1
|
Piszczek R, Krajewski W, Subiela JD, Del Giudice F, Nowak Ł, Chorbińska J, Moschini M, Masson-Lecomte A, Bebane S, Cimadamore A, Grobet-Jeandin E, Rouprêt M, D'Andrea D, Mastroianni R, Gutierrez Hidalgo B, Gomez Rivas J, Mori K, Soria F, Laukhtina E, Mari A, Albisinni S, Gallioli A, Mertens LS, Pichler R, Marcq G, Łaszkiewicz J, Hałoń A, Carrion DM, Akand M, Pradere B, Shariat SF, Palou J, Babjuk M, Burgos Revilla J, Małkiewicz B, Szydełko T. Prognosis of patients with T1 low-grade urothelial bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:591-599. [PMID: 37728495 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05418-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The existence and prognosis of T1LG (T1 low-grade) bladder cancer is controversial. Also, because of data paucity, it remains unclear what is the clinical history of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treated T1LG tumors and if it differs from other NMIBC (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer) representatives. The aim of this study was to analyse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with T1LG bladder cancers treated with BCG immunotherapy. METHODS A multi-institutional and retrospective study of 2510 patients with Ta/T1 NMIBC with or without carcinoma in situ (CIS) treated with BCG (205 T1LG patients) was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test for RFS and PFS to compare the survival between TaLG, TaHG, T1LG, and T1HG NMIBC were used. Also, T1LG tumors were categorized into EAU2021 risk groups and PFS analysis was performed, and Cox multivariate model for both RFS and PFS were constructed. RESULTS The median follow-up was 52 months. For the T1LG cohort, the estimated RFS and PFS rates at 5-year were 59.3% and 89.2%, respectively. While there were no differences in RFS between NMIBC subpopulations, a slightly better PFS was found in T1LG NMIBC compared to T1HG (5-year PFS; T1LG vs. T1HG: 82% vs. 89%; P<0.001). A heterogeneous classification of patients with T1LG NMIBC was observed when EAU 2021 prognostic model was applied, finding a statistically significant worse PFS in patients classified as high-risk T1LG (5-year PFS; 81.8%) compared to those in intermediate (5-year PFS; 93,4%), and low-risk T1LG tumors (5-year PFS; 98,1%). CONCLUSIONS The RFS of T1LG was comparable to other NMIBC subpopulations. The PFS of T1LG tumors was significantly better than of T1HG NMIBC. The EAU2021 scoring model heterogeneously categorized the risk of progression in T1LG tumors and the high-risk T1LG had the worst PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radosław Piszczek
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland -
| | - Jose D Subiela
- Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Łukasz Nowak
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Joanna Chorbińska
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sonia Bebane
- Department of Urology, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jan Łaszkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Hałoń
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Diego M Carrion
- Department of Urology, Torrejon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Murat Akand
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Juan Palou
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Javier Burgos Revilla
- Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bebane S, Denize J, Goujon A, Meria P, Verine J, Mongiat-Artus P, Desgrandchamps F, Masson-Lecomte A. Perioperative outcomes of transurethral resection for t1 bladder tumors: quality evaluation based on patient, tumor and surgeon criteria. World J Urol 2021; 39:4159-4165. [PMID: 34160681 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03765-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is a fundamental but challenging step in the diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The first- and second-look TURBT are central in the management of T1 tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with TURBT for T1 urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) of the bladder in one academic institution between 2007 and 2017. Quality of TURBT was evaluated based on the presence/absence of muscle on pathology report, the presence/absence of residual tumor on the second look and the occurrence of complications. Patient-, surgeon- and tumor-related factors were investigated for their association with TURBT quality. RESULTS 283 patients were included. Second-look resection was performed after a mean delay of 54 days. Muscle was observed in 85.9% of the samples on the first TURBT. On the second-look resection, UCC was observed in 52.3% of the samples. 38 complications were reported after the first TURBT (13.4%). Surgeon's experience was the only factor significantly associated with occurrence of post-operative complications (OR = 0.40; p = 0.04). Location of the tumor at the bottom of the bladder was a risk factor for not finding muscle at pathological analysis (OR = 0.20; p = 0.06). Male gender, multiplicity and tumor located at the bottom of the bladder were significantly associated with residual disease on reTURBT. In multivariate analysis, only male gender (OR = 4.71; p = 0.02) and tumor multiplicity remained significant (OR for unique tumor = 0.36; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION TURBT is a challenging procedure and surgeon's experience is crucial in reducing the rate of post-operative complications. Technical difficulties resulting from patient's gender, tumor location or number of tumors may be as important as oncological factors in deciding whether or not to perform a second-look resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Bebane
- Service D'Urologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Justine Denize
- Service D'Urologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Annabelle Goujon
- Service D'Urologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Paul Meria
- Service D'Urologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Jerome Verine
- Pathology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Mongiat-Artus
- Service D'Urologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Francois Desgrandchamps
- Service D'Urologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- Service D'Urologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France.
- Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|