1
|
Andriamirado M, Balantekin AB, Bass CD, Bergeron DE, Bernard EP, Bowden NS, Bryan CD, Carr R, Classen T, Conant AJ, Deichert G, Delgado A, Diwan MV, Dolinski MJ, Erickson A, Foust BT, Gaison JK, Galindo-Uribari A, Gilbert CE, Gokhale S, Grant C, Hans S, Hansell AB, Heeger KM, Heffron B, Jaffe DE, Jayakumar S, Ji X, Jones DC, Koblanski J, Kunkle P, Kyzylova O, LaBelle D, Lane CE, Langford TJ, LaRosa J, Littlejohn BR, Lu X, Maricic J, Mendenhall MP, Meyer AM, Milincic R, Mueller PE, Mumm HP, Napolitano J, Neilson R, Nikkel JA, Nour S, Palomino Gallo JL, Pushin DA, Qian X, Roca C, Rosero R, Searles M, Surukuchi PT, Sutanto F, Tyra MA, Venegas-Vargas D, Weatherly PB, Wilhelmi J, Woolverton A, Yeh M, Zhang C, Zhang X. Final Measurement of the ^{235}U Antineutrino Energy Spectrum with the PROSPECT-I Detector at HFIR. Phys Rev Lett 2023; 131:021802. [PMID: 37505961 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.131.021802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
This Letter reports one of the most precise measurements to date of the antineutrino spectrum from a purely ^{235}U-fueled reactor, made with the final dataset from the PROSPECT-I detector at the High Flux Isotope Reactor. By extracting information from previously unused detector segments, this analysis effectively doubles the statistics of the previous PROSPECT measurement. The reconstructed energy spectrum is unfolded into antineutrino energy and compared with both the Huber-Mueller model and a spectrum from a commercial reactor burning multiple fuel isotopes. A local excess over the model is observed in the 5-7 MeV energy region. Comparison of the PROSPECT results with those from commercial reactors provides new constraints on the origin of this excess, disfavoring at 2.0 and 3.7 standard deviations the hypotheses that antineutrinos from ^{235}U are solely responsible and noncontributors to the excess observed at commercial reactors, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Andriamirado
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - A B Balantekin
- Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - C D Bass
- Department of Physics, Le Moyne College, Syracuse, New York 13214, USA
| | - D E Bergeron
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - E P Bernard
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - N S Bowden
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - C D Bryan
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - R Carr
- Department of Physics, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland 21402, USA
| | - T Classen
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - A J Conant
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - G Deichert
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - A Delgado
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - M V Diwan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - M J Dolinski
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia PA 19104-2875, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - A Erickson
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
| | - B T Foust
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - J K Gaison
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - A Galindo-Uribari
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, USA
| | - C E Gilbert
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - S Gokhale
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - C Grant
- Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - S Hans
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - A B Hansell
- Department of Physics, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, Pennsylvania 17870, USA
| | - K M Heeger
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - B Heffron
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, USA
| | - D E Jaffe
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - S Jayakumar
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia PA 19104-2875, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - X Ji
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - D C Jones
- Department of Physics (035-08), Temple University, 1925 N 12th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122-1801, USA
| | - J Koblanski
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
| | - P Kunkle
- Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - O Kyzylova
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia PA 19104-2875, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - D LaBelle
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia PA 19104-2875, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - C E Lane
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia PA 19104-2875, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - T J Langford
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - J LaRosa
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - B R Littlejohn
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - X Lu
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, USA
| | - J Maricic
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
| | - M P Mendenhall
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - A M Meyer
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
| | - R Milincic
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
| | - P E Mueller
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - H P Mumm
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - J Napolitano
- Department of Physics (035-08), Temple University, 1925 N 12th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122-1801, USA
| | - R Neilson
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia PA 19104-2875, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - J A Nikkel
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - S Nour
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - J L Palomino Gallo
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - D A Pushin
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Ontario, Canada
| | - X Qian
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - C Roca
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - R Rosero
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - M Searles
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - P T Surukuchi
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - F Sutanto
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - M A Tyra
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - D Venegas-Vargas
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, USA
| | - P B Weatherly
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia PA 19104-2875, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - J Wilhelmi
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - A Woolverton
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Ontario, Canada
| | - M Yeh
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - C Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - X Zhang
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
An FP, Andriamirado M, Balantekin AB, Band HR, Bass CD, Bergeron DE, Berish D, Bishai M, Blyth S, Bowden NS, Bryan CD, Cao GF, Cao J, Chang JF, Chang Y, Chen HS, Chen SM, Chen Y, Chen YX, Cheng J, Cheng ZK, Cherwinka JJ, Chu MC, Classen T, Conant AJ, Cummings JP, Dalager O, Deichert G, Delgado A, Deng FS, Ding YY, Diwan MV, Dohnal T, Dolinski MJ, Dolzhikov D, Dove J, Dvořák M, Dwyer DA, Erickson A, Foust BT, Gaison JK, Galindo-Uribarri A, Gallo JP, Gilbert CE, Gonchar M, Gong GH, Gong H, Grassi M, Gu WQ, Guo JY, Guo L, Guo XH, Guo YH, Guo Z, Hackenburg RW, Hans S, Hansell AB, He M, Heeger KM, Heffron B, Heng YK, Hor YK, Hsiung YB, Hu BZ, Hu JR, Hu T, Hu ZJ, Huang HX, Huang JH, Huang XT, Huang YB, Huber P, Koblanski J, Jaffe DE, Jayakumar S, Jen KL, Ji XL, Ji XP, Johnson RA, Jones DC, Kang L, Kettell SH, Kohn S, Kramer M, Kyzylova O, Lane CE, Langford TJ, LaRosa J, Lee J, Lee JHC, Lei RT, Leitner R, Leung JKC, Li F, Li HL, Li JJ, Li QJ, Li RH, Li S, Li SC, Li WD, Li XN, Li XQ, Li YF, Li ZB, Liang H, Lin CJ, Lin GL, Lin S, Ling JJ, Link JM, Littenberg L, Littlejohn BR, Liu JC, Liu JL, Liu JX, Lu C, Lu HQ, Lu X, Luk KB, Ma BZ, Ma XB, Ma XY, Ma YQ, Mandujano RC, Maricic J, Marshall C, McDonald KT, McKeown RD, Mendenhall MP, Meng Y, Meyer AM, Milincic R, Mueller PE, Mumm HP, Napolitano J, Naumov D, Naumova E, Neilson R, Nguyen TMT, Nikkel JA, Nour S, Ochoa-Ricoux JP, Olshevskiy A, Palomino JL, Pan HR, Park J, Patton S, Peng JC, Pun CSJ, Pushin DA, Qi FZ, Qi M, Qian X, Raper N, Ren J, Morales Reveco C, Rosero R, Roskovec B, Ruan XC, Searles M, Steiner H, Sun JL, Surukuchi PT, Tmej T, Treskov K, Tse WH, Tull CE, Tyra MA, Varner RL, Venegas-Vargas D, Viren B, Vorobel V, Wang CH, Wang J, Wang M, Wang NY, Wang RG, Wang W, Wang W, Wang X, Wang Y, Wang YF, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang ZM, Weatherly PB, Wei HY, Wei LH, Wen LJ, Whisnant K, White C, Wilhelmi J, Wong HLH, Woolverton A, Worcester E, Wu DR, Wu FL, Wu Q, Wu WJ, Xia DM, Xie ZQ, Xing ZZ, Xu HK, Xu JL, Xu T, Xue T, Yang CG, Yang L, Yang YZ, Yao HF, Ye M, Yeh M, Young BL, Yu HZ, Yu ZY, Yue BB, Zavadskyi V, Zeng S, Zeng Y, Zhan L, Zhang C, Zhang FY, Zhang HH, Zhang JW, Zhang QM, Zhang SQ, Zhang X, Zhang XT, Zhang YM, Zhang YX, Zhang YY, Zhang ZJ, Zhang ZP, Zhang ZY, Zhao J, Zhao RZ, Zhou L, Zhuang HL, Zou JH. Joint Determination of Reactor Antineutrino Spectra from ^{235}U and ^{239}Pu Fission by Daya Bay and PROSPECT. Phys Rev Lett 2022; 128:081801. [PMID: 35275656 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.081801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
A joint determination of the reactor antineutrino spectra resulting from the fission of ^{235}U and ^{239}Pu has been carried out by the Daya Bay and PROSPECT Collaborations. This Letter reports the level of consistency of ^{235}U spectrum measurements from the two experiments and presents new results from a joint analysis of both data sets. The measurements are found to be consistent. The combined analysis reduces the degeneracy between the dominant ^{235}U and ^{239}Pu isotopes and improves the uncertainty of the ^{235}U spectral shape to about 3%. The ^{235}U and ^{239}Pu antineutrino energy spectra are unfolded from the jointly deconvolved reactor spectra using the Wiener-SVD unfolding method, providing a data-based reference for other reactor antineutrino experiments and other applications. This is the first measurement of the ^{235}U and ^{239}Pu spectra based on the combination of experiments at low- and highly enriched uranium reactors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F P An
- Institute of Modern Physics, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai
| | - M Andriamirado
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - A B Balantekin
- Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - H R Band
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - C D Bass
- Department of Physics, Le Moyne College, Syracuse, New York
| | - D E Bergeron
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - D Berish
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - M Bishai
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - S Blyth
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - N S Bowden
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
| | - C D Bryan
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - G F Cao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J Cao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J F Chang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y Chang
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - H S Chen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - S M Chen
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - Y Chen
- Shenzhen University, Shenzhen
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - Y X Chen
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - J Cheng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z K Cheng
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - J J Cherwinka
- Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - M C Chu
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - T Classen
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
| | - A J Conant
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | | | - O Dalager
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - G Deichert
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - A Delgado
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - F S Deng
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - Y Y Ding
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M V Diwan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - T Dohnal
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - M J Dolinski
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - D Dolzhikov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - J Dove
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
| | - M Dvořák
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - D A Dwyer
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - A Erickson
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - B T Foust
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - J K Gaison
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - A Galindo-Uribarri
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - J P Gallo
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - C E Gilbert
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - M Gonchar
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - G H Gong
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - H Gong
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - M Grassi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - W Q Gu
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - J Y Guo
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - L Guo
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - X H Guo
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing
| | - Y H Guo
- Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an
| | - Z Guo
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | | | - S Hans
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - A B Hansell
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - M He
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - K M Heeger
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - B Heffron
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - Y K Heng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y K Hor
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - Y B Hsiung
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - B Z Hu
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - J R Hu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - T Hu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z J Hu
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - H X Huang
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | - J H Huang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - Y B Huang
- Guangxi University, No.100 Daxue East Road, Nanning
| | - P Huber
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
| | - J Koblanski
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - D E Jaffe
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - S Jayakumar
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - K L Jen
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - X L Ji
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X P Ji
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - R A Johnson
- Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
| | - D C Jones
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - L Kang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - S H Kettell
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - S Kohn
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - M Kramer
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - O Kyzylova
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - C E Lane
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - T J Langford
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - J LaRosa
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - J Lee
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - J H C Lee
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - R T Lei
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - R Leitner
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J K C Leung
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - F Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - H L Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J J Li
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - Q J Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - R H Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - S Li
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - S C Li
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
| | - W D Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X N Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X Q Li
- School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin
| | - Y F Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z B Li
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - H Liang
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - C J Lin
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - G L Lin
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - S Lin
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - J J Ling
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - J M Link
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
| | | | - B R Littlejohn
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - J C Liu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J L Liu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai
| | - J X Liu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - C Lu
- Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
| | - H Q Lu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X Lu
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - K B Luk
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - B Z Ma
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - X B Ma
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - X Y Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y Q Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - R C Mandujano
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - J Maricic
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - C Marshall
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - K T McDonald
- Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
| | - R D McKeown
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
- College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187
| | - M P Mendenhall
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
| | - Y Meng
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai
| | - A M Meyer
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - R Milincic
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - P E Mueller
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - H P Mumm
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - J Napolitano
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - D Naumov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - E Naumova
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - R Neilson
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - T M T Nguyen
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - J A Nikkel
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - S Nour
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - J P Ochoa-Ricoux
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - A Olshevskiy
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - J L Palomino
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - H-R Pan
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - J Park
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
| | - S Patton
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - J C Peng
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
| | - C S J Pun
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - D A Pushin
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario
| | - F Z Qi
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M Qi
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - X Qian
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - N Raper
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - J Ren
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | - C Morales Reveco
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - R Rosero
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - B Roskovec
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - X C Ruan
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | - M Searles
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - H Steiner
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - J L Sun
- China General Nuclear Power Group, Shenzhen
| | - P T Surukuchi
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - T Tmej
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - K Treskov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - W-H Tse
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - C E Tull
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - M A Tyra
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - R L Varner
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - D Venegas-Vargas
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - B Viren
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - V Vorobel
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C H Wang
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - J Wang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - M Wang
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - N Y Wang
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing
| | - R G Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W Wang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
- College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187
| | - W Wang
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - X Wang
- College of Electronic Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
| | - Y Wang
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - Y F Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z Wang
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - Z M Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - P B Weatherly
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - H Y Wei
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - L H Wei
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L J Wen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - C White
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - J Wilhelmi
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - H L H Wong
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - A Woolverton
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario
| | - E Worcester
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - D R Wu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - F L Wu
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - Q Wu
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - W J Wu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - D M Xia
- Chongqing University, Chongqing
| | - Z Q Xie
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z Z Xing
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - H K Xu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J L Xu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - T Xu
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - T Xue
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - C G Yang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Yang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - Y Z Yang
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - H F Yao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M Ye
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M Yeh
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - B L Young
- Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
| | - H Z Yu
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - Z Y Yu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - B B Yue
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - V Zavadskyi
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - S Zeng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y Zeng
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - L Zhan
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - C Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
| | - F Y Zhang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai
| | - H H Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - J W Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Q M Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an
| | - S Q Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - X Zhang
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
| | - X T Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y M Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - Y X Zhang
- China General Nuclear Power Group, Shenzhen
| | - Y Y Zhang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai
| | - Z J Zhang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - Z P Zhang
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - Z Y Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - R Z Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Zhou
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - H L Zhuang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J H Zou
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Almazán H, Andriamirado M, Balantekin AB, Band HR, Bass CD, Bergeron DE, Bernard L, Blanchet A, Bonhomme A, Bowden NS, Bryan CD, Buck C, Classen T, Conant AJ, Deichert G, Del Amo Sanchez P, Delgado A, Diwan MV, Dolinski MJ, El Atmani I, Erickson A, Foust BT, Gaison JK, Galindo-Uribarri A, Gilbert CE, Hans S, Hansell AB, Heeger KM, Heffron B, Jaffe DE, Jayakumar S, Ji X, Jones DC, Koblanski J, Kyzylova O, Labit L, Lamblin J, Lane CE, Langford TJ, LaRosa J, Letourneau A, Lhuillier D, Licciardi M, Lindner M, Littlejohn BR, Lu X, Maricic J, Materna T, Mendenhall MP, Meyer AM, Milincic R, Mueller PE, Mumm HP, Napolitano J, Neilson R, Nikkel JA, Nour S, Palomino JL, Pessard H, Pushin DA, Qian X, Réal JS, Ricol JS, Roca C, Rogly R, Rosero R, Salagnac T, Savu V, Schoppmann S, Searles M, Sergeyeva V, Soldner T, Stutz A, Surukuchi PT, Tyra MA, Varner RL, Venegas-Vargas D, Vialat M, Weatherly PB, White C, Wilhelmi J, Woolverton A, Yeh M, Zhang C, Zhang X. Joint Measurement of the ^{235}U Antineutrino Spectrum by PROSPECT and STEREO. Phys Rev Lett 2022; 128:081802. [PMID: 35275665 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.081802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The PROSPECT and STEREO collaborations present a combined measurement of the pure ^{235}U antineutrino spectrum, without site specific corrections or detector-dependent effects. The spectral measurements of the two highest precision experiments at research reactors are found to be compatible with χ^{2}/ndf=24.1/21, allowing a joint unfolding of the prompt energy measurements into antineutrino energy. This ν[over ¯]_{e} energy spectrum is provided to the community, and an excess of events relative to the Huber model is found in the 5-6 MeV region. When a Gaussian bump is fitted to the excess, the data-model χ^{2} value is improved, corresponding to a 2.4σ significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Almazán
- Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Andriamirado
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - A B Balantekin
- Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - H R Band
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - C D Bass
- Department of Physics, Le Moyne College, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - D E Bergeron
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - L Bernard
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - A Blanchet
- IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - A Bonhomme
- Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
- IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - N S Bowden
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
| | - C D Bryan
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - C Buck
- Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Classen
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
| | - A J Conant
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - G Deichert
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - A Delgado
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - M V Diwan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - M J Dolinski
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - I El Atmani
- IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - A Erickson
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia USA
| | - B T Foust
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - J K Gaison
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - A Galindo-Uribarri
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - C E Gilbert
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - S Hans
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - A B Hansell
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - K M Heeger
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - B Heffron
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - D E Jaffe
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - S Jayakumar
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - X Ji
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - D C Jones
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - J Koblanski
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - O Kyzylova
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - L Labit
- Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LAPP-IN2P3, 74000 Annecy, France
| | - J Lamblin
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - C E Lane
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - T J Langford
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - J LaRosa
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - A Letourneau
- IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - D Lhuillier
- IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - M Licciardi
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - M Lindner
- Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B R Littlejohn
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - X Lu
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - J Maricic
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - T Materna
- IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - M P Mendenhall
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
| | - A M Meyer
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - R Milincic
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - P E Mueller
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - H P Mumm
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - J Napolitano
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - R Neilson
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - J A Nikkel
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - S Nour
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - J L Palomino
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - H Pessard
- Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LAPP-IN2P3, 74000 Annecy, France
| | - D A Pushin
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - X Qian
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - J-S Réal
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - J-S Ricol
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - C Roca
- Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Rogly
- IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - R Rosero
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - T Salagnac
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - V Savu
- IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - S Schoppmann
- Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Searles
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - V Sergeyeva
- Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LAPP-IN2P3, 74000 Annecy, France
| | - T Soldner
- Institut Laue-Langevin, CS 20156, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
| | - A Stutz
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - P T Surukuchi
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - M A Tyra
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - R L Varner
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - D Venegas-Vargas
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - M Vialat
- Institut Laue-Langevin, CS 20156, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
| | - P B Weatherly
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - C White
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - J Wilhelmi
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - A Woolverton
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Yeh
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - C Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - X Zhang
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balantekin AB, Band HR, Bass CD, Bergeron DE, Berish D, Bowden NS, Brodsky JP, Bryan CD, Classen T, Conant AJ, Deichert G, Diwan MV, Dolinski MJ, Erickson A, Foust BT, Gaison JK, Galindo-Uribarri A, Gilbert CE, Hackett BT, Hans S, Hansell AB, Heeger KM, Heffron B, Jaffe DE, Ji X, Jones DC, Kyzylova O, Lane CE, Langford TJ, LaRosa J, Littlejohn BR, Lu X, Maricic J, Mendenhall MP, Milincic R, Mitchell I, Mueller PE, Mumm HP, Napolitano J, Neilson R, Nikkel JA, Norcini D, Nour S, Palomino-Gallo JL, Pushin DA, Qian X, Romero-Romero E, Rosero R, Surukuchi PT, Tyra MA, Varner RL, White C, Wilhelmi J, Woolverton A, Yeh M, Zhang A, Zhang C, Zhang X. Nonfuel Antineutrino Contributions in the High Flux Isotope Reactor. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 101. [PMID: 33336123 DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.101.054605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Reactor neutrino experiments have seen major improvements in precision in recent years. With the experimental uncertainties becoming lower than those from theory, carefully considering all sources of ν ¯ e is important when making theoretical predictions. One source of ν ¯ e that is often neglected arises from the irradiation of the nonfuel materials in reactors. The ν ¯ e rates and energies from these sources vary widely based on the reactor type, configuration, and sampling stage during the reactor cycle and have to be carefully considered for each experiment independently. In this article, we present a formalism for selecting the possible ν ¯ e sources arising from the neutron captures on reactor and target materials. We apply this formalism to the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the ν ¯ e source for the the Precision Reactor Oscillation and Spectrum Measurement (PROSPECT) experiment. Overall, we observe that the nonfuel ν ¯ e contributions from HFIR to PROSPECT amount to 1% above the inverse beta decay threshold with a maximum contribution of 9% in the 1.8-2.0 MeV range. Nonfuel contributions can be particularly high for research reactors like HFIR because of the choice of structural and reflector material in addition to the intentional irradiation of target material for isotope production. We show that typical commercial pressurized water reactors fueled with low-enriched uranium will have significantly smaller nonfuel ν ¯ e contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A B Balantekin
- Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - H R Band
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - C D Bass
- Department of Physics, Le Moyne College, Syracuse, NY 13214, USA
| | - D E Bergeron
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA
| | - D Berish
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - N S Bowden
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
| | - J P Brodsky
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
| | - C D Bryan
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
| | - T Classen
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
| | - A J Conant
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.,High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
| | - G Deichert
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
| | - M V Diwan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - M J Dolinski
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - A Erickson
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
| | - B T Foust
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - J K Gaison
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - A Galindo-Uribarri
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - C E Gilbert
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - B T Hackett
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - S Hans
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - A B Hansell
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - K M Heeger
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - B Heffron
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - D E Jaffe
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - X Ji
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - D C Jones
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - O Kyzylova
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - C E Lane
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - T J Langford
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - J LaRosa
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA
| | - B R Littlejohn
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, USA
| | - X Lu
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - J Maricic
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HA 96822, USA
| | - M P Mendenhall
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
| | - R Milincic
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HA 96822, USA
| | - I Mitchell
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HA 96822, USA
| | - P E Mueller
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
| | - H P Mumm
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA
| | - J Napolitano
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - R Neilson
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - J A Nikkel
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - D Norcini
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - S Nour
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA
| | - J L Palomino-Gallo
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, USA
| | - D A Pushin
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - X Qian
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - E Romero-Romero
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA.,Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - R Rosero
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - P T Surukuchi
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - M A Tyra
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA
| | - R L Varner
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
| | - C White
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, USA
| | - J Wilhelmi
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - A Woolverton
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - M Yeh
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - A Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - C Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - X Zhang
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mekel O, Martin-Olmedo P, Classen T. Opportunities and strategies for HIA implementation – from a public health perspective. Eur J Public Health 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.1373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Health Impact Assessment (HIA) has various origins: environmental health, health promotion with the perspective of the wider determinants of health, and health equity. These three individual but related areas are linked by the overall aim of promoting healthier programmes, policies and projects, which are developed in non-health sectors mostly. As a consequence, this led to a significant use of HIA worldwide. The areas are complementary, but given their different original frameworks, applied methodologies may differ. Another typology of characterizing HIA can be done by the purpose for which HIA has been conducted in practice: mandated, decision support, advocacy and community-led HIA. These forms are important with regard to HIA implementation strategies. By now, the consideration of health in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has become an established feature, not least due to the mandatory legal basis in many countries of the world. However, this situation is different for application in other policy areas so far. Some countries, in the absence of specific HIA legislation, have established HIA support units to conduct, commission, support HIA and deliver training. Advocacy and community-led HIA are mainly carried out by non-governmental organisations and universities. However, in general the potential of HIA has not yet been fully recognised: HIA is seen as a time-consuming and costly process and the effectiveness of HIA has not yet been communicated convincingly. The Health in All Policies approach is becoming increasingly important in the policy arena as a strategy to reduce non-communicable diseases by policies from non-health sectors. This requires different public health methods for implementation. HIA is particularly suitable for this. This development offers new opportunities for the implementation of HIA, which will be presented in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Mekel
- EUPHA-HIA
- NRW Centre for Health, NRW, Bochum, Germany
| | - P Martin-Olmedo
- EUPHA-HIA
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Publica, EASP, Granada, Spain
| | - T Classen
- NRW Centre for Health, NRW, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ashenfelter J, Balantekin AB, Band HR, Bass CD, Bergeron DE, Berish D, Bowden NS, Brodsky JP, Bryan CD, Cherwinka JJ, Classen T, Conant AJ, Cox AA, Davee D, Dean D, Deichert G, Diwan MV, Dolinski MJ, Erickson A, Febbraro M, Foust BT, Gaison JK, Galindo-Uribarri A, Gilbert CE, Gilje KE, Hackett BT, Hans S, Hansell AB, Heeger KM, Insler J, Jaffe DE, Ji X, Jones DC, Kyzylova O, Lane CE, Langford TJ, LaRosa J, Littlejohn BR, Lu X, Martinez Caicedo DA, Matta JT, McKeown RD, Mendenhall MP, Minock JM, Mueller PE, Mumm HP, Napolitano J, Neilson R, Nikkel JA, Norcini D, Nour S, Pushin DA, Qian X, Romero-Romero E, Rosero R, Sarenac D, Surukuchi PT, Telles AB, Tyra MA, Varner RL, Viren B, White C, Wilhelmi J, Wise T, Yeh M, Yen YR, Zhang A, Zhang C, Zhang X. Measurement of the Antineutrino Spectrum from ^{235}U Fission at HFIR with PROSPECT. Phys Rev Lett 2019; 122:251801. [PMID: 31347897 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.122.251801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This Letter reports the first measurement of the ^{235}U ν[over ¯]_{e} energy spectrum by PROSPECT, the Precision Reactor Oscillation and Spectrum experiment, operating 7.9 m from the 85 MW_{th} highly enriched uranium (HEU) High Flux Isotope Reactor. With a surface-based, segmented detector, PROSPECT has observed 31678±304(stat) ν[over ¯]_{e}-induced inverse beta decays, the largest sample from HEU fission to date, 99% of which are attributed to ^{235}U. Despite broad agreement, comparison of the Huber ^{235}U model to the measured spectrum produces a χ^{2}/ndf=51.4/31, driven primarily by deviations in two localized energy regions. The measured ^{235}U spectrum shape is consistent with a deviation relative to prediction equal in size to that observed at low-enriched uranium power reactors in the ν[over ¯]_{e} energy region of 5-7 MeV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ashenfelter
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - A B Balantekin
- Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - H R Band
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - C D Bass
- Department of Physics, Le Moyne College, Syracuse, New York 13214, USA
| | - D E Bergeron
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - D Berish
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - N S Bowden
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - J P Brodsky
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - C D Bryan
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - J J Cherwinka
- Physical Sciences Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - T Classen
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - A J Conant
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
| | - A A Cox
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - D Davee
- Department of Physics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - D Dean
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - G Deichert
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - M V Diwan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - M J Dolinski
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - A Erickson
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
| | - M Febbraro
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - B T Foust
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - J K Gaison
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - A Galindo-Uribarri
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, USA
| | - C E Gilbert
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, USA
| | - K E Gilje
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - B T Hackett
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, USA
| | - S Hans
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - A B Hansell
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - K M Heeger
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - J Insler
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - D E Jaffe
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - X Ji
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - D C Jones
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - O Kyzylova
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - C E Lane
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - T J Langford
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - J LaRosa
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - B R Littlejohn
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - X Lu
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, USA
| | - D A Martinez Caicedo
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - J T Matta
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - R D McKeown
- Department of Physics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - M P Mendenhall
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - J M Minock
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - P E Mueller
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - H P Mumm
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - J Napolitano
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - R Neilson
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - J A Nikkel
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - D Norcini
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - S Nour
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - D A Pushin
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - X Qian
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - E Romero-Romero
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, USA
| | - R Rosero
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - D Sarenac
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - P T Surukuchi
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - A B Telles
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - M A Tyra
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - R L Varner
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - B Viren
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - C White
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - J Wilhelmi
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - T Wise
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - M Yeh
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - Y-R Yen
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - A Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - C Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - X Zhang
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ashenfelter J, Balantekin AB, Baldenegro C, Band HR, Bass CD, Bergeron DE, Berish D, Bignell LJ, Bowden NS, Bricco J, Brodsky JP, Bryan CD, Bykadorova Telles A, Cherwinka JJ, Classen T, Commeford K, Conant AJ, Cox AA, Davee D, Dean D, Deichert G, Diwan MV, Dolinski MJ, Erickson A, Febbraro M, Foust BT, Gaison JK, Galindo-Uribarri A, Gilbert CE, Gilje KE, Glenn A, Goddard BW, Hackett BT, Han K, Hans S, Hansell AB, Heeger KM, Heffron B, Insler J, Jaffe DE, Ji X, Jones DC, Koehler K, Kyzylova O, Lane CE, Langford TJ, LaRosa J, Littlejohn BR, Lopez F, Lu X, Martinez Caicedo DA, Matta JT, McKeown RD, Mendenhall MP, Miller HJ, Minock JM, Mueller PE, Mumm HP, Napolitano J, Neilson R, Nikkel JA, Norcini D, Nour S, Pushin DA, Qian X, Romero-Romero E, Rosero R, Sarenac D, Seilhan BS, Sharma R, Surukuchi PT, Trinh C, Tyra MA, Varner RL, Viren B, Wagner JM, Wang W, White B, White C, Wilhelmi J, Wise T, Yao H, Yeh M, Yen YR, Zhang A, Zhang C, Zhang X, Zhao M. First Search for Short-Baseline Neutrino Oscillations at HFIR with PROSPECT. Phys Rev Lett 2018; 121:251802. [PMID: 30608854 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.251802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
This Letter reports the first scientific results from the observation of antineutrinos emitted by fission products of ^{235}U at the High Flux Isotope Reactor. PROSPECT, the Precision Reactor Oscillation and Spectrum Experiment, consists of a segmented 4 ton ^{6}Li-doped liquid scintillator detector covering a baseline range of 7-9 m from the reactor and operating under less than 1 m water equivalent overburden. Data collected during 33 live days of reactor operation at a nominal power of 85 MW yield a detection of 25 461±283 (stat) inverse beta decays. Observation of reactor antineutrinos can be achieved in PROSPECT at 5σ statistical significance within 2 h of on-surface reactor-on data taking. A reactor model independent analysis of the inverse beta decay prompt energy spectrum as a function of baseline constrains significant portions of the previously allowed sterile neutrino oscillation parameter space at 95% confidence level and disfavors the best fit of the reactor antineutrino anomaly at 2.2σ confidence level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ashenfelter
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - A B Balantekin
- Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - C Baldenegro
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
| | - H R Band
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - C D Bass
- Department of Physics, Le Moyne College, Syracuse, New York 13214, USA
| | - D E Bergeron
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - D Berish
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - L J Bignell
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - N S Bowden
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - J Bricco
- Physical Sciences Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - J P Brodsky
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - C D Bryan
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
| | - A Bykadorova Telles
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - J J Cherwinka
- Physical Sciences Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - T Classen
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - K Commeford
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - A J Conant
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
| | - A A Cox
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - D Davee
- Department of Physics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185, USA
| | - D Dean
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
| | - G Deichert
- High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
| | - M V Diwan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - M J Dolinski
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - A Erickson
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
| | - M Febbraro
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
| | - B T Foust
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - J K Gaison
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - A Galindo-Uribarri
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - C E Gilbert
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - K E Gilje
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - A Glenn
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - B W Goddard
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - B T Hackett
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - K Han
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - S Hans
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - A B Hansell
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - K M Heeger
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - B Heffron
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - J Insler
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - D E Jaffe
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - X Ji
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - D C Jones
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - K Koehler
- Physical Sciences Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - O Kyzylova
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - C E Lane
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - T J Langford
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - J LaRosa
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - B R Littlejohn
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - F Lopez
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - X Lu
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - D A Martinez Caicedo
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - J T Matta
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
| | - R D McKeown
- Department of Physics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185, USA
| | - M P Mendenhall
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - H J Miller
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - J M Minock
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - P E Mueller
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
| | - H P Mumm
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - J Napolitano
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - R Neilson
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - J A Nikkel
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - D Norcini
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - S Nour
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - D A Pushin
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - X Qian
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - E Romero-Romero
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - R Rosero
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - D Sarenac
- Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - B S Seilhan
- Nuclear and Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - R Sharma
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - P T Surukuchi
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - C Trinh
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - M A Tyra
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
| | - R L Varner
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
| | - B Viren
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - J M Wagner
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - W Wang
- Department of Physics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185, USA
| | - B White
- Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
| | - C White
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - J Wilhelmi
- Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - T Wise
- Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - H Yao
- Department of Physics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185, USA
| | - M Yeh
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - Y-R Yen
- Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - A Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - C Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - X Zhang
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - M Zhao
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- T Classen
- NRW Centre for Health, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Myasoedova NM, Renfeld ZV, Podieiablonskaia EV, Samoilova AS, Chernykh AM, Classen T, Pietruszka J, Kolomytseva MP, Golovleva LA. Novel laccase—producing ascomycetes. Microbiology (Reading) 2017. [DOI: 10.1134/s0026261717030110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
10
|
Podieiablonskaia EV, Kolomytseva MP, Myasoedova NM, Baskunov BP, Chernykh AM, Classen T, Pietruszka J, Golovleva LA. Myrothecium verrucaria F-3851, a producer of laccases transforming phenolic compounds at neutral and alkaline conditions. Microbiology (Reading) 2017. [DOI: 10.1134/s0026261717030146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
11
|
Tran TN, Warwas S, Haversath M, Classen T, Hohn HP, Jäger M, Kowalczyk W, Landgraeber S. Experimental and computational studies on the femoral fracture risk for advanced core decompression. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2014; 29:412-7. [PMID: 24629519 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2013] [Revised: 01/19/2014] [Accepted: 02/07/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two questions are often addressed by orthopedists relating to core decompression procedure: 1) Is the core decompression procedure associated with a considerable lack of structural support of the bone? and 2) Is there an optimal region for the surgical entrance point for which the fracture risk would be lowest? As bioresorbable bone substitutes become more and more common and core decompression has been described in combination with them, the current study takes this into account. METHODS Finite element model of a femur treated by core decompression with bone substitute was simulated and analyzed. In-vitro compression testing of femora was used to confirm finite element results. FINDINGS The results showed that for core decompression with standard drilling in combination with artificial bone substitute refilling, daily activities (normal walking and walking downstairs) are not risky for femoral fracture. The femoral fracture risk increased successively when the entrance point is located further distal. The critical value of the deviation of the entrance point to a more distal part is about 20mm. INTERPRETATION The study findings demonstrate that optimal entrance point should locate on the proximal subtrochanteric region in order to reduce the subtrochanteric fracture risk. Furthermore the consistent results of finite element and in-vitro testing imply that the simulations are sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T N Tran
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; Chair of Mechanics and Robotics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstr. 1, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
| | - S Warwas
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - M Haversath
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - T Classen
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - H P Hohn
- Department of Anatomy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - M Jäger
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - W Kowalczyk
- Chair of Mechanics and Robotics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstr. 1, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
| | - S Landgraeber
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abe Y, Aberle C, dos Anjos JC, Barriere JC, Bergevin M, Bernstein A, Bezerra TJC, Bezrukhov L, Blucher E, Bowden NS, Buck C, Busenitz J, Cabrera A, Caden E, Camilleri L, Carr R, Cerrada M, Chang PJ, Chimenti P, Classen T, Collin AP, Conover E, Conrad JM, Crespo-Anadón JI, Crum K, Cucoanes A, D’Agostino MV, Damon E, Dawson JV, Dazeley S, Dietrich D, Djurcic Z, Dracos M, Durand V, Ebert J, Efremenko Y, Elnimr M, Erickson A, Etenko A, Fallot M, Fechner M, von Feilitzsch F, Felde J, Fernandes SM, Fischer V, Franco D, Franke AJ, Franke M, Furuta H, Gama R, Gil-Botella I, Giot L, Göger-Neff M, Gonzalez LFG, Goodenough L, Goodman MC, Goon JTM, Greiner D, Haag N, Habib S, Hagner C, Hara T, Hartmann FX, Haser J, Hatzikoutelis A, Hayakawa T, Hofmann M, Horton-Smith GA, Hourlier A, Ishitsuka M, Jochum J, Jollet C, Jones CL, Kaether F, Kalousis LN, Kamyshkov Y, Kaplan DM, Kawasaki T, Keefer G, Kemp E, de Kerret H, Kibe Y, Konno T, Kryn D, Kuze M, Lachenmaier T, Lane CE, Langbrandtner C, Lasserre T, Letourneau A, Lhuillier D, Lima HP, Lindner M, López-Castaño JM, LoSecco JM, Lubsandorzhiev BK, Lucht S, McKee D, Maeda J, Maesano CN, Mariani C, Maricic J, Martino J, Matsubara T, Mention G, Meregaglia A, Meyer M, Miletic T, Milincic R, Miyata H, Mueller TA, Nagasaka Y, Nakajima K, Novella P, Obolensky M, Oberauer L, Onillon A, Osborn A, Ostrovskiy I, Palomares C, Pepe IM, Perasso S, Perrin P, Pfahler P, Porta A, Potzel W, Pronost G, Reichenbacher J, Reinhold B, Remoto A, Röhling M, Roncin R, Roth S, Rybolt B, Sakamoto Y, Santorelli R, Sato F, Schönert S, Schoppmann S, Schwetz T, Shaevitz MH, Shimojima S, Shrestha D, Sida JL, Sinev V, Skorokhvatov M, Smith E, Spitz J, Stahl A, Stancu I, Stokes LFF, Strait M, Stüken A, Suekane F, Sukhotin S, Sumiyoshi T, Sun Y, Svoboda R, Terao K, Tonazzo A, Toups M, Trinh Thi HH, Valdiviesso G, Veyssiere C, Wagner S, Watanabe H, White B, Wiebusch C, Winslow L, Worcester M, Wurm M, Yermia F, Zimmer V. Direct measurement of backgrounds using reactor-off data in Double Chooz. Int J Clin Exp Med 2013. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.87.011102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
13
|
Abe Y, Aberle C, Akiri T, dos Anjos JC, Ardellier F, Barbosa AF, Baxter A, Bergevin M, Bernstein A, Bezerra TJC, Bezrukhov L, Blucher E, Bongrand M, Bowden NS, Buck C, Busenitz J, Cabrera A, Caden E, Camilleri L, Carr R, Cerrada M, Chang PJ, Chimenti P, Classen T, Collin AP, Conover E, Conrad JM, Cormon S, Crespo-Anadón JI, Cribier M, Crum K, Cucoanes A, D'Agostino MV, Damon E, Dawson JV, Dazeley S, Dierckxsens M, Dietrich D, Djurcic Z, Dracos M, Durand V, Efremenko Y, Elnimr M, Endo Y, Etenko A, Falk E, Fallot M, Fechner M, von Feilitzsch F, Felde J, Fernandes SM, Franco D, Franke AJ, Franke M, Furuta H, Gama R, Gil-Botella I, Giot L, Göger-Neff M, Gonzalez LFG, Goodman MC, Goon JTM, Greiner D, Guillon B, Haag N, Hagner C, Hara T, Hartmann FX, Hartnell J, Haruna T, Haser J, Hatzikoutelis A, Hayakawa T, Hofmann M, Horton-Smith GA, Ishitsuka M, Jochum J, Jollet C, Jones CL, Kaether F, Kalousis L, Kamyshkov Y, Kaplan DM, Kawasaki T, Keefer G, Kemp E, de Kerret H, Kibe Y, Konno T, Kryn D, Kuze M, Lachenmaier T, Lane CE, Langbrandtner C, Lasserre T, Letourneau A, Lhuillier D, Lima HP, Lindner M, Liu Y, López-Castanõ JM, LoSecco JM, Lubsandorzhiev BK, Lucht S, McKee D, Maeda J, Maesano CN, Mariani C, Maricic J, Martino J, Matsubara T, Mention G, Meregaglia A, Miletic T, Milincic R, Milzstajn A, Miyata H, Motta D, Mueller TA, Nagasaka Y, Nakajima K, Novella P, Obolensky M, Oberauer L, Onillon A, Osborn A, Ostrovskiy I, Palomares C, Peeters SJM, Pepe IM, Perasso S, Perrin P, Pfahler P, Porta A, Potzel W, Queval R, Reichenbacher J, Reinhold B, Remoto A, Reyna D, Röhling M, Roth S, Rubin HA, Sakamoto Y, Santorelli R, Sato F, Schönert S, Schoppmann S, Schwan U, Schwetz T, Shaevitz MH, Shrestha D, Sida JL, Sinev V, Skorokhvatov M, Smith E, Spitz J, Stahl A, Stancu I, Strait M, Stüken A, Suekane F, Sukhotin S, Sumiyoshi T, Sun Y, Sun Z, Svoboda R, Tabata H, Tamura N, Terao K, Tonazzo A, Toups M, Trinh Thi HH, Veyssiere C, Wagner S, Watanabe H, White B, Wiebusch C, Winslow L, Worcester M, Wurm M, Yanovitch E, Yermia F, Zbiri K, Zimmer V. Indication of reactor ν(e) disappearance in the Double Chooz experiment. Phys Rev Lett 2012; 108:131801. [PMID: 22540693 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.108.131801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2012] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The Double Chooz experiment presents an indication of reactor electron antineutrino disappearance consistent with neutrino oscillations. An observed-to-predicted ratio of events of 0.944±0.016(stat)±0.040(syst) was obtained in 101 days of running at the Chooz nuclear power plant in France, with two 4.25 GW(th) reactors. The results were obtained from a single 10 m(3) fiducial volume detector located 1050 m from the two reactor cores. The reactor antineutrino flux prediction used the Bugey4 flux measurement after correction for differences in core composition. The deficit can be interpreted as an indication of a nonzero value of the still unmeasured neutrino mixing parameter sin(2)2θ(13). Analyzing both the rate of the prompt positrons and their energy spectrum, we find sin(2)2θ(13)=0.086±0.041(stat)±0.030(syst), or, at 90% C.L., 0.017<sin(2)2θ(13)<0.16.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Abe
- Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, 152-8551, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Classen T, Wegner A, von Knoch M. [Modification of the Blackburne-Peel ratio for improved application in total knee arthroplasty]. Orthopade 2010; 38:1229-34. [PMID: 19685035 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1510-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The methods currently used to measure patella height in relation to the tibiofemoral joint line after total knee arthroplasty are not easily reproducible. For this reason we modified the Blackburne-Peel ratio. MATERIALS AND METHODS Instead of taking the tibial joint line as the reference line, we constructed a tangent on the femoral condyle. In addition, we took the greatest diameter of the patella from the tip of the patella as a measuring line. RESULTS Compared with the classic Blackburne-Peel and Caton-Deschamps ratios, it was much easier to determine the patella height in osteoarthritic knees and after total knee replacement using this modified Blackburne-Peel ratio. Factors such as the height of the polyethylene inlay, the slope of the tibial component, and superimposition of the patellar joint line can be disregarded. Preoperative and postoperative reference lines can be compared readily. Furthermore, the classic Blackburne-Peel ratio shows a greater tendency to interpret the measurements after total knee arthroplasty as pseudo-patella baja. The interobserver variability was good for all ratios. CONCLUSION We can therefore recommend the modified Blackburne-Peel ratio for measuring patella height in relation to the tibiofemoral joint line after total knee arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Classen
- Klinik für Orthopädie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Classen T, Wegner A, Müller RD, von Knoch M. [Accuracy of rotational positioning of the femoral component using the tibial-cut-first technique]. Z Orthop Unfall 2010; 149:626-9. [PMID: 20135610 DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1240587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM Problems with the patellofemoral joint are still one of the most common difficulties after total knee arthroplasty. One of the main reasons for these problems seems to be the rotatory malposition of the femoral component. We examined the rotation of the femoral component and the symmetry of the flexion gap of knee prostheses implanted using the tibial-cut-first technique. METHOD The radiographs of 58 consecutive patients who underwent primary LCS total knee arthroplasty in 2008 were examined retrospectively. The rotation of the femoral component was determined intraoperatively using the femoral positioner and depended on the amount of tibial resection and the tension of the collateral ligaments. The position was then checked by means of three anatomic landmarks: the epicondylar axis, the posterior condyles and the Whiteside line. We used Kanekasu's technique for the radiographs. With this technique it was possible to ascertain the rotation of the femoral component after total knee arthroplasty easily and with a low level of radiation. It was also possible to determine the opening of the flexion gap. RESULTS The radiographs showed a slight external rotation of the femoral component of 1.31°. The opening of the flexion gap was increased laterally, but only by 1.5°. CONCLUSION In this study, determination of femoral rotation using the tibial-cut-first technique resulted in a slight external rotation of the femoral component. Furthermore, it is possible to create an almost symmetrical flexion gap with this method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Classen
- Abteilung für Orthopädie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Pattbergstrasse 1-3, Duisberg, Essen.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abe S, Ebihara T, Enomoto S, Furuno K, Gando Y, Ichimura K, Ikeda H, Inoue K, Kibe Y, Kishimoto Y, Koga M, Kozlov A, Minekawa Y, Mitsui T, Nakajima K, Nakajima K, Nakamura K, Nakamura M, Owada K, Shimizu I, Shimizu Y, Shirai J, Suekane F, Suzuki A, Takemoto Y, Tamae K, Terashima A, Watanabe H, Yonezawa E, Yoshida S, Busenitz J, Classen T, Grant C, Keefer G, Leonard DS, McKee D, Piepke A, Decowski MP, Detwiler JA, Freedman SJ, Fujikawa BK, Gray F, Guardincerri E, Hsu L, Kadel R, Lendvai C, Luk KB, Murayama H, O'Donnell T, Steiner HM, Winslow LA, Dwyer DA, Jillings C, Mauger C, McKeown RD, Vogel P, Zhang C, Berger BE, Lane CE, Maricic J, Miletic T, Batygov M, Learned JG, Matsuno S, Pakvasa S, Foster J, Horton-Smith GA, Tang A, Dazeley S, Downum KE, Gratta G, Tolich K, Bugg W, Efremenko Y, Kamyshkov Y, Perevozchikov O, Karwowski HJ, Markoff DM, Tornow W, Heeger KM, Piquemal F, Ricol JS. Precision measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters with KamLAND. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100:221803. [PMID: 18643415 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.221803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2008] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The KamLAND experiment has determined a precise value for the neutrino oscillation parameter Deltam21(2) and stringent constraints on theta12. The exposure to nuclear reactor antineutrinos is increased almost fourfold over previous results to 2.44 x 10(32) proton yr due to longer livetime and an enlarged fiducial volume. An undistorted reactor nu[over]e energy spectrum is now rejected at >5sigma. Analysis of the reactor spectrum above the inverse beta decay energy threshold, and including geoneutrinos, gives a best fit at Deltam21(2)=7.58(-0.13)(+0.14)(stat) -0.15+0.15(syst) x 10(-5) eV2 and tan2theta12=0.56(-0.07)+0.10(stat) -0.06+0.10(syst). Local Deltachi2 minima at higher and lower Deltam21(2) are disfavored at >4sigma. Combining with solar neutrino data, we obtain Deltam21(2)=7.59(-0.21)+0.21 x 10(-5) eV2 and tan2theta12=0.47(-0.05)+0.06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Abe
- Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Araki T, Enomoto S, Furuno K, Gando Y, Ichimura K, Ikeda H, Inoue K, Kishimoto Y, Koga M, Koseki Y, Maeda T, Mitsui T, Motoki M, Nakajima K, Nakamura K, Ogawa H, Ogawa M, Owada K, Ricol JS, Shimizu I, Shirai J, Suekane F, Suzuki A, Tada K, Takeuchi S, Tamae K, Tsuda Y, Watanabe H, Busenitz J, Classen T, Djurcic Z, Keefer G, Leonard DS, Piepke A, Yakushev E, Berger BE, Chan YD, Decowski MP, Dwyer DA, Freedman SJ, Fujikawa BK, Goldman J, Gray F, Heeger KM, Hsu L, Lesko KT, Luk KB, Murayama H, O'Donnell T, Poon AWP, Steiner HM, Winslow LA, Jillings C, Mauger C, McKeown RD, Vogel P, Zhang C, Lane CE, Miletic T, Guillian G, Learned JG, Maricic J, Matsuno S, Pakvasa S, Horton-Smith GA, Dazeley S, Hatakeyama S, Rojas A, Svoboda R, Dieterle BD, Detwiler J, Gratta G, Ishii K, Tolich N, Uchida Y, Batygov M, Bugg W, Efremenko Y, Kamyshkov Y, Kozlov A, Nakamura Y, Karwowski HJ, Markoff DM, Rohm RM, Tornow W, Wendell R, Chen MJ, Wang YF, Piquemal F. Search for the invisible decay of neutrons with KamLAND. Phys Rev Lett 2006; 96:101802. [PMID: 16605724 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.96.101802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2005] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
The Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector is used in a search for single neutron or two-neutron intranuclear disappearance that would produce holes in the -shell energy level of (12)C nuclei. Such holes could be created as a result of nucleon decay into invisible modes (inv), e.g., n--> 3v or nn--> 2v. The deexcitation of the corresponding daughter nucleus results in a sequence of space and time-correlated events observable in the liquid scintillator detector. We report on new limits for one- and two-neutron disappearance: tau(n--> inv) > 5.8 x 10(29) years and tau (nn--> inv) > 1.4 x 10(30) years at 90% C.L. These results represent an improvement of factors of approximately 3 and >10(4) and over previous experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Araki
- Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Araki T, Enomoto S, Furuno K, Gando Y, Ichimura K, Ikeda H, Inoue K, Kishimoto Y, Koga M, Koseki Y, Maeda T, Mitsui T, Motoki M, Nakajima K, Ogawa H, Ogawa M, Owada K, Ricol JS, Shimizu I, Shirai J, Suekane F, Suzuki A, Tada K, Takeuchi S, Tamae K, Tsuda Y, Watanabe H, Busenitz J, Classen T, Djurcic Z, Keefer G, Leonard D, Piepke A, Yakushev E, Berger BE, Chan YD, Decowski MP, Dwyer DA, Freedman SJ, Fujikawa BK, Goldman J, Gray F, Heeger KM, Hsu L, Lesko KT, Luk KB, Murayama H, O'Donnell T, Poon AWP, Steiner HM, Winslow LA, Mauger C, McKeown RD, Vogel P, Lane CE, Miletic T, Guillian G, Learned JG, Maricic J, Matsuno S, Pakvasa S, Horton-Smith GA, Dazeley S, Hatakeyama S, Rojas A, Svoboda R, Dieterle BD, Detwiler J, Gratta G, Ishii K, Tolich N, Uchida Y, Batygov M, Bugg W, Efremenko Y, Kamyshkov Y, Kozlov A, Nakamura Y, Karwowski HJ, Markoff DM, Nakamura K, Rohm RM, Tornow W, Wendell R, Chen MJ, Wang YF, Piquemal F. Experimental investigation of geologically produced antineutrinos with KamLAND. Nature 2005; 436:499-503. [PMID: 16049478 DOI: 10.1038/nature03980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 296] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2005] [Accepted: 07/04/2005] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The detection of electron antineutrinos produced by natural radioactivity in the Earth could yield important geophysical information. The Kamioka liquid scintillator antineutrino detector (KamLAND) has the sensitivity to detect electron antineutrinos produced by the decay of 238U and 232Th within the Earth. Earth composition models suggest that the radiogenic power from these isotope decays is 16 TW, approximately half of the total measured heat dissipation rate from the Earth. Here we present results from a search for geoneutrinos with KamLAND. Assuming a Th/U mass concentration ratio of 3.9, the 90 per cent confidence interval for the total number of geoneutrinos detected is 4.5 to 54.2. This result is consistent with the central value of 19 predicted by geophysical models. Although our present data have limited statistical power, they nevertheless provide by direct means an upper limit (60 TW) for the radiogenic power of U and Th in the Earth, a quantity that is currently poorly constrained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Araki
- Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Araki T, Eguchi K, Enomoto S, Furuno K, Ichimura K, Ikeda H, Inoue K, Ishihara K, Iwamoto T, Kawashima T, Kishimoto Y, Koga M, Koseki Y, Maeda T, Mitsui T, Motoki M, Nakajima K, Ogawa H, Owada K, Ricol JS, Shimizu I, Shirai J, Suekane F, Suzuki A, Tada K, Tajima O, Tamae K, Tsuda Y, Watanabe H, Busenitz J, Classen T, Djurcic Z, Keefer G, McKinny K, Mei DM, Piepke A, Yakushev E, Berger BE, Chan YD, Decowski MP, Dwyer DA, Freedman SJ, Fu Y, Fujikawa BK, Goldman J, Gray F, Heeger KM, Lesko KT, Luk KB, Murayama H, Poon AWP, Steiner HM, Winslow LA, Horton-Smith GA, Mauger C, McKeown RD, Vogel P, Lane CE, Miletic T, Gorham PW, Guillian G, Learned JG, Maricic J, Matsuno S, Pakvasa S, Dazeley S, Hatakeyama S, Rojas A, Svoboda R, Dieterle BD, Detwiler J, Gratta G, Ishii K, Tolich N, Uchida Y, Batygov M, Bugg W, Efremenko Y, Kamyshkov Y, Kozlov A, Nakamura Y, Gould CR, Karwowski HJ, Markoff DM, Messimore JA, Nakamura K, Rohm RM, Tornow W, Wendell R, Young AR, Chen MJ, Wang YF, Piquemal F. Measurement of neutrino oscillation with KamLAND: evidence of spectral distortion. Phys Rev Lett 2005; 94:081801. [PMID: 15783875 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.94.081801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2004] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
We present results of a study of neutrino oscillation based on a 766 ton/year exposure of KamLAND to reactor antineutrinos. We observe 258 nu (e) candidate events with energies above 3.4 MeV compared to 365.2+/-23.7 events expected in the absence of neutrino oscillation. Accounting for 17.8+/-7.3 expected background events, the statistical significance for reactor nu (e) disappearance is 99.998%. The observed energy spectrum disagrees with the expected spectral shape in the absence of neutrino oscillation at 99.6% significance and prefers the distortion expected from nu (e) oscillation effects. A two-neutrino oscillation analysis of the KamLAND data gives Deltam(2)=7.9(+0.6)(-0.5)x10(-5) eV(2). A global analysis of data from KamLAND and solar-neutrino experiments yields Deltam(2)=7.9(+0.6)(-0.5)x10(-5) eV(2) and tan((2)theta=0.40(+0.10)(-0.07), the most precise determination to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Araki
- Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kistemann T, Classen T, Koch C, Dangendorf F, Fischeder R, Gebel J, Vacata V, Exner M. Microbial load of drinking water reservoir tributaries during extreme rainfall and runoff. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68:2188-97. [PMID: 11976088 PMCID: PMC127524 DOI: 10.1128/aem.68.5.2188-2197.2002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 278] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2001] [Accepted: 01/20/2002] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Hygienic and microbiological examinations of watercourses are usually not carried out during heavy rainfall and runoff events. After rainfall or snowmelt, there are often massive increases in turbidity in flooding creeks in mountain ranges, which are frequently interpreted as an indication of microbial contamination. The aim of this study was to quantify the microbial loads of watercourses during such runoff events and to compare these loads with loads occurring during regular conditions. In a 14-month monitoring period we investigated the microbial loads of three tributaries of different drinking water reservoirs. A total of 99 water samples were taken under different runoff conditions and analyzed to determine physical, chemical, bacterial, and parasitic parameters. Thirty-two water samples were considered event samples during nine measuring series. The criteria for events, based on duration and intensity of precipitation, water depth gauge measurements, and dynamics, had been fixed before the investigation for each creek individually. Of the physical and chemical parameters examined, only the turbidity, pH, and nitrate values differed clearly from the values obtained for regular samples. Most of the bacteriological parameters investigated (colony, Escherichia coli, coliform, fecal streptococcal, and Clostridium perfringens counts) increased considerably during extreme runoff events. If relevant sources of parasitic contamination occurred in catchment areas, the concentrations of Giardia and Cryptosporidium rose significantly during events. The results show that substantial shares of the total microbial loads in watercourses and in drinking water reservoirs result from rainfall and extreme runoff events. Consequently, regular samples are considered inadequate for representing the microbial contamination of watercourse systems. The procedures for raw water surveillance in the context of multiple-barrier protection and risk assessment ought to include sampling during extreme runoff situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Kistemann
- Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, WHO'CC for Health Promoting Water Management and Risk Communication, University of Bonn, D-53105 Bonn, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|