after both routes) and of unbound temocillin in plasma, muscle and subcutis (only after intravenous dosing) were determined up to 12 h post-dose.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous dosing caused some infusion site discomfort but resulted in sustained drug concentrations over time with only slightly decreased overall exposure compared with intravenous dosing. Plasma protein binding of temocillin showed concentration-dependent behaviour and was higher than previously reported. Still, unbound drug concentrations in muscle and subcutis determined by microdialysis markedly exceeded those in plasma, suggesting good tissue penetration of temocillin.

CONCLUSIONS

The subcutaneous administration of temocillin is a valid and feasible alternative to intravenous dosing. With the description of plasma protein binding and soft tissue PK of temocillin in healthy volunteers, this study provides important information that adds to the ongoing characterization of the PK profile of temocillin and might serve as input for PK/PD considerations.

Activity of temocillin against ESBL-, AmpC-, and/or KPC-producing Enterobacterales isolated in Poland

We evaluated the in vitro effectiveness of temocillin and several commonly used antimicrobials against Enterobacterales bacteria in isolates from Polish patients. We tested 400 isolates: 260 extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- and/or ampC β-lactamase (AmpC)-producing isolates; 40 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing isolates; and 100 ESBL-, AmpC-, and KPC-negative isolates. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of temocillin and 16 other antimicrobials were determined by reference microdilution. We also determined the activities of fosfomycin and ceftazidime/avibactam in KPC-producing isolates. The antibiotic sensitivities were interpreted according to EUCAST, BSAC, and CLSI criteria. Overall, 91% of the isolates were susceptible to temocillin using the urinary tract infection breakpoint (≤ 32 mg/L), and 61.8% were susceptible using the systemic infection breakpoint (≤ 8 mg/L). Meropenem and imipenem were the most active drugs (MIC50 values of 0.06 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively). Colistin and ertapenem (both MIC50 = 0.12 mg/L) were less active than meropenem or imipenem, but some strains were 77% susceptible to each of them. Among the KPC-producing isolates, 42.5% had MIC values of ≤ 32 mg/L (urinary tract infection breakpoint), but 100% were resistant to temocillin (systemic infection breakpoint). Ceftazidime/avibactam was active against 100% of the KPC-producing isolates, and fosfomycin was active against 40%. The empirical susceptibility rate observed among the urinary isolates suggests that temocillin may be considered as an alternative to carbapenems in the absence of KPC-producing bacteria. With regard to isolates from other sources, temocillin might be useful as a documented therapy agent or an empirical treatment in hospitals with a low prevalence of ESBL/AmpC-producing strains.

Activity of temocillin and 15 other agents, including fosfomycin and colistin, against Enterobacteriaceae in Hong Kong

Limited data are available on temocillin susceptibilities in Enterobacteriaceae from Asian countries where antimicrobial resistance is prevalent. The in vitro activities of temocillin and 15 commonly used antimicrobials against 613 non-duplicate blood (n = 310) and urine (with clinically significant bacteriuria; n = 303) isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from patients who attended 3 out of 7 clusters of public hospitals of the Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, during 2015/2016 were tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) microbroth dilution (agar dilution with fosfomycin). For temocillin, MICs were also obtained using the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) microbroth dilution method and interpreted using the BSAC breakpoints. Overall, 93.0% (570) isolates were susceptible to temocillin using BSAC systemic breakpoint (≤8 mg/L) and all except 2 isolates were susceptible using the urinary breakpoint (≤32 mg/L). The extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) positivity rate was 23.2% (118 out of 508 E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp.). Temocillin resistance rate to ESBL-positive isolates was 16.1% using the systemic breakpoint of ≤8 mg/L (MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ were 8 mg/L and 16 mg/L respectively). Two isolates (1 E. coli, temocillin MIC 64 mg/L, 1 Klebsiella sp., MIC 32 mg/mL) were resistant to meropenem and possessed the NDM-5 and KPC-2 genes respectively. Other susceptibility rates were: amoxicillin/clavulanate (59.1%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (62.5%), ciprofloxacin (71.5%), ceftriaxone (75.4%), nitrofurantoin (76.4%), gentamicin (78.3%), cefepime (81.1%), ceftazidime (83.5%), piperacillin/tazobactam (86%), colistin (88.8%), tigecycline (89.4%), fosfomycin (92.8%), ertapenem (99.0%), amikacin (99.2%) and meropenem (99.7%). Temocillin may be a useful alternative for the treatment of infections caused by ESBL and multi-drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Hong Kong, particularly as resistance rates to ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin and piperacillin/tazobactam are high.

Temocillin (6 g daily) in critically ill patients: continuous infusion versus three times daily administration

OBJECTIVES

The growing incidence of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae producing ESBLs has led to increased use of carbapenems. Temocillin, which resists most β-lactamases, may be a useful alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and target attainment rates of 6 g of temocillin daily divided into three administrations every 8 h (three times daily) or administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, two-centre, randomized, controlled study in patients with intra-abdominal or lower respiratory tract infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included and analysed for clinical efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were measured in 29 of them. Four patients undergoing continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) were analysed separately. Mean, median and range of percentages of the dosing interval during which the free drug concentration remained >16 mg/L were 76.4, 98 and 18.7-98.9 in patients treated three times daily and 98.9, 89.7 and 36.4-99.9 in patients with continuous infusion, respectively. Clinical cure rates were 79% and 93% in each of these groups, respectively (not significant). Patients with CVVH received a daily dose of 750 mg given by continuous infusion and had a mean free drug concentration of only 13.8 ± 1.9 mg/L. No adverse event attributable to temocillin was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Temocillin (6 g daily) given by continuous infusion allows a larger proportion of critically ill patients to have free drug serum concentrations covering infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae with an MIC of 16 mg/L compared with administration three times daily. Clinical efficacy compared with carbapenems in documented severe infections needs to be further studied.