Prognosis of polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutation in high-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

POLE mutated endometrial carcinomas may represent a subspecific type of tumors harboring a more favorable prognosis. Grade 3 (G3 or high-grade) endometrioid endometrial carcinomas remain a clinical dilemma, with some tumors behaving as the low-grade counterparts and others presenting a more aggressive behavior.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between POLE mutational status and the overall-survival (OS) and progression-free-survival (PFS) of patients with G3 endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC). We also aimed to determine the prevalence of POLE mutations in G3 endometrioid EC.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO No: CRD4202340008). We searched the following electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. For time-to-event data, the effect of POLE mutation in G3 EC was described using hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Individual patient data for each study was investigated if available from the study authors. If individual patient data were not available, information regarding time-to-event outcomes was extracted using an appropriate methodology. OS and PFS were analyzed using both one-stage and two-stage approaches, the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox-proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 19 studies with 3092 patients who had high-grade endometrioid EC. Patients with POLE mutations had lower risks of death (HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.50, I2 = 0%, 10 trials) and disease progression (HR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.57, I2 = 33%, 10 trials). The pooled prevalence of POLE mutation was 11% (95% CI 9 to 13, I2 = 68%, 18 studies).

CONCLUSION

POLE mutations in high-grade endometrioid EC are associated with a more favorable prognosis with increased OS and PFS.

Strategies for research capacity building by family physicians in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

The qualities of primary healthcare (PHC) make it a very relevant environment for research; however, there is still work to be done to enhance the research capabilities of family physicians in healthcare units. Considering there is no ongoing review that specifically addresses this objective, the proposed goal of this scoping review is to determine the depth of the literature on the current strategies that support research capacity building among family physicians in the context of PHC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The scoping review will include studies from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and grey literature, published from 2008 to 2023, that address strategies to promote research capacity building among family physicians in the context of PHC. Only studies published in English, Portuguese or Spanish will be considered. All study designs, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies, will be eligible for inclusion. The literature search will be performed from January to March of 2024 and data charting will employ a descriptive-analytical method, systematically summarising study objectives, methodologies, findings and implications. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols and the review will employ the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review does not need ethical approval. Peer-reviewed publications, policy summaries, presentations at conferences and involvement with pertinent stakeholders are all part of our outreach approach.

Methods for the Clinical Validation of Digital Endpoints: Protocol for a Scoping Review Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials often use digital technologies to collect data continuously outside the clinic and use the derived digital endpoints as trial endpoints. Digital endpoints are also being developed to support diagnosis, monitoring, or therapeutic interventions in clinical care. However, clinical validation stands as a significant challenge, as there are no specific guidelines orienting the validation of digital endpoints.

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents the protocol for a scoping review that aims to map the existing methods for the clinical validation of digital endpoints.

METHODS

The scoping review will comprise searches from the electronic literature databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus (including conference proceedings), Embase, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Xplore, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) Digital Library, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science Core Collection (including conference proceedings), and Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. We will also include various sources of gray literature with search terms related to digital endpoints. The methodology will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review and the Guidance for Conducting Systematic Scoping Reviews.

RESULTS

A search for reviews on the existing evidence related to this topic was conducted and has shown that no such review was previously undertaken. This review will provide a systematic assessment of the literature on methods for the clinical validation of digital endpoints and highlight any potential need for harmonization or reporting of methods. The results will include the methods for the clinical validation of digital endpoints according to device, digital endpoint, and clinical application goal of digital endpoints. The study started in January 2023 and is expected to end by December 2023, with results to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSIONS

A scoping review of methodologies that validate digital endpoints is necessary. This review will be unique in its breadth since it will comprise digital endpoints collected from several devices and not focus on a specific disease area. The results of our work should help guide researchers in choosing validation methods, identify potential gaps in the literature, or inform the development of novel methods to optimize the clinical validation of digital endpoints. Resolving these gaps is the key to presenting evidence in a consistent way to regulators and other parties and obtaining regulatory acceptance of digital endpoints for patient benefit.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/47119.

[Severe Interstitial Lung Disease and Manic Symptoms Secondary to Corticosteroids in a Patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Secondary Sjögren's Syndrome]

Interstitial lung disease occurs in up to 25% of patients with Sjögren's syndrome and 2% - 8 % of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Corticosteroid therapy remains the main treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus. However, it can be associated with several neuropsychiatric disorders especially with prednisolone at a dose of more than 40 mg/day. We present the case of a 51-year-old patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and secondary Sjögren's syndrome with severe pulmonary involvement four years after the diagnosis. Chest computed tomography revealed neofibrosis and ground glass appearance pattern. After increasing the dose of prednisolone to 60 mg/day, the patient presented a manic episode. There was need of hospitalization and the situation was considered to be secondary to corticosteroids at high doses. Central neurological involvement by organic disease was excluded. We introduced monthly perfusion of cyclophosphamide for six months and later started mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day, reducing prednisolone to 10 mg/day and maintaining hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day, with control of disease activity.