Epidemiological changes of acute respiratory infections in children: A single-center experience after COVID-19 lockdown

BACKGROUND

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the epidemiology of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) has continually changed, making it difficult to predict. Our study aimed to evaluate epidemiological changes and clinical outcomes of ARIs in pediatric patients in the post-lockdown period.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cross-sectional study was performed in one of the largest pediatric emergency departments in Lithuania during two cold seasons-from October 1, 2021, to April 30, 2022 (Season I) and in the same period in 2022-2023 (Season II). Patients under 18 years of age who had been tested for COVID-19 were enrolled in the study. Additional data about other respiratory pathogens in the study group (specifically influenza A/B, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and group A Streptococcus (GAS)), were included.

RESULTS

During both seasons of our study, 19,366 children were screened for COVID-19. Positive tests for COVID-19 decreased from 14.5% in Season I to 5.9% in Season II, while at the same time, the rates of other infections increased significantly: influenza from 17.5% to 27.1%, RSV from 8.8% to 27.6%, and GAS from 8.4% to 44%, respectively. In Season II, COVID-19 infection presented in fewer admissions to pediatric intensive care (0.8% vs. 3.7%, p<0.01) and there were no deaths, while influenza presented in a higher proportion of hospitalizations (10.5% vs. 6.1%, p<0.01) and there was one death. The proportion of RSV hospitalizations also increased in Season II (34.6% vs. 44.0%, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The early post-lockdown period saw a decline of COVID-19 and re-emergence of influenza, RSV and GAS infections in children. In Season II, COVID-19 cases became milder contrary to influenza. RSV infection contributed significantly to hospitalizations for respiratory infections in children in both seasons, particularly in Season II. Coinfections were not associated with a more severe course of the disease.

Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections in Pediatric Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Experience

The overlap of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with other common respiratory pathogens may complicate the course of the disease and prognosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rates, characteristics, and outcomes of pediatric patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza A/B infections, and their coinfections. A single-center prospective cross-sectional study was performed at the pediatric emergency department in Vilnius from 1 October 2021 to 30 April 2022. In total, 5127 children were screened for SARS-CoV-2, RSV, and influenza A/B. SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were positive for 21.0% of children (1074/5127). The coinfection rate of respiratory viruses (RSV, influenza A) in patients with COVID-19 was 7.2% (77/1074). Among the 4053 SARS-CoV-2 negative patients, RSV was diagnosed in 405 (10.0%) patients and influenza A/B in 827 (20.4%) patients. Patients with COVID-19 and coinfection did not have a more severe clinical course than those with RSV or influenza infection alone. RSV and SARS-CoV-2 primarily affected younger patients (up to 2 years), while the influenza was more common in older children (4-10 years). Patients infected with RSV were more severely ill, reflected by higher hospitalization proportion and need for respiratory support.

Screening for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) at the Pediatric Emergency Department During Different Pandemic Phases

The wide spectrum of COVID-19 symptoms complicates the selection of target groups for screening. We aimed to compare data of children screened for COVID-19 at the pediatric emergency department in Vilnius between different phases throughout 1 year (Phase I: March-May, 2020; Phase II: June-September, 2020; and Phase III: October, 2020-February, 2021) and to evaluate the possible predictors of the disease. SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were positive for 2.7% of tested children (248/9,238), significantly higher during the Phase III (5.5%) compared with the Phase I (0.6%, p = 0.000) and Phase II (0.3%, p = 0.000). Infants and teenagers (12-17 years) accounted for a larger proportion of COVID-19 patients (24.6 and 26.2%, respectively) compared to other age groups: 1-2 years (18.9%), 3-6 years (14.9%), and 7-11 years (15.3%). There were more COVID-19 cases among children with a known SARS-CoV-2 exposure compared to those who did not declare any contact (18.2 vs. 1.1%, p = 0000). When symptoms were adjusted for age, gender and known exposure to SARS-CoV-2, we found that fever (OR 2.66; 95% CI 1.89-3.81), pharyngitis (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.01-1.80), headache (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.09-2.90), and anosmia/ageusia (OR 6.47; 95% CI 1.61-22.47) were the most significant predictors. Conclusion: Although high numbers of testing were maintained throughout the year, the positive test results were significantly higher during the Phase III. Age (<1 year, 12-17 years), a history of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and some symptoms, such as fever, pharyngitis, headache and anosmia/ageusia could aid in targeting groups for screening for COVID-19 in children.

Aetiology of acute respiratory infection in preschool children requiring hospitalisation in Europe-results from the PED-MERMAIDS multicentre case-control study

Background

Both pathogenic bacteria and viruses are frequently detected in the nasopharynx (NP) of children in the absence of acute respiratory infection (ARI) symptoms. The aim of this study was to estimate the aetiological fractions for ARI hospitalisation in children for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza virus and to determine whether detection of specific respiratory pathogens on NP samples was associated with ARI hospitalisation.

Methods

349 children up to 5 years of age hospitalised for ARI (following a symptom-based case definition) and 306 hospital controls were prospectively enrolled in 16 centres across seven European Union countries between 2016 and 2019. Admission day NP swabs were analysed by multiplex PCR for 25 targets.

Results

RSV was the leading single cause of ARI hospitalisations, with an overall population attributable fraction (PAF) of 33.4% and high seasonality as well as preponderance in younger children. Detection of RSV on NP swabs was strongly associated with ARI hospitalisation (OR adjusted for age and season: 20.6, 95% CI: 9.4 to 45.3). Detection of three other viral pathogens showed strong associations with ARI hospitalisation: influenza viruses had an adjusted OR of 6.1 (95% CI: 2.5 to 14.9), parainfluenza viruses (PIVs) an adjusted OR of 4.6 (95% CI: 1.8 to 11.3) and metapneumoviruses an adjusted OR of 4.5 (95% CI: 1.3 to 16.1). Influenza viruses had a PAF of 7.9%, PIVs of 6.5% and metapneumoviruses of 3.0%. In contrast, most other pathogens were found in similar proportions in cases and controls, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, which was weakly associated with case status, and endemic coronaviruses.

Conclusion

RSV is the predominant cause of ARI hospitalisations in young children in Europe and its detection, as well as detection of influenza virus, PIV or metapneumovirus, on NP swabs can establish aetiology with high probability. PAFs for RSV and influenza virus are highly seasonal and age dependent.

A cross-sectional study of screening for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at the pediatric emergency department in Vilnius during the first wave of the pandemic

Screening for COVID-19 is based on clinical and epidemiological factors. Children infected with SARS-CoV-2 may have a few or many non-specific symptoms or may be asymptomatic. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical features and exposure to SARS-CoV-2 characteristics of children screened for COVID-19 at the pediatric emergency department in Vilnius during the first 3 months (March-May) of the COVID-19 pandemic in Lithuania. SARS-CoV-2 PCR was positive for 0.6% (8/1348) of all screened children and for 0.9% (7/811) of symptomatic patients, more among children with fever and cough (2.6%, 4/154). There were also COVID-19 cases among children without cough but with other respiratory symptoms (0.5%, 2/409) or gastrointestinal symptoms (1.2%, 3/257). Only one child with positive SARS-CoV-2 did not meet COVID-19 clinical criteria-he presented with vomiting and dehydration only. All COVID-19 cases (n = 8) had a contact with a confirmed COVID-19 family member. There were no COVID-19 cases among children without known exposure to SARS-CoV-2 or among asymptomatic children.Conclusion: Screening for COVID-19 in children is exceptionally challenging due to the diverse and non-specific symptoms of infection they present. Testing strategies should not only focus on the typical COVID-19 symptoms of fever or cough, but also include other symptoms, especially gastrointestinal symptoms, which are also important. The greatest attention should be paid to known exposure to SARS-CoV-2, especially in family clusters. Screening of asymptomatic children with no known exposure should be weighed for medical necessity and cost-effectiveness. What is Known: • Diagnosis of COVID-19 in children is challenging because the disease does not always manifest with typical symptoms. What is New: • Children in our study who did not have symptoms of acute infection and contact with another person infected with COVID-19 were not diagnosed with COVID-19, so the benefit of PCR testing is questionable. Such testing may only be useful for infection control purposes, and to limit intra-hospital transmission.

Factors Determining Parents' Decisions to Bring Their Children to the Pediatric Emergency Department for a Minor Illness

Background

The number of children visiting Emergency Departments (EDs) is increasing in Lithuania; therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the factors influencing the parental decision to bring their child to the ED for a minor illness that could be managed in a primary healthcare setting, and to compare parents’ and medical professionals’ attitudes toward a child’s health status and need for urgent care.

Material/Methods

A prospective observational study was performed at the tertiary-level teaching Children’s Hospital in Vilnius. A total of 381 patients’ parents were interviewed using an original questionnaire based on Andersen’s behavioral model of healthcare utilization; in addition, the medical records of patients were reviewed to identify factors that might have an impact on parental decisions to bring their child to the ED for a minor health problem. The study participants were enrolled from October 1, 2013 to August 31, 2014. The urgency of medical care needed to be provided to the patients was evaluated by a tertiary-level triage system.

Results

Based on the assessment of the triage nurses, the need for emergency care to patients was distributed as follows: 298 patients (78.2%) needed non-urgent care and 83 patients (21.8%) needed urgent care. More than one-third (38.8%) of the parents reported that they came to the ED due to their child’s urgent care need and worsened child’s health; however, the opinion of ED professionals indicated only a fifth of patients required urgent care. Parents who brought their children to the ED without physician referral were five times more likely to visit the ED during evening hours and on weekends (OR=5.416; 95% CI, 3.259–8.99; p<0.001). The decision to come to the ED without visiting a primary care physician was made more often by parents with a higher income (OR=2.153; 95% CI, 1.167–3.97) and those who came due to children having rash (OR=4.303; 95% CI, 1.089–16.995) or fever (OR=3.463; 95% CI, 1.01–11.876). Older parents were 2.07 (95% CI, 1.1224–3.506) times more likely to evaluate their child’s health unfavorably than younger parents.

Conclusions

We identified predisposing, enabling, and need factors that influenced the parents’ decision to bring their child to the ED for minor health problems that could be managed by a primary care physician. Parents assessed their child’s condition more critically and thought that their child required urgent medical aid more frequently than healthcare professionals.

Unscheduled return visits to a pediatric emergency department

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Return visits (RVs) to a pediatric emergency department (ED) within a short period after discharge have an influence on overcrowding of the ED and reveal some weaknesses of the health care system. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of RVs and factors related to RVs to the pediatric ED in Lithuania.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study in an urban, tertiary-level teaching hospital was carried out. Electronic medical records of all patients (n=44097) visiting the ED of this hospital between 1 January and 31 December 2013 were analyzed. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who return to the ED within 72h and those who had not visited the ED were compared. Factors associated with RVs were determined by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the overall ED population, 33889 patients were discharged home after the initial assessment. A total of 1015 patients returned to the ED within 72h, giving a RV rate of 3.0%. Being a 0-7-year old, visiting the ED during weekdays, having a GP referral, receiving of laboratory tests and ultrasound on the initial visit were associated with greater likelihoods of returning to the ED. Patients who arrived to the ED from 8:01a.m. to 4:00p.m. and underwent radiological test were less likely to return to the ED within 72h. Diseases such as gastrointestinal disorders or respiratory tract/earth-nose-throat (ENT) diseases and symptoms such as fever or pain were significantly associated with returning to the ED. The initial diagnosis corresponded to the diagnosis made on the second visit for only 44.1% of the patients, and the highest rate of the congruity in diagnosis was for injuries/poisoning, surgical pathologies (77.2%) and respiratory tract diseases (76.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

RVs accounted for only a small proportion of visits to the ED. RVs were more prevalent among younger patients and patients with a GP referral as well as performed more often after discharging from the ED in the evening and at night.