Affordability of newer antiseizure medications in Asian resource-limited countries

OBJECTIVE

One of the objectives of the Intersectoral Global Action Plan on epilepsy and other neurological disorders for 2022 to 2031 is to ensure at least 80% of people with epilepsy (PWE) will have access to appropriate, affordable, and safe antiseizure medications (ASMs) by 2031. However, ASM affordability is a significant issue in low- and middle-income countries, preventing PWE from accessing optimal treatment. This study aimed to determine the affordability of the newer (second and third generation) ASMs in resource-limited countries in Asia.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey by contacting country representatives in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, including Indonesia, Lao People's Democratic Republic (PDR), Myanmar, Philippines, Vietnam, India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, and the upper-middle-income country Malaysia, from March 2022 to April 2022. The affordability of each ASM was calculated by dividing the 30-day ASM cost by the daily wage of the lowest paid unskilled laborers. Treatment costing 1 day's wage or less for a 30-day supply of chronic disease is considered affordable.

RESULTS

Eight LMICs and one upper-middle-income country were included in this study. Lao PDR had no newer ASM, and Vietnam had only three newer ASMs. The most frequently available ASMs were levetiracetam, topiramate, and lamotrigine, and the least frequently available was lacosamide. The majority of the newer ASMs were unaffordable, with the median number of days' wages for a 30-day supply ranging from 5.6 to 14.8 days.

SIGNIFICANCE

All new generation ASMs, whether original or generic brands, were unaffordable in most Asian LMICs.

Seizure remission rates remain low in a resource-limited country, a multicentre comparison study in Malaysia

Seizure remission rates of 60% with antiseizure medications were reported in developed countries, but might be lower in resource-limited countries. The challenges in epilepsy care in resource-limited regions were highlighted 10 years ago, and still remain an ongoing issue. This study aimed to determine the seizure freedom rates in level-2 epilepsy care centres (centres with general neurologists) compared to level-3/4 centres (centres with epileptologists providing epilepsy surgery evaluation) in Malaysia. This is a retrospective study of 1,347 adult epilepsy patients from two level-2 (n = 290) and two level-3/4 epilepsy care centres (n = 1,057). The seizure remission rates were significantly lower in level-2 centres (42.5%) compared to the level 3/4 centres (61.9%, p < 0.05). Level-2 centres had significantly more patients with undetermined seizure types compared to level-3/4 centres (6.6% vs 3.1%, p < 0.05). Level-3/4 centres had significantly more patients with epilepsy of structural and genetic origins, whereas more patients in level-2 centres had unknown aetiology (46.2% vs. 34.0% in level-3/4, p < 0.05). Level-2 centres had a lower neurologist-to-patient ratio (1:97 vs. 1:50 in level-3/4 centres, p < 0.05). Level-2 centres also had fewer patients, who underwent investigations such as EEG (74.1% vs. 89.6%) and brain MRI (54.1% vs. 72.4%, p < 0.05) in comparison with level-3/4 centres. Our study emphasized the existing challenges in epilepsy care in a resource-limited country to achieve the ideal 60% seizure remission rate.