CT features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: experience of a single center in Southern Italy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report the radiological features of chest CT scan of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) living in a town in Southern Italy where a significant outbreak of the disease occurred.

METHODS

We revised the CT scan of 62 patients (34 male, 28 female, mean age 71 +/- 14 years) with clinical and laboratory signs of COVID-19, as assessed by positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing. All patients underwent chest CT at the time of admission to the hospital. A semi-quantitative scoring system was used to evaluate the extension of the disease.

RESULTS

Out of the 62 patients the main radiological findings were reticular pattern (29%), ground-glass opacities (24%), crazy paving pattern (11%) and consolidation (35%). Most of the lesions were bilateral (97%), posterior (95%) and located near pleura (50%) or lung fissures (45%), mainly involving the lower right lobe (56%) and lower left lobe (23%). Pleural thickening was observed in 72.6% of patients and pleural effusion in 18%. Median value of the score was 7.0 and was significantly higher in male than female (8.5 vs 6.0, p=0.03) and in patients with pleural thickening compared to those without this finding (8.0 vs 5.0, p=0.03).

SARS-CoV-2 Infection with Different Radiological Insights

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel viral infection characterized by several symptoms range from mild to severe clinical conditions that could lead to death. We report two different radiological findings on computed tomography (CT) in two patients affected by SARS-CoV-2: a lung acute embolism (APE) in the first case and a radiological picture of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the second case. This is an important issue to be identified in order to provide more specific therapy earlier, including both antiviral and anti-inflammatory drugs associated with anti anticoagulant therapy.

Relations of longitudinal left ventricular systolic function to left ventricular mass, load, and Doppler stroke volume

AIMS

To evaluate whether the peak systolic velocities of the displacement of the lateral mitral anulus (Sa) and of the mid-portion of the interventricular septal wall (Sm) correlate with measures of left ventricular load, left ventricular mass, and Doppler stroke volume in normotensive and hypertensive subjects without clinically overt cardiovascular disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Tissue Doppler imaging was used to evaluate Sa and Sm in apical 4-chamber view; standard echocardiographic procedures were used to assess left ventricular structure and traditional parameters of systolic function (ejection fraction, stress-corrected midwall shortening, meridional and circumferential end-systolic stress); pulsed Doppler was employed to evaluate stroke volume. In 87 subjects meeting inclusion criteria, Sa and Sm were not significantly correlated either with left ventricular end-diastolic volume and end-systolic stress, or with stroke volume; in contrast, endocardial and midwall fractional shortening were lower with higher afterload, as expected. Fractional shortening at endocardium and midwall, and Sm were lower with higher left ventricular mass. Mean Sa and Sm values were lower in subjects with low vs. those with normal stress-corrected midwall shortening, but low Sa was not associated with lower stress-corrected midwall shortening in our study sample.

CONCLUSIONS

While Sa and Sm might be indices of longitudinal left ventricular systolic mechanics, they should not be considered as measures of left ventricular contractility alternative to well-established parameters of systolic function, such as stress-corrected midwall shortening, in subjects at rest without overt heart disease.

Isolated left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: implications for exercise left ventricular performance in patients without congestive heart failure

OBJECTIVE

Clinical relevance of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in the absence of congestive heart failure (CHF) and LV systolic dysfunction is not fully established.

METHODS

Asymptomatic outpatients, sedentary, with cardiovascular risk factors but no history of cardiovascular events, underwent echocardiographic evaluation of LV structure and function by standard Doppler, color M-mode, and Doppler tissue methods, and exercise testing with simultaneous noninvasive assessment of LV stroke index and cardiac index. LV ejection fraction less than 50% and significant valvular disease or stress test suggestive of coronary disease were additional exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

In 70 patients selected (40 +/- 10 years old, 63% men, 34% hypertensive, 34% diabetic, 4% diabetic and hypertensive, 11% with LV hypertrophy), LV diastolic dysfunction was detected in 26%, which was associated with hypertension, higher LV mass index, lower systolic function, lower peak exercise heart rate, and chronotropic reserve (all P < .05), and with lower peak exercise stroke index and cardiac index (both covariates adjusted P < .05), but not with lower peak exercise metabolic equivalents (P > .5). Abnormal LV relaxation was independently correlated with lower peak exercise cardiac index and stroke index (both P < .05). Peak exercise systolic and cardiac indices were comparable between patients with CHF risk factors (74%) versus those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated LV diastolic dysfunction was independently associated with lower peak exercise LV systolic performance in patients without CHF. Its diagnosis may provide a target for aggressive CHF risk management.

Individuals' cardiovascular risk profile projected by family doctors and individuals' knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors: a challenge for primary prevention. The cardiovascular risk prevention project "Help Your Heart Stay Young"

BACKGROUND

Whether the practice of family doctors of assessing individuals' cardiovascular risk profile improves individuals' knowledge of risk factors in primary prevention has not been established. Accordingly, we evaluated patients' knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle in healthy subjects whose family doctors provided individual cardiovascular risk score.

METHODS

Subjects who visited their family doctor in a time frame of 3 months, who accepted to fill-in a simple questionnaire measuring their knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and of non-pharmacological interventions able to reduce cardiovascular risk were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-one family doctors were involved. The study sample comprised 4239 subjects (mean age 56 +/- 9 years, 62% women) in primary prevention. They were classified by their family doctors, based on the Framingham algorithm, as being at low (< 10%; 45.7% of subjects), medium (10-20%; 38.7% of subjects) or moderate-to-high (> 20%; 15.6% of subjects) cardiovascular risk. The prevalence of obese subjects (40, 48, and 49%, respectively) and of heavy smokers (> or = 20 cigarettes/day; 26, 30, and 34%) increased from the low to the moderate-to-high risk group (both p < 0.05). The proportion of subjects unaware of personal history of arterial hypertension (5, 6, and 9%) and that of subjects who were unaware of history of elevated cholesterol levels (10, 11, and 12%, both p < 0.01) increased with higher cardiovascular risk score. The proportion of subjects self-reporting blood pressure > 135/85 mmHg, but self-reporting being normotensive (30, 50, and 52%), and the proportion of subjects who referred cholesterol levels > 200 mg/dl among those who self-referred not to have elevated cholesterol levels (13, 25, and 31%) increased both with cardiovascular risk category (p < 0.001). The proportion of subjects who were unaware of their personal history of diabetes was similar in the cardiovascular risk groups. The prevalence of low educational level was higher (56, 58, and 62%, p < 0.01) and the level of knowledge of non-pharmacological remedies to cardiovascular risk factors (63, 61, and 59%, p < 0.01) was lower in higher cardiovascular risk score group. Subjects aged < 55 years showed similar lack of knowledge about cardiovascular risk factors and the proportion of heavy smoking was as high as in the group of older participants.

CONCLUSIONS

In cardiovascular primary prevention, the projection of higher individuals' risk profile by family doctors was not paralleled by an increase in individual's knowledge of major cardiovascular risk factors and of lifestyle interventions able to reduce the cardiovascular risk.

Cardiovascular secondary prevention: patients' knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and their attitude to reduce the risk burden, and the practice of family doctors. The "Help Your Heart Stay Young" study

BACKGROUND

Whether the practice of family doctors of assessing the global cardiovascular risk profile improves the knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and the attitude to lifestyle change in patients' secondary cardiovascular prevention is unknown.

METHODS

We evaluated subjects who visited their family doctors and those with self-reported cardiovascular disease in the urban area of Naples, Italy. Patients self-administered a simple standard questionnaire to evaluate their knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and of simple lifestyle modifications to reduce the cardiovascular risk burden. For each participant, family doctors, blinded to the information provided by patients, had to provide a global coronary risk based on the risk factors recorded in their electronic database, or report the missing information.

RESULTS

The study sample comprised 560 subjects, 61% male, with mean age 60 +/- 9 years. Angina pectoris (49%) and myocardial infarction (40.9%) were the most frequently self-reported cardiovascular diseases in the study sample. The self-reported data revealed that 46% of the sample was overweight and an additional 20% overtly obese. Among those who self-reported arterial hypertension, approximately 11% admitted that they were unaware of their blood pressure, and 26% believed that they were normotensive but reported a recently detected blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg. Approximately 8% were not aware of whether they had high cholesterol levels, and among those who declared having normal cholesterol levels, 9% referred levels > 200 mg/dl. Of the sample, 22% self-reported diabetes, but 7% did not know whether they were diabetic or not. Thirty percent of the sample were smokers and among these, 40% smoked > 20 cigarettes/day. A low level of education was reported in 66% of the study sample. Women were more frequently obese, more often reported high cholesterol levels, had a low level of education and achieved a lower score from the questionnaire on knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors than men. Patients > 55 years more often reported an elevated blood pressure among those who defined themselves as normotensive, and achieved a lower score from the questionnaire on knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors than younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to secondary cardiovascular prevention, the study population was found to have insufficient knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and of the correct approach to reduce their global risk despite the fact that the attitude of their family doctors in detecting and recording risk factors was above average.