How should we secure the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A UK-wide survey of clinical practice and systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

It is currently unknown which method of cystic duct closure is most effective at reducing the risk of bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aims of this work were to determine the most common closure methods used in the UK and review available evidence on which method has the lowest risk of bile leak.

METHODS

We conducted an online survey through the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons (AUGIS). We also undertook a systematic review using PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for studies that compared different methods for cystic duct occlusion and reported postoperative bile leak.

FINDINGS

There was significant variation in practice between consultant surgeons. For routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy metal clips were used most (64%) followed by locking polymer clips (33%) and suture ties (3%). In cases of a dilated cystic duct, preferences were locking polymer clips (60%), suture ties (30%) and metal clips (5%). We included six studies in our review with a total of 8,011 patients. Metal clips were associated with an increased odds of bile leak compared with locking polymer clips (OR 5.66, 95% CI 1.13-28.41, p=0.04) or suture ties (OR 4.17, 95% CI 0.72-24.31, p=0.12). Most studies were retrospective, unlikely to be adequately powered, and vulnerable to selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited available evidence suggests that metal clips have the highest risk of bile leak, but results are not strong enough to recommend a change in current clinical practice. A trial is now required to determine the best method of cystic duct closure.

60 Neoadjuvant Imatinib Mesylate – an Ace of Spaces for Surgical Management of an Oesophago-Gastric Junction Gastro-Intestinal Stromal Tumour

Introduction

Oesophageal gastro-intestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare, accounting for less than five percent of all GIST, with the majority of these occurring at the oesophago-gastric junction (OGJ). Due to the anatomical location and size of these tumours at presentation, surgical resection is often a major undertaking.

Neoadjuvant treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as Imatinib mesylate, have the potential to downstage such tumours, thereby limiting the extent of subsequent surgical resection. This may therefore reduce any potentially associated morbidity and mortality.

Case Description

We report the case of a 75-year-old gentleman who presented with a large OGJ GIST, which presented with dysphagia. The tumour was deemed too large for local excision due to the risk of compromising the lumen at the OGJ in attempting to obtain a clear resection margin. Given the patient’s co-morbidity, oesophagectomy or total gastrectomy was deemed too major an undertaking. Therefore, endoscopic biopsies were obtained with a view to possible neoadjuvant therapy. These confirmed DOG-1 and Exon-11 mutations, suggesting sensitivity to Imatinib mesylate. A standard dose regime of 400mg daily for a planned 36-month course was commenced. Subsequent imaging showed a substantial decrease in tumour bulk and the decision was made to perform a local excision. A local enucleation procedure was performed, and the patient made a sound recovery.

Post-operative histology of resected tumour showed almost complete tumour regression.

Discussion

This significant response to neoadjuvant Imatinib mesylate therapy demonstrates clear potential for its use in similar cases, where radical resection would cause significant morbidity and risk mortality.