Integrating biomechanics with stakeholder perspectives to inform safety in grassroots dirt track racing

Grassroots dirt track racing is a foundational part of motorsports with a high risk of severe injury. This study aimed to gather perspectives and experiences of motorsports drivers surrounding safety and head acceleration events experienced during grassroots dirt track racing to inform strategies to improve driver safety. Thirteen drivers (n=9 who primarily race on dirt tracks; n=4 who primarily race on pavement tracks) with prior dirt track racing experience participated in separate, group-specific focus groups and/or one-on-one interviews where video, simulations of head motion, and head acceleration data were shared. Peak kinematics of laps and crash contact scenarios were recorded, and head perturbations (i.e., deviations in head motion relative to its moving-average trajectory) were quantified for each lap and presented through guided discussion. Responses were summarized using Rapid Assessment Process. Audio recordings and field notes were collected from focus groups and interviews and analyzed across 25 domains. Drivers described dirt track racing as short, fast bursts of racing. Benefits of dirt track racing for driver development were described, including learning car control. Drivers acknowledged risks of racing and expressed confidence in safety equipment but identified areas for improvement. Drivers observed lateral bouncing of the head in video and simulations but recognized that such motions were not noticed while racing. Track conditions and track type were identified as factors influencing head perturbations. Mean PLA (5.5 g) and PRV (3.07 rad/s) of perturbations experienced during racing laps and perturbation frequencies of 5 and 7 perturbations per second were reported. Generally, drivers accurately estimated the head acceleration magnitudes but were surprised by the frequency and maximum magnitude of perturbations. Maximum perturbation magnitudes (26.8 g and 19.0 rad/s) were attributed to hitting a "rut" in the dirt. Drivers described sudden stops, vertical loads due to landing from a large height, and impacts to the vehicle frame as crash events they physically feel the most. Summary statistics for crashes (medians = 7.30 g, 6.94 rad/s) were reported. Typical impact magnitudes measured in other sports (e.g., football) were provided for context. Upon reviewing the biomechanics, drivers were surprised that crash accelerations were relatively low compared to other contact/collision sports. Pavement drivers noted limited safety features in dirt track racing compared to pavement, including rigidity of vehicle frames, seat structure, seatbelt integration, and lack of oversight from sanctioning bodies. Most drivers felt seat inserts and head and neck restraints are important for injury prevention; however, usage of seat inserts and preferred head and neck restraint system differed among drivers. Drivers described their perspectives and experiences related to safety and identified strategies to improve safety in grassroots dirt track racing. Drivers expressed support for future safety research.

Driver head kinematics in grassroots dirt track racing crashes: A pilot analysis

Motorsport athletes experience head acceleration loading during crashes; however, there is limited literature quantifying the frequency and magnitude of these loads, particularly at the grassroots level of the sport. Understanding head motion experienced during crash events in motorsport is necessary to inform interventions to improve driver safety. This study aimed to quantify and characterize driver head and vehicle kinematics during crashes in open-wheel grassroots dirt track racing. Seven drivers (ages 16-22, n = 2 female) competing in a national midget car series were enrolled in this study over two racing seasons and were instrumented with custom mouthpiece sensors. Drivers' vehicles were outfitted with an incident data recorder (IDR) to measure vehicle acceleration. Forty-one crash events were verified and segmented into 139 individual contact scenarios via film review. Peak resultant linear acceleration (PLA) of the vehicle and PLA, peak rotational acceleration (PRA), and peak rotational velocity (PRV) of the head were quantified and compared across the part of the vehicle contacted (i.e., tires or chassis), the vehicle location contacted (e.g., front, left, bottom), the external object contacted (i.e., another vehicle, wall, or the track), and the principal direction of force (PDOF). The median (95th percentile) PLA, PRA, and PRV of the head and PLA of the vehicle were 12.3 (37.3) g, 626 (1799) rad/s2, 8.92 (18.6) rad/s, and 23.2 (88.1) g, respectively. Contacts with a non-horizontal PDOF (n = 98, 71%) and contact with the track (n = 96, 70%) were common in the data set. Contact to the left side of the vehicle, with the track, and with a non-horizontal PDOF tended to have the greatest head kinematics compared to other factors in each sub-analysis. Results from this pilot study can inform larger studies of head acceleration exposure during crashes in the grassroots motorsports environment and may ultimately support evidence-based driver safety interventions.

Assessing the association between on-field heading technique and head impact kinematics in a cohort of female youth soccer players

There is concern that exposure to soccer headers may be associated with neurological sequelae. Training proper heading technique represents a coachable intervention that may reduce head acceleration exposure. The objective was to assess relationships between heading technique and head kinematics in female youth soccer players. Fourteen players (mean age = 14.4 years) wore instrumented mouthpieces during practices and games. Headers were reviewed by three raters to assign a technique score. Mixed models and LASSO regression evaluated associations of technique with peak linear acceleration (PLA), rotational acceleration (PRA), rotational velocity (PRV), and head impact power ratio (HIP Ratio) while adjusting for session type and ball delivery. Two hundred eighty-nine headers (n = 212 standing, n = 77 jumping) were analyzed. Technique score (p = 0.043) and the technique score - session type interaction (p = 0.004) were associated with PRA of standing headers, whereby each 10-unit increase in technique score was associated with an 8.6% decrease in PRA during games but a 5.1% increase in PRA during practices. Technique was not significantly associated with any other kinematic metrics; however, peak kinematics tended to decrease as technique score increased. LASSO regression identified back extension and shoulder/hip alignment as important predictors of peak kinematics. Additional research on heading technique and head acceleration is recommended.

Head Impact Exposure in Female Collegiate Soccer by Activity Type

Soccer, one of the most popular sports in the world, has one of the highest rates of sports-related concussions. Additionally, soccer players are frequently exposed to nonconcussive impacts from intentionally heading the ball, a fundamental component of the sport. There have been many studies on head impact exposure in soccer, but few focus on soccer practices or practice activities. This study aimed to characterize the frequency and magnitude of head impacts in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I female soccer practice activities using a custom-fit instrumented mouthpiece. Sixteen players were instrumented over the course of 54 practice sessions. Video analysis was performed to verify all mouthpiece-recorded events and classify practice activities. Category groupings of practice activities include technical training, team interaction, set pieces, position-specific, and other. Differences in head impact rates and peak resultant kinematics were observed across activity types and category groupings. Technical training had the highest impact rate compared to other category groupings. Impacts occurring during set piece activities had the highest mean kinematic values. Understanding drill exposure can help inform coaches on training plans aimed to reduce head impact exposure for their athletes.

Pilot characterization of head kinematics in grassroots dirt track racing

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to utilize an instrumented mouthpiece sensor to characterize head kinematics experienced by grassroots dirt track race car drivers.

METHODS

Four dirt track race car drivers (ages 16-19) were instrumented with custom mouthpiece sensors capable of accurately measuring head motion during racing. Sensors were deployed before races and recorded tri-axial linear acceleration and rotational velocity for approximately 10 min at 200 Hz. Film review was performed to identify data associated with racing laps. For each lap, moving average kinematics were computed and subtracted from the head motion signals to obtain 'adjusted' head motion accounting for lower frequency variance due to periodic motion around the track. From adjusted data, linear and angular head perturbations (i.e., deviations from moving average) were extracted using a custom algorithm.

RESULTS

Data was collected during 400 driver-races. A total of 2438 laps were segmented from mouthpiece recordings. The median (95th percentile) peak linear acceleration, rotational velocity, and rotational acceleration of all laps were 5.33 (8.28) g, 2.89 (4.60) rad/s, and 179 (310) rad/s², respectively. Angular perturbations occurred most frequently about the anterior-posterior axis (median lap frequency = 6.39 Hz); whereas linear perturbations occurred most frequently in the inferior-superior direction (7.96 Hz). Nine crash events were recorded by the mouthpiece sensors. The median (95^th percentile) peak head kinematics of these events were 13.4 (36.6) g, 9.67 (21.9) rad/s, and 630 (1330) rad/s².

CONCLUSIONS

Mouthpiece sensors can be used to measure head kinematics during active racing. Laps, head perturbations, and crashes may be useful units of observation to describe typical head kinematic exposure experienced by drivers while racing. Subsequent research is needed to understand the associations between repetitive racing exposure and neurological function. Higher magnitude events (i.e., crashes) are not uncommon and may result in concussion or more severe injury. Results represent novel characterizations of head kinematic exposure experienced in a dirt track racing environment. This information may inform evidence-based strategies (e.g., vehicle/seat design) to improve driver safety.

Header biomechanics in youth and collegiate female soccer

Concerns about the effects of intentional heading in soccer have led to regulatory restrictions on headers for youth players. However, there is limited data describing how header exposure varies across age levels, and few studies have attempted to compare head impact exposure across different levels of play with the same sensor. Additionally, little is known about the biomechanical response of the brain to header impacts. The objective of this study was to evaluate head kinematics and the resulting tissue-level brain strain associated with intentional headers among youth and collegiate female soccer players. Six youth and 13 collegiate participants were instrumented with custom mouthpiece-based sensors measuring six-degree-of-freedom head kinematics of headers during practices and games. Kinematics of film-verified headers were used to drive impact simulations with a detailed brain finite element model to estimate tissue-level strain. Linear and rotational head kinematics and strain metrics, specifically 95th percentile maximum principal strain (ε_1,95) and the area under the cumulative strain damage measure curve (VSM₁), were compared across levels of play (i.e., youth vs. collegiate) while adjusting for session type and ball delivery method. A total of 483 headers (n = 227 youth, n = 256 collegiate) were analyzed. Level of play was significantly associated with linear acceleration, rotational acceleration, rotational velocity, ε_1,95, and VSM₁. Headers performed by collegiate players had significantly greater mean head kinematics and strain metrics compared to those performed by youth players (all p < .001). Targeted interventions aiming to reduce head impact magnitude in soccer should consider factors associated with the level of play.

Comparison of women's collegiate soccer header kinematics by play state, intent, and outcome

Although most head impacts in soccer are headers, limited knowledge exists about how header magnitude varies by on-field scenario. This study aimed to compare head kinematics during on-field headers by play state (i.e., corner kick, goal kick, free kick, throw-in, drill, or live ball), intent (i.e., pass, shot, or clearance), and outcome (i.e., successful or unsuccessful). Fifteen female collegiate soccer players were instrumented with mouthpiece-based head impact sensors during 72 practices and 24 games. A total of 336 headers were verified and contextualized via film review. Play state was associated with peak linear acceleration, rotational acceleration, and rotational velocity (all p < .001) while outcome was associated with peak linear acceleration (p < .010). Header intent was not significantly associated with any kinematic metric. Headers during corner kicks (22.9 g, 2189.3 rad/s², 9.87 rad/s), goal kicks (24.3 g, 2658.9 rad/s², 10.1 rad/s), free kicks (18.0 g, 1843.3 rad/s², 8.43 rad/s), and live balls (18.8 g, 1769.7 rad/s², 8.09 rad/s) each had significantly greater mean peak linear acceleration (all p < .050), rotational acceleration (all p < .001), and rotational velocity (all p < .001) than headers during drills (13.0 g, 982.4 rad/s², 5.28 rad/s). Headers during goal kicks also had a significantly greater mean rotational acceleration compared to headers during live ball scenarios (p < .050). Successful headers (18.3 g) had a greater mean peak linear acceleration compared to unsuccessful headers (13.8 g; p < .010). Results may help inform efforts to reduce head impact exposure in soccer.