1
|
Muls A, Georgopoulou S, Hainsworth E, Hartley B, O'Gara G, Stapleton S, Cruickshank S. The psychosocial and emotional experiences of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Semin Oncol 2022; 49:371-382. [PMID: 36089413 PMCID: PMC9393184 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11th, 2020. Global social lockdowns were instigated to reduce spread and prevent health-services from becoming overwhelmed. People having treatment for cancer are known to have heightened psychological/emotional burden. The combined impact of managing pandemic regulations alongside this may present additional burden. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine current evidence of the psychological and emotional impact of COVID-19 on people with cancer, early in the pandemic. METHODS Five electronic databases were searched (Embase, Global Health, HMIC, PsychINFO, CINAHL) from September 2019 to October 2021. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method primary research studies exploring emotional and psychological impacts of COVID-19 on cancer patients, limited to English language, were included. Quality appraisal was conducted using the MMAT. RESULTS Fifty-one papers, with 27,356 people from 21 countries treated for cancer, were included. 43 studies were quantitative with a survey method approach, six studies qualitative and four used a mixed methods design. MMAT score was mostly two or three. Four themes were identified: Emotional aspects and Quality of Life; Psychosocial aspects; Impact of COVID-19 on self; Impact of COVID-19 on cancer, with themes overlapping. CONCLUSION Whilst emotional/psychological impacts such as anxiety, isolation, employment fears, and uncertainty about the future were potentially universal concerns early in the pandemic, they may have been particularly acute for people living with cancer and represent complex, overlapping factors. As COVID-19 continues to impact health-services and society, it is important to focus on any ongoing impact to the experience of cancer patients. Most of the studies reviewed used tools that do not provide deeper understanding of how and why emotional states of people with cancer were affected. Further qualitative work may reveal patterns of what was unique to cancer patients during the pandemic, compared to general populations.
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Gara G, Murray L, Georgopoulou S, Anstiss T, Macquarrie A, Wheatstone P, Bellman B, Gilbert P, Steed A, Wiseman T. SafeSpace: what is the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned virtual reality intervention, incorporating compassionate mind training, to support people undergoing cancer treatment in a clinical setting? BMJ Open 2022; 12:e047626. [PMID: 35144943 PMCID: PMC8845220 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The SafeSpace study codesigned and tested a virtual reality (VR) intervention, incorporating relaxation and compassionate mind training to determine acceptability/feasibility in an oncology setting and evaluate impact on physical/psychological well-being and quality of life. DESIGN A two-phase study. Phase I determined key characteristics using an experienced-based codesign approach. Phase II evaluated the intervention using various measures and qualitative interviews in a mixed methods approach. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse measures data and framework analysis to analyse interviews. SETTING A specialist cancer centre, UK. PARTICIPANTS 11 in phase I and 21 in phase II. Participants were in cancer treatment, recovery or palliative care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME Primary outcome: acceptability of the intervention, assessed by >60% uptake of three sessions. SECONDARY OUTCOMES impact on psychological well-being using EQ-5D/QLQ-C30, Profile of Mood Scale, Warwick and Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, Depression and Anxiety Severity Scale 21, Self-Compassion Scale, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire and a locally developed questionnaire to capture self-compassion post use. Physiological impact was assessed by change in heart rate (HR)/HR variability and electrodermal activity (EDA). RESULTS Twenty participants (mean age=48.7 years; SD=16.87); 65% (n=13) completed three sessions. Mental well-being improved following each use and from baseline to after session 3 (VR 1-z=2.846, p≤0.01; VR 2-z=2.501, p≤0.01; VR 3-z=2.492, p≤0.01). There was statistically significant difference in mean scores for EDA at mid-session and post session compared with pre session (F (1.658, 4.973)=13.364, p<0.05). There was statistically significant reduction in stress levels from baseline to post session 3. Participants found the intervention acceptable and highlighted areas for development. CONCLUSION The intervention is acceptable and feasible and has shown positive effects on mental well-being/stress in the oncology setting. Larger studies are needed to confirm findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geraldine O'Gara
- Applied Health Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Geraldine.O'
| | - Lisa Murray
- Department of Research and Innovation, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew Macquarrie
- School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Pete Wheatstone
- Patient and Public Representative, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Barbie Bellman
- Patient and Public Representative, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Gilbert
- Mental Health Research Unit, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, Derbyshire, UK
| | - Anthony Steed
- Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- Applied Health Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scott DL, Ibrahim F, Hill H, Tom B, Prothero L, Baggott RR, Bosworth A, Galloway JB, Georgopoulou S, Martin N, Neatrour I, Nikiphorou E, Sturt J, Wailoo A, Williams FMK, Williams R, Lempp H. Intensive therapy for moderate established rheumatoid arthritis: the TITRATE research programme. Programme Grants Appl Res 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Rheumatoid arthritis is a major inflammatory disorder and causes substantial disability. Treatment goals span minimising disease activity, achieving remission and decreasing disability. In active rheumatoid arthritis, intensive management achieves these goals. As many patients with established rheumatoid arthritis have moderate disease activity, the TITRATE (Treatment Intensities and Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis ThErapy) programme assessed the benefits of intensive management.
Objectives
To (1) define how to deliver intensive therapy in moderate established rheumatoid arthritis; (2) establish its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in a trial; and (3) evaluate evidence supporting intensive management in observational studies and completed trials.
Design
Observational studies, secondary analyses of completed trials and systematic reviews assessed existing evidence about intensive management. Qualitative research, patient workshops and systematic reviews defined how to deliver it. The trial assessed its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in moderate established rheumatoid arthritis.
Setting
Observational studies (in three London centres) involved 3167 patients. These were supplemented by secondary analyses of three previously completed trials (in centres across all English regions), involving 668 patients. Qualitative studies assessed expectations (nine patients in four London centres) and experiences of intensive management (15 patients in 10 centres across England). The main clinical trial enrolled 335 patients with diverse socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity (in 39 centres across all English regions).
Participants
Patients with established moderately active rheumatoid arthritis receiving conventional disease-modifying drugs.
Interventions
Intensive management used combinations of conventional disease-modifying drugs, biologics (particularly tumour necrosis factor inhibitors) and depot steroid injections; nurses saw patients monthly, adjusted treatment and provided supportive person-centred psychoeducation. Control patients received standard care.
Main outcome measures
Disease Activity Score for 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR)-categorised patients (active to remission). Remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.60) was the treatment target. Other outcomes included fatigue (measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale), disability (as measured on the Health Assessment Questionnaire), harms and resource use for economic assessments.
Results
Evaluation of existing evidence for intensive rheumatoid arthritis management showed the following. First, in observational studies, DAS28-ESR scores decreased over 10–20 years, whereas remissions and treatment intensities increased. Second, in systematic reviews of published trials, all intensive management strategies increased remissions. Finally, patients with high disability scores had fewer remissions. Qualitative studies of rheumatoid arthritis patients, workshops and systematic reviews helped develop an intensive management pathway. A 2-day training session for rheumatology practitioners explained its use, including motivational interviewing techniques and patient handbooks. The trial screened 459 patients and randomised 335 patients (168 patients received intensive management and 167 patients received standard care). A total of 303 patients provided 12-month outcome data. Intention-to-treat analysis showed intensive management increased DAS28-ESR 12-month remissions, compared with standard care (32% vs. 18%, odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 3.68; p = 0.004), and reduced fatigue [mean difference –18, 95% confidence interval –24 to –11 (scale 0–100); p < 0.001]. Disability (as measured on the Health Assessment Questionnaire) decreased when intensive management patients achieved remission (difference –0.40, 95% confidence interval –0.57 to –0.22) and these differences were considered clinically relevant. However, in all intensive management patients reductions in the Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were less marked (difference –0.1, 95% confidence interval –0.2 to 0.0). The numbers of serious adverse events (intensive management n = 15 vs. standard care n = 11) and other adverse events (intensive management n = 114 vs. standard care n = 151) were similar. Economic analysis showed that the base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £43,972 from NHS and Personal Social Services cost perspectives. The probability of meeting a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 was 17%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio decreased to £29,363 after including patients’ personal costs and lost working time, corresponding to a 50% probability that intensive management is cost-effective at English willingness-to-pay thresholds. Analysing trial baseline predictors showed that remission predictors comprised baseline DAS28-ESR, disability scores and body mass index. A 6-month extension study (involving 95 intensive management patients) showed fewer remissions by 18 months, although more sustained remissions were more likley to persist. Qualitative research in trial completers showed that intensive management was acceptable and treatment support from specialist nurses was beneficial.
Limitations
The main limitations comprised (1) using single time point remissions rather than sustained responses, (2) uncertainty about benefits of different aspects of intensive management and differences in its delivery across centres, (3) doubts about optimal treatment of patients unresponsive to intensive management and (4) the lack of formal international definitions of ‘intensive management’.
Conclusion
The benefits of intensive management need to be set against its additional costs. These were relatively high. Not all patients benefited. Patients with high pretreatment physical disability or who were substantially overweight usually did not achieve remission.
Future work
Further research should (1) identify the most effective components of the intervention, (2) consider its most cost-effective delivery and (3) identify alternative strategies for patients not responding to intensive management.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN70160382.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Scott
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Fowzia Ibrahim
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Harry Hill
- ScHARR Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Brian Tom
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Louise Prothero
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rhiannon R Baggott
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - James B Galloway
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Naomi Martin
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Isabel Neatrour
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Department of Adult Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Allan Wailoo
- ScHARR Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Frances MK Williams
- Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ruth Williams
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sloan M, Lever E, Gordon C, Harwood R, Georgopoulou S, Naughton F, Wincup C, Sutton S, D'Cruz D. Medication decision-making and adherence in lupus: Patient-physician discordance and the impact of previous 'Adverse Medical Experiences'. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:1417-1429. [PMID: 34247235 PMCID: PMC8996780 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Medication adherence is critical in the successful management of lupus. There is very limited existing literature on reasons why non-adherence is not reported. This study explores the impact of current and previous medical experiences on patient satisfaction, adherence and reporting of non-adherence. Methods Mixed methodology involved thematic analysis of in-depth interviews (n = 23) to further explore the statistically analysed quantitative survey findings (n = 186). Results This study identified five themes: (i) physician-patient discordance and a ‘hierarchy of evidence’ in medication decisions; (ii) the association of adherence with satisfaction with care; (iii) the persisting impact of past adverse medical experiences (AMEs); (iv) the dynamic balance of patient-physician control; and (v) holistic care, beyond a purely medication-based focus. Improving quality of life (43% of participants) and a supportive medical relationship (24%) were the main reasons for adherence. Patient-priorities and self-reported symptoms were perceived as less important to physicians than organ-protection and blood results. Non-reporters of non-adherence, non-adherers and those with past AMEs (e.g. psychosomatic misdiagnoses) had statistically significant lower satisfaction with care. The importance of listening to patients was a key component of every theme, and associated with patient satisfaction and adherence. The mean rating for rheumatologist’s listening skills was 2.88 for non-adherers compared with 3.53 for other participants (mean difference 0.65, P = 0.003). Conclusion Patients would like more weight and discussion given to self-reported symptoms and quality of life in medication decisions. Greater understanding and interventions are required to alleviate the persisting impact of past AMEs on some patients’ wellbeing, behaviour and current medical relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Sloan
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Elliott Lever
- Rheumatology department, Northwick Park Hospital, UK
| | - Caroline Gordon
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of inflammation and ageing, College of Medical and Dental Science, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Rupert Harwood
- Patient and Public Involvement in lupus Research Group, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Felix Naughton
- Behavioural and Implementation Science Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, UK
| | - Chris Wincup
- Department of Rheumatology, University College London, UK
| | - Stephen Sutton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - David D'Cruz
- The Louise Coote Lupus unit, Guy's and St Thomas', NHS foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scott D, Ibrahim F, Hill H, Tom B, Prothero L, Baggott RR, Bosworth A, Galloway JB, Georgopoulou S, Martin N, Neatrour I, Nikiphorou E, Sturt J, Wailoo A, Williams FMK, Williams R, Lempp H. The clinical effectiveness of intensive management in moderate established rheumatoid arthritis: The titrate trial. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 50:1182-1190. [PMID: 32931984 PMCID: PMC7390769 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many trials have shown that intensive management is effective in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). But its benefits are unproven for the large number of RA patients seen in routine care who have established, moderately active RA and are already taking conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). The TITRATE trial studied whether these patients also benefit from intensive management and, in particular, achieve more remissions. METHODS A 12-month multicentre individually randomised trial compared standard care with monthly intensive management appointments which was delivered by specially trained healthcare professionals and incorporated monthly clinical assessments, medication titration and psychosocial support. The primary outcome was 12-month remission assessed using the Disease Activity Score for 28 joints using ESR (DAS28-ESR). Secondary outcomes included fatigue, disability, harms and healthcare costs. Intention-to-treat multivariable logistic- and linear regression analyses compared treatment arms with multiple imputation used for missing data. RESULTS 459 patients were screened and 335 were randomised (168 intensive management; 167 standard care); 303 (90%) patients provided 12-month outcomes. Intensive management increased DAS28-ESR 12-month remissions compared to standard care (32% vs 18%, p = 0.004). Intensive management also significantly increased remissions using a range of alternative remission criteria and increased patients with DAS28-ESR low disease activity scores. (48% vs 32%, p = 0.005). In addition it substantially reduced fatigue (mean difference -18; 95% CI: -24, -11, p<0.001). There was no evidence that serious adverse events (intensive management =15 vs standard care =11) or other adverse events (114 vs 151) significantly increase with intensive management. INTERPRETATION The trial shows that intensive management incorporating psychosocial support delivered by specially trained healthcare professions is effective in moderately active established RA. More patients achieve remissions, there were greater improvements in fatigue, and there were no more harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Scott
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
| | - Fowzia Ibrahim
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom.
| | - Harry Hill
- ScHARR Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, United Kingdom
| | - Brian Tom
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Prothero
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
| | - Rhiannon R Baggott
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
| | - Ailsa Bosworth
- National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS), Switchback Office Park, Gardner Rd, Maidenhead, SL6 7RJ, United Kingdom
| | - James B Galloway
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi Martin
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
| | - Isabel Neatrour
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Department Of Adult Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, United Kingdom
| | - Allan Wailoo
- ScHARR Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, United Kingdom
| | - Frances M K Williams
- Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Williams
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sarakatsianou C, Baloyiannis I, Perivoliotis K, Georgopoulou S, Tzovaras G. Quality of life after laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: spinal vs general anesthesia. Hernia 2020; 25:789-796. [PMID: 33000326 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02313-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the anesthesia type on the postoperative quality of life in patients who underwent trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. METHODS In this study, 70 patients submitted to TAPP for inguinal hernia repair, were randomized between spinal and general anesthesia. Overall, 58 patients completed the follow-up process and were, therefore, included. The quality of life evaluation was based on the SF-36 questionnaire. Significance was considered at the level of P < 0.05 RESULTS: General anesthesia was applied to 31 patients, whereas 27 operations were performed under spinal anesthesia. Except gender, the two study subgroups were similar in terms of demographics. Although spinal anesthesia displayed higher energy, emotional health, and general health scores these findings were not statistically significant. A positive correlation was identified between age and physical and emotional role. Operative time was associated with the estimated energy and general health. CONCLUSION Our study could not identify a difference between spinal and general anesthesia on the postoperative quality of life. Spinal anesthesia is as effective as general anesthesia and remains an attractive anesthetic alternative for TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Given several study limitations, further high-quality trials are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Sarakatsianou
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece.
| | - I Baloyiannis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - K Perivoliotis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - S Georgopoulou
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - G Tzovaras
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The quality of physician-patient interaction can have a significant impact on medication adherence. Little is known about this relationship in patients with lupus nephritis. METHODS A cross-sectional, quantitative study. Data collected included demographics, current medication, systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index, medication adherence, beliefs about medicines, shared decision-making, patient-doctor depth of relationship, patient-doctor quality of relationship, interpersonal trust in a physician and illness perceptions. RESULTS Ninety-eight patients with lupus nephritis completed the questionnaires. Logistic regression indicated that medication adherence was significantly predicted by (a) interpersonal trust in a physician (B = 0.85, Wald 3.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01, 5.44; P = 0.05); (b) timeline cyclical (B = -0.89, Wald 4.95, 95% CI 0.19, 0.90; P < 0.05) and beliefs about the necessity of medicines (B = 0.75, Wald 4.14, 95% CI 1.03, 4.38; P < 0.05). Mediation analysis showed that beliefs about the necessity of medicines significantly mediated the relationship between trust and medication adherence when adjusted for age (B = 0.48, 95% CI 0.06, 1.08; P < 0.01). A further mediation analysis showed that patient-doctor depth of relationship (B = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01, 0.09; P < 0.001), shared decision-making (B = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01, 0.13; P < 0.001) and patient-doctor quality of relationship (B = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01, 0.16; P < 0.001) significantly mediated the relationship between illness coherence and interpersonal trust in a physician. CONCLUSION The findings highlighted two key elements: (a) the importance of trust in relation to medication adherence; and (b) a good understanding of patients' illness is linked to a better relationship with their doctor and greater participation in shared decision-making which is associated with increased trust. Tailored psycho-educational interventions could contribute to improving the patient-doctor relationship quality, trust and increased shared decision-making, which, in turn, might improve medication adherence in patients with lupus nephritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Georgopoulou
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK.,The Royal Marsden Hospital, Applied Health Research Group, London, UK
| | - Louise Nel
- Guy's Hospital, Louise Coote Lupus Unit, London, UK
| | | | - David P D'Cruz
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK.,Guy's Hospital, Louise Coote Lupus Unit, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prothero L, Barley E, Galloway J, Georgopoulou S, Sturt J. Corrigendum to ``The evidence base for psychological interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of reviews'' [International Journal of Nursing Studies Volume 82, June 2018, Pages 20-29]. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 107:103581. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
9
|
Bearne LM, Bieles J, Georgopoulou S, Andrews J, Tully A, Stolarchuk-Prowting K, Williamson T, Suarez BS, Nel L, D'Cruz D, Lempp H. Fatigue in adults with primary antiphospholipid syndrome: findings from a mixed-methods study. Lupus 2020; 29:924-933. [PMID: 32501170 PMCID: PMC7543013 DOI: 10.1177/0961203320928421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to explore the experience and impact of fatigue in adults with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (pAPS). Methods This sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study enrolled adults with a six-month or more history of pAPS. Consenting participants completed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue subscale (FS), Multi-Dimensional Perceived Social Support Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQMETS). Relationships between FS and other variables were explored with multiple linear regression. Interviews were conducted with a subgroup of participants, and the data were analysed thematically. Results A total of 103 participants were recruited (Mage = 50.3 years; standard deviation = 10.1 years; 18 males). Of these, 62% reported severe fatigue. Greater fatigue was associated with lower mood, physical inactivity, poorer sleep quality and lower perceived social support. The best-fit model explained 56% of the variance in FS (adjusted R2 = 0.560, F(3, 74) = 33.65, p > 0.001) and included PHQ9 and IPAQMETS as significant predictors, and PSQI as a non-significant predictor. Twenty participants completed interviews. Three key themes were identified: characteristics of fatigue, impact on life and coping strategies. Conclusion Fatigue was a common symptom of pAPS and challenging to manage. Other factors, particularly mood and physical activity, influenced fatigue. Evidence-based self-management interventions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay M Bearne
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Julie Bieles
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Josie Andrews
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Amy Tully
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Tom Williamson
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Beatriz Santana Suarez
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Nel
- Guys and St Thomas Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David D'Cruz
- Guys and St Thomas Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lempp H, Baggott R, Scott DL, Parker L, Bosworth A, Georgopoulou S, Firth J. The value, impact and role of nurses in rheumatology outpatient care: Critical review of the literature. Musculoskeletal Care 2020; 18:245-255. [PMID: 32222059 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As rheumatology nurses make substantial contributions to intensive management programmes following 'treat to target' principles of people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there is a need to understand the impacts of their involvement. A structured literature review was undertaken of qualitative studies, clinical trials and observational studies to assess the impacts of rheumatology nurses on clinical outcomes and the experiences of patients with RA and to examine the skills and training of the nurses involved. METHOD A structured literature review was conducted to examine the value, impact and professional role of nurses in RA management. RESULTS The literature search identified 657 publications, and 20 of them were included comprising: seven qualitative studies (242 patients), nine trials (a total of 2,440 patients) and four observational studies (1,234 patients). In clinical trials, nurses achieved similar patient clinical outcomes to doctors, and nurses also enhanced patients' satisfaction of received care and self-efficacy. In the qualitative studies reviewed, the nurses increased patients' knowledge and promoted their self-management. The observational studies studied examined found that nursing care led to improved patients' global functioning. The nurses in the various studies had a wide range of titles, experiences and training. DISCUSSION Our structured literature review provides strong evidence that rheumatology nurses are effective in delivering care for RA patients. However, their titles, experience and training were highly variable. CONCLUSION There is a convincing case to maintain and extend the role of nurses in managing RA, but further work is needed on standardisation of their titles and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rhiannon Baggott
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David L Scott
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Parker
- Rheumatology Department, Royal Free London NHSFT, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Bosworth
- National Patient Champion, National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, Maidenhead, UK
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK.,Applied Health Services Research Group, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Baggott R, Scott D, Sturt J, Bosworth A, Parker L, Georgopoulou S, Lempp H. 150 What is the value, impact and role of nurses in rheumatology outpatient care? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez108.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon Baggott
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - David Scott
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - Ailsa Bosworth
- CEO, National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, Maidenhead, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - Louise Parker
- Rheumatology Department, Royal Free London NHSFT, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Applied Health Research, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The nature of physician-patient interaction can have a significant impact on patient outcomes through information-sharing and disease-specific education that can enhance patients' active involvement in their care. The aim of this systematic review was to examine all the empirical evidence pertaining to aspects of physician-patient communication and its impact on patient outcomes. A systematic search of five electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science) was undertaken from earliest record to December 2016. Studies were eligible if they: (1) included adult participants (18 years or over) with a diagnosis of a rheumatic condition; (2) were of quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods design; (4) were surveys, observational and interventional studies; (5) were published in the English language; and (6) reported findings on either various physician-patient communication aspects alone or in combination with physical and psychological outcomes. Searches identified 455 papers. Following full-text retrieval and assessment for eligibility and quality, ten studies were included in the review; six quantitative, one mixed methods, and three qualitative papers. Higher levels of trust in the physician and active patient participation in the medical consultation were linked to lower disease activity, better global health, less organ damage accrual, greater treatment satisfaction with fewer side effects from the medication, more positive beliefs about control over the disease, and about current and future health. Future research could focus on the design and implementation of interventions incorporating communications skills and patient-education training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Georgopoulou
- Department of Psychology, University of East London, Arthur Edwards Building, Water Lane, Stratford, E15 4LZ UK
- Clinical Trials Group, Academic Department of Rheumatology, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, 3rd Floor Weston Education Centre, 10 Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ UK
| | - Louise Prothero
- Clinical Trials Group, Academic Department of Rheumatology, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, 3rd Floor Weston Education Centre, 10 Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ UK
| | - David P. D’Cruz
- Clinical Trials Group, Academic Department of Rheumatology, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, 3rd Floor Weston Education Centre, 10 Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ UK
- Louise Coote Lupus Unit, 4th Floor Tower Wing, Guys Hospital, London, SE1 9RT UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Georgopoulou
- Psychological Sciences, University of East London, London, UNITED KINGDOM
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - Louise Nel
- Louise Coote Lupus Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - Shirish Sangle
- Louise Coote Lupus Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - Michael Robson
- Louise Coote Lupus Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UNITED KINGDOM
- Renal Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - David P D'Cruz
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UNITED KINGDOM
- Louise Coote Lupus Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UNITED KINGDOM
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Prothero L, Barley E, Galloway J, Georgopoulou S, Sturt J. The evidence base for psychological interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of reviews. Int J Nurs Stud 2018; 82:20-29. [PMID: 29573593 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological interventions are an important but often overlooked adjunctive treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Findings from systematic reviews of psychological interventions for this patient group are conflicting. A systematic review of reviews can explain inconsistencies between studies and provide a clearer understanding of the effects of interventions. OBJECTIVES To: 1) determine the effectiveness of psychological interventions in improving biopsychosocial outcomes for adults with rheumatoid arthritis, 2) determine the relationship between the intensity of the psychological interventions (number of sessions, duration of sessions, duration of intervention) on outcomes, and 3) assess the impact of comparator group (usual care, education only) on outcomes. DESIGN We conducted a systematic review of reviews using the following inclusion criteria: 1) randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions (including cognitive behavioural therapy, supportive counselling, psychotherapy, self-regulatory techniques, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and disclosure therapy) provided as an adjunct to medication, 2) included rheumatoid arthritis patients aged ≥ 18 years, 3) reported findings for at least 1 of the primary outcomes: pain, fatigue, psychological status, functional disability and disease activity and 4) were published in English between January 2000 and March 2015 (updated January 2018). DATA SOURCES We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. Reference lists were searched for additional reviews. REVIEW METHODS Study selection and 50% of the quality assessments were performed by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality was measured using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews checklist. Data extraction was conducted by one reviewer using a predesigned data extraction form. RESULTS Eight systematic reviews met inclusion criteria (one review was excluded due to its low-quality score). Small post intervention improvements in patient global assessment, functional disability, pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression were observed. The effect on coping, self-efficacy and physical activity was greater. Improvements in depression, coping and physical activity were maintained (8.5-14 months). Interventions delivered over a longer period with a maintenance component appeared more effective. Attention, education, and placebo control groups produced some improvements but not as large as those produced by the psychological interventions. CONCLUSIONS Psychological interventions result in small to moderate improvements in biopsychosocial outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in addition to those achieved by standard care. Several priorities for future research were identified, including determining the cost effectiveness of non-psychologically trained health professionals delivering psychological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Prothero
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, 10 Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK; Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
| | - Elizabeth Barley
- College of Nursing, Midwifery and Healthcare, University of West London, Boston Manor Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GA, UK.
| | - James Galloway
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, 10 Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, 10 Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK; School of Psychology, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK.
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Martin NH, Ibrahim F, Tom B, Galloway J, Wailoo A, Tosh J, Lempp H, Prothero L, Georgopoulou S, Sturt J, Scott DL. Does intensive management improve remission rates in patients with intermediate rheumatoid arthritis? (the TITRATE trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:591. [PMID: 29221496 PMCID: PMC5723045 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2330-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Uncontrolled active rheumatoid arthritis can lead to increasing disability and reduced quality of life over time. ‘Treating to target’ has been shown to be effective in active established disease and also in early disease. However, there is a lack of nationally agreed treatment protocols for patients with established rheumatoid arthritis who have intermediate disease activity. This trial is designed to investigate whether intensive management of disease leads to a greater number of remissions at 12 months. Levels of disability and quality of life, and acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the intervention will also be examined. Methods The trial is a 12-month, pragmatic, randomised, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, multicentre trial undertaken at specialist rheumatology centres across England. Three hundred and ninety-eight patients with established rheumatoid arthritis will be recruited. They will currently have intermediate disease activity (disease activity score for 28 joints assessed using an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 3.2 to 5.1 with at least three active joints) and will be taking at least one disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug. Participants will be randomly selected to receive intensive management or standard care. Intensive management will involve monthly clinical reviews with a specialist health practitioner, where drug treatment will be optimised and an individualised treatment support programme delivered based on several principles of motivational interviewing to address identified problem areas, such as pain, fatigue and adherence. Standard care will follow standard local pathways and will be in line with current English guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Patients will be assessed initially and at 6 and 12 months through self-completed questionnaires and clinical evaluation. Discussion The trial will establish whether the known benefits of intensive treatment strategies in active rheumatoid arthritis are also seen in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis who have moderately active disease. It will evaluate both the clinical and cost-effectiveness of intensive treatment. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials, ID: ISRCTN70160382. Registered on 16 January 2014. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2330-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi H Martin
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
| | - Fowzia Ibrahim
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Brian Tom
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK
| | - James Galloway
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Allan Wailoo
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Jonathan Tosh
- DRG Abacus, Manchester One, 53 Portland Street, Manchester, M1 3LF, UK
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Louise Prothero
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Department of Physiotherapy, King's College London, 5th Floor, Addison House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK
| | - David L Scott
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Georgopoulou S, Efraimidou S, MacLennan SJ, Ibrahim F, Cox T. The relationship between social support and health-related quality of life in patients with antiphospholipid (hughes) syndrome. Mod Rheumatol 2017; 28:147-155. [DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2017.1317319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Georgopoulou
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King’s College London, School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sofia Efraimidou
- Centre for Sustainable Working Life, Birkbeck University of London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Fowzia Ibrahim
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King’s College London, School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Cox
- Centre for Sustainable Working Life, Birkbeck University of London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Georgopoulou S, Prothero L, Lempp H, Galloway J, Sturt J. Motivational interviewing: relevance in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016; 55:1348-56. [PMID: 26515960 PMCID: PMC5854032 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2015] [Revised: 09/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in pharmacological treatment options in RA have led to a dramatic potential for improvement in patients' physical and psychological status. Despite advances, poor outcomes, including fatigue, pain, reduced physical activity and quality of life, are still observed. Reasons include non-adherence to medication, insufficient knowledge about the disease and lack of support in coping and effectively self-managing their condition. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a person-centred approach that relies on collaboration and empathy aiming to elicit a person's own motivation for behaviour change. It has been implemented in a variety of long-term conditions, addressing issues such as lifestyle changes with beneficial effects, but it is yet to be widely recognized and adopted in the field of rheumatology. This review will explain the techniques underpinning MI and the rationale for adopting this approach in rheumatology with the aim to increase medication adherence and physical activity and improve patients' coping strategies for pain and fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Georgopoulou
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine and
| | - Louise Prothero
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine and
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine and
| | - James Galloway
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine and
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Prothero L, Georgopoulou S, de Souza S, Bosworth A, Bearne L, Lempp H. Patient involvement in the development of a handbook for moderate rheumatoid arthritis. Health Expect 2016; 20:288-297. [PMID: 27086728 PMCID: PMC5354020 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-management is a key recommendation for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Educational materials may support self-management, and increasingly patients are becoming involved with the development of these materials. The TITRATE trial compares the effectiveness of intensive management to standard care in patients with moderate RA across England. As part of the intensive management intervention, participants are given a handbook. AIM AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to develop a handbook to support the intensive management. The objectives were to: (i) involve patients in the identification of relevant information for inclusion in the TITRATE handbook; (ii) ensure the content of the handbook is acceptable and accessible. DESIGN We held an audio-taped workshop with RA patients. The transcript of the workshop was analysed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS Five main themes were identified as follows: 'rheumatoid arthritis treatment, perceptions of rheumatoid arthritis, the importance of individualized goals, benefits of self-management and the patient handbook'. Feedback from the workshop was incorporated into the handbook, and patients' anonymous testimonies were added. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that patient contribution to the development of educational material to support intensive management of RA is both feasible and valuable. A qualitative evaluation of the use and impact of the handbook with patients and practitioners is planned on completion of the TITRATE trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Prothero
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Trials Group, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Weston Education Centre, London, UK
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Trials Group, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Weston Education Centre, London, UK
| | - Savia de Souza
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Trials Group, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Weston Education Centre, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Bosworth
- National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK
| | - Lindsay Bearne
- Academic Department of Physiotherapy, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Trials Group, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Weston Education Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Prothero L, Georgopoulou S, Galloway J, Williams R, Bosworth A, Lempp H. Patients’ and carers’ views and expectations about intensive management for moderate rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2015; 21:918-25. [DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2015.1111394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
20
|
Georgopoulou S, Efraimidou S, MacLennan SJ, Ibrahim F, Cox T. Antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome: description of population and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the SF-36. Lupus 2014; 24:174-9. [DOI: 10.1177/0961203314551809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective Antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome (APS) affects mainly women 15 to 50 years of age and is responsible for approximately 20% of strokes in people <40 years. Little is known about the psychological burden of this long-term condition. We investigated HRQoL in APS. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey involving 270 members of the Hughes Syndrome Foundation worldwide. Data included HRQoL (SF-36), demographics, and APS-related self-reported major issues. Response rate was 60%. Results T-tests indicated significantly worse mean scores for seven of the eight domains of the SF-36 in secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (SAPS) compared to primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS), e.g. bodily pain t(263) = 6.10 p < 0.001 except for mental health t(267) = 1.95 p = 0.053. PAPS appeared to be associated with poorer HRQoL in most mental health domains but overall better physical domains compared to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) alone. SAPS appeared to have a more adverse impact on HRQoL compared to PAPS and SLE. Major issues identified: pain and fatigue, lack of health care professional/public awareness, and medication unpredictability. Conclusion HRQoL in PAPS appears to be generally better than SLE and SAPS in physical domains, but poorer in mental domains. APS patients might need more social support in terms of information and awareness of the condition to improve their coping strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Georgopoulou
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Efraimidou
- Centre for Sustainable Working Life, School of Business, Economics & Informatics, Birkbeck University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - S J MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - F Ibrahim
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - T Cox
- Centre for Sustainable Working Life, School of Business, Economics & Informatics, Birkbeck University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
White P, Thornton H, Pinnock H, Georgopoulou S, Booth HP. Overtreatment of COPD with inhaled corticosteroids--implications for safety and costs: cross-sectional observational study. PLoS One 2013; 8:e75221. [PMID: 24194824 PMCID: PMC3806778 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2013] [Accepted: 08/14/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Combined inhaled long-acting beta-agonists and corticosteroids (LABA+ICS) are costly. They are recommended in severe or very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). They should not be prescribed in mild or moderate disease. In COPD ICS are associated with side-effects including risk of pneumonia. We quantified appropriateness of prescribing and examined the risks and costs associated with overuse. METHODS Data were extracted from the electronic and paper records of 41 London general practices (population 310,775) including spirometry, medications and exacerbations. We classified severity, assessed appropriateness of prescribing using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines for 2009, and performed a sensitivity analysis using the broader recommendations of the 2011 revision. RESULTS 3537 patients had a diagnosis of COPD. Spirometry was recorded for 2458(69%). 709(29%) did not meet GOLD criteria. 1749(49%) with confirmed COPD were analysed: 8.6% under-treated, 38% over-treated. Over-prescription of ICS in GOLD stage I or II (n=403, 38%) and in GOLD III or IV without exacerbations (n=231, 33.6%) was common. An estimated 12 cases (95%CI 7-19) annually of serious pneumonia were likely among 897 inappropriately treated. 535 cases of overtreatment involved LABA+ICS with a mean per patient cost of £553.56/year (€650.03). Using the broader indications for ICS in the 2011 revised GOLD guideline 25% were still classified as over-treated. The estimated risk of 15 cases of pneumonia (95%CI 8-22) in 1074 patients currently receiving ICS would rise by 20% to 18 (95%CI 9.8-26.7) in 1305 patients prescribed ICS if all with GOLD grade 3 and 4 received LABA+ICS. CONCLUSION Over-prescription of ICS in confirmed COPD was widespread with considerable potential for harm. In COPD where treatment is often escalated in the hope of easing the burden of disease clinicians should consider both the risks and benefits of treatment and the costs where the benefits are unproven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick White
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Thornton
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hilary Pinnock
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen P. Booth
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Tzovaras G, Fafoulakis F, Pratsas K, Georgopoulou S, Stamatiou G, Hatzitheofilou C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia. Surg Endosc 2006; 20:580-2. [PMID: 16437265 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0405-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2005] [Accepted: 10/21/2005] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional anesthesia has not been used as the sole anesthetic procedure other than in the scenario of a patient at high risk to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with CO2 pneumoperitoneum under general anesthesia. METHODS Fifteen ASA grade I or II patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum under spinal anesthesia. Intraoperative parameters, postoperative pain and recovery in general, as well as patient satisfaction at follow-up were prospectively recorded in a pilot study to assess the feasibility and safety of the procedure. RESULTS All operations were completed laparoscopically and conversion from spinal to general anesthesia was not required in any of the cases. Median pain score 4 h postoperatively was 1.5 (range, 0-5), at 8 h it was 1 (range, 0-6), and at 24 h it was 1 (range, 0-4). All patients were discharged after 24 h. Follow-up 2 weeks postoperatively showed all but one patient to be satisfied and strongly recommending the anesthetic procedure. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum can be successfully and safely performed under spinal anesthesia. Furthermore, it seems that spinal anesthesia is associated with minimal postoperative pain and at least an equally good recovery as with general anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Tzovaras
- Department of Surgery, University of Thessaly Medical School, University Hospital of Larissa, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Douzinas EE, Georgopoulou S, Karmpaliotis DI, Karavasilis J, Andrianakis I, Roussos C. Drainage tube endoscopy: a contribution to the management of severe acute pancreatitis? Intensive Care Med 1997; 23:1171-3. [PMID: 9434924 DOI: 10.1007/s001340050475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Peritoneal lavage is one of the interventional approaches that have gained some attention in the early, toxaemic phase of acute pancreatitis. Additionally some kind of drainage is necessary for suppurative collections that characterize the late phase of the disease. In both the above situations tube plugging is a common problem and it is usually associated with a relapse of the patient's septic state and newly formed collection(s) on abdominal CT. Two cases are presented, in early and in late phases respectively, in which drainage tube adoscopy (DTE) re-established tube patency and ensured drainage. DTE may represent an alternative to surgery or to CT-guided paracentesis and evacuation of newly formed intra-abdominal collections secondary to tube obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E E Douzinas
- Critical Care Department, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens University School of Medicine, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|