Toll-like receptor 7 and tumor necrosis factor alpha polymorphisms in Egyptian patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases

Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) and Graves' disease (GD) susceptibility depends on a complex interaction between environmental and genetic factors. Genes for tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and toll-like receptors (TLRs) have been incorporated into the pathophysiology of autoimmune disorders. Our aim is to assess the association between TLR7 (rs179009) and TNF-α (rs1800629) polymorphisms and susceptibility to autoimmune thyroid disorders. One-hundred ninety-nine individuals, divided into 68 HT patients in group I, 57 GD patients in group II, and 74 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects in group III, underwent laboratory investigations, including the detection of TLR7 and TNF-α polymorphisms using real-time PCR technique. TLR7 (rs179009) genotypes, A/G and G/G, were significantly more prevalent in HT patients (group I) compared to normal controls. Meanwhile, TNF-α (rs1800629) genotypes in GD patients (group II) showed a six fold increase in the risk of the disease in the G/A and A/A genotypes. Our findings propose the fact that the polymorphisms of TLR7 (rs179009) play a role in the susceptibility and the development of Hashimoto's thyroiditis, whereas TNF-α (rs1800629) polymorphisms play a role in the susceptibility and development of Graves' disease.

Expression pattern of long non-coding RNAs MALAT1 and MEG3 in COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 is a novel infectious disease for which no specific treatment exists. It is likely that a combination of genetic and non-genetic factors predispose to it. Expression levels of genes that are involved in the interaction with SARS-CoV-2 or the host response are thought to play a role in disease susceptibility and severity. It is crucial to explore biomarkers for disease severity and outcome. Herein, we studied the expression levels and effects of long non-coding metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (lnc-MALAT1) and long non-coding maternally expressed gene 3 (lnc-MEG3) in COVID-19 patients. The study enrolled 35 hospitalized and 35 non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and 35 healthy controls. A chest computed tomography (CT) scan, complete blood count (CBC), ferritin, C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer and analysis of lnc-MALAT1 and lnc-MEG3 expression were done.

RESULTS

There was a significant relation between ferritin, CRP, D-dimer levels, oxygen saturation, CT-CORADS score and disease severity. Lnc-MALAT1 was significantly higher but lnc-MEG3 was significantly lower in patients vs. controls, and in hospitalized vs. non-hospitalized patients. Elevated MALAT1 and reduced MEG3 levels were significantly associated with more elevated ferritin, CRP, D-dimer levels, lower oxygen saturation, higher CT-CORADS score and poor survival. Moreover, MALAT1 and MEG3 levels displayed higher sensitivity and specificity as predictors of COVID-19 severity compared with other prognostic biochemical markers such as ferritin, CRP, and D-dimer.

CONCLUSIONS

MALAT1 levels are higher, whereas MEG3 levels are lower in COVID-19 patients. Both are linked to disease severity and mortality and could emerge as predictive biomarkers for COVID-19 severity and therapeutic targets.

Biochemical and clinical impacts of miR-150 and miR-21 expression levels in diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Identification of biomarkers is crucial in guiding the treatment decision and improving the future outcomes of DLBCL. The aim of the current study is to detect the biochemical and clinical impacts of miR-150 and miR-21 expression levels in DLBCL. Quantification of serum miR-150 and miR-21 expression levels by real-time PCR after micro-RNA extraction and RT-PCR. At a cutoff point of 2.3 for miR-21, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values for diagnosis of DLBCL were 98%, 90%, 90.7%, and 97.8%, respectively. At cut-off point (≤19.12) the sensitivity, specificity, the positive predictive and negative predictive values of miR-21 to discriminate stage IV vs stage II DLBCL patients were 68.42%, 80%, 86.7%%,and 57.1%, respectively. Serum miR-150 and serum miR-21 can be used as diagnostic markers for DLBCL patients, but miR-21 is more sensitive than miR-150. Serum miR-21 can be used as prognostic marker for DLBCL patients. It was more sensitive and more specific than miR-150.