Kulkarni AV, Kumar P, Sharma M, Sowmya TR, Talukdar R, Rao PN, Reddy DN. Pathophysiology and Prevention of Paracentesis-induced Circulatory Dysfunction: A Concise Review.
J Clin Transl Hepatol 2020;
8:42-48. [PMID:
32274344 PMCID:
PMC7132018 DOI:
10.14218/jcth.2019.00048]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2019] [Revised: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Annually, 10% of cirrhotic patients with ascites develop refractory ascites for which large-volume paracentesis (LVP) is a frequently used therapeutic procedure. LVP, although a safe method, is associated with circulatory dysfunction in a significant percentage of patients, which is termed paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD). PICD results in faster reaccumulation of ascites, hyponatremia, renal impairment, and shorter survival. PICD is diagnosed through laboratory results, with increases of >50% of baseline plasma renin activity to a value ≥4 ng/mL/h on the fifth to sixth day after paracentesis. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology and prevention of PICD.
Collapse