1
|
Petros BA, Turcinovic J, Welch NL, White LF, Kolaczyk ED, Bauer MR, Cleary M, Dobbins ST, Doucette-Stamm L, Gore M, Nair P, Nguyen TG, Rose S, Taylor BP, Tsang D, Wendlandt E, Hope M, Platt JT, Jacobson KR, Bouton T, Yune S, Auclair JR, Landaverde L, Klapperich CM, Hamer DH, Hanage WP, MacInnis BL, Sabeti PC, Connor JH, Springer M. Early Introduction and Rise of the Omicron Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Variant in Highly Vaccinated University Populations. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:e400-e408. [PMID: 35616119 PMCID: PMC9213864 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is highly transmissible in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. The dynamics that govern its establishment and propensity toward fixation (reaching 100% frequency in the SARS-CoV-2 population) in communities remain unknown. Here, we describe the dynamics of Omicron at 3 institutions of higher education (IHEs) in the greater Boston area. METHODS We use diagnostic and variant-specifying molecular assays and epidemiological analytical approaches to describe the rapid dominance of Omicron following its introduction into 3 IHEs with asymptomatic surveillance programs. RESULTS We show that the establishment of Omicron at IHEs precedes that of the state and region and that the time to fixation is shorter at IHEs (9.5-12.5 days) than in the state (14.8 days) or region. We show that the trajectory of Omicron fixation among university employees resembles that of students, with a 2- to 3-day delay. Finally, we compare cycle threshold values in Omicron vs Delta variant cases on college campuses and identify lower viral loads among college affiliates who harbor Omicron infections. CONCLUSIONS We document the rapid takeover of the Omicron variant at IHEs, reaching near-fixation within the span of 9.5-12.5 days despite lower viral loads, on average, than the previously dominant Delta variant. These findings highlight the transmissibility of Omicron, its propensity to rapidly dominate small populations, and the ability of robust asymptomatic surveillance programs to offer early insights into the dynamics of pathogen arrival and spread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany A Petros
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard/Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MD-PhD Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jacquelyn Turcinovic
- National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Bioinformatics Program, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nicole L Welch
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Program in Virology, Division of Medical Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Laura F White
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric D Kolaczyk
- Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Rafik B. Hariri Institute for Computing and Computational Science and Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew R Bauer
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Program in Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Medical Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Cleary
- Harvard University Clinical Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sabrina T Dobbins
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lynn Doucette-Stamm
- Boston University Clinical Testing Laboratory, Boston University Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mitch Gore
- Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc, Coralville, Iowa, USA
| | - Parvathy Nair
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA
| | - Tien G Nguyen
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Scott Rose
- Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc, Coralville, Iowa, USA
| | - Bradford P Taylor
- Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel Tsang
- Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc, Coralville, Iowa, USA
| | | | - Michele Hope
- Harvard University Clinical Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Judy T Platt
- Boston University Student Health Services, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karen R Jacobson
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tara Bouton
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Seyho Yune
- Student Affairs, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jared R Auclair
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Life Sciences Testing Center, Northeastern University, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.,Biopharmaceutical Analysis and Training Laboratory, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lena Landaverde
- Boston University Clinical Testing Laboratory, Boston University Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Catherine M Klapperich
- Boston University Clinical Testing Laboratory, Boston University Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Boston University Student Health Services, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Boston University Precision Diagnostics Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Davidson H Hamer
- National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Boston University Precision Diagnostics Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Center for Emerging Infectious Disease Research and Policy, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William P Hanage
- Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bronwyn L MacInnis
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Pardis C Sabeti
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA.,Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John H Connor
- National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Bioinformatics Program, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Microbiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Springer
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nguyen H, Weber S, Kataria Y, Cole M, Duffy E, Ragan E, Turcinovic J, Miller N, Hanage WP, Connor J, Pierre C, Jacobson K, Lodi S, Bouton T. 376. Sensitivity and Specificity of the WHO Probable SARS-CoV-2 Case Definition Among Symptomatic Healthcare Personnel. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021. [PMCID: PMC8690484 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab466.577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background SARS-CoV-2 continues to spread globally, including in limited resource settings. It is therefore important to derive general case definitions that can be useful and accurate in the absence of timely test results. We aim to validate the World Health Organization (WHO) case definition, a symptom-screening tool currently used to identify SARS-CoV-2 cases in a cohort of symptomatic health care providers (HCP) who completed a symptom survey interview and received a PCR test at Boston Medical Center (BMC) between March 13, 2020 and May 5, 2020. Methods We classified each HCP as a probable or not probable case of SARS-CoV-2 based on the WHO case definition. Using PCR test as gold standard, we computed the sensitivity and specificity of the WHO case definition. We used a stepwise logistic regression model on all PCR-tested HCP to identify symptoms predictive of PCR positivity. Results Of 328 included HCP, 109 (33.2%) were PCR positive, 213 (64.9%) negative, and 6 (1.8%) had indeterminate test result. The sensitivity and specificity of the WHO case definition were 65.1% and 74.6%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 56.8% and the negative predictive value was 80.7%. Symptoms found to be predictive of PCR positivity were fever, headache, loss of smell and/or loss of taste, and muscle ache/joint pain. Sore throat was found to be predictive of PCR negativity. The area under the curve using the final model was 0.8412. All statistically significant symptoms included in the final model, were also included in the WHO case definition. ![]()
![]()
![]()
Conclusion In our largely symptomatic HCP cohort, our model yielded similar symptoms to those identified in the WHO probable case definition. As seen in similar studies, it is unlikely that further adjustment will improve the performance of a SARS-CoV-2 case definition. However, it is concerning that 35% (38/109) of PCR positive SARS-CoV-2 HCP would have been classified as not probable cases by the WHO definition, given that this definition does not even include asymptomatic cases. This is further evidence for global building of laboratory capacity and development of affordable diagnostics to improve global pandemic control. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Nguyen
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah Weber
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sara Lodi
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tara Bouton
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|