1
|
Alexandre AM, Monforte M, Brunetti V, Scarcia L, Cirillo L, Zini A, Scala I, Nardelli V, Arbia F, Arbia G, Frisullo G, Kalsoum E, Camilli A, De Leoni D, Colò F, Abruzzese S, Piano M, Rollo C, Macera A, Ruggiero M, Lafe E, Gabrieli JD, Cester G, Limbucci N, Arba F, Ferretti S, Da Ros V, Bellini L, Salsano G, Mavilio N, Russo R, Bergui M, Caragliano AA, Vinci SL, Romano DG, Frauenfelder G, Semeraro V, Ganimede MP, Lozupone E, Romi A, Cavallini A, Milonia L, Muto M, Candelaresi P, Calabresi P, Pedicelli A, Broccolini A. Baseline clinical and neuroradiological predictors of outcome in patients with large ischemic core undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: A retrospective multicenter study. Int J Stroke 2024:17474930241245828. [PMID: 38546177 DOI: 10.1177/17474930241245828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent randomized trials have shown the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) also in patients with an established large ischemic core. AIMS The purpose of this study was to define baseline predictors of clinical outcome in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation and an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) ⩽ 5, undergoing MT. MATERIAL AND METHODS The databases of 16 comprehensive stroke centers were retrospectively screened for patients with LVO and ASPECTS ⩽5 that received MT. Baseline clinical and neuroradiological features, including the differential contribution of all ASPECTS regions to the composite score, were collected. Primary clinical outcome measure was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. Statistical analysis used a logistic regression model and random forest algorithm. RESULTS A total of 408 patients were available for analysis. In multivariate model, among baseline features, lower age (odd ratio (OR) = 0.962, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.943-0.982) and lower National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (OR = 0.911, 95% CI = 0.862-0.963) were associated with the mRS score 0-2. Involvement of the M2 (OR = 0.398, 95% CI = 0.206-0.770) or M4 (OR = 0.496, 95% CI = 0.260-0.945) ASPECTS regions was associated with an unfavorable outcome. Random forest analysis confirmed that age and baseline NIHSS score are the most important variables influencing clinical outcome, whereas involvement of cortical regions M5, M4, M2, and M1 can have a negative impact. CONCLUSION Our retrospective analysis shows that, along with age and baseline clinical impairment, presence of early ischemic changes involving cortical areas has a role in clinical outcome in patients with large ischemic core undergoing MT. DATA ACCESS STATEMENT The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M Alexandre
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Monforte
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Brunetti
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Scarcia
- Neuroradiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Luigi Cirillo
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Zini
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Irene Scala
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Nardelli
- Department of Statistical Sciences, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Arbia
- Department of Neuroradiology, S. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Arbia
- Department of Statistical Sciences, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Frisullo
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Erwah Kalsoum
- Neuroradiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Mariangela Piano
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Rollo
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Macera
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Ruggiero
- Neuroradiology Unit, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Elvis Lafe
- Neuroradiology Unit, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Cester
- Neuroradiology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Nicola Limbucci
- Interventional Neurovascular Unit, A.O.U. Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Simone Ferretti
- NEUROFARBA Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Valerio Da Ros
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, "Tor Vergata" University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Bellini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, "Tor Vergata" University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Nicola Mavilio
- Neuroradiology Unit, "San Martino" Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Riccardo Russo
- Neuroradiology Unit, A.O. "Città della Salute e della Scienza," Turin, Italy
| | - Mauro Bergui
- Neuroradiology Unit, A.O. "Città della Salute e della Scienza," Turin, Italy
| | | | - Sergio L Vinci
- Neuroradiology Unit, "G. Martino" Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Daniele G Romano
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU "S Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona," Salerno, Italy
| | - Giulia Frauenfelder
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU "S Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona," Salerno, Italy
| | - Vittorio Semeraro
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Romi
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS "San Matteo" Hospital, Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna Cavallini
- Cerebrovascular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Mondino, Pavia, Italy
| | - Luca Milonia
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, "Umberto I" University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Muto
- Neuroradiology Unit, A.O.R.N. "Antonio Cardarelli," Naples, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Calabresi
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pedicelli
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldobrando Broccolini
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valente I, Alexandre AM, Colò F, Brunetti V, Frisullo G, Camilli A, Falcou A, Scarcia L, Gigli R, Scala I, Rizzo PA, Abruzzese S, Milonia L, Piano M, Macera A, Ruggiero M, Da Ros V, Bellini L, Lazzarotti GA, Cosottini M, Caragliano AA, Vinci SL, Gabrieli JD, Causin F, Panni P, Roveri L, Limbucci N, Arba F, Renieri L, Ferretti S, Pileggi M, Bianco G, Romano DG, Frauenfelder G, Semeraro V, Ganimede MP, Lozupone E, Fasano A, Lafe E, Cavallini AM, Mazzacane F, Russo R, Bergui M, Broccolini A, Pedicelli A. Effect of General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation/Local Anesthesia on the Outcome of Patients with Minor Stroke and Isolated M2 Occlusion Undergoing Immediate Thrombectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Matched Analysis. World Neurosurg 2024; 183:e432-e439. [PMID: 38154680 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigates the impact of general anesthesia (GA) versus conscious sedation/local anesthesia (CS/LA) on the outcome of patients with minor stroke and isolated M2 occlusion undergoing immediate mechanical thrombectomy (iMT). METHODS The databases of 16 comprehensive stroke centers were retrospectively screened for consecutive patients with isolated M2 occlusion and a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5 who received iMT. Propensity score matching was used to estimate the effect of GA versus CS/LA on clinical outcomes and procedure-related adverse events. The primary outcome measure was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1. Secondary outcome measures were a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 and all-cause mortality, successful reperfusion, procedural-related symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraprocedural dissections, and new territory embolism. RESULTS Of the 172 patients who were selected, 55 received GA and 117 CS/LA. After propensity score matching, 47 pairs of patients were available for analysis. We found no significant differences in clinical outcome, rates of efficient reperfusion, and procedural-related complications between patients receiving GA or LA/CS (mRS score 0-1, P = 0.815; mRS score 0-2, P = 0.401; all-cause mortality, P = 0.408; modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3, P = 0.374; symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, P = 0.082; intraprocedural dissection, P = 0.408; new territory embolism, P = 0.462). CONCLUSIONS In patients with minor stroke and isolated M2 occlusion undergoing iMT, the type of anesthesia does not affect clinical outcome or the rate of procedural-related complications. Our results agree with recent data showing no benefit of one specific anesthesiologic procedure over the other and confirm their generalizability also to patients with minor baseline symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iacopo Valente
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea M Alexandre
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Colò
- Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Brunetti
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Frisullo
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Arianna Camilli
- Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Anne Falcou
- Stroke Unit, University Hospital Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Scarcia
- Neuroradiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Riccardo Gigli
- Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Irene Scala
- Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Pier A Rizzo
- Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Serena Abruzzese
- Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Milonia
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariangela Piano
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Antonio Macera
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Valerio Da Ros
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Hospital of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Bellini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Hospital of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Guido A Lazzarotti
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), Pisa, Italy
| | - Mirco Cosottini
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Sergio L Vinci
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - Joseph D Gabrieli
- Neuroradiology Unit, Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Causin
- Neuroradiology Unit, Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Pietro Panni
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit and Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luisa Roveri
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Limbucci
- Interventional Neurovascular Unit, Stroke Unit, A.O.U. Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Leonardo Renieri
- Interventional Neurovascular Unit, Stroke Unit, A.O.U. Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - Simone Ferretti
- NEUROFARBA Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Pileggi
- Neuroradiology Unit and Stroke Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland-EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Bianco
- Stroke Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland-EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Daniele G Romano
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU S Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Giulia Frauenfelder
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU S Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Vittorio Semeraro
- Interventional Radiology Unit and Neuroradiology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto, Italy
| | | | - Emilio Lozupone
- Neuroradiology Unit and Neurology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | | | - Elvis Lafe
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna M Cavallini
- Cerebrovascular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Mondino, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Russo
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Mauro Bergui
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Aldobrando Broccolini
- Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy; Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Pedicelli
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alexandre AM, Scarcia L, Brunetti V, Scala I, Kalsoum E, Valente I, Camilli A, De Leoni D, Colò F, Frisullo G, Piano M, Rollo C, Macera A, Ruggiero M, Lafe E, Gabrieli JD, Cester G, Limbucci N, Arba F, Ferretti S, Da Ros V, Bellini L, Salsano G, Mavilio N, Russo R, Bergui M, Caragliano AA, Vinci SL, Romano DG, Frauenfelder G, Semeraro V, Ganimede MP, Lozupone E, Romi A, Cavallini A, Milonia L, Muto M, Giordano F, Cirillo L, Calabresi P, Pedicelli A, Broccolini A. Predictors of parenchymal hematoma and clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large ischemic core due to large vessel occlusion: a retrospective multicenter study. J Neurointerv Surg 2023:jnis-2023-021146. [PMID: 38129110 DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to find predictors of parenchymal hematoma (PH) and clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and baseline large infarct. METHODS The databases of 16 stroke centers were retrospectively screened for patients with anterior circulation LVO and baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≤5 that received MT. Procedural parameters, including the number of passes during first and second technique of MT, were recorded. Outcome measures were occurrence of PH type 2 and any type of PH after MT, and the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3 and 0-2. RESULTS In total, 408 patients were available for analysis. A higher number of passes in the second technique was predictive of PH type 2 (odds ratio (OR) - 3.204, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.140 to 9.005), whereas procedure conducted under general anesthesia was associated with lower risk (OR 0.127, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.808). The modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade 2c-3 was associated with the mRS score 0-3 (OR 3.373, 95% CI 1.891 to 6.017), whereas occurrence of PH type 2 was predictive of unfavorable outcome (OR 0.221, 95% CI 0.063 to 0.773). Similar results were found for the mRS score 0-2 outcome measure. CONCLUSION In patients with large ischemic core, a higher number of passes during MT and procedure not conducted under general anesthesia are associated with increased rate of PH type 2, that negatively impact the clinical outcome. Our data outline a delicate balance between the need of a complete recanalization and the risk of PH following MT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M Alexandre
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Scarcia
- Neuroradiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Valerio Brunetti
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Irene Scala
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Erwah Kalsoum
- Neuroradiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Iacopo Valente
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giovanni Frisullo
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariangela Piano
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Rollo
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Macera
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Ruggiero
- Neuroradiology Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Elvis Lafe
- Neuroradiology Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Joseph D Gabrieli
- Neuroradiology Unit, Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Giacomo Cester
- Neuroradiology Unit, Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Nicola Limbucci
- Interventional Neurovascular Unit, A.O.U. Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Simone Ferretti
- NEUROFARBA Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Valerio Da Ros
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Hospital of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Bellini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Hospital of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Salsano
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genua, Italy
| | - Nicola Mavilio
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genua, Italy
| | - Riccardo Russo
- Neuroradiology Unit, A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Mauro Bergui
- Neuroradiology Unit, A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Sergio L Vinci
- Neuroradiology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - Daniele G Romano
- Neuroradiology Unit, A.O.U. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Giulia Frauenfelder
- Neuroradiology Unit, A.O.U. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Vittorio Semeraro
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Romi
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna Cavallini
- Department of Emergency Neurology and Stroke Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Mondino, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Milonia
- Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Muto
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale "A. Cardarelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Flavio Giordano
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale "A. Cardarelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Cirillo
- Neurology and Stroke Center, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna - Maggiore Hospital, Bolona, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Calabresi
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pedicelli
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldobrando Broccolini
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Broccolini A, Brunetti V, Colò F, Alexandre AM, Valente I, Falcou A, Frisullo G, Pedicelli A, Scarcia L, Scala I, Rizzo PA, Bellavia S, Camilli A, Milonia L, Piano M, Macera A, Commodaro C, Ruggiero M, Da Ros V, Bellini L, Lazzarotti GA, Cosottini M, Caragliano AA, Vinci SL, Gabrieli JD, Causin F, Panni P, Roveri L, Limbucci N, Arba F, Pileggi M, Bianco G, Romano DG, Frauenfelder G, Semeraro V, Ganimede MP, Lozupone E, Fasano A, Lafe E, Cavallini A, Russo R, Bergui M, Calabresi P, Della Marca G. Early neurological deterioration in patients with minor stroke due to isolated M2 occlusion undergoing medical management: a retrospective multicenter study. J Neurointerv Surg 2023; 16:38-44. [PMID: 36977569 DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with minor stroke and M2 occlusion undergoing best medical management (BMM) may face early neurological deterioration (END) that can lead to poor long-term outcome. In case of END, rescue mechanical thrombectomy (rMT) seems beneficial. Our study aimed to define factors relevant to clinical outcome in patients undergoing BMM with the possibility of rMT on END, and find predictors of END. METHODS Patients with M2 occlusion and a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score≤5 that received either BMM only or rMT on END after BMM were extracted from the databases of 16 comprehensive stroke centers. Clinical outcome measures were a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 or 0-2, and occurrence of END. RESULTS Among 10 169 consecutive patients with large vessel occlusion admitted between 2016 and 2021, 208 patients were available for analysis. END was reported in 87 patients that were therefore all subjected to rMT. In a logistic regression model, END (OR 3.386, 95% CI 1.428 to 8.032), baseline NIHSS score (OR 1.362, 95% CI 1.004 to 1.848) and a pre-event mRS score=1 (OR 3.226, 95% CI 1.229 to 8.465) were associated with unfavorable outcome. In patients with END, successful rMT was associated with favorable outcome (OR 4.549, 95% CI 1.098 to 18.851). Among baseline clinical and neuroradiological features, presence of atrial fibrillation was a predictor of END (OR 3.547, 95% CI 1.014 to 12.406). CONCLUSION Patients with minor stroke due to M2 occlusion and atrial fibrillation should be closely monitored for possible worsening during BMM and, in this case, promptly considered for rMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldobrando Broccolini
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Brunetti
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Andrea M Alexandre
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Iacopo Valente
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anne Falcou
- Stroke Unit, University Hospital Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Frisullo
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pedicelli
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Scarcia
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Irene Scala
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Luca Milonia
- Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariangela Piano
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Macera
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Valerio Da Ros
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Fondazione PTV Policlinico 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Bellini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Fondazione PTV Policlinico 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Guido A Lazzarotti
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mirco Cosottini
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Sergio L Vinci
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - Joseph D Gabrieli
- Neuroradiology Unit, Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Causin
- Neuroradiology Unit, Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Pietro Panni
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luisa Roveri
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Limbucci
- Interventional Neurovascular Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Arba
- Stroke Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Pileggi
- Neuroradiology Unit, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland-EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Bianco
- Stroke Unit, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland-EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Daniele G Romano
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Giulia Frauenfelder
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Vittorio Semeraro
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Elvis Lafe
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna Cavallini
- Cerebrovascular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Mondino, Pavia, Italy
| | - Riccardo Russo
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Mauro Bergui
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Calabresi
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Della Marca
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alexandre AM, Colò F, Brunetti V, Valente I, Frisullo G, Pedicelli A, Scarcia L, Rollo C, Falcou A, Milonia L, Andrighetti M, Piano M, Macera A, Commodaro C, Ruggiero M, Da Ros V, Bellini L, Lazzarotti GA, Cosottini M, Caragliano AA, Vinci SL, Gabrieli JD, Causin F, Panni P, Roveri L, Limbucci N, Arba F, Pileggi M, Bianco G, Romano DG, Diana F, Semeraro V, Burdi N, Ganimede MP, Lozupone E, Fasano A, Lafe E, Cavallini A, Russo R, Bergui M, Calabresi P, Della Marca G, Broccolini A. Mechanical thrombectomy in minor stroke due to isolated M2 occlusion: a multicenter retrospective matched analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2023; 15:e198-e203. [PMID: 36223995 DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with isolated M2 occlusion and minor symptoms and identify possible baseline predictors of clinical outcome. METHODS The databases of 16 high-volume stroke centers were retrospectively screened for consecutive patients with isolated M2 occlusion and a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤5 who received either early MT (eMT) or best medical management (BMM) with the possibility of rescue MT (rMT) on early neurological worsening. Because our patients were not randomized, we used propensity score matching (PSM) to estimate the treatment effect of eMT compared with the BMM/rMT. The primary clinical outcome measure was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1. RESULTS 388 patients were initially selected and, after PSM, 100 pairs of patients receiving eMT or BMM/rMT were available for analysis. We found no significant differences in clinical outcome and in safety measures between patients receiving eMT or BMM/rMT. Similar results were also observed after comparison between eMT and rMT. Concerning baseline predicting factors of outcome, the involvement of the M2 inferior branch was associated with a favorable outcome. CONCLUSION Our multicenter retrospective analysis has shown no benefit of eMT in minor stroke patients with isolated M2 occlusion over a more conservative therapeutic approach. Although our results must be viewed with caution, in these patients it appears reasonable to consider BMM as the first option and rMT in the presence of early neurological deterioration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M Alexandre
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Valerio Brunetti
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Iacopo Valente
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Frisullo
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pedicelli
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Scarcia
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Anne Falcou
- Stroke Unit, University Hospital Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Milonia
- Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Mariangela Piano
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Macera
- Neuroradiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Valerio Da Ros
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Hospital of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Bellini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Hospital of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Guido A Lazzarotti
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), Pisa, Italy
| | - Mirco Cosottini
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Sergio L Vinci
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - Joseph D Gabrieli
- Neuroradiology Unit, Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padia, Italy
| | - Francesco Causin
- Neuroradiology Unit, Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padia, Italy
| | - Pietro Panni
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luisa Roveri
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Limbucci
- Interventional Neurovascular Unit, A.O.U. Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Marco Pileggi
- Neuroradiology Unit, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland-EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Bianco
- Stroke Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland-EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Daniele G Romano
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU S Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Francesco Diana
- Neuroradiology Unit, AOU S Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Vittorio Semeraro
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto, Italy
| | - Nicola Burdi
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Elvis Lafe
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna Cavallini
- Cerebrovascular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Mondino, Pavia, Italy
| | - Riccardo Russo
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Mauro Bergui
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Calabresi
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Della Marca
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldobrando Broccolini
- Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tessitore A, Paolucci A, Hohenstatt S, Caragliano AA, Buonomo O, Mormina E, Pitrone A, Vinci SL. Comparison between second generation HydroSoft coils and bare platinum coils for the treatment of large intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2022:15910199221088711. [PMID: 35317639 PMCID: PMC10369119 DOI: 10.1177/15910199221088711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development of HydroSoft coils (HSC) aims to reduce the high recurrence and retreatment rates observed in large brain aneurysms by improving primary brain aneurysm filling and thus occlusion efficacy. We compared clinical and angiographic effectiveness of bare platinum coils (BPC) versus second generation HSC for large intracranial aneurysms at our center. METHODS We included 61 large aneurysms between 2015 and 2018, 29 embolized primarily using HSC and 32 treated with BPC. The aneurysm occlusion rates were assessed after 3 and 12 months with an MRI scan and at 6 moths with a control digital subtraction angiography (DSA) using the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the modified ranking scale (mRS). RESULTS The observed immediate occlusion rate was slightly better in the BPC group, however, this group had a significant increase of progressive reperfusion at all imaging follow-up. Contrarily, the rate of complete occlusion increased significantly in the HSC group, starting from the 6 and 12-months follow-up. 7 aneurysms (11.4%) were re-treated (15.6% BPC and 6.9% HSC). The 6 and 12-months clinical data showed mRS score 0-1 in 96.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS In our single-center experience, the second generation HydroSoft coils were shown to be safe and effective for endovascular treatment of large intracranial aneurysms with encouraging clinical and angiographic results, also for ruptured aneurysms. Even if the validity is limited due to our small cohort size, HSC showed a significantly lower rate of recurrence at mid-term follow-up when compared to BPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agostino Tessitore
- Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Martino" - Messina, Italy
| | - Aldo Paolucci
- Operative Unit of Neuroradiology, 9339Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sophia Hohenstatt
- Department of Neuroradiology, 27178Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antonio A Caragliano
- Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Martino" - Messina, Italy
| | - Orazio Buonomo
- Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Martino" - Messina, Italy
| | - Enricomaria Mormina
- Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Martino" - Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Pitrone
- Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Martino" - Messina, Italy
| | - Sergio L Vinci
- Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital A.O.U. "G. Martino" Messina, Italy.,Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, 18980University of Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
By regulating several phases of gene expression, RNA editing modifications contribute to maintaining physiological RNA expression levels. RNA editing dysregulation can affect RNA molecule half-life, coding/noncoding RNA interaction, alternative splicing, and circular RNA biogenesis. Impaired RNA editing has been observed in several pathological conditions, including cancer and Alzheimer's disease. No data has been published yet on the editome profile of endothelial cells (ECs) isolated from human cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) lesions. Here, we describe a landscape of editome modifications in sporadic CCM-derived ECs (CCM-ECs) by comparing editing events with those observed in human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs). With a whole transcriptome-based variant calling pipeline, we identified differential edited genes in CCM-ECs that were enriched in pathways related to angiogenesis, apoptosis and cell survival, inflammation and, in particular, to thrombin signalling mediated by protease-activated receptors and non-canonical Wnt signalling. These pathways, not yet associated to CCM development, could be a novel field for further investigations on CCM molecular mechanisms. Moreover, enrichment analysis of differentially edited miRNAs suggested additional small noncoding transcripts to consider for development of targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Concetta Scimone
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.,therapies, I.E.ME.S.TDepartment of Biomolecular strategies, genetics, cutting-edge, Palermo, Italy
| | - Simona Alibrandi
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.,therapies, I.E.ME.S.TDepartment of Biomolecular strategies, genetics, cutting-edge, Palermo, Italy.,Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Luigi Donato
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.,therapies, I.E.ME.S.TDepartment of Biomolecular strategies, genetics, cutting-edge, Palermo, Italy
| | - Concetta Alafaci
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonino Germanò
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Sergio L Vinci
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Rosalia D'Angelo
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.,therapies, I.E.ME.S.TDepartment of Biomolecular strategies, genetics, cutting-edge, Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonina Sidoti
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.,therapies, I.E.ME.S.TDepartment of Biomolecular strategies, genetics, cutting-edge, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alexandre AM, Valente I, Consoli A, Piano M, Renieri L, Gabrieli JD, Russo R, Caragliano AA, Ruggiero M, Saletti A, Lazzarotti GA, Pileggi M, Limbucci N, Cosottini M, Cervo A, Viaro F, Vinci SL, Commodaro C, Pilato F, Pedicelli A. Posterior Circulation Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large-Vessel Occlusion: Predictors of Favorable Clinical Outcome and Analysis of First-Pass Effect. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:896-903. [PMID: 33664106 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Successful vessel recanalization in posterior circulation large-vessel occlusion is considered crucial, though the evidence of clinical usefulness, compared with the anterior circulation, is not still determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate predictors of favorable clinical outcome and to analyze the effect of first-pass thrombectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted in 10 high-volume stroke centers in Europe, including the period from January 2016 to July 2019. Only patients with an acute basilar artery occlusion or a single, dominant vertebral artery occlusion ("functional" basilar artery occlusion) who had a 3-month mRS were included. Clinical, procedural, and radiologic data were evaluated, and the association between these parameters and both the functional outcome and the first-pass effect was assessed. RESULTS A total of 191 patients were included. A lower baseline NIHSS score (adjusted OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96; P = .025) and higher baseline MR imaging posterior circulation ASPECTS (adjusted OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.03-8.76; P = .043) were predictors of better outcomes. The use of large-bore catheters (adjusted OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.08-4.67; P = .030) was a positive predictor of successful reperfusion at first-pass, while the use of a combined technique was a negative predictor (adjusted OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.76; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS The analysis of our retrospective series demonstrates that a lower baseline NIHSS score and a higher MR imaging posterior circulation ASPECTS were predictors of good clinical outcome. The use of large-bore catheters was a positive predictor of first-pass modified TICI 2b/3; the use of a combined technique was a negative predictor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Alexandre
- From the Unità Operativa Complessa Radiologia e Neuroradiologia (A.M.A., I.V., A.P.), Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Roma, Italia
| | - I Valente
- From the Unità Operativa Complessa Radiologia e Neuroradiologia (A.M.A., I.V., A.P.), Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Roma, Italia
| | - A Consoli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.Consoli, R.R.), Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
| | - M Piano
- Neuroradiologia (M.Piano, A.Cervo), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - L Renieri
- UOC Interventistica Neurovascolare (L.R., N.L.), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - J D Gabrieli
- Neuroradiology Unit (J.D.G.), Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - R Russo
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.Consoli, R.R.), Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
| | - A A Caragliano
- Neuroradiology Unit, Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Images (A.A.C., S.L.V.), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - M Ruggiero
- Neuroradiology Unit (M.R., C.C.), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Romagna, Cesena, Italy
| | - A Saletti
- Interventional Neuroradiology (A.S.), S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - G A Lazzarotti
- Department of Neuroradiology (G.A.L., M.C.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - M Pileggi
- Department of Neuroradiology (M.Pileggi), Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - N Limbucci
- UOC Interventistica Neurovascolare (L.R., N.L.), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - M Cosottini
- Department of Neuroradiology (G.A.L., M.C.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Cervo
- Neuroradiologia (M.Piano, A.Cervo), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - F Viaro
- UOC Neurologia (F.V.), Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - S L Vinci
- Neuroradiology Unit, Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Images (A.A.C., S.L.V.), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - C Commodaro
- Neuroradiology Unit (M.R., C.C.), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Romagna, Cesena, Italy
| | - F Pilato
- UOC Neurologia (F.P.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Roma, Italy
| | - A Pedicelli
- From the Unità Operativa Complessa Radiologia e Neuroradiologia (A.M.A., I.V., A.P.), Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Casetta I, Pracucci G, Saletti A, Saia V, Padroni M, De Vito A, Inzitari D, Zini A, Vallone S, Bergui M, Cerrato P, Bracco S, Tassi R, Gandini R, Sallustio F, Piano M, Motto C, Spina PL, Vinci SL, Causin F, Baracchini C, Gasparotti R, Magoni M, Castellan L, Serrati C, Mangiafico S, Toni D. Combined intravenous and endovascular treatment versus primary mechanical thrombectomy. The Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke. Int J Stroke 2019; 14:898-907. [DOI: 10.1177/1747493019851279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Whether mechanical thrombectomy alone may achieve better or at least equal clinical outcome than mechanical thrombectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis is a matter of debate. Methods From the Italian Registry of Endovascular Stroke Treatment, we extracted all cases treated with intravenous thrombolysis followed by mechanical thrombectomy or with primary mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke due to proximal vessel occlusion. We included only patients who would have qualified for intravenous thrombolysis. We compared outcomes of the two groups by using multivariate regression analysis and propensity score method. Results We included 1148 patients, treated with combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy therapy (n = 635; 55.3%), or with mechanical thrombectomy alone (n = 513; 44.7%). Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics did not differ between the two groups, except for a shorter onset to groin puncture time (p < 0.05) in the mechanical thrombectomy group. A shift in the 90-day modified Rankin Scale distributions toward a better outcome was found in favor of the combined treatment (adjusted common odds ratio = 1.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.66). Multivariate analyses on binary outcome show that subjects who underwent combined treatment had higher probability to survive with modified Rankin Scale 0–3 (odds ratio = 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.95) and lower case fatality rate (odds ratio = 0.6; 95% confidence interval: 0.44–0.9). Hemorrhagic transformation did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion These data seem to indicate that combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy could be associated with lower probability of death or severe dependency after three months from stroke due to large vessel occlusion, supporting the current guidelines of treating eligible patients with intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Casetta
- Neurological Clinic, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Saletti
- Interventional Neuroradiology, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
| | - Valentina Saia
- Neurology and Stroke Unit, Santa Corona Hospital, Pietra Ligure
| | - Marina Padroni
- Stroke Unit, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Zini
- Stroke Unit, Ospedale Civile “S.Agostino-Estense”, Modena
| | - Stefano Vallone
- Neuroradiological Unit, Ospedale Civile “S.Agostino-Estense”, Modena
| | - Mauro Bergui
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Ospedale “Molinette”, Torino
| | - Paolo Cerrato
- Stroke Unit, Ospedale “Molinette”, Torino
- Ospedale “Molinette”, Torino
| | - Sandra Bracco
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Siena University Hospital
| | | | - Roberto Gandini
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome
| | | | - Mariangela Piano
- NEUROFARBA Department, Neuroscience Section, University of Florence
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Niguarda Cà Granda” Hospital, Milan
| | | | | | - Sergio L Vinci
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Policlinico G. Martino, Messina
| | | | | | | | | | - Lucio Castellan
- Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS S. Martino-IST, Genova
| | | | | | - Danilo Toni
- Stroke Unit, University Hospital “Umberto I”, Rome
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Longo M, Bernava G, Calamuneri A, Caragliano AA, Pitrone A, Papa R, Mormina E, Granata F, Musolino R, Tessitore A, Centorrino G, Midiri F, Vernuccio F, Vinci SL. MRI patient selection for endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: correlation between pretreatment diffusion weighted imaging and outcome scores. Radiol Med 2018; 123:609-617. [DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0887-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
11
|
Romano DG, Cioni S, Vinci SL, Pero G, Comelli C, Comai A, Peschillo S, Mardighian D, Castellan L, Resta F, Piano MG, Comelli S, Barletta L, Puliti A, Leonini S, Bracco S. Thromboaspiration technique as first approach for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: initial experience at nine Italian stroke centers. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 9:6-10. [PMID: 26984869 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Revised: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 02/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Aspiration thrombectomy of large vessel occlusions has made a comeback among recanalization techniques thanks to recent advances in catheter technology resulting in faster recanalization and promising clinical results when used either alone or as an adjunct to stent retriever. This multicenter retrospective study reports angiographic data, complications, and clinical outcome in patients treated with aspiration thrombectomy as the first-line option. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analysed the clinical and procedural data of patients treated from January 2014 to March 2015. Recanalization was assessed according to the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score. Clinical outcome was evaluated at discharge and after 3 months. RESULTS Overall, 152 patients (mean age 68 years) were treated. Sites of occlusion were 90.8% anterior circulation (including 16.4% tandem extracranial/intracranial occlusions) and 9.2% basilar artery. In 79 patients administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator was attempted. Recanalization of the target vessel was obtained in 115/152 cases (75.6%) whereas direct aspiration alone was successful in 83/152 cases (54.6%) with an average puncture to revascularization time of 44.67 min. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 7.8% and embolization to new territories in 1.9%. 77 patients (50.6%) had a good outcome at 90-day follow-up: 55/96 in the direct aspiration alone group and 22/56 in the aspiration-stent retriever group. CONCLUSIONS Direct aspiration thrombectomy appears a feasible technique with good revascularization results achieved in more than half the patients. In light of the self-reported data, inhomogeneous patient selection, absence of a core imaging laboratory, and a non-standardized approach, the results should be validated in a larger trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Romano
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Siena, Italy
| | - S Cioni
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Siena, Italy
| | - S L Vinci
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - G Pero
- Neuroradiology Department, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - C Comelli
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, S. Giovanni Bosco Emergencies Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - A Comai
- Department of Radiology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Italy
| | - S Peschillo
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Endovascular Neurosurgery/Interventional Neuroradiology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - D Mardighian
- Department of Neuroradiology, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - L Castellan
- Neuroradiology Unit, San Martino Hospital-IST-IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | - F Resta
- Department of Cardiology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - M G Piano
- Neuroradiology Department, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - S Comelli
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, S. Giovanni Bosco Emergencies Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - L Barletta
- Neuroradiology Unit, San Martino Hospital-IST-IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | - A Puliti
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Siena, Italy
| | - S Leonini
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Siena, Italy
| | - S Bracco
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mormina E, Longo M, Arrigo A, Alafaci C, Tomasello F, Calamuneri A, Marino S, Gaeta M, Vinci SL, Granata F. MRI Tractography of Corticospinal Tract and Arcuate Fasciculus in High-Grade Gliomas Performed by Constrained Spherical Deconvolution: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36:1853-8. [PMID: 26113071 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a4368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2014] [Accepted: 03/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE MR imaging tractography is increasingly used to perform noninvasive presurgical planning for brain gliomas. Recently, constrained spherical deconvolution tractography was shown to overcome several limitations of commonly used DTI tractography. The purpose of our study was to evaluate WM tract alterations of both the corticospinal tract and arcuate fasciculus in patients with high-grade gliomas, through qualitative and quantitative analysis of probabilistic constrained spherical deconvolution tractography, to perform reliable presurgical planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty patients with frontoparietal high-grade gliomas were recruited and evaluated by using a 3T MR imaging scanner with both morphologic and diffusion sequences (60 diffusion directions). We performed probabilistic constrained spherical deconvolution tractography and tract quantification following diffusion tensor parameters: fractional anisotropy; mean diffusivity; linear, planar, and spherical coefficients. RESULTS In all patients, we obtained tractographic reconstructions of the medial and lateral portions of the corticospinal tract and arcuate fasciculus, both on the glioma-affected and nonaffected sides of the brain. The affected lateral corticospinal tract and the arcuate fasciculus showed decreased fractional anisotropy (z = 2.51, n = 20, P = .006; z = 2.52, n = 20, P = .006) and linear coefficient (z = 2.51, n = 20, P = .006; z = 2.52, n = 20, P = .006) along with increased spherical coefficient (z = -2.51, n = 20, P = .006; z = -2.52, n = 20, P = .006). Mean diffusivity values were increased only in the lateral corticospinal tract (z = -2.53, n = 20, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS In this study, we demonstrated that probabilistic constrained spherical deconvolution can provide essential qualitative and quantitative information in presurgical planning, which was not otherwise achievable with DTI. These findings can have important implications for the surgical approach and postoperative outcome in patients with glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Mormina
- From the Departments of Biomedical Science and Morphological and Functional Images (E.M., F.G., A.A., M.G., S.L.V., M.L.)
| | - M Longo
- From the Departments of Biomedical Science and Morphological and Functional Images (E.M., F.G., A.A., M.G., S.L.V., M.L.)
| | - A Arrigo
- From the Departments of Biomedical Science and Morphological and Functional Images (E.M., F.G., A.A., M.G., S.L.V., M.L.)
| | - C Alafaci
- Neurosciences (C.A., F.T., A.C.), University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - F Tomasello
- Neurosciences (C.A., F.T., A.C.), University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - A Calamuneri
- Neurosciences (C.A., F.T., A.C.), University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - S Marino
- Scientific Institute for Recovery and Care Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo (S.M.), Messina, Italy
| | - M Gaeta
- From the Departments of Biomedical Science and Morphological and Functional Images (E.M., F.G., A.A., M.G., S.L.V., M.L.)
| | - S L Vinci
- From the Departments of Biomedical Science and Morphological and Functional Images (E.M., F.G., A.A., M.G., S.L.V., M.L.)
| | - F Granata
- From the Departments of Biomedical Science and Morphological and Functional Images (E.M., F.G., A.A., M.G., S.L.V., M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|