Identifying and preventing burnout in young oncologists, an overwhelming challenge in the COVID-19 era: a study of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM)

BACKGROUND

Young oncologists are at particular risk of professional burnout, and this could have a significant impact on their health and care of their patients. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced rapid changes in professionals' jobs and training, with the consequent physical and psychological effects. We aimed to characterize burnout levels and determinants in young oncologists, and the effects of the pandemic on their training and health.

METHODS

Two online surveys were conducted among oncology residents and young oncology specialists in Spain. The first addressed professional burnout and its determinants before the COVID-19 pandemic, while the second analyzed the impact of the pandemic on health care organization, training, and physical and psychological health in the same population.

RESULTS

In total, 243 respondents completed the first survey, and 263 the second; 25.1% reported significant levels of professional burnout. Burnout was more common among medical oncology residents (28.2%), mainly in their second year of training. It was significantly associated with a poor work-life balance, inadequate vacation time, and the burnout score. Nearly three-quarters of respondents (72%) were reassigned to COVID-19 care and 84.3% of residents missed part of their training rotations. Overall, 17.2% of this population reported that they had contracted COVID-19, 37.3% had scores indicating anxiety, and 30.4% moderate to severe depression. Almost a quarter of young oncologists (23.3%) had doubts about their medical vocation.

CONCLUSIONS

Burnout affects a considerable number of young oncologists. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on causes of burnout, making it even more necessary to periodically monitor it to define appropriate detection and prevention strategies.

Consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology on secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer

Up to 20% of cancer patients will develop some manifestation of venous thromboembolic disease (VTD) during their clinical course. VTD greatly impacts morbidity, mortality, quality of life and pharmaceutical expenditure. In addition, both thrombotic relapse and major haemorrhages derived from VTD treatment are more likely in oncological patients. To make the decision to establish secondary thromboprophylaxis as an indefinite treatment in these patients, it is important to review all the risk factors involved, whether related to the disease, the patient or the prior thrombotic event. The objectives of this consensus of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna-SEMI) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica-SEOM) are to establish recommendations that help assess the risk of recurrence of VTD and haemorrhagic risk in patients with cancer, as well as to analyse the evidence that exists on the currently available drugs, which will allow the establishment of a protocol for shared decision-making with the informed patient.

SEOM Clinical Guideline of fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients (2016)

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy often result in reduced fertility in cancer patients. With increasing survival rates, fertility is an important quality-of-life concern for many young cancer patients. Around 70–75% of young cancer survivors are interested in parenthood but the numbers of patients who access fertility preservation techniques prior to treatment are significantly lower. Moreover, despite existing guidelines, healthcare professionals do not address fertility preservation issues adequately. There is a critical need for improvements in clinical care to ensure patients are well informed about infertility risks and fertility preservation options and to support them in their reproductive decision-making prior to cancer treatment.

Every-other week capecitabine (C7) combinations: An active and well tolerated treatment in heavily pretreated patients (p) with advanced solid tumours

10649

Background: Standard C schedule is 14 days every 3 w (C14). However, data have shown that C7 schedule is as effective as and significantly less toxic than C14. The objective is to evaluate retrospectively the response rate and toxicity of C7 as single agent or in combination in heavily pretreated p with advanced solid tumours. Methods: p with advanced solid tumour, age ≤ 75 years, ECOG PS <2 and adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic functions were analyzed. p received C7: 1250 mg/m2/12 h x 7 days every-other week. The combination drugs doses were adjusted to be used days 1 and 15. Cycles every 28 days. Response was evaluated every 3 cycles according to RECIST criteria Results: 20 p received C7. Cancer type: 11 breast (BC), 7 colo-rectal (CRC), 1 H&N and 1 gastric (GC). Median age 56 y (33–75). M/F: 8p/12p. ECOG 0/1: 39%/61%. 19 p stage IV and 1 (H&N) stage III. The most frequent metastatic site was liver 42.2%. 90% p had been heavily pretreated with chemotherapy (CT): 55% p had received ≥ 2 CT lines. 15% p had been treated with taxanes, 45% p taxanes + anthracyclines, 10% p 5-FU, 15% p oxaliplatin (Oxa) and/or raltritexed. 2 BC p had also received herceptin (Her) and 2 p (1BC/1CRC) had been previously treated with C14. Median nº cycles: 6 (1–19). C7 combinations were: 5/7 CRC p Oxa or CPT-11 and 11/11 BC p docetaxel (1p) or gemcitabine (1 p) or carboplatin (9 p) ± Her. 4 p received C7 alone. Toxicity (20 p). Grade I/II: HFS 55%, diarrhoea 25%, nausea/vomiting 15%, mucositis 5%, skin 5% and parestesias 5%. Grade III/IV: diarrhoea in 2 p (1CRC and 1 BC). Response (20 p): 2 CR (10%) both CRC p; 6 PR (30%) 5 BC p and 1 CRC p; 4 SD (20%) and 8 PD (40%). 40% ORR rate and 60% TGC. Median response duration: 37 w (22–44 w). 2 p who achieved CR received C7 combined with CPT-11. C7 combination in p with PR were Oxa (1 CRC p) and carboplatin ± Her (5 BC p). Conclusions: C7 schedule is an active regimen in patients with advanced CRC and BC heavily pretreated with CT and it shows a very favourable toxicity profile. These results warrant a phase II trial of carboplatin-C7 in MBC as front line therapy that will by lauched by Feb-2006.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.