Transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy in France: A cross-sectional study with 413 patients and real-world tafamidis meglumine use (2009-2019)

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe characteristics of patients with ATTR variant polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN) and ATTRv-mixed and assess the real-world use and safety profile of tafamidis meglumine 20mg.

METHODS

Thirty-eight French hospitals were invited. Patient files were reviewed to identify clinical manifestations, diagnostic methods, and treatment compliance.

RESULTS

Four hundred and thirteen patients (296 ATTRv-PN, 117 ATTRv-mixed) were analyzed. Patients were predominantly male (68.0%) with a mean age of 57.2±17.2 years. Interval between first symptom(s) and diagnosis was 3.4±4.3 years. First symptoms included sensory complaints (85.9%), dysautonomia (38.5%), motor deficits (26.4%), carpal tunnel syndrome (31.5%), shortness of breath (13.3%), and unexplained weight loss (16.0%). Mini-invasive accessory salivary gland or punch skin and nerve biopsies were most common, with a performance of 78.8-100%. TTR genetic sequencing, performed in all patients, revealed 31 TTR variants. Tafamidis meglumine was initiated in 156/214 (72.9%) ATTRv-PN patients at an early disease stage. Median treatment duration was 6.00 years in ATTRv-PN and 3.42 years in ATTRv-mixed patients. Tafamidis was well tolerated, with 20 adverse events likely related to study drug among the 336 patients.

CONCLUSION

In France, ATTRv patients are usually identified early thanks to the national network and the help of diagnosis combining genetic testing and mini-invasive biopsies.

[Cardiac amyloidosis: State of art in 2022]

The 3 main types of cardiac amyloidosis are linked to two protein precursors: AL amyloidosis secondary to free light chain deposits in the context of monoclonal gammopathy (mainly of undetermined significance or myeloma) and transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), comprising wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt for wild type) and hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv for variant). These diseases are underdiagnosed and highly prevalent in common cardiac phenotypes in recent studies (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, severe aortic stenosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). Myocardial amyloid infiltration affects all cardiac structures and clinically promotes predominantly heart failure, conductive disorders and cardioembolic events. The search for extracardiac signs makes it possible to arouse diagnostic suspicion. Electrocardiogram, echocardiography and cardiac MRI can suspect cardiac amyloidosis. The diagnostic confirmation follows a simple algorithm including a systematic search for monoclonal gammapathy and a disphosphonate scintigraphy. Histological proof is necessary in case of AL or ATTR amyloidosis with concomitant monoclonal gammopathy in order to initiate specific treatment. Due to the late disease onset in ATTRv, genetic testing must be routine in all cases of ATTR. These diseases are no longer perceived as incurable since recent therapeutic innovations. A better knowledge of the disease is more than ever necessary.

Association between common cardiovascular risk factors and clinical phenotype in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EurObservational Research Programme (EORP) Cardiomyopathy/Myocarditis registry

AIMS

The interaction between common cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is poorly studied. We sought to explore the relation between CVRF and the clinical characteristics of patients with HCM enrolled in the EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) Cardiomyopathy registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

1739 patients with HCM were studied. The relation between hypertension (HT), diabetes (DM), body mass index (BMI), and clinical traits was analysed. Analyses were stratified according to the presence or absence of a pathogenic variant in a sarcomere gene. The prevalence of HT, DM, and obesity (Ob) was 37, 10, and 21%, respectively. HT, DM, and Ob were associated with older age (P<0.001), less family history of HCM (HT and DM P<0.001), higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (P<0.001), atrial fibrillation (HT and DM P<0.001; Ob p = 0.03) and LV (left ventricular) diastolic dysfunction (HT and Ob P<0.001; DM P = 0.003). Stroke was more frequent in HT (P<0.001) and mutation-positive patients with DM (P = 0.02). HT and Ob were associated with higher provocable LV outflow tract gradients (HT P<0.001, Ob P = 0.036). LV hypertrophy was more severe in Ob (P = 0.018). HT and Ob were independently associated with NYHA class (OR 1.419, P = 0.017 and OR 1.584, P = 0.004, respectively). Other associations, including a higher proportion of females in HT and of systolic dysfunction in HT and Ob, were observed only in mutation-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

Common CVRF are associated with a more severe HCM phenotype, suggesting a proactive management of CVRF should be promoted. An interaction between genotype and CVRF was observed for some traits.

Demographic characteristics of the 1902 transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy patients treated by tafamidis through the French early access program

Background

Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a rare and serious, systemic disease characterized by deposits of amyloid fibrils in various tissues and organs. Tafamidis meglumine is a potent and selective stabilizer of TTR, indicated since 2011 in the treatment of neurological forms of the disease. The French “Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé” (ANSM) granted a temporary recommendation for use (RTU) on November 28th 2018, based on ATTR-ACT, the pivotal trial results, and designed to enable use of tafamidis meglumine in ATTR cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) patients with NYHA I, II and III before marketing authorization. This RTU has been a unique opportunity in France to collect real world data of ATTR-CM patients treated by tafamidis meglumine.

Objective

We aimed to describe the characteristics of ATTR-CM patient treated by tafamidis in the setting of the RTU, over 2 years from November 28th 2018 to November 27th 2020.

Methods

Demographic and clinical data about the diagnosis pathway of patients included in the RTU were prospectively collected using questionnaires, as requested by ANSM to be completed by physicians at the time of tafamidis prescription. A second version of the inclusion form, introduced in May 2020, has allowed collection of additional clinical information.

Results

Overall, 1902 ATTR-CM patients have been included by 189 physicians from 107 centers. Nine centers included each at least 50 patients, accounting for 1092, or 57.4% of all patients. The median age of the patients was 82 years (IQR=9 years), 82% were male, and, 12.4%, 58.8% and 28.7% of patients had a NYHA class of I, II and III, respectively. For almost all patients, the diagnosis of restrictive/infiltrative heart failure was based on heart MRI and/or echocardiography (98.5%; among the 601 patients included from May 2020 28.8% had both exams, 69.7% echo only and 1.6% MRI only), the infiltrative nature of the cardiomyopathy had been confirmed by bone scintigraphy (99.3%), and the absence of light chains had been confirmed by protein electrophoresis or Bence Jones proteinuria (96.6%). Genetic test was performed in 1205 patients (69.4%). Out of the 884 patients who had a genetic test result available at the time of initial prescription, 762 (86.2%) were affected with the wild-type form and 122 (13.8%) with the hereditary form. Among the 601 patients included from May 2020, a hospitalization for cardiovascular condition within the 6 months preceding tafamidis initiation was reported for 22.3% of them, and tafamidis was initiated within 12 months after diagnosis for 92% of them (only 8% initiated the treatment beyond that period).

Conclusion

The RTU program has provided 1902 ATTR-CM patients with early access to tafamidis over 24 months, in France. Overall, as compared to patients included in ATTR-ACT, the pivotal trial, RTU patients were older, the proportion of wild-type was slightly higher, and NYHA distributions were similar.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Early access program sponsored by Pfizer

Diagnosis and management of heart failure from hospital admission to discharge: A practical expert guidance

Heart failure (HF) has high event rates, mortality, and is challenging to manage in clinical practice. Clinical management is complicated by complex therapeutic strategies in a population with a high prevalence of comorbidity and general frailty. In the last four years, an abundance of research has become available to support multidisciplinary management of heart failure from within the hospital through to discharge and primary care as well as supporting diagnosis and comorbidity management. Within the hospital setting, recent evidence supports sacubitril-valsartan combination in frail, deteriorating or de novo patients with LVEF≤40%. Furthermore, new strategies such as SGLT2 inhibitors and vericiguat provide further benefit for patients with decompensating HF. Studies with tafamidis report major clinical benefits specifically for patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, a remaining underdiagnosed and undertreated disease. New evidence for medical interventions supports his bundle pacing to reduce QRS width and improve haemodynamics as well as ICD defibrillation for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. The Mitraclip reduces hospitalisations and mortality in patients with symptomatic, secondary mitral regurgitation and ablation reduces mortality and hospitalisations in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. In end-stage HF, the 2018 French Heart Allocation policy should improve access to heart transplants for stable, ambulatory patients and, mechanical circulatory support should be considered to avoid deteriorating on the waiting list. In the community, new evidence supports that improving discharge education, treatment and patient support improves outcomes. The authors believe that this review fills the gap between the guidelines and clinical practice and provides practical recommendations to improve HF management.

Echocardiographic phenotypes of patients with sickle cell disease. An unsupervised analysis based on etendard cohort

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): PHRC

Backgroung

Echocardiography is the cornerstone in the diagnosis of cardiopulmonary involvement in sickle cell disease (SCD). However, given the unique pathophysiology of SCD associating high cardiac output, and various degrees of peripheral vasculopathy, differentiate the pathological from the physiological using echocardiography can be particularly challenging.

Purpose

This study sought to link cardiac phenotypes in homozygous SCD patients with clinical profiles and outcomes using cluster analysis.

Methods

We analyzed data of 379 patients with a sufficient echographic dataset included in the French Etendard Cohort, a prospective cohort initially designed to assess the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension. A cluster analysis was performed on echocardiographic variables, and the association between clusters and clinical profiles and outcomes was assessed.

Results

Three clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (N = 122) patients had the lowest cardiac output, only mild left cavities remodeling, diastolic dysfunction, and high tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV). They were predominantly female, as old as cluster 2, and displayed the most severe functional limitation. Cluster 2 (N = 103) patients had the highest cardiac output, left ventricular mass and a severely dilated left atrium. Diastolic function and TRV were similar to cluster 1. These patients had a higher blood pressure and a severe hemolytic anemia. Cluster 3 (N = 154) patients had mild left cavities remodeling, the best diastolic function and the lowest TRV. They were younger patients with the highest hemoglobin and lowest hemolytic markers. Right heart catheterization was performed in 94 patients. Cluster 1 gathered the majority of precapillary PH while cluster 2 gathered postcapillary PH and no PH was found in cluster 3. After a follow-up of 9.9 years (IQR: 9.3 to 10.5 years) death occurred in 38 patients (10%). Clusters 2 had the worst prognosis with 18% mortality rate vs. 12% in cluster 2 and 5% in cluster 1 (P log-rank = 0,02). Results are summarized in the central illustration.

Conclusions

Cluster analysis of echocardiographic variables identified 3 phenotypes among SCD patients, each associated with different clinical features and outcome. These findings underlines the necessity to rethink echocardiographic evaluation of SCD patients, with an integrative approach based on simultaneous evaluation of TRV along with left cavities remodeling and diastolic parameters.

Abstract Figure.

Risk of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a clustering analysis based on the French registry on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (REMY)

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI – UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris-Centre Université de Paris, University of Paris

onbehalf

REMY register

Paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM),(20%-25% of patients), and is often considered as an important disease turning point. The aim of this study is to determine HCM-phenogroups with different risk of AF-occurrence at 5-year.

We applied the Bayesian method to differentiate phenogroups of patients with different risks of AF across a French hospital registry of adult HCM(REMY). Data were prospectively recorded on 5 years follow-up. 1431 HCM patients were recruited, including 1275 analyzed.

The population included 412 women. AF-occurred in 167 (11.6%) patients. 3 phenogroups were defined according to their common characteristics. Patients at the highest risk were more often female, with more frequent comorbidities, greatest anteroposterior LA diameter, diastolic dysfunction, outflow-tract obstruction or mitral valve abnormality, and presented higher sPAP or right ventricular dysfunction. These also had a higher risk of all-cause hospitalizations and death.

Based on a clustering analysis, 3 phenogroups of HCM according to the risk of AF occurrence can be identified. It can indicate which patients should be more monitored.

3 different AF-risk groups Intermediate risk group n = 524 High-risk group n= 207 Low-risk group n = 544 P Gender = Males (%) 338 (64.5) 103 (49.8) 422 (77.6) &lt;0.001 Age (median [IQR]) 59.00 [47.00, 66.00] 63.00 [54.00, 74.00] 50.00 [38.00, 60.00] &lt;0.001 Stroke (%) 29 (5.5) 44 (21.3) 5 (0.9) &lt;0.001 Right ventricular failure (%) 10 (1.9) 41 (19.8) 0 (0.0) &lt;0.001 None Mitral regurgitation (%) 207 (42.2) 25 (12.6) 416 (81.2) &lt;0.001 Moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (%) 258 (52.6) 143 (72.3) 92 (18) &lt;0.001 Mitral Valve elongation (%) 113 (23.5) 48 (24.9) 62 (12.1) Abnormal insertion of a papillary muscle (%) 13 (2.7) 12 (6.2) 6 (1.2) Mitral valve SAM (%) 214 (40.8) 115 (55.6) 77 (14.2) &lt;0.001 Basal obstruction (%) 196 (37.4) 119 (57.5) 54 (9.9) &lt;0.001 Anteroposterior LA diameter (mm) (median [IQR]) 44.00 [38.00, 49.00] 47.00 [42.00, 51.00] 39.00 [33.00, 43.00] &lt;0.001 Mitral E/e’ Lateral (median [QR]) 10.00 [8.00, 13.53] 15.00 [10.11, 20.00] 7.50 [5.80, 10.00] &lt;0.001 Mitral E/e’ Septal (median [QR]) 15.00 [11.18, 19.55] 18.40 [14.20, 23.50] 10.50 [8.33, 13.88] &lt;0.001 Normal sPAP (%) 354 (82.1) 74 (39.6) 435 (98.0) &lt;0.001 Event AF (%) 80 (15.3) 60 (29.0) 27 (5.0) &lt;0.001 Any cause death (%) 29 (5.5) 36 (17.4) 7 (1.3) &lt;0.001 Any cause hospitalization (%) 174 (33.2) 113 (54.6) 56 (10.3) &lt;0.001 3 different groups on their caracteristics and AF-risk Abstract Figure.

Long-term survival with tafamidis in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy

Background

The Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT), demonstrated that tafamidis was an effective treatment for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Tafamidis, at an 80 mg daily dose, was subsequently approved in several countries for the treatment of ATTR-CM. Patients who completed ATTR-ACT were eligible to enroll in an ongoing long-term extension study (LTE) which provides additional data on the long-term efficacy of tafamidis.

Purpose

To assess the long-term benefit of tafamidis in patients with ATTR-CM and to determine median survival times with treatment.

Methods

Patients with ATTR-CM who completed ATTR-ACT (in which they were randomized to tafamidis meglumine 80 mg, 20 mg or placebo for 30 months) could enroll in the ongoing LTE in which patients continued to be treated with the same dose of tafamidis or, if previously treated with placebo, were randomized to tafamidis meglumine 80 mg or 20 mg. Tafamidis free acid 61 mg is a new formulation (bioequivalent to tafamidis meglumine 80 mg) developed for patient convenience and all patients in the LTE transitioned to tafamidis free acid 61 mg as of 1 Aug, 2018. All-cause mortality (with heart transplant or cardiac mechanical assist device [CMAD] implantation counted as death) was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model (as of 1 Aug, 2019). Patients treated with tafamidis meglumine 80 mg in ATTR-ACT and the LTE who transitioned to tafamidis free acid 61 mg (tafamidis 80/61 mg) were compared with patients treated with placebo in ATTR-ACT who transitioned to tafamidis in the LTE (placebo/tafamidis).

Results

There were a total of 176 tafamidis 80/61 mg patients and 177 placebo/tafamidis patients. Median treatment duration was 51.9 months with tafamidis 80/61 mg and 51.4 months with placebo/tafamidis. With tafamidis 80/61 mg, there were 75 (42.6%) all-cause deaths; consisting of 67 (38.1%) deaths, 6 (3.4%) heart transplants, and 2 (1.1%) CMAD implantations. With placebo/tafamidis, there were 108 (61.0%) all-cause deaths; consisting of 102 (57.6%) deaths and 6 (3.4%) heart transplants. There was a significant reduction of 41.1% in the risk of all-cause mortality with tafamidis 80/61 mg compared with placebo/tafamidis (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.5888 [0.4370, 0.7931]; P=0.0004). Median survival time with placebo/tafamidis was 35.8 months but was not reached with tafamidis 80/61 mg.

Conclusions

Treatment with tafamidis significantly improves long-term survival in patients with ATTR-CM. The comparatively poorer survival in patients treated with placebo in ATTR-ACT who transitioned to tafamidis in the LTE highlights the importance of early diagnosis and treatment.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): This study was sponsored by Pfizer.

Echocardiographic evaluation of patients with sickle cell disease. A study based on Etendar Cohort

Background

Echocardiography is the main non-invasive screening tool for pulmonary hypertension (PH) in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), but relies mostly on the tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) assessment, without distinction between pre and postcapillary patterns.

Purpose

Using Etendard Cohort data, the aim of this study was to refine echocardiographic assessment of PH in SCD patients.

Methods

The French Etendard Study is a prospective cohort initially designed to assess the prevalence of PH among 398 SCD participants. We analyzed echocardiography data of the 96 Etendard patients who underwent Right Heart Catheterization (RCH), because of a TRV≥2.5m/s, and compared them to invasive haemodynamic measurements. Based on RHC results, patients were classified as follows: Absence of pulmonary hypertension if mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) was &lt;25mmHg. Precapillary PH if mPAP≥25mmHg and pulmonary-capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≤15mmHg. Postcapillary PH if mPAP≥25mmHg and PCWP &gt;15mmHg.

Results

PH was found in 24/96 patients with 11 precapillary and 13 postcapillary. In addition to TRV, multivariate analysis identified indexed left atrial volume (LAVind) and lateral E' wave velocity (E'lat) as independent echocardiographic predictors of PH (OR=1.06 and 0.6 respectively, p&lt;0.01). LAVind and E'lat showed good correlation with mPAP (R=0.51 and R=0.40 respectively and p&lt;10–3 for both) and had good accuracy to predict PH with an optimal cut-off of 48ml/m2 for LAVind (AUC=0.78, Se=81% and Sp=75%) and 12cm/s for E'lat (AUC=0.8, Se=72% and Sp=79). Using the association of a TRV≥3m/s or a TRV [2.5; 2.9] m/s with LAVind&gt;48ml/m2 and E'lat&lt;12cm/s, we could predict PH with a PPV of 68% and NPV of 90%.

Moreover, comparing echocardiography data of pre and post-capillary PH patients, we observed that Pulmonary acceleration time (PAcT) was different in the two groups (104±22ms vs. 160±21ms, p&lt;0.001) with an excellent accuracy for the differentiation of both phenotypes (AUC=0.95, optimal cut-off=115ms, Se=100% and Sp=78%). PAcT correlated with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) assessed by RHC (R=0.34, p=0.001) but not with mPAP (R=0.1, p=0.2) and a PAcT&gt;115ms ruled out pre-capillary PH with a NPV of 97%.

Conclusion

Echocardiography can accurately estimates the probability of PH in SCD patients with an integrated approach using TRV, LAVind and E'lat. In addition, among patients with suspected PH, measuring PAcT as a PVR surrogate allows a good differentiation between pre and post-capillary phenotypes. We propose a new echocardiographic algorithm for the diagnosis of PH in SCD that could be a true assistance in referring patients for RHC.

TTE Algorithm for PH in SCD

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Funded by the French Ministry of Health and Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris

Death, hospitalization, emergency department visits and out-patient visits in patients with heart failure in contemporary practice: results from the prospective Europeam 9069-patient ARIADNE registry

Background

In Europe, heart failure (HF) is managed in variable settings and frequently in office-based practice. In HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) there is now extensive evidence based therapy, but implementation is inconsistent, variable and overall inadequate. The Assessment of Real lIfe cAre –Describing EuropeaN hEart failure management (ARIADNE) registry aimed to assess in detail how outpatients with HFrEF are managed in Europe in contemporary practice.

Methods

ARIADNE was a prospective non-interventional registry of patients with HFrEF (NYHA class II-IV) treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists) in a real world setting. Patients were enrolled in 687 centres in 17 European countries, and studied at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Key pre-specified outcomes were deaths, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and office visits, and their primary reasons.

Results

Over 20 months, we enrolled 9069 patients; median age 69 (19–96) years, 24% women, with 30% older than 75 years, 61% NYHA class II, with a median EF 35% (30–40%).

Over a median follow-up of 353 (1–631) days, 382 patients (4.3%) died, with 171 cardiovascular deaths (1.9%). The rates of total hospitalizations overall, for HF, and for non-HF cardiovascular reasons were 19.3, 8.1, and 4.8 per 100 patient years, respectively; and rates of emergency department visits overall, for HF reasons, and for non-HF CV reason were 7.7, 1.6, and 1.8, respectively. The number of HF office visits were on average 1.0 per patient.

Conclusions

In this large multinational HFrEF registry with detailed data on cause-specific outcomes and health care utilization, incidence of death was low and outpatient HF visits were few, but incidence of HF and CV hospitalization and emergency department visits was high.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis AG, Switzerland

Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in European outpatients with chronic heart failure in Europe: results from ARIADNE registry

Background

Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) was introduced as a novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of heart failure (HF). The Assessment of Real lIfe cAre –Describing EuropeaN hEart failure management (ARIADNE) registry provides real world information about its use and efficacy in real life in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in Europe.

Methods

ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF (NYHA II-IV, reduced EF) treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists) in a real world setting. 9069 HFrEF patients were enrolled from 674 investigators in 17 European countries, and followed over 12 months. Out of 8787 patients fulfilling criteria for analysis, 52.5% of the patients received S/V treatment at baseline, whereas 47.5% continued on their previous individualized heart failure medication. Results of S/V patients are reported here.

Results

The mean age of patients prescribed S/V was 67.3 years, mainly NYHA class II or III (49.7% and 48.2%, respectively), and mean LVEF of 32.7%. Common documented comorbidities were arterial hypertension (63.7%), coronary heart disease (62.4%), dyslipidemia (50.3%), diabetes (32.5%), and chronic kidney disease (24.1%).

Of the 4143 patients in the S/V group, 89.9% received S/V at baseline, 74.8% received S/V in combination with a β-blocker; 47.8% with a β-blocker and MRA.

Within 6 months of the observational period, 693 (17.4%) of the S/V patients were hospitalized, of which 46.8% and 28.7%, had HF related and non-HF cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations. Emergency room visits without hospitalization were documented for 3.4% of S/V patients in the same time period; stroke and myocardial infarction occurred in 22 (0.5%) and 24 (0.6%) of the S/V patients, respectively. Cardiac catheterization or coronary angiography procedures were applied to 1.7% and 2.8% of the S/V patients. Total mortality was 4.3% (S/V 3.8%; non-S/V 5.0%), cardiovascular mortality 1.9% (S/V 1.8%; non-S/V 2.2%), during the 12 month observational period.

The proportion of S/V patients in NYHA class III or IV decreased in the course of the study from 44.6% to 24.0%. After 12 months of follow up, 46.3% of patients with NYHA class III had a reported improvement to NYHA class II. Consistently, mean LVEF increased to 37.9%. The percentage of S/V patients with LVEF &lt;22.5% decreased from 11.5% to 5.8%. KCCQ overall summary score increased by 1.9 points. An improvement of ≥5 points, denoting a clinically meaningful increase, was reported for 36.2% of S/V patients.

Conclusions

Data from the ARIADNE prospective registry portray a diverse, multinational study cohort receiving sacubitril/valsartan under real-world conditions. Throughout the study, symptoms and quality of life improved with the use of S/V.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis AG, Switzerland

Baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a European real-world, non-interventional registry study

Background

Heart failure (HF) is a major medical and economic burden that is often managed in office based practices. Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) was introduced as novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of HF. The ARIADNE registry aims to provide information on how outpatients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are managed in Europe, in light of this novel treatment option.

Methods

ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF treated by office-based cardiologists (OBC) or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists; PCP) in a real world setting. HFrEF patients were included prospectively, independently of whether treatment had been changed recently or not. 9069 patients were recruited from 687 centres in 17 European countries.

Results

The mean age of all patients was 68.1 years (S/V: 67.3 years, Non-S/V: 68.9 years). The majority of patients were in NYHA class II (61.3%), or NYHA class III (37.1%) overall, while more patients in the S/V group showed NYHA class III (S/V: 42.8%, Non-S/V: 30.9%). Mean LVEF was slightly lower in the S/V group than in the Non-S/V group (S/V: 32.7%, Non-S/V: 35.4%, overall 34.0%). The most frequently observed signs of HF were dyspnoea upon effort, followed by fatigue, palpitations on exertion at baseline. More patients tend to have more severe symptoms in the S/V groups (e.g. for dyspnoea on effort, Non-S/V: moderate 40.8%, severe 8.6%; S/V: moderate 46.4%, severe 14.1%). 44.0% of patients from the S/V group and 39.3% of non-S/V patients reported at least one hospitalization within 12 months prior to baseline, of which 73.3% in S/V and 69.9% in non-S/V patients were due to HF., At baseline, 44.7% of the patients used a CV device, of which most were implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD: Non-S/V 54.2%, S/V: 52.8%), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-ICD:Non-S/V 21.9%, S/V: 27.0%), and pacemaker (Non-S/V: 13.4%, S/V: 10.5%). The mean KCCQ overall summary score was 62.6 in the S/V group and 69.5 in the Non-S/V group at baseline.

83.9% of patients were treated with ARB or ACEi in Non-S/V group, (ACEi 57.3%, ARB 26.9%). The most frequently taken drug combinations in either group were ACEi/ ARB or S/V with β -blockers (Non-S/V 69.3%, S/V 67.3%). 40.2% in the Non-S/V group and 42.9% in S/V groups used a combination of ACEi/ARB or S/V, β-blocker and MRA.

Conclusions

The ARIADNE prospective registry provides insights and reflects variations in HF treatment practices in outpatients in Europe and the way S/V was introduced by OBCs and specialized PCPs in a real-world setting. In the observed population, S/V is more often prescribed to slightly younger patients with slightly lower LVEF, there was a greater observed percentage of S/V patients NYHA class III, with lower quality of life measurements and with more severe symptoms and recent hospitalizations for heart failure.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG

P1272 Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction : usefulness of inferior vena cava measurement

Methods

Invasive hemodynamics and echocardiographic measurements were documented in 132 consecutive patients referred to our centre with dyspnea, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%, and suspected pulmonary hypertension on a previous echocardiogram. Echocardiographic measurements of mitral flow (E and A wave velocities), the E/e’ratio, indexed left atrial volume (LAV), tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and the IVC size and collapsibility were obtained. Increased LVFP was defined by an invasive pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) &gt; 15 mmHg.

Results

In sinus rhythm patients, the sum of the criteria (E/e’ ratio &gt; 14, TRV &gt; 2.8 m/s and indexed LAV &gt; 34 ml/m²) ≥ 2 had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 63% for PAWP &gt; 15 mmHg, whereas a dilated (&gt; 2.1 cm) and/or non collapsible (≤ 50%) IVC had a PPV of 83%. In atrial fibrillation (AF), a dilated and/or non collapsible IVC had an 86% PPV for increased LVFP. We found that 16% of patients with elevated LVFP were more accurately classified using IVC evaluation than using the current guidelines criteria (net reclassification improvement = 0.25, p &lt;0.05).

Conclusion

Echographic measurements of the IVC size and collapsibility outperformed the classic 2016 recommendations algorithm to evaluate LVFP in sinus rhythm patients with suspected HFpEF. The IVC study was also valuable in patients with atrial fibrillation.

P1658Pharmacological treatment of patients with HFrEF: is it really optimized in case of CRT and/or ICD implantation?

Background

Cardiac resynchronization (CRT) as well as implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) in primary prevention should be considered in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) only when pharmacological treatment has been optimized.

Purpose

we sought to analyze pharmacological treatments according to the presence or not of CRT-P, CRT-D or ICD in real life HFrEF patients by using a multicenter survey.

Methods

the survey (NCT01956539) was carried out between 2015 and 2018 in 32 hospitals and included 2735 patients with HF who gave their consent during consultation or hospitalization. In this study, we analyzed only outpatients with chronic HFrEF treated for more than 6 months.

Results

among 1061 patients studied, 138 had CRT-P or CRT-D and 215 had ICD for primary prevention. The main clinical characteristics were: age 65±13 years, ischemic heart disease in, NYHA classes 1, 2, 3 and 4 in 15%, 52%, 23% and 10% cases respectively, systolic blood pressure 115mmHg [IQR 104–129], heart rate 70bpm [IQR 60–80], eGFR 64ml/min/1.73m2 [IQR 46–83]and LVEF was 30% [IQR 24–34]. The table shows the rate of use of evidence-based drugs and the dose for ACEi/ARB and betablockers, according to the presence of ICD or CRT.

HFrEF CRT-P or D ICD (primary prevention) n=1061 n=138 n=215 Loop diuretics 78.2% 79.7% 74.9% ACEi or ARB 65.2% 75.4% 67.3% Sacubitril/valsartan 5.9% 8.5% 9.5% Betablockers 72.3% 83.9% 76.8% Mineralocorticoid antagonists 45.7% 63.6% 60.2% ACEi/ARB mean % maxi dose 77 81 83 Beta-blockers mean % maxi dose 74 63 79

Conclusion

these results suggest that pharmacological treatment remains poorly optimized in a number of patients with HFrEF who received ICD or CRT

P6321Therapeutic optimization and inclusion in rehabilitation and education programs depend on age in chronic heart failure. A report of the French survey OFICSel

Background

Heart Failure (HF) is a major public health problem resulting in high rates of hospitalization and mortality. Frequency of HF increase due to the aging of population and improvement of treatments. Therefore, we hypothetized that elderly is a factor that might limit access to appropriate HF Care.

Purpose and methods

Our aim was to analyzed the optimization therapy and participation in rehabilitation and education programs depending according to classes of age (<40 years, 40–50; 50–60; 60–70; 70–80 and >80) in a large French HF population (out and in-patients, de novo/chronique/acute; consultation/hospitalization/rehabilitation; all LVEF classes and any type of cardiologist practice). Data were analized according to age groups

Results

A total of 2729 HF patients from 79 French departments were included of whom 36% were out patients, 53% were in-patients and 11% were in rehabilitation center. 16% were de novo Chronic HF and 31% were in Acute HF. Elderly patients were more frequently included in acute HF. Main data according on classes of age are presented in the table. Ischemic etiology and valvular diseases increased with age (p<0.0001). Cardiovascular risk factors (HTA, hypercholesterolemia) and atrial fibrillation were more frequent with ageing (p<0.0001).

Beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and anti-aldosterone, were less prescribed after 60 years old (p<0.0001) as therapeutic education or rehabilitation programs (p<0.0001). Modern means of communication (e-mail, smartphone and internet) were less used by elderly patients.(p<0.0001).

Main data according on classes of age Characteristics All (n=2729) <40 (n=91) 40–50 (n=197) 50–60 (n=447) 60–70 (n=706) 70–80 (n=715) >80 (n=573) p SBP 120±21 107±15 117±21 117±21 118±21 122±20 126±22 <0.0001 NYHA Class <0.0001   I 339 (13.8) 16 (19.3) 42 (23.5) 87 (21.4) 103 (16.1) 57 (8.8) 34 (6.7)   II 1187 (48.2) 45 (54.2) 95 (53.1) 213 (52.3) 311 (48.5) 314 (48.4) 209 (41.3)   III 763 (31.0) 20 (24.1) 34 (19.0) 97 (23.8) 199 (31.0) 206 (31.7) 207 (40.9)   IV 176 (7.1) 2 (2.4) 8 (4.5) 10 (2.5) 28 (4.4) 72 (11.1) 56 (11.1) LVEF 36 (29–50) 33 (26–44) 35 (25–45) 35 (25–42) 35 (25–45) 40 (30–50) 44 (32–55) <0.0001 NTproBNP 1808 (690–4323) 1176 (569–2434) 737 (294–1945) 1072 (346–2611) 1480 (619–3597) 2287 (1015–5689) 3275 (1500–6240) <0.0001 Plus-minus values are means ± SD, n (%) median (IQR).

Origin of patients according on classes

Conclusion

Elderly patients receive less Chronic HF treatment, and are less included in patient education and rehabilitation program despite having more comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors. Thus, to improve outcome, the health care system needs to be adapt to the patients'age.

Acknowledgement/Funding

SFC, CNCF, CNCH, FFC, Alliance du coeur, GERS, SNSMCV

132Imaging criteria for the diagnosis of heart failure with midrange and preserved LVEF in the real life

Background

According to last ESC guidelines, the diagnosis of heart failure with midrange and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFmrEF-HF and HFpEF) requires at least one of the following imaging criteria: LV hypertrophy with LVMI >115g/m2 in men and 95g/m2 in women, left atria dilation with LAVI >34ml/m2, TDI e' wave average <9cm/s and E/e' average ≥13.

Purpose

We analyzed the prevalence of these imaging criteria in real life patients who are labeled HFmrEF or HFpEF by using a multicenter survey on HF.

Methods

Our survey (NCT01956539) was carried out in 32 hospitals between 2015 and 2018 and included 2735 HF patients who gave their consent during consultation or hospitalization. The diagnosis of HF was left to the discretion of investigators. Besides clinical and biological data, echocardiographic data (<1 month before or <3 months after inclusion) was collected in an electronic database. No echographic variable except the LVEF was mandatory to be included.

Results

Among the 523 and 765 HF patients who were labeled respectively as HFmrEF-HF and HFpEF, the 4 echographic variables required for the diagnosis of HFmrEF or HFpEF were obtained in 512 patients. The median age was 74y [IQR 62–82], HF was de novo in 28%, AF in 34%, median NTproBNP was 1563 pg/mL [IQR 500–4372]. At least one of the 4 diagnostic criteria was present in all patients but 2, and patients had 2, 3 or 4 criteria in 43%, 37% and 1% of cases. The table shows only little differences between HFmrEF and HFpEF or de novo HF regarding the rate of each diagnostic criteria. There was no difference regarding the date of inclusion, i.e. before or after the last ESC guidelines.

Table 1 All HF patients De novo HF HFpEF HFmrEF mrEF or pEF (n=143) (n=293) (n=219) LVMI >115g/m2 (men) or 95g/m2 (women) 69.6% 64.3% 68.6% 70.2% LAVI >34ml/m2 74.2% 73.3% 80.4% 68.9% e' average <9cm/s 64.1% 55.3% 55.9% 76.1% E/e' average ≥13 35.4% 38.6% 37.3% 32.8%

Conclusion

The diagnosis of HFpEF or mrEF may be difficult and requires comprehensive echocardiography including all diagnostic variables because each single diagnostic criteria are present in only 33 to 80% cases.

Assessment of autonomic innervation of the foot in familial amyloid polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Distal involvement of autonomic nerve fibers is critical in familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) due to transthyretin (TTR) mutation. This study compares different methods for assessing autonomic foot innervation in TTR-FAP patients.

METHODS

Three groups of seven TTR-FAP patients were included, according to disease severity: clinically asymptomatic, moderate or advanced neuropathy. The autonomic investigation included the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics test and laser Doppler flowmetry for vasomotor aspects and the Sudoscan® (measuring electrochemical skin conductance) and Neuropad® test for sudomotor aspects. Somatic innervation was assessed by performing nerve conduction studies, quantitative sensory testing [including vibration, cold and warm detection threshold (WDT) measurements] and laser evoked potentials.

RESULTS

The results of all neurophysiological tests varied according to TTR-FAP severity (P ≤ 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test), except for the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics test and laser Doppler flowmetry variables. In addition, the sudomotor tests (Sudoscan or Neuropad) or WDT measurement provided early markers of neuropathy in two of the seven asymptomatic carriers. Finally, all neurophysiological results correlated with the Neuropathy Impairment Score (r values between -0.88 and -0.66, P < 0.005, Spearman test), except the cold detection threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

The Neuropad test could be used to detect TTR-FAP onset, but confirmation requires electrochemical skin conductance and WDT measurement. The Sudoscan technique, but not the Neuropad test (at least assessed at a fixed time point), could be valuable to follow the progression of the neuropathy. Follow-up investigation should also include large-fiber investigation (e.g. nerve conduction studies and vibration detection threshold). Conversely, reliable tests for assessing vasomotor disturbances in limb extremities of TTR-FAP patients are still awaited.