1
|
Bierbaum M, Rapport F, Arnolda G, Tran Y, Nic Giolla Easpaig B, Ludlow K, Clay-Williams R, Austin E, Laginha B, Lo CY, Churruca K, van Baar L, Hutchinson K, Chittajallu R, Owais SS, Nullwala R, Hibbert P, Fajardo Pulido D, Braithwaite J. Rates of adherence to cancer treatment guidelines in Australia and the factors associated with adherence: A systematic review. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:618-644. [PMID: 36881529 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
Adherence to cancer treatment clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) varies enormously across Australia, despite being associated with improved patient outcomes. This systematic review aims to characterize adherence rates to active-cancer treatment CPGs in Australia and related factors to inform future implementation strategies. Five databases were systematically searched, abstracts were screened for eligibility, a full-text review and critical appraisal of eligible studies performed, and data extracted. A narrative synthesis of factors associated with adherence was conducted, and the median adherence rates within cancer streams calculated. A total of 21,031 abstracts were identified. After duplicates were removed, abstracts screened, and full texts reviewed, 20 studies focused on adherence to active-cancer treatment CPGs were included. Overall adherence rates ranged from 29% to 100%. Receipt of guideline recommended treatments was higher for patients who were younger (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], colorectal, lung, and breast cancer); female (breast and lung cancer), and male (DLBCL and colorectal cancer); never smokers (DLBCL and lung cancer); non-Indigenous Australians (cervical and lung cancer); with less advanced stage disease (colorectal, lung, and cervical cancer), without comorbidities (DLBCL, colorectal, and lung cancer); with good-excellent Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (lung cancer); living in moderately accessible places (colon cancer); and; treated in metropolitan facilities (DLBLC, breast and colon cancer). This review characterized active-cancer treatment CPG adherence rates and associated factors in Australia. Future targeted CPG implementation strategies should account for these factors, to redress unwarranted variation particularly in vulnerable populations, and improve patient outcomes (Prospero number: CRD42020222962).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Bierbaum
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frances Rapport
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, AIHI, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yvonne Tran
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, AIHI, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brona Nic Giolla Easpaig
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, AIHI, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kristiana Ludlow
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robyn Clay-Williams
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Austin
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bela Laginha
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chi Yhun Lo
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Churruca
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lieke van Baar
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Hutchinson
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Renuka Chittajallu
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Riverina Cancer Care Centre, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
- GenesisCare, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Syeda Somyyah Owais
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ruqaiya Nullwala
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- North Eastern Public Health Unit, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Diana Fajardo Pulido
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, AIHI, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lamprell K, Fajardo-Pulido D, Arnolda G, Owais SS, Nic Giolla Easpaig B, Tran Y, Liauw W, Braithwaite J. Things I need you to know: a qualitative analysis of advice-giving statements in early-onset colorectal cancer patients' personal accounts published online. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068073. [PMID: 36948549 PMCID: PMC10040059 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE People with early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as colorectal cancer (CRC) before the age of 50, now constitute a significant patient population. In empirical and grey literature EOCRC patients report unsatisfactory experiences of care, especially in relation to protracted intervals from first help-seeking to diagnosis. This study is the first to investigate EOCRC patients' perspectives on ways to improve experiences of care. The objective is to provide foundational knowledge for the development of EOCRC-specific patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). DESIGN The study was designed as qualitative Internet Mediated Research, involving a thematic analysis of unsolicited narratives recounting personal experiences of EOCRC care. We examined advice-giving statements in 120 online texts written by EOCRC patients and survivors. SETTING The Internet is the broad research setting. The host websites of three prominent charitable CRC support organisations were selected as specific research sites: Bowel Cancer Australia, Bowel Cancer UK and Bowel Cancer New Zealand. RESULTS We found that 90% of texts comprised statements of advice to new patients about the importance of self-advocacy in achieving quality care. Four key contexts for self-advocacy were identified: (1) accessing relevant diagnostic services; (2) driving diagnostic investigations when symptoms are not resolved; (3) involvement in treatment decision-making and (4) proactivity about preferred outcomes. Over 30% of advice-giving texts also directed statements of advice to healthcare providers, indicating that their youthfulness had been a barrier to timely diagnosis. CONCLUSION Healthcare barriers to, and facilitators of, patient self-advocacy may be indicators of quality EORC care. There is a need for greater awareness of the impact of age bias on the responsiveness of clinicians and healthcare services in EOCRC care. Our findings support the development of EOCRC-specific PREMs that can guide age-appropriate policy and practice for this newly identified patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klay Lamprell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Syeda Somyyah Owais
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig
- College of Nursing & Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Yvonne Tran
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Macquarie University Hearing, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Owais SS, Arnolda G, Lamprell K, Liauw W, Delaney GP, Olver I, Karnon J, Braithwaite J. Age-related experiences of colorectal cancer diagnosis: a secondary analysis of the English National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2023; 10:bmjgast-2022-001066. [PMID: 36868584 PMCID: PMC9990662 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in people aged <50 years has been increasing dramatically in the past three decades and such patients are known to face difficulties in diagnosis. The objective of this study was to better understand the diagnostic experiences of patients with CRC and explore age-related differences in the proportion with positive experiences. METHOD A secondary analysis of the English National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES) 2017 was conducted on the responses of patients with CRC, restricted to those likely to have been diagnosed in the preceding 12 months via pathways other than routine screening. Ten diagnosis-related experience questions were identified, with responses to them categorised as positive, negative or uninformative. Age group-related difference in positive experiences were described and ORs estimated, both raw and adjusted for selected characteristics. Sensitivity analysis was performed by weighting survey responses to 2017 cancer registrations by strata defined by age group, sex and cancer site, to assess whether differential response patterns by these characteristics affected the estimated proportion of positive experiences. RESULTS The reported experiences of 3889 patients with CRC were analysed. There was a significant linear trend (p<0.0001) for 9 of 10 experience items, with older patients consistently displaying higher rates of positive experiences and patients aged 55-64 showing rates of positive experience intermediate between younger and older age groups. This was unaffected by differences in patient characteristics or CPES response rates. CONCLUSION The highest rates of positive diagnosis-related experiences were reported by patients aged 65-74 or 75 years and older, and this is robust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syeda Somyyah Owais
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Klay Lamprell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- St. George Cancer Care Centre, Saint George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.,St. George Hospital Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Geoff P Delaney
- South-Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- Flinders Health and Medical Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lamprell K, Pulido DF, Arnolda G, Easpaig BNG, Tran Y, Owais SS, Liauw W, Braithwaite J. People with early-onset colorectal cancer describe primary care barriers to timely diagnosis: a mixed-methods study of web-based patient reports in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. BMC Prim Care 2023; 24:12. [PMID: 36641420 PMCID: PMC9840343 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-01967-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with early-onset colorectal cancer, under the age of 50, are more likely to experience diagnostic delay and to be diagnosed at later stages of the disease than older people. Advanced stage diagnosis potentially requires invasive therapeutic management at a time of life when these patients are establishing intimate relationships, raising families, building careers and laying foundations for financial stability. Barriers to timely diagnosis at primary care level have been identified but the patient perspective has not been investigated. METHODS Personal accounts of cancer care are increasingly accessed as rich sources of patient experience data. This study uses mixed methods, incorporating quantitative content analysis and qualitative thematic analysis, to investigate patients' accounts of early-onset colorectal cancer diagnosis published on prominent bowel cancer support websites in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. RESULTS Patients' perceptions (n = 273) of diagnostic barriers at primary care level were thematically similar across the three countries. Patients perceived that GPs' low suspicion of cancer due to age under 50 contributed to delays. Patients reported that their GPs seemed unaware of early-onset colorectal cancer and that they were not offered screening for colorectal cancer even when 'red flag' symptoms were present. Patients described experiences of inadequate information continuity within GP practices and across primary, specialist and tertiary levels of care, which they perceived contributed to diagnostic delay. Patients also reported tensions with GPs over the patient-centredness of care, describing discord related to symptom seriousness and lack of shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Wider dissemination of information about early-onset colorectal cancer at primary care level is imperative given the increasing incidence of the disease, the frequency of diagnostic delay, the rates of late-stage diagnosis and the dissatisfaction with patient experience reported by patients whose diagnosis is delayed. Patient education about diagnostic protocols may help to pre-empt or resolve tensions between GPs' enactment of value-based care and patients' concerns about cancer. The challenges of diagnosing early-onset colorectal cancer are significant and will become more pressing for GPs, who will usually be the first point of access to a health system for this growing patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klay Lamprell
- grid.1004.50000 0001 2158 5405Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Diana Fajardo Pulido
- grid.41312.350000 0001 1033 6040Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, DC Colombia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- grid.1004.50000 0001 2158 5405Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig
- grid.1043.60000 0001 2157 559XCollege of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT Australia
| | - Yvonne Tran
- grid.1004.50000 0001 2158 5405Macquarie University Hearing, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW Australia
| | - Syeda Somyyah Owais
- grid.1004.50000 0001 2158 5405Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- grid.416398.10000 0004 0417 5393St. George Cancer Care Centre, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW Australia ,grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432St. George Hospital Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- grid.1004.50000 0001 2158 5405Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Owais SS, Horner RD, Khan MA, Kenison K, Probst JC. Integrating maternal depression care at primary private clinics in low-income settings in Pakistan: A secondary analysis. Front Glob Womens Health 2023; 4:1091485. [PMID: 37091298 PMCID: PMC10117980 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1091485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The prevalence of depression among women in Pakistan ranges from 28% to 66%. There is a lack of structured mental healthcare provision at private primary care clinics in low-income urban settings in Pakistan. This study investigated the effectiveness and processes of a facility-based maternal depression intervention at private primary care clinics in low-income settings. Materials and methods A mixed-methods study was conducted using secondary data from the intervention. Mothers were assessed for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). A total of 1,957 mothers (1,037 and 920 in the intervention and control arms, respectively) were retrieved for outcome measurements after 1 year of being registered. This study estimated the effectiveness of the depression intervention through cluster adjusted differences in the change in PHQ-9 scores between the baseline and the endpoint measurements for the intervention and control arms. Implementation was evaluated through emerging themes and codes from the framework analysis of 18 in-depth interview transcriptions of intervention participants. Results Intervention mothers had a 3.06-point (95% CI: -3.46 to -2.67) reduction in their PHQ-9 score at the endpoint compared with their control counterparts. The process evaluation revealed that the integration of structured depression care was feasible at primary clinics in poor urban settings. It also revealed gaps in the public-private care linkage system and the need to improve referral systems. Conclusions Intervening for depression care at primary care clinics can be effective in reducing maternal depression. Clinic assistants can be trained to identify and deliver key depression counseling messages. The study invites policymakers to seize an opportunity to implement a monitoring mechanism toward standard mental health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syeda Somyyah Owais
- Centre for Healthcare Resilienceand Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Correspondence: Syeda Somyyah Owais
| | - Ronnie D. Horner
- Department of Health Services Research & Administration, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | | | - Kelli Kenison
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Janice C. Probst
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|