A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Tearcare® and Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease (SAHARA)

Purpose

We compare outcomes in eyes with dry eye disease (DED) treated with TearCare (TC) or topical cyclosporine 0.05% (RESTASIS; CsA).

Setting

Nineteen ophthalmic and optometric practices in 11 US states.

Design

Multicenter, randomized, assessor-masked, controlled IRB-approved trial. Eligible subjects: ≥22 years of age, dry eye symptoms within 3-6 months, Tear Break-up Time (TBUT) ≥1 to ≤7 s, Meibomian Gland Secretion Score (MGSS) ≤12, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) of 23-79. Randomized (1:1) to TC or CsA. TC subjects treated at baseline and month 5; CsA was twice daily for 6 months.

Methods

Follow-up visits were scheduled for Day 1, Week 1, Months 1, 3, and 6 with primary inference at Month 6. Primary outcomes: TBUT and OSDI; secondary outcomes: MGSS, conjunctival and corneal staining, eye dryness score (EDS), symptoms assessment in dry eye (SANDE) score, and Schirmer tear score (STS). Safety assessments included adverse events, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and slit-lamp findings.

Results

Overall, 345 subjects, 172 TC and 173 CsA. TBUT improved at all time points in both groups (p<0.0001), with statistically greater improvement for TC versus CsA (p=0.0006). OSDI improved significantly at all time points in both groups (p<0.0001) with no significant differences between treatments. MGSS and other measures of meibomian gland function improved significantly more with TC eyes versus CsA; other secondary outcomes showed significant improvements in both groups with no difference between groups. Treatment-related adverse events were uncommon (10 total, 8 in the CsA group consistent with prior CsA studies); most (9/10) mild.

Conclusion

TC provides statistically superior and sustained improvement in TBUT and multiple measures of meibomian gland secretion, and non-inferior improvement in OSDI, corneal and conjunctival staining, SANDE, EDS, and STS versus CsA. TC should be a preferred treatment for DED associated with MGD.

Localized Heat Treatment for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy over Time

SIGNIFICANCE

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) can produce a myriad of symptoms. The effective treatment of MGD can reduce the burden of this condition. Although several studies have indicated that TearCare (Sight Sciences, Menlo Park, CA) is an effective treatment for MGD, no studies currently provide information regarding the duration of efficacy.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this analysis was to determine the duration of efficacy of symptom relief and improvement of signs (as measured by gland function) for a treatment consisting of controlled heating of the meibomian glands using SmartLids (Sight Sciences) combined with manual expression of the liquefied meibum by a physician.

METHODS

This study involved retrospective analysis of data gathered from a single-center ophthalmology/optometry practice. Symptoms were assessed using the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, and the signs were assessed using the meibomian gland expression (MGE) scores before and at several time points (8 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months). Further analysis evaluating the efficacy in subgroups based on age, race, and sex was performed.

RESULTS

There were 78 patients included in this study. The mean baseline SPEED score decreased from 14 to 7.9 at 8 weeks. The mean SPEED scores at 6 and 12 months were maintained at 7.7 and 7.9, respectively, and at 18 months went to 8.9. At baseline, the mean MGE was 4.9 in the right eye and 4.8 in the left eye. In both eyes, the mean MGE increased to 9.0 in both eyes at 8 weeks. At 6 months, the mean MGE score was maintained at 8.6 in the right and 8.2 in the left and remained consistent at 12 months with 7.8 in the right and 7.8 in the left. At 18 months, the MGE score went to 6.8 in the right eye and 7.0 in the left eye.

CONCLUSIONS

A single TearCare treatment effectively reduced both the symptoms and signs of MGD and maintained its effects for 12 months.

Erratum: How Can We Best Diagnose Severity Levels of Dry Eye Disease: Current Perspectives [Corrigendum]

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S388289.].

A Prospective Study of Cyclosporine A 0.1% Combined with Loteprednol 0.2% vs Cyclosporine A 0.05% Alone in the Treatment of Dry Eye

PURPOSE

To examine the efficacy and tolerability of a combination of cyclosporine 0.1% and loteprednol 0.2% (CsA-LE; Klarity CL) in comparison to commercially available cyclosporine 0.05% (CsA; Restasis) in improving signs and symptoms of dry eye.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study evaluated 60 patients randomized to a single treatment for 4 weeks and evaluated at day 0, day 14, and day 28. Comparison was made of corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), dry-eye symptoms (SPEED score), tear-breakup time (TBUT), corneal staining, and ocular hyperemia, as well as tolerability of each medication with the validated COMTOL instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients completed enrollment. Corneal HOAs improved significantly with CsA-LE, but not CsA alone. Both groups showed significant improvement (with no significant differences between groups) in SPEED scores, corneal staining, TBUT, and conjunctival hyperemia. Tolerability was similar between the drugs, and no significant safety issues were identified.

CONCLUSION

The combination of CsA 0.1%-LE 0.2% provided significant improvement in corneal HOAs, while CsA 0.05% did not. For all other measures of ocular surface improvement, both medications showed similar benefits. Tolerability was comparable between the formulations. When rapid rehabilitation of the ocular surface is needed to reduce aberrations, CsA-LE is an appropriate choice.

How Can We Best Diagnose Severity Levels of Dry Eye Disease: Current Perspectives

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular condition, but the diagnosis relative to other ocular conditions and the evaluation of severity of the condition has often been difficult. This challenge can be due to clinical signs and symptoms not always correlating with each other. An understanding of the various components which create the condition, as well as the diagnostic measures used to evaluate these components, is useful to the clinician working with DED patients. This review paper will discuss traditional diagnostic options, diagnostic imaging, and Advanced Point of Care testing capabilities to determine the severity level of dry eye disease more adequately.

A Single-center Retrospective Trial of a Blink-assisted Eyelid Device in Treating the Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye

SIGNIFICANCE

The clinical features of meibomian gland disease include altered tear film stability, damage to the ocular surface, symptoms of ocular surface irritation, and visual fluctuations. Finding an adequate treatment to alleviate a patient's signs and symptoms is vital to caring for those with dry eye disease resulting from meibomian gland disease.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether the controlled heating of meibomian glands with the SmartLid devices (TearCare) combined with evacuation of the liquefied meibum using a handheld clearance assistant would improve a patient's dry eye symptoms (as measured by the Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness [SPEED] questionnaire) and signs (as measured by meibomian gland expression [MGE] scores).

METHODS

This study involved a retrospective analysis of data gathered in a single-center ophthalmology/optometry practice. The symptom frequency and severity were assessed using the SPEED questionnaire, and the signs were assessed via MGE scores before and after (8 to 12 weeks) treatment. A further analysis evaluating efficacy in subgroups based on age, race, and sex was performed. A statistical analysis was performed with t tests for group comparisons.

RESULTS

A SPEED questionnaire was answered by 92 patients with dry eye disease. In addition, each patient's meibomian gland function was recorded as MGE scores for each eye (176 eyes). These procedures were completed before and approximately 8 weeks after a single bilateral TearCare treatment. The median total SPEED score was reduced from 16 to 9, and the total MGE scores improved from 5.0 to 9.0 in the right eye and 4.0 to 9.0 in the left eye after a single TearCare treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A single TearCare treatment was effective in reducing both the signs and symptoms of dry eye in all subjects.

Comparative acaricidal efficacy of the topically applied combinations fipronil/(S)-methoprene, permethrin/imidacloprid and metaflumizone/ amitraz against Dermacentor reticulatus, the European dog tick (ornate dog tick, Fabricius, 1794) in dogs

The acaricidal efficacy against Dermacentor reticulatus in dogs of the commercial topical combinations fipronil/(S)-methoprene (FRONTLINE Combo spot-on dog), imidacloprid/permethrin (Advantix) and metaflumizone/amitraz (ProMeris Duo) was evaluated and compared. Three treatment groups and one untreated control group of six adult Beagle dogs each were randomly formed. Each treatment was administered topically once on Day-0, according to the recommended label dose and instructions for use. All dogs were infested weekly with approximately 50 adult unfed D. reticulatus over a period of seven weeks. Ticks were removed and counted approximately 48 hours after each infestation. The percent reduction in numbers of ticks for fipronil/(S)-methoprene was > or = 97% compared to untreated controls for all seven weekly infestations. The percent reductions for imidacloprid/permethrin and metaflumizone/amitraz were satisfactory initially but fell and stayed below 90 % after three weeks. From the third week onwards, fipronil/(S)-methoprene treated dogs had significantly fewer ticks than imidacloprid/permethrin or metaflumizone/amitraz treated dogs (p < 0.05).

A clustering of immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy among swine abattoir workers exposed to aerosolized porcine brains, Indiana, United States

In November 2007 a novel neuropathy, immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy (IP), was identified among workers at a Minnesota swine abattoir where a unique compressed air technique was used to remove porcine brains. An epidemiologic investigation at another abattoir in Indiana that also uses this process was launched to evaluate workers self-reporting neurologic illness compatible with IP. A nested case-control study was performed to identify cases and risk factors. Six confirmed, one probable, and three possible IP cases were detected. IP cases were 28-52 years old, of Latino origin, and 62.5% female. Onset dates ranged from April 2005-December 2007; 60% were hospitalized. IP cases at this plant were similar in clinical presentation and exposure risks to those detected in Minnesota. Swine abattoirs using similar brain extraction methods should discontinue this process.

British HIV Association guidelines for prescribing antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy (1998)

The aim of antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy is to deliver a healthy uninfected child to a healthy mother, without prejudicing the future treatment opportunities of the mother. The use of zidovudine monotherapy rapidly became standard practice once it had been shown to reduce by 67% mother to child transmission in women with CD4+ lymphocyte counts above 200 x 10(6)/l. High rates of transmission are seen when maternal disease is advanced (high viral load, low CD4+ lymphocyte counts) despite zidovudine. In these women highly active antiretroviral therapy gives the best prospect for prolonged health and it is anticipated that reducing plasma viral load below the limits of detection will further reduce transmission rates. However, safety data for antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy are limited and each additional treatment exposes a significant proportion of uninfected infants to potential long term hazards. Where maternal therapy is not indicated and the sole objective of treatment is to reduce mother to child transmission, recent data suggest that short course zidovudine (especially in conjunction with prelabour caesarean section) is a reasonable option. This may minimise the emergence of viruses with reduced sensitivity to zidovudine and preserve maternal options for later therapy.