1
|
Lloyd PC, Lufkin B, Moll K, Ogilvie RP, McMahill-Walraven CN, Beachler DC, Kelman JA, Shi X, Hobbi S, Amend KL, Djibo DA, Shangguan S, Shoaibi A, Sheng M, Secora A, Zhou CK, Kowarski L, Chillarige Y, Forshee RA, Anderson SA, Muthuri S, Seeger JD, Kline A, Reich C, MaCurdy T, Wong HL. Incidence rates of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) among adults in United States commercial and Medicare claims databases, 2017-2020. Vaccine 2024; 42:2004-2010. [PMID: 38388240 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased risk of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) following adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccinations has been identified in passive surveillance systems. TTS incidence rates (IRs) in the United States (U.S.) are needed to contextualize reports following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS We estimated annual and monthly IRs of overall TTS, common site TTS, and unusual site TTS for adults aged 18-64 years in Carelon Research and MarketScan commercial claims (2017-Oct 2020), CVS Health and Optum commercial claims (2019-Oct 2020), and adults aged ≥ 65 years using CMS Medicare claims (2019-Oct 2020); IRs were stratified by age, sex, and race/ethnicity (CMS Medicare). RESULTS Across data sources, annual IRs for overall TTS were similar between Jan-Dec 2019 and Jan-Oct 2020. Rates were higher in Medicare (IRs: 370.72 and 365.63 per 100,000 person-years for 2019 and 2020, respectively) than commercial data sources (MarketScan IRs: 24.21 and 24.06 per 100,000 person-years; Optum IRs: 32.60 and 31.29 per 100,000 person-years; Carelon Research IRs: 24.46 and 26.16 per 100,000 person-years; CVS Health IRs: 30.31 and 30.25 per 100,000 person-years). Across years and databases, common site TTS IRs increased with age and were higher among males. Among adults aged ≥ 65 years, the common site TTS IR was highest among non-Hispanic black adults. Annual unusual site TTS IRs ranged between 2.02 and 3.04 (commercial) and 12.49 (Medicare) per 100,000 person-years for Jan-Dec 2019; IRs ranged between 1.53 and 2.67 (commercial) and 11.57 (Medicare) per 100,000 person-years for Jan-Oct 2020. Unusual site TTS IRs were higher in males and increased with age in commercial data sources; among adults aged ≥ 65 years, IRs decreased with age and were highest among non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska native adults. CONCLUSION TTS IRs were generally similar across years, higher for males, and increased with age. These rates may contribute to surveillance of post-vaccination TTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cindy Ke Zhou
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas MaCurdy
- Acumen LLC, Burlingame, CA, USA; Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Hui Lee Wong
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kozlowski S, Tworkoski E, Dharmarajan S, Flowers N, Kwist A, Shangguan S, Chillarige Y, Wernecke M, MaCurdy T, Kelman JA, Graham DJ. Dispensing pharmacy chains and direct anticoagulants: Potential associations with patient outcomes. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2024; 33:e5749. [PMID: 38362655 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pharmacy chains can differ with respect to the characteristics of their patient populations as well as their nonprescription products, services, and practices, and thus may serve as a surrogate for potential unmeasured confounding in observational studies of prescription drugs. This study evaluates whether a single-source drug can have different patient outcomes based on the dispensing pharmacy chain. METHODS Separate analyses for two anticoagulant drugs, rivaroxaban and apixaban, were conducted using Medicare Fee-for-Service claims evaluating the association between dispensing pharmacy chain and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, all-cause mortality, and major GI bleeding. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline covariates across pharmacy chain cohorts, and outcome association was assessed with a Cox Proportional Hazards model. RESULTS We observed no differences in outcomes across pharmacy chains for apixaban recipients. Rivaroxaban recipients from pharmacy chain C, however, had lower rates of GI bleeding (adjusted HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.69-1.00) and ischemic stroke (adjusted HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38-0.87) as compared to chain A in primary analyses with a 3-day grace period. The results moved closer to the null when 14- and 30-day grace periods were implemented. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that dispensing pharmacy chains may have the potential to act as a confounder of associations between drug exposure and outcome in some observational studies. Additional studies of potential confounding by pharmacy chain are needed. Further evaluation of potential pharmacy chain effects on safe use would be of value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Kozlowski
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Sai Dharmarajan
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David J Graham
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Graham DJ, Izurieta HS, Zhang D, Avagyan A, Lyu H, Wiederhorn R, Lu Y, Mosholder AD, Smith ER, Zhao Y, Shangguan S, Tsai HT, Pennap D, Sandhu AT, Wernecke M, MaCurdy TE, Kelman JA, Forshee RA. Risk of Severe COVID-19 in Prevalent Users of Alpha-1 Adrenergic Receptor Antagonists: A National Case-Control Study of Medicare Beneficiaries. Am J Med 2023; 136:1018-1025.e3. [PMID: 37454868 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonists prevent cytokine storm in mouse sepsis models. This led to the hypothesis that alpha-1 blockers may prevent severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is characterized by hypercytokinemia and progressive respiratory failure. METHODS We performed an observational case-control study in male Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older, with or without benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and treated with alpha-1 receptor blockers or 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for outcomes of uncomplicated and severe COVID-19 hospitalization (intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, or death). RESULTS There were 20,963 cases of hospitalized COVID-19 matched to 101,161 controls on calendar date and neighborhood of residence. In the primary analysis (males with BPH), there was no difference in risk of uncomplicated COVID-19 hospitalization (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.996-1.17) or hospitalization with severe complications (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.08). In the secondary analysis (males with or without BPH), the corresponding aORs were 1.02 (95% CI, 0.96-1.09) (uncomplicated) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.91-1.07) (complicated), respectively. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Of note, there was no difference in risk of severe COVID-19 hospitalization when comparing non-selective vs selective alpha-1 blocker use (aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.10), higher- vs lower-dose alpha-1 blocker use (aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86-1.08), or current vs remote alpha-1 blocker use (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91-1.18). CONCLUSIONS Prevalent use of alpha-1 receptor blockers was not associated with a protective or harmful effect on risk of uncomplicated or severe hospitalized COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Graham
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md.
| | - Hector S Izurieta
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md
| | - Di Zhang
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md
| | | | | | - Roger Wiederhorn
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md
| | - Yun Lu
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md
| | - Andrew D Mosholder
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md
| | | | - Yueqin Zhao
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md
| | | | - Huei-Ting Tsai
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md
| | - Dinci Pennap
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md
| | - Alexander T Sandhu
- Acumen, LLC; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Calif
| | | | - Thomas E MaCurdy
- Acumen, LLC; Department of Economics, Stanford University, Calif
| | | | - Richard A Forshee
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moll K, Lufkin B, Fingar KR, Ke Zhou C, Tworkoski E, Shi C, Hobbi S, Hu M, Sheng M, McCarty J, Shangguan S, Burrell T, Chillarige Y, Beers J, Saunders-Hastings P, Muthuri S, Edwards K, Black S, Kelman J, Reich C, Amend KL, Djibo DA, Beachler D, Ogilvie RP, Secora A, McMahill-Walraven CN, Seeger JD, Lloyd P, Thompson D, Dimova R, MaCurdy T, Obidi J, Anderson S, Forshee R, Wong HL, Shoaibi A. Background rates of adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring in the United States, 2019-2020. Vaccine 2023; 41:333-353. [PMID: 36404170 PMCID: PMC9640387 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) Initiative conducts active surveillance of adverse events of special interest (AESI) after COVID-19 vaccination. Historical incidence rates (IRs) of AESI are comparators to evaluate safety. METHODS We estimated IRs of 17 AESI in six administrative claims databases from January 1, 2019, to December 11, 2020: Medicare claims for adults ≥ 65 years and commercial claims (Blue Health Intelligence®, CVS Health, HealthCore Integrated Research Database, IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Database, Optum pre-adjudicated claims) for adults < 65 years. IRs were estimated by sex, age, race/ethnicity (Medicare), and nursing home residency (Medicare) in 2019 and for specific periods in 2020. RESULTS The study included >100 million enrollees annually. In 2019, rates of most AESI increased with age. However, compared with commercially insured adults, Medicare enrollees had lower IRs of anaphylaxis (11 vs 12-19 per 100,000 person-years), appendicitis (80 vs 117-155), and narcolepsy (38 vs 41-53). Rates were higher in males than females for most AESI across databases and varied by race/ethnicity and nursing home status (Medicare). Acute myocardial infarction (Medicare) and anaphylaxis (all databases) IRs varied by season. IRs of most AESI were lower during March-May 2020 compared with March-May 2019 but returned to pre-pandemic levels after May 2020. However, rates of Bell's palsy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, narcolepsy, and hemorrhagic/non-hemorrhagic stroke remained lower in multiple databases after May 2020, whereas some AESI (e.g., disseminated intravascular coagulation) exhibited higher rates after May 2020 compared with 2019. CONCLUSION AESI background rates varied by database and demographics and fluctuated in March-December 2020, but most returned to pre-pandemic levels after May 2020. It is critical to standardize demographics and consider seasonal and other trends when comparing historical rates with post-vaccination AESI rates in the same database to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Cindy Ke Zhou
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | - Mao Hu
- Acumen LLC, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeff Kelman
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Patricia Lloyd
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Deborah Thompson
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Rositsa Dimova
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Thomas MaCurdy
- Acumen LLC, Burlingame, CA, USA,Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joyce Obidi
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Steve Anderson
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Richard Forshee
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Hui-Lee Wong
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Azadeh Shoaibi
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang L, Chang S, Guan J, Shangguan S, Lu X, Wang Z, Wu L, Zou J, Zhao H, Bao Y, Qiu Z, Niu B, Zhang T. Tissue-Specific Methylation of Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element-1 of Homo Sapiens (L1Hs) During Human Embryogenesis and Roles in Neural Tube Defects. Curr Mol Med 2015; 15:497-507. [DOI: 10.2174/1566524015666150630130229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2014] [Revised: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 06/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|