Basal characteristics of the prospective spanish immunotherapy registry of cardiovascular toxicity: SIR-CVT

Background

The immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved the prognosis of many cancers in the last years but concerning cardiovascular toxicity (CVtox) have been reported. Nowadays, specific surveillance protocols are lacking, and early diagnosis of toxicity may be challenging.

Purpose

To characterize the cardiovascular (CV) effects of immunotherapy and to seek for the mechanisms of CVtox of ICI in a protocolize surveillance program of cardio-oncology.

Methods

A multicentre national registry was developed by a research consortium of scientific societies of Cardiology and Oncology (SEC and SEOM) and the cardiovascular research centre (CNIC) in Spain (Figure 1). A total of 18 hospitals participate in recruiting since Q4 2021. A follow-up protocol was stablished with clinical, electrocardiographic (EKG), echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and laboratory assessment, including cardiac biomarkers, inflammatory panel and the expression of miR-721, a specific myocarditis biomarker. Toxicity management is performed at each institution following international guidelines.

Results

53 patients were currently included. Median age was 68 [59, 75] years-old, 79% were male. 83% had at least 1 CV-risk factor (75% smoking history, 20% diabetes mellitus, 50% hyperlipemia, 57% hypertension, 19% chronic kidney injury) and up to34% had previous CV disease. 93% had at least one dose of COVID19 vaccine. Dyspnoea was referred by 23% of patients, 28% have abnormal EKG findings and one-third (33%) abnormal cardiac biomarkers (median Troponin I-hs 5.30 [2.60, 11.00]; NT-proBNP 199 [68, 736]). Mean LVEF (60% [56.15, 66.78]) and GLS (−18 [−19.75, −16]) were within the normal range but 26% showed LGE at baseline. Cancer characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Conclusion

Real-world SIR-CVT patients show a high CV risk profile and frequent pre-existing CV diseases before ICI treatment. The prospective follow-up of this cohort will help to develop personalized surveillance protocols according to baseline CVtox risk and to define different grades of cardiotoxicity.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

P3606Impact of diabetes mellitus on the selection of antiplatelet treatment and medium-term prognosis after acute coronary syndrome

Introduction

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher atherothrombotic risk and higher rates of recurrent ischemic events compared with the non-diabetic population. Although current antiplatelet therapy strategies have been shown to be successful in improving outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), patients with DM continue to experience high rates of adverse cardiovascular events. Today, it is known that diabetic patients are characterized by a deregulation in different intracellular signaling pathways, which leads to an inadequate or suboptimal response to antiplatelets agents. The purpose of this study is to analyze the different therapeutic strategies, the use of new antiplatelet drugs and medium-term prognosis in diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic patients who have suffered an ACS.

Methods

It is an observational, prospective and multicenter registry of patients with ACS. The objective is to analyze the differences in the management of DM patients vs non-DM patients in the acute phase and their evolution during the first year after coronary event. Antiplatelet therapy administered will be evaluated, type of coronary injury and treatment performed, major adverse events as well as cardiovascular complications and mortality at one year of follow-up.

Results

Of a total of 1717 patients, 38% were diabetic. The diabetic population was older, with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and higher rate of previous cardiovascular events (cerebrovascular, peripheral arterial disease and coronary disease). Patients with DM received less new antiplatelets drugs at admission (15.5% DM vs 26.5% non DM, p<0.001) and less in-hospital switch to new antiplatelet agents was performed. They were subjected to a lower number of catheterizations and at the time of revascularization, the drug-eluting stent was of choice. During admission, they developed more complications, both ischemic (refractory angina, reinfarction or CVA) and hemorrhagic. Following one year, DM had higher major cardiovascular events (MACE) and higher mortality (7.72% vs 5.14%, p=0.0039). Non-coronary revascularization, renal failure, and reduced ejection fraction were predictive variables of death in diabetic population. Treatment with new antiplatelet drugs was associated with a statistically significant decrease in total mortality an MACE without differences in major bleeding.

Conclusion

More than a third of patients with ACS are diabetic. These patients present with more severe coronary disease associating a greater number of cardiovascular events and a higher mortality rate after one year of ACS. However, despite this, they undergo less invasive tests and they were undertreated with the new antiplatelets therapies.

Acknowledgement/Funding

SEC