New electric-shock job exposure matrix

BACKGROUND

To evaluate a consistent association between jobs in "electric" occupations and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a comprehensive job exposure matrix (JEM) that includes electric shocks and magnetic fields (MF) is needed.

METHODS

We used incident electric shocks and electrocutions from two available data sources along with expert judgment to create a JEM that was integrated into an existing MF JEM. The final JEM contained ordinal electric-shock exposure assignments for 501 job titles.

RESULTS

Main occupational groups experiencing the electric shocks were precision production, craft, and repair occupations. Specific jobs with the highest proportion of shocks per 100,000 workers were: electrical apprentices (99.7), mechanic and repairer helpers (74.0), hoist and winch operators (63.3), and electrical power installers (52.4). Examples of job titles with low electric-shock exposures were administrative support occupations, data-key entry operators, and waiters and waitresses.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining publicly available data with an expert panel is a viable method to construct an electric-shock MF JEM. This JEM will allow an evaluation of association between electric shocks and neurodegenerative diseases.

An integrated job exposure matrix for electrical exposures of utility workers

Electric utility workers may be exposed to any combination of magnetic fields, electric fields, nuisance shocks (from spark discharges and continuous currents), imperceptible contact currents, and electrical injuries. Collectively these exposures are referred to as EMF Factors. Previous occupational exposure assessments have mainly characterized the magnetic field, with less attention to the electric field. Nuisance shocks and electrical injuries, though palpable, have received little to no attention. This article presents a prototype job exposure matrix that addresses exposure to all EMF Factors taking into account job category, work environment, and occupied environment. Exposures for all factors were classified into three ordinal levels for 22 job categories. Electric and magnetic field exposures were classified by the geometric mean of daily average of personal exposure measurements. Although relatively sparse, survey data on nuisance shocks were adequate for exposure assignment by job category and indicate that the frequency of these exposures has diminished over time. The least information was available for imperceptible contact currents that are associated with electric field exposures and small contact voltages. Data for electrical injuries by job category were derived from the Electric Power Research Institute Occupational Health Surveillance Database, with exposure assignments based on combined injury rates for flash burn and electric shock/electrocution. The highest exposures for all EMF Factors are essentially limited to four job categories that work on or close to electrical equipment: (1) cable splicers, (2) electricians, (3) line workers, and (4) substation operators.

Analyses of magnetic-field peak-exposure summary measures

Two previous epidemiologic studies reported an association between the maximum magnetic field exposure logged during a 24-h measurement period and risk of miscarriage. A hypothesis was put forth which argued that the observed association may be the result of behavioral differences between women with healthy pregnancies (less physically active) and women with miscarriage. We analyzed four existing data sets with power-frequency magnetic-field personal exposure (PE) measurements to investigate the characteristics of peak-exposure measures. We found that the value of the measured maximum magnetic-field exposure varied inversely with the sampling interval between magnetic-field measurements and that maximum values demonstrated less stability over time in repeated measurements, compared to time-weighted average and 95th and 99th -percentile values. We also found that the number of activity categories entered by study subjects could be used to estimate the proportion of subjects with exposure above various threshold values. Exposure metrics based on maximum values exceeding thresholds tend to classify active people into higher exposure categories. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis suggesting that the association between maximum magnetic fields and miscarriage are possibly the result of behavioral differences between women with healthy pregnancies and women who experience miscarriages. Thus, generalization from a given study to more global exposure characterization should be made with particular caution and with due consideration to sampling interval and other characteristics of the measurement protocol potentially influencing the measured maximum. Future epidemiologic studies of peak magnetic field exposure and spontaneous abortion should carefully evaluate the potential confounding effect of the women's activity level during pregnancy.

Evaluation of nonuniform 60-hertz magnetic-field exposures for compliance with guidelines

Magnetic-field exposures are considered in compliance with guidelines if they do not cause the induced electric field or current density to exceed basic restrictions that are based on possible adverse biological responses. Magnetic-field guidelines provide induction models for extrapolating from external field exposures to basic restrictions and vice versa. However, the uniform-field exposures used in these models do not reflect the nonuniform fields often encountered in actual high-field exposures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the relationships between external magnetic-field exposures and induced electric fields in nonuniform 60-hertz fields and to present a method for evaluating the compliance of such exposures with guidelines. Induction factors provide the induced electric field per unit of incident magnetic field. They represent a means of extrapolating from external field exposure to a peak induced electric field. Uniform and nonuniform field induction factors were computed for homogeneous ellipses and ellipsoids, and for an anatomically correct heterogeneous human model. Computations were carried out for three orthogonal uniform fields and for related nonuniform fields at varying distances from three line sources. Analytic expressions were used to compute induced peak electric fields for homogeneous models in uniform fields. A scalar-potential finite-difference method computed induced quantities for all models at 3.6-mm resolution in uniform and nonuniform fields. Equivalent uniform magnetic fields that produce the same peak electric field as a nonuniform field with a known maximum field were derived from the induction factors. To evaluate a nonuniform field exposure for compliance, the equivalent uniform field for the exposure is estimated based on the magnitude of the maximum surface field and the distance from the line source. Compliance is achieved if the equivalent uniform magnetic field is below the magnetic-field limit. Equivalent uniform magnetic-field exposures are computed for two actual electric utility tasks, as examples.

Evaluating occupational 60-hertz electric-field exposures for guideline compliance

This article examines determination of compliance of 60-Hz electric-field exposures with occupational guideline limits. The guidelines are expressed as a limit on the unperturbed electric field without allowance for the severity of potential spark discharges. A line worker on a 500-kV transmission-line tower provided a practical example of an occupational exposure. In this realistic case, the worker's posture, the uniformity of the field, and the field orientation differed from the guideline exposure scenario of standing erect in a vertical uniform field. An accurate estimate of the unperturbed nonuniform fields in the climbing space of a lattice steel structure was computed using Monte Carlo methods that modeled surface and spatial electric fields on and near standard geometrical elements. Fields were computed at 20 points in a three-dimensional array, simulating the location of the human body on the tower. We estimated the average unperturbed electric field, space potential, induced short-circuit current, induced open-circuit voltage, and the stored charge and energy available for a discharge over a range of capacitances to ground. The on-tower exposure parameters were compared with those from the idealistic guideline exposure scenario. The average electric field of 24.4 kV/m for the on-tower exposure exceeded the limit of 20 kV/m stated in the recently adopted IEEE Standard C95.6 2002. However, the charge available for a spark discharge during the on-tower exposure was less than that for the guideline exposure scenario. Thus, for an exposure limit based on a constant-charge criterion for adverse reaction to spark discharges, guideline on-tower exposure would be below the limit established for the guideline exposure scenario. Evaluation of electric-field exposures in terms of the charge associated with spark discharges provides a means of comparing any electric-field exposure scenario with the ideal guideline scenario in terms of an effects-related physical quantity. This approach is consistent with the exposure limit/basic restriction methodology that employs a basic restriction on a physical quantity as the ultimate determinant of compliance.

Occupational magnetic field exposures of garment workers: results of personal and survey measurements

To explore the feasibility of performing an epidemiologic study of female breast cancer and magnetic field (MF) exposures, we chose to study garment workers, who reportedly have some of the highest MF exposures. We collected personal exposure (PE, n = 48) and survey measurements (n = 77) near commercial sewing machines at three garment facilities and conducted a pilot interview among 25 garment workers asking about exposure duration, activities, and machine characteristics. MF levels were higher for older machines with alternating current (AC) than newer machines with direct current (DC) motors. MF levels were comparable for both idling and sewing activities. Most interviewed workers could describe duration of exposure and machine type (automatic/manual), but not other machine characteristics. Measurements were lower than previously reported for garment workers but were higher than exposures to most women. A historical exposure assessment can be conducted by linking duration of exposure with reconstructed exposure measurements but may be limited by the accuracy of work history data.

Assessing compliance with power-frequency magnetic-field guidelines

Several organizations have established guidelines for occupational exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields. At 60 hertz, exposure limits are 1.0 millitesla (mT) for the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 0.42 mT for the International Committee on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection, and 1.6 mT for the National Radiation Protection Board guidelines. Adoption of the current guidelines as mandatory standards could dramatically affect electric-utility work practices. Two large personal-exposure monitoring projects have characterized exposures of overhead lineworkers and cable splicers while they perform various tasks near energized conductors. Personal exposure measurements indicate that these two groups are very likely the most highly exposed among utility workers and often experience fields above guideline levels. In addition, survey measurements in utility environments have identified locations where other workers may experience exposures at guideline levels. The nature of high-field exposure scenarios in the utility industry suggests a simple practical method for determining compliance with basic restrictions on internal induced current density [< 10 milliamperes per square meter (mA m(-2))] in the presence of fields that exceed limits to magnetic fields external to the body.

Results of a multisite study of U.S. residential magnetic fields

This paper describes the study design, measurement protocols, and results of a project examining residential magnetic-field exposures at eight sites across the contiguous United States. The goal of the project was to investigate surrogates that have been used in epidemiologic studies to characterize residential magnetic-field exposure. These surrogates include: personal-exposure (PE), fixed-location long-term (LT), and outside and inside point-in-time (PIT) magnetic-field measurements; net-service (or ground current) measurements; and the "wire-code category" of the residence. (The latter is a surrogate for magnetic-field exposure based on the nature and proximity of electric power lines outside the house.) Measurements were conducted on four visits to each of eight sites between January 1994 and June 1997 for a study population of 218 single-unit detached dwellings. Information on the residence, residents, and neighborhood was collected. A simple random sample of 392 single-unit detached dwellings at the sites was used to create a weighted sample of houses representative of the population of single-unit residences. The correlations among the various types of 60-Hz magnetic-field measures were relatively strong (Pearson r>0.74, Spearman rho>0.78). Variability of PE and LT measurements, as measured by the standard deviations during a visit, was independent of wire-code category. Visit means for PE, LT, and outside and inside PIT were well correlated over periods between visits of from 1.5 to 20 months (r>0.62, rho>0.76). These results support the use of survey measurements (less demanding than personal monitoring) to represent exposure that occurred up to 20 months in the past. The principal component of the total variance in PE measurements was the between-house variance; between-visit and between-site variances were generally less important. This supports the sampling of many houses with relatively few visits in residential exposure characterization studies. There was a trend for presumably higher wire-code categories to be associated with higher field summary measures for all summary measures related to magnetic-field magnitude, including PE and LT resultant, and inside and outside resultant (60 Hz) and harmonics. However, because of the overlap in field levels between categories, wire code was not a good predictor of magnetic-field levels, accounting for less than 21% of the variance in magnetic-field measurements.

A population-based prospective cohort study of personal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage

To study the effect of magnetic fields on the risk of miscarriage, we conducted a population-based prospective cohort study among pregnant women within a large health maintenance organization. All women with a positive pregnancy test at less than 10 weeks of gestation and residing in the San Francisco area were contacted for participation in the study. We conducted in-person interviews to obtain information on risk factors for miscarriage and other potential confounders. All participants were also asked to wear a magnetic field-measuring meter for 24 hours and to keep a diary of their activities. Pregnancy outcomes were obtained for all participants by searching the health maintenance organization's databases, reviewing medical charts, and telephone follow-up. We used the Cox proportional hazard model for examining the magnetic field-miscarriage association. A total of 969 subjects were included in the final analyses. Although we did not observe an association between miscarriage risk and the average magnetic field level, miscarriage risk increased with an increasing level of maximum magnetic field exposure with a threshold around 16 milligauss (mG). The rate ratio (RR) associated with magnetic field exposure > or = 16 mG (vs <16 mG) was 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-2.7]. The risk remained elevated for levels (in tertiles) of maximum magnetic field exposure > or = 16 mG. The association was stronger for early miscarriages (<10 weeks of gestation) (RR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.2-4.0) and among "susceptible" women with multiple prior fetal losses or subfertility (RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.3-7.7). After excluding women who indicated that their daily activity pattern during the measurements did not represent their typical daily activity during pregnancy, the association was strengthened; RR = 2.9 (95% CI = 1.6-5.3) for maximum magnetic field exposure > or = 16 mG, RR = 5.7 (95% CI = 2.1-15.7) for early miscarriage, and RR = 4.0 (95% CI = 1.4-11.5) among the susceptible women. Our findings provide strong prospective evidence that prenatal maximum magnetic field exposure above a certain level (possibly around 16 mG) may be associated with miscarriage risk. This observed association is unlikely to be due to uncontrolled biases or unmeasured confounders.

Evaluation of biological effects, dosimetric models, and exposure assessment related to ELF electric- and magnetic-field guidelines

Several organizations worldwide have issued guidelines to limit occupational and public exposure to electric and magnetic fields and contact currents in the extremely low frequency range (<3 kilohertz). In this paper, we evaluate relevant developments in biological and health research, computational methods for estimating dosimetric quantities, and exposure assessment, all with an emphasis on the power frequency (60 hertz in North America, 50 hertz in Europe). The aim of each guideline is to prevent acute neural effects of induced electric fields. An evaluation of epidemiological and laboratory studies of neurobiological effects identified peripheral nerve stimulation as the response most suitable for establishing a magnetic-field guideline. Key endpoints that merit further study include reversal of evoked potentials; cardiovascular function, as measured by heart rate and heart rate variability; and sleep patterns. High-resolution computations of induced electric fields and current densities in anatomically correct human models are now achieved with finite-difference methods. The validity and limitations of these models have been demonstrated by computations in regular geometric shapes, using both analytic and numeric computations. Calculated values for average dosimetric quantities are typically within a few percent for the two approaches. However, maximum induced quantities are considerably overestimated by numerical methods, particularly at air interfaces. Overestimates are less pronounced for the upper 99th percentile level of a dosimetric quantity, making this measure a more useful indicator of maximum dose. Neural stimulation thresholds are dependent on the electric field around the excitable cell rather than on the current density, making the former preferable for expression of basic restrictions based on nervous system function. Furthermore, modeling data indicate that the induced electric field is much less strongly influenced by tissue conductivity than is the induced current density. In the electric utility industry, most magnetic-field exposures at or near guideline levels occur in highly nonuniform fields. Two methods are described for simplified estimation of induced quantities in such fields, with each method using as input modeling results for uniform field exposure. These methods have practical value for assessing occupational exposures relative to guideline levels.

Long-term effects of 60-Hz electric vs. magnetic fields on IL-1 and IL-2 activity in sheep

This study was designed to assess the effect of exposure to long-term extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields (ELF-EMF) from a 500 kV transmission line on IL-1 and IL-2 activity in sheep. The primary hypothesis was that the reduction in IL-1 activity observed in our two previous short-term studies (10 months) was due to EMF exposure from this transmission line. To repeat and expand these studies and to characterize the components of EMF responsible for the previously observed reduction in IL-1 activity, the current experiment examined not only the effect of exposure to electric and magnetic fields, but also the magnetic field component alone. In the current study, IL-2 was examined to characterize the effects of EMF exposure on an indicator of T cell responses. 45 Suffolk ewe lambs were randomized into three groups of 15 animals each. One group of animals was placed in the EMF pen, located directly beneath the transmission line. A second group was placed in the shielded MF (magnetic field only) pen, also directly beneath the transmission line. The third group of animals was placed in the control pen located several hundred meters away from the transmission line. During the 27 month exposure period, blood samples were taken from all animals monthly. When the data were analyzed collectively over time, no significant differences between the groups were found for IL-1 or IL-2 activity. In previous studies ewe lambs of 8-10 weeks of age were used as the study animals and significant differences in IL-1 activity were observed after exposure of these animals to EMF at mean magnetic fields of 3.5-3.8 microT (35-38 mG) and mean electric fields of 5.2-5.8 kV/m. At the start of the current study EMF levels were reduced as compared to previous studies. One interpretation of the current data is that magnetic field strength and age of the animals may be important variables in determining whether EMF exposure will affect IL-1 activity.

Magnetic-field exposures of cable splicers in electrical network distribution vaults

The purposes of the research reported here were to quantify the power-frequency magnetic-field exposures of cable splicers while they were performing tasks in energized network distribution vaults and to compare these exposures with occupational exposure guideline levels. Network vaults supply electricity to commercial and residential urban areas as well as to large buildings. Participating workers wore a personal exposure monitor at the waist, kept a simple diary to record their work location, and recorded information about the vaults and tasks performed. To capture temporal variability, a stationary meter was deployed in the vault during a task. Load current in the vault was measured. To examine temporal variability over long time periods, stationary meters were deployed in selected vaults for one month. Data were collected during 77 tasks in 69 vaults for 191 person-tasks, representing approximately 400 hours of in-vault personal exposure data. Highest exposures were observed in tasks performed near secondary conductors. Personal exposure variability arises principally from worker movement and activities in the vaults, not from load variability during a task. Maximum field during a person-task exceeded the International Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (0.42 millitesla) and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (1.0 millitesla) guideline levels during 14 percent and 8 percent of the person-tasks, respectively. The mean of measurements during a person-task exceeded those guideline levels during 4 percent and 2 percent of the person-tasks, respectively. A large number of person-tasks (40%) had measured fields above the ACGIH recommended limit of 0.1 millitesla for workers with pacemakers or other implanted devices. Based on the frequency and duration of their high exposures, cable splicers working in network distribution vaults are one of the most highly exposed groups in the electric utility industry. Selective assignment of work location and task could minimize the likelihood of exposures for vault workers exceeding guideline limits for wearers of pacemakers or other implanted devices. Scheduling vault tasks during off-peak hours (nights and weekends) may reduce exposures. However, even during these periods exposures in certain vaults can still exceed guideline levels.

Rate of occurrence of transient magnetic field events in U.S. residences

Recent interest in the transient magnetic field events produced by electrical switching events in residential and occupational environments has been kindled by the possibility that these fields may explain observed associations between childhood cancer and wire codes. This paper reports the results of a study in which the rate of occurrence of magnetic field events with 2-200 kHz frequency content were measured over 24 h or longer periods in 156 U.S. residences. A dual-channel meter was developed for the study that, during 20 s contiguous intervals of time, counted the number of events with peak 2-200 kHz magnetic fields exceeding thresholds of 3. 3 nT and 33 nT. Transient activity exhibited a distinct diurnal rhythm similar to that followed by power frequency magnetic fields in residences. Homes that were electrically grounded to a conductive water system that extended into the street and beyond, had higher levels of 33 nT channel transient activity. Homes located in rural surroundings had less 33 nT transient activity than homes in suburban/urban areas. Finally, while transient activity was perhaps somewhat elevated in homes with OLCC, OHCC, and VHCC wire codes relative to homes with underground (UG) and VLCC codes, the elevation was the smallest in VHCC and the largest in OLCC homes. This result does not provide much support for the hypothesis that transient magnetic fields are the underlying exposure that explains the associations, observed in several epidemiologic studies, between childhood cancer and residence in homes with VHCC, but not OLCC and OHCC, wire codes.

Probabilistic approach to ranking sources of uncertainty in ELF magnetic field exposure limits

There is a need to improve the biological data, dosimetry, and risk assessment methodology used for setting guidelines for occupational exposures to extreme-low-frequency magnetic fields. This paper illustrates how a probabilistic approach can be used to determine priorities for future research based upon the analysis of biological and dosimetric variables that affect stimulation of the heart by magnetically-induced currents. A model was constructed to predict a level of whole-body magnetic-field exposure below which no cardiac stimulation is expected (Bncs). For each iteration of the model, a value was selected from cardiac stimulation threshold, shape factor, and conductivity distributions by Latin Hypercube sampling, and a value for Bncs was computed. The very wide range of simulated Bncs magnetic-field values obtained indicates that there is considerable uncertainty about what constitutes a "safe" level of exposure. The results show that the major occupational-exposure guidelines are very conservative with respect to risks of cardiac stimulation. The minimum Bncs value computed (0.01 T) by either a circular-loop model or an ellipsoid dosimetric model is ten times the highest recommended workday exposure value in a guideline. The lowest 5% Bncs value calculated for a circular-loop model is about 50-times the ICNIRP occupational exposure limit; the lowest 5% Bncs value calculated for an ellipsoid model is more than 100 times the ACGIH occupational exposure limit. A new finding is that the method specified by several guidelines for determining guideline compliance when exposures occur at multiple frequencies (additive weighting of harmonics) leads to substantially lower Bncs estimates relative to a probably more valid rms-weighting method. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicate that lack of knowledge of the threshold for cardiac stimulation is the greatest source of uncertainty as to what is a "safe" level of exposure to extreme-low-frequency magnetic fields. Additional research to address this source of uncertainty may be expected to have the greatest potential impact to reduce overall uncertainty about safe magnetic field exposures.

Summary and evaluation of guidelines for occupational exposure to power frequency electric and magnetic fields

Major U.S. and international guidelines for limiting occupational exposures to EMF are evaluated. These safety guidelines are designed to prevent short-term adverse effects by maintaining bulk-tissue current densities below 10 mA m(-2) (rms). Above this level, effects of induced currents and electric fields can include stimulation of neural and cardiac tissues. The models and input data used by guideline-setting organizations to relate 50/60-Hz magnetic-field exposures to induced current densities differ significantly. In order to develop a better understanding of such differences, the current densities derived from exposure guideline models are compared to minimum thresholds for cardiac stimulation and fibrillation. The nominal minimum thresholds for cardiac stimulation and ventricular fibrillation are 100 times and 200 times greater, respectively, than the current density of 10 mA m(-2) used as a dosimetric limit. However, the assumed relationship between the 10 mA m(-2) dose limit and magnetic field exposure limits introduces additional uncertainty. The ratios between the threshold for cardiac stimulation and the calculated induced current density at the exposure limit vary between a low of 50 and a high of 526, depending upon the guideline. These ratios, as indicators of implicit safety factors, are larger than those recommended to protect against adverse effects of induced current density, including cardiac stimulation, in magnetic resonance imaging or against adverse effects of toxic chemical exposures. This review and assessment of EMF occupational exposure guidelines suggests that several scientific and compliance issues remain ambiguous or unresolved. Recommendations are made for guideline organizations to strengthen and clarify the scientific basis for the guideline process. These recommendations include the documentation of supporting data, development of operational definitions for guidelines, examination of dosimetric models, clarification of safety factors, and identification of high priority topics for future research.

Variability and consistency of electric and magnetic field occupational exposure measurements

There is widespread scientific and public interest in possible health effects from exposure to electric and magnetic fields at frequencies associated with electricity use. Electric and magnetic field exposure assessment presents specific problems, among which are the inherent variability in exposure, the lack of robust statistical summary measures, and the lack of an accepted metric based on biological response. These pose challenges in defining distinct exposure groups, a basic goal for exposure assessments used in epidemiological studies. This paper explores the extent to which distinct electric and magnetic field exposure groups can be defined, by examining the variability and consistency of occupational electric and magnetic field exposure measurements among studies and within individual studies. Principal analyses are made by job titles because they are the most frequently used descriptors for stratifying occupational exposures to electric and magnetic fields. Methodological issues affecting the degree of consistency in measured electric and magnetic field exposures among occupational environments are also examined. Exposures by job title reported from electric and magnetic field measurement studies are summarized by general job category and industry. Analyses are performed both within and between job categories. Distributions of daily measured exposures for job categories taken from three large studies in the U.S. electric utility industry are compared to investigate consistency of exposures at a more detailed level. Analyses of reported personal exposure measurements from many studies and countries are consistent with less rigorous observations made heretofore on the basis of individual studies. In these studies, significantly elevated electric and magnetic field exposures are found in the electrician, lineworker, and substation worker categories; significantly elevated magnetic field exposures are also noted in the generation worker category; and magnetic field exposures in these groups are consistent across countries. Analyses within and among the elevated exposure job categories indicate that there are no significant differences between them. Among the studies, it is not possible to distinguish between exposures for well-defined groups within the categories, such as between transmission lineworkers and distribution lineworkers in the lineworker category; between generation operators and generation mechanics; or between substation operators and substation maintenance workers. This information provides a context for past studies and will help future efforts to define distinct occupational exposure groups exposed to electric and magnetic fields. Compilations of measured personal exposure data by industry and job title have been prepared as appendices (available from the author upon request).

Magnetic field exposure among utility workers

The Electric and Magnetic Field Measurement Project for Utilities--the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Electric and Magnetic Field Digital Exposure (EMDEX) Project (the EPRI EMDEX Project)--was a multifaceted project that entailed technology transfer, measurement protocol design, data management, and exposure assessment analyses. This paper addresses one specific objective of the project: the collection, analysis, and documentation of power-frequency magnetic field exposures for a diverse population of utility workers. Field exposure data measured by an EMDEX system were collected by volunteer utility employees at 59 sites in four countries between September, 1988, and September, 1989. Specially designed sampling procedures and data collection protocols were used to ensure uniform implementation across sites. Volunteers within 13 job classifications recorded which of eight work or three nonwork environments they occupied while wearing an EMDEX meter. Approximately 50,000 hours of magnetic field exposure records taken at 10 s intervals were obtained, about 70% of which were from work environments. Exposures and time spent in environments were analyzed by primary work environment, by occupied environment, and by job classification. Generally, for utility-specific job classifications related to the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity, the field and exposure measurements in terms of workday mean field were higher than in more general occupations. The job classifications with the highest (median workday mean) exposure were substation operators (0.7 microT) and electricians (0.5 microT). Total variance also tended to be largest for utility-specific job classifications. For these workers, the contributions of between-worker and within-worker variances to total variance were about the same. Measurements in utility-specific environments were higher than in more general environments. Estimates of time-integrated exposure indicated that utility-specific job classifications received about one-half or more of their total exposure on the job. The nonwork field and exposure distributions for workers in all job categories were comparable with median nonworkday means of about 0.09 microT.

Correlations among indices of electric and magnetic field exposure in electric utility workers

Power-frequency electric and magnetic fields are known to exhibit marked temporal variation, yet in the absence of clear biological indications, the most appropriate summary indices for use in epidemiologic studies are unknown. In order to assess the statistical patterns among candidate indices, data on 4383 worker-days for magnetic fields and 2082 worker-days for electric fields collected for the Electric and Magnetic Field Project for Electric Utilities using the EMDEX meter [Bracken (1990): Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute] were analyzed. We examined correlations at the individual and job title group levels among indices of exposure to both electric and magnetic fields, including the arithmetic mean, geometric mean, median, 20th and 90th percentiles, time above lower cutoffs of 20 V/m and 0.2 microT, and time above higher cutoffs of 100 V/m and 2.0 microT. For both electric and magnetic fields, the arithmetic mean was highly correlated with the 90th percentile; moderately correlated with the geometric mean, median, and lower and higher cutoff scores; and weakly correlated with the 20th percentile. Electric and magnetic field indices were generally weakly correlated with one another. Rank-order correlation coefficients were consistently greater than product-moment correlation coefficients. Job title group summary scores showed higher correlations among electric field indices and magnetic field indices and between electric and magnetic field indices than was found for individual worker-days, with only the 20th percentile clearly independent of the others. These results suggest that individuals' exposures are adequately characterized by a measure of central tendency for electric and magnetic fields, such as the arithmetic or geometric mean, and an indicator of a lower threshold or cutoff for each field type, such as the 20th percentile or proportion of time above 20 V/m or 0.2 microT. A single measure of central tendency for each type of field appears to be adequate when exposures are assessed at the job title level.

Exposure assessment for power frequency electric and magnetic fields

Over the past decade considerable data have been collected on electric and magnetic fields in occupational environments. These data have taken the form of area measurements, source characterizations, and personal exposure measurements. Occupational EMF levels are highly variable in space and time. Exposures associated with these fields exhibit similar large variations during a day, between days, and between individuals within a group. The distribution of exposure measures is skewed over several decades with only a few values occurring at the maximum field levels. The skewness of exposure measures implies that large sample sizes may be required for assessments and that multiple statistical descriptors are preferred to describe individual and group exposures. Except for the relatively few occupational settings where high voltage sources are prevalent, electric fields encountered in the workplace are probably similar to residential exposures. Consequently, high electric field exposures are essentially limited to utility environments and occupations. Within the electric utility industry, it is definitely possible to identify occupations with high electric field exposures relative to those of office workers or other groups. The highly exposed utility occupations are linemen, substation operators, and utility electricians. The distribution of electric field exposures in the utility worker population is very skewed even within a given occupation. As with electric fields, magnetic fields in the workplace appear to be comparable with residential levels, unless a clearly defined high-current source is present. Since high-current sources are more prevalent than high-voltage sources, environments with relatively high magnetic field exposures encompass a more diverse set of occupations than do those with high electric fields. Within the electric utility industry, it is possible to identify occupational environments with high magnetic field exposure relative to the office environment. Utility job categories with the highest exposures are generation facility workers, substation operators, utility linemen, and utility electricians. There are also higher exposures among traditional "electrical worker" job categories. Outside the electrical utility industry, potential sources of high occupational magnetic field exposures at ELF are induction furnaces, welding machines, electrical transportation systems, and electrical distribution vaults. However, the use of low power electrical equipment such as small motors in close proximity to workers and possibly for long periods of time could also lead to high exposure situations. Handheld survey instruments are available to perform area measurements of electric and magnetic fields at power frequencies but not aat all frequencies within the ELF range. Sophisticated personal computer-based instruments are available to characterize areas and sources across the entire frequency range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Exposure assessment for power frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF) and its application to epidemiologic studies

Epidemiologic studies suggesting possible health effects associated with exposure to electric and magnetic fields (EMF) from the transmission, distribution, and use of electricity have motivated increased interest in and attention to EMF exposure assessment. The result has been new instruments, measurement approaches, and exposure models that can improve on what has been a weakness in past epidemiologic studies, namely EMF exposure assessment. This paper presents a status report on EMF exposure assessment that emphasizes the need for incorporation of these advances in future studies. Several factors are identified that make the assignment of contemporary or retrospective EMF exposures potentially more difficult than for other environmental agents. These include: EMF is not generally detectable by humans, exposure scenarios for EMF are generally not memorable, there is no clear mechanism for EMF effects, and the pervasive nature of EMF in an industrialized society makes identification of a low-exposure group difficult. Elements of study design that are impacted by the nature of EMF exposures include: sampling and measurement strategies, summary measures of exposure, and the choice of surrogate and/or models of exposure. Consideration of these exposure assessment issues and incorporation of recent advances can improve the overall quality of epidemiologic studies with an EMF exposure component.

Experimental macroscopic dosimetry for extremely-low-frequency electric and magnetic fields

Environmental and laboratory exposure to electric and magnetic fields (EMF) in the extremely-low-frequency range (ELF) produces electrical quantities that interact directly with the exposed biological system on a scale small compared to the size of the human body but large with respect to cellular dimensions. The purpose of this paper is to describe these macroscopic electrical quantities and their characterization through measurements on living systems and experimental models. Electric field exposure results in a total induced current, surface electric fields, internal electric fields, and internal currents. Magnetic field exposure results in internal magnetic field, internal electric fields, and internal currents. Basic properties of fields and matter determine the methods by which these quantities can be measured. Quantification or dosimetry for these parameters on a macroscopic basis can be directed to the whole body, a cross section across the body, a local surface area, or a local volume. Models of varying degrees of sophistication have been used to establish spatial distributions of external fields and internal fields and currents.

Effects of a high-voltage direct-current transmission line on beef cattle production

Two herds of beef cattle were maintained beneath a +/- 500 kV direct-current transmission line during a 30-month period, and were compared with two similar herds maintained away from the transmission line. Exposures of animals under the line were five to 30 times greater than those of control animals, depending on the parameter of interest, with average exposure magnitudes of 5.6 kV/m, 4.1 nA/m2, and 13 k ions/cm3, respectively, for electric field, ion current, and density of ions. Productivity and health status of cows and calves were similar between lines and control treatments. Mean body mass of cows increased with maturity, from 438 kg in 1985 to 496 kg in 1987. Calf gain averaged 0.93 kg per head per day. No unusual sources of mortality were observed. Based on this confinement study, beef cattle permitted to graze in the vicinity of a high-voltage, direct-current transmission lines are not expected to experience any decrease in frequency of conception, calving, growth rate, or survival.