The Brown University Oncology Group Experience With FOLFOX + Nab-paclitaxel [FOLFOX-A] for Metastatic and Locally Advanced Pancreatic, BrUOG-292 and BrUOG-318

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate response rate, toxicity, and efficacy of the novel combination of nab-paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin [FOLFOX-A] in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC].

METHODS

BrUOG-292 and BrUOG-318 were two concurrently run, prospective, single-arm phase II studies evaluating FOLFOX-A as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic and locally advanced/borderline resectable PDAC respectively. The FOLFOX-A regimen consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 1200 mg/m 2 /d as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over 46 hours, leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 IV, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 IV, and nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m 2 IV on day 1 every 14 days up to a maximum of 12 cycles. Patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable disease were permitted to stop treatment after 6 cycles and receive radiation therapy and/or surgical exploration if feasible. The primary end point was overall response rate [ORR]. Secondary end points were median progression-free survival [PFS], median overall survival [OS], and safety.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients with previously untreated PDAC were enrolled between June 2014 and November 2019; 76 patients were evaluable. The median follow-up was 40 months and 32 months, respectively. overall response rate was 34%. Among the patients enrolled on BrUOG-292 [48 patients], the PFS was 5 months and OS was 11 months, respectively. For those enrolled on BrUOG 318 [28 patients], the PFS was 11 months and OS was 22 months. Treatment-related toxicities included grade 3 fatigue [40%], diarrhea [14%], and neuropathy [2%].

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of FOLFOX-A has promising activity in PDAC and may represent an alternative to FOLFIRINOX when reduction of gastrointestinal toxicity is required.

37. ADXS11-001, mitomycin, 5-FU and radiation for anal cancera A phase I/II study

Background Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA is present in the majority of squamous cell cancers of the anus. ADXS11–001 immunotherapy is a live attenuated Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) bioengineered to secrete an HPV-16-E7 fusion protein targeting HPV-transformed cells. The Lm vector infects antigen-presenting cells, stimulating both MHC class 1 and 2 pathways resulting in specific T-cell immunity to tumours. The Brown University Oncology Research Group has initiated a phase I/II study evaluating two treatment schedules of ADXS11–001 with standard chemoradiation for anal cancer. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed anal cancer with a primary tumour >4 cm or lymph node involvement, without distant metastases, are eligible. All patients receive two courses of mitomycin, 5-FU with concurrent radiation (54 Gy in 30 fractions by IMRT). Patients receive four treatments of ADXS11–001, 1 × 109 colony-forming units intravenously once approximately every 28 days. In treatment schedule 1, the first dose is given before chemoradiation and the second to fourth doses are given every 28 days after completion of radiation. In treatment schedule 2, the second dose of ADXS11–001 is administered during chemoradiation. Results: Three patients have been treated with ADXS11–001 and chemoradiation on treatment schedule 1. One patient developed grade 3 chills and one patient experienced grade 2 flu-like symptoms post-infusion, both resolved with symptomatic treatment. Conclusions: ADXS11–001 is a highly novel form of immunotherapy designed to generate an immune response against HPV transformed cells. Accrual is continuing to evaluate safety and efficacy for patients with anal cancer.

Dosimetric Feasibility of Dose Escalation Using SBRT Boost for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Standard chemoradiation therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLCa) results in suboptimal outcomes with a high rate of local failure and poor overall survival. We hypothesize that dose escalation using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost could improve upon these results. We present here a study evaluating the dosimetric feasibility of such an approach.

METHODS

Anonymized CT data sets from five randomly selected patients with stage III NSCLCa undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy in our department with disease volumes appropriate for SBRT boost were selected. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) plans to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions were generated follow by SBRT plans to two dose levels, 16 Gy in two fractions and 28 Gy in two fractions. SBRT plans and total composite (3D-CRT and SBRT) were optimized and evaluated for target coverage and dose to critical structures; lung, esophagus, cord, and heart.

RESULTS

All five plans met predetermined target coverage and normal tissue dose constraints. PTV V95 was equal to or greater than 95% in all cases. The cumulative lung V20 and V5 of the combined 3D-CRT and SBRT plans were less than or equal to 30 and 55%, respectively. The 5 cc esophageal dose was less than 12 Gy for all low and high dose SBRT plans. The cumulative dose to the esophagus was also acceptable with less than 10% of the esophagus receiving doses in excess of 50 Gy. The cumulative spinal cord dose was less than 33 Gy and heart V25 was less than 5%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of chemoradiation to 50.4 Gy followed by SBRT boost to gross disease at the primary tumor and involved regional lymph nodes is feasible with respect to normal tissue dose constraints in this dosimetric pilot study. A phase I/II trial to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of this approach is being undertaken.

A Phase I Study of Dasatinib with Concurrent Chemoradiation for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objectives: Src family kinases (SFKs) are expressed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and may be involved in tumor growth and metastases. Inhibition of SFK may also enhance radiation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a maximum dose of 100 mg of dasatinib could be safely administered with concurrent chemoradiation and then continued as maintenance for patients with newly diagnosed stage III NSCLC. Methods: Patients with stage III locally advanced NSCLC received paclitaxel, 50 mg/m²/week, with carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) = 2, weekly for 7 weeks, and concurrent radiotherapy, 64.8 Gy. Three dose levels of dasatinib 50, 70, and 100 mg/day were planned. Results: 11 patients with locally advanced NSCLC were entered. At the 70 mg dose level 1 patient had grade 5 pneumonitis not responsive to therapy, and one patient had reversible grade 3 pneumonitis and grade 3 pericardial effusion. Due to these toxicities the Brown University Oncology Group Data Safety Monitoring Board terminated the study. Conclusion: Dasatinib could not be safely combined with concurrent chemoradiation for stage 3 lung cancer due to pneumonitis.

A phase II Brown University Oncology Group study of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (DOC) for metastatic esophagogastric cancer

e15541^

Background: We previously reported results of a phase I study of oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and capecitabine for advanced esophagogastric cancer (Evans et al, Am J C Onc 2007). In this phase II component we describe response rates, toxicity, and survival data. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic esophagogastric squamous or adenocarcinoma were eligible. Patients received oxaliplatin 50mg/m2 and docetaxel 35mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 as well as capecitabine 750 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–10 in each 21 day cycle. Results: 21 patients were enrolled and were evaluable. Median age was 65, range 46–83. All had adenocarcinoma histology. Three patients received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. A total of 91 cycles were delivered, median of 4, range of 1–11. Median follow-up was 2 years; all patients have been followed for at least 1 year. Median overall survival was 11 months. The overall response rate was 43%. Three patients achieved a complete response. Two of these patients remain without evidence of disease at 38 and 12 months. Three patients experienced confirmed pulmonary emboli, and one patient expired at home with possible pulmonary embolism (exact cause unknown).Other Grade 3/4 toxicities were: nausea (3/21), fatigue (2/21), diarrhea (4/21), hand/foot (1/21), dehydration (3/21), esophagitis (2/21), infection (1/21), Electrolyte (3/21), neutropenic fever (2/21), neutropenia (4/21), anemia (1/21). Conclusions: DOC is an active and easily administered regimen for metastatic esophagogastric cancer. Consideration should be given for prophylactic anticoagulation for patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer.

[Table: see text]

ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and Exceptions

In compliance with the guidelines established by the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:519–521) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), ASCO strives to promote balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor through disclosure of financial and other interests, and identification and management of potential conflicts. According to the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy, the following financial and other relationships must be disclosed: employment or leadership position, consultant or advisory role, stock ownership, honoraria, research funding, expert testimony, and other remuneration (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:520). The ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy disclosure requirements apply to all authors who submit abstracts to the Annual Meeting.

For clinical trials that began accrual on or after April 29, 2004, ASCO's Policy places some restrictions on the financial relationships of principal investigators (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:521). If a principal investigator holds any restricted relationships, his or her abstract will be ineligible for placement in the 2009 Annual Meeting unless the ASCO Ethics Committee grants an exception. Among the circumstances that might justify an exception are that the principal investigator (1) is a widely acknowledged expert in a particular therapeutic area; (2) is the inventor of a unique technology or treatment being evaluated in the clinical trial; or (3) is involved in international clinical oncology research and has acted consistently with recognized international standards of ethics in the conduct of clinical research. NIH-sponsored trials are exempt from the Policy restrictions. Abstracts for which authors requested and have been granted an exception in accordance with ASCO's Policy are designated with a caret symbol (^) in the Annual Meeting Proceedings.

For more information about the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and the exceptions process, please visit www.asco.org/conflictofinterest .

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation in clinical stage II-III rectal cancer

4105^

Background: This study evaluates induction bevacizumab and FOLFOX followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with bevacizumab, weekly oxaliplatin, and continuous infusion 5-FU prior to surgical resection of newly-diagnosed Stage II or III rectal cancer. Methods: Eligible patients received one month of induction, biweekly bevacizumab (5mg/kg) and modified FOLFOX6. Patients then received 50.4Gy of radiation and concurrent bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on days 1, 15, and 29), oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2/week for 6 weeks), and 5-FU (200mg/m2/day) as a continuous IV infusion throughout radiation. Due to gastrointestinal toxicity, the oxaliplatin dose was reduced to 40 mg/m2/week. Resection was performed 4 to 8 weeks after the completion of CRT. Adjuvant chemotherapy was started after 4 but less than 12 weeks following surgical resection and consisted of 6 biweekly treatments of modified FOLFOX6 and bevacizumab. Results: Twenty-six eligible patients were treated. The median age was 50. One patient developed a grade 4 arrhythmia during induction chemotherapy and was removed from the study. Of the remaining 25 patients, there were no other grade 3 or 4 toxicities during induction FOLFOX/bevacizumab. Toxicity was more significant during chemoradiation. Any grade 3 toxicity was experienced by 19 of 25 (76%) patients. Grade 3 toxicities included diarrhea (40%), neutropenia (16%), pain (16%), fatigue (8%), nausea (8%), and radiation dermatitis (8%) and bleeding with menstruation (4%). Grade 4 toxicities included neutropenia (4%), sepsis (4%) and nausea/diarrhea (4%). Six of 25 resected patients (24%) had a complete pathologic response. Eight of 25 patients (32%) developed post-operative wound complications including infection/abscess (n=4), fistula (n=2), ischemic colonic reservoir (n=1) and sterile fluid collection (n=1). Nine of 25 (36%) patients developed postoperative wound complications including infection (n=4), delayed healing (n=3), leak/abscess (n=2), sterile fluid collection (n=2), ischemic colonic reservoir (n=1), and fistula (n=1). Conclusions: Concurrent oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, continuous infusion 5-FU and radiation causes significant gastrointestinal toxicity. The pathologic complete response rate of this regimen to similar to other fluorouracil based chemoradiaton regimens. The high incidence of post-operative wound complications is concerning and consistent with other reports utilizing bevacizumab prior to major surgical resections.

[Table: see text]

ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and Exceptions

In compliance with the guidelines established by the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:519–521) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), ASCO strives to promote balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor through disclosure of financial and other interests, and identification and management of potential conflicts. According to the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy, the following financial and other relationships must be disclosed: employment or leadership position, consultant or advisory role, stock ownership, honoraria, research funding, expert testimony, and other remuneration (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:520). The ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy disclosure requirements apply to all authors who submit abstracts to the Annual Meeting.

For clinical trials that began accrual on or after April 29, 2004, ASCO's Policy places some restrictions on the financial relationships of principal investigators (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:521). If a principal investigator holds any restricted relationships, his or her abstract will be ineligible for placement in the 2009 Annual Meeting unless the ASCO Ethics Committee grants an exception. Among the circumstances that might justify an exception are that the principal investigator (1) is a widely acknowledged expert in a particular therapeutic area; (2) is the inventor of a unique technology or treatment being evaluated in the clinical trial; or (3) is involved in international clinical oncology research and has acted consistently with recognized international standards of ethics in the conduct of clinical research. NIH-sponsored trials are exempt from the Policy restrictions. Abstracts for which authors requested and have been granted an exception in accordance with ASCO's Policy are designated with a caret symbol (^) in the Annual Meeting Proceedings.

For more information about the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and the exceptions process, please visit www.asco.org/conflictofinterest .

Cetuximab with concurrent chemoradiation for esophagogastric cancer: assessment of toxicity

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility and toxicity of the addition of cetuximab with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation for patients with esophagogastric cancer on a Phase II study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with locoregional esophageal and proximal gastric cancer without distant organ metastases were eligible. All patients received cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin weekly for 6 weeks with 50.4 Gy radiation.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled, 57 with esophageal cancer and 3 with gastric cancer. Forty-eight had adenocarcinoma and 12 had squamous cell cancer. Fourteen of 60 patients (23%) had Grade 3 dermatologic toxicity consisting of a painful, pruritic acneiform rash on the face outside of the radiation field. The rates of Grades 3 and 4 esophagitis were 12% and 3%, respectively. Three patients had Grade 3/4 cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions and were not assessable for response. Forty of 57 patients (70%) had a complete clinical response after chemoradiation.

CONCLUSION

Cetuximab can be safely administered with chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Dermatologic toxicity and hypersensitivity reactions were associated with the addition of cetuximab. There was no increase in esophagitis or other radiation-enhanced toxicity.

Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), cisplatin and concurrent radiation for esophageal and gastric cancer: A phase I study

15130

Background: PPX is a conjugate of paclitaxel to a polyglutamate polymer. Preclinically, PPX demonstrated a radiation enhancement factor (REF) >7.0, versus 1.5–2.0 for paclitaxel. (Milas et al Int J Rad Onc 55:2003, Li et al. Clin Cancer Res 6:2000). The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of PPX was determined previously to be 70 mg/m2 /week with concurrent radiation. We initiated a phase I study of PPX, cisplatin, and concurrent radiation with patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with esophageal or gastric cancer receiving chemoradiation for locoregional control, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant treatment were eligible. All patients received radiation at a dose of 50.4 Gy delivered in 28 fractions (5 fractions per week for 5 1/2 weeks), and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. PPX was given as a 10 minute infusion in escalating dosages prior to each cisplatin dose. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as grade 4 hematologic toxicity, esophagitis, nausea/vomiting, or dehydration, or any other grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity. Patients were enrolled in successive cohorts of three. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which no more than 2 of 6 patients have DLTs. Results: Eleven patients have been entered over 2 dose levels of PPX: 50 mg/m2 (six patients, dose level 1), and 60mg/m2 (5 patients, dose level 2). Five patients had esophageal cancer and six had gastric cancer. All histologies were adenocarcinomas. One of six patients treated at dose level had a DLT (esophagitis). Three of five patients had DLTs at dose level 2, including esophagitis, nausea, vomiting, and dehydration. Conclusions: PPX is a novel radiation sensitizer for patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. The MTD for PPX is 50 mg/m2 /week in combination with cisplatin 25mg/ m2 /week for 6 weeks, and 50.4 Gy concurrent radiation for patients with esophagogastric cancer. A phase II study of PPX/cisplatin and radiation will be initiated.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I/II study of trastuzumab, paclitaxel, cisplatin and radiation for locally advanced, HER2 overexpressing, esophageal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To determine the overall survival for patients with locally advanced, HER2 overexpressing, esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving trastuzumab, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation on a Phase I-II study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus without distant organ metastases and 2+/3+ HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were eligible. All patients received cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks with radiation therapy (RT) 50.4 Gy. Patients received trastuzumab at dose levels of 1, 1.5, or 2 mg/kg weekly for 5 weeks after an initial bolus of 2, 3, or 4 mg/kg.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were entered: 7 (37%) had celiac adenopathy, and 7 (37%) had retroperitoneal, portal adenopathy, or scalene adenopathy. Fourteen of 19 patients (74%) had either 3+ HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry, or an increase in HER2 gene copy number by HER2 gene amplification or high polysomy by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The median survival of all patients was 24 months and the 2-year survival was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of the effect of trastuzumab in the treatment of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma overexpressing HER2 is limited by the small number of patients in this study. Overall survival, however, was similar to prior studies without an increase in toxicity. Evaluation of HER2 status should be performed in future trials for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus that investigate therapies targeting the HER family.

Preliminary results and evaluation of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a phase II clinical study

BACKGROUND

This report presents the preliminary results and evaluation of the MammoSite balloon catheter (MammoSite Radiation Therapy System; Cytyc Corporation, Marlboro, MA) as the sole method of delivering partial breast irradiation to the lumpectomy bed with breast-conserving surgery in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

Twelve institutions are participating in this phase II clinical study. A total of 133 patients have been enrolled and 100 patients have successfully completed the prescribed radiation therapy. A dose of 34 Gy was delivered in 10 fractions over 5 days prescribed to 1 cm from the applicator surface using iridium-192 high-dose rate brachytherapy. Patients who met the following criteria were selected for enrollment into the study: age 45 years or older, unicentric pure DCIS, mammographic lesion of 3 cm or less, negative margins as defined by 1 mm or more, postoperative final gross pathologic size of tumor of 5 cm or less, clinically node negative, and a postlumpectomy mammogram showing the absence of any residual suspicious microcalcifications. The placement of the MammoSite catheter was performed either at the time of the lumpectomy or postlumpectomy. The minimum distance from the balloon surface to the surface of the skin is greater than 5 mm. Data collection points are at time of enrollment, time of implant, 3 months, 6 months, and then yearly at 1- to 5-year follow-up visits. Data collected are local control rates, cosmetic outcome using the Harvard Scale, toxicities, serious adverse events, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and contralateral breast failure. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index scores were calculated for each patient. Local recurrence is defined as either invasive or noninvasive recurrence within the target volume. Ipsilateral elsewhere recurrence is defined as either an invasive or noninvasive recurrence occurring outside of the target volume in the previously treated breast. This recurrence is classified as a new primary tumor.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 9.5 months (range, 1-24 mo). The MammoSite catheter was explanted for the following reasons: inadequate skin distance (5.1%; 6 of 117), poor cavity conformance (5.1%; 6 of 117), positive margins (2.6%; 3 of 117), final histology (.85%; 1 of 117), and physician decision (.85%; 1 of 117). Of the patients in whom the MammoSite was explanted because of skin spacing or cavity conformance, 50% were at sites of new users (institutions that have placed fewer than 10 Mammosite catheters). Cosmetic results were rated as excellent in 63%, good in 35%, and fair in 2% in the 86 patients with a follow-up visit. Two patients were diagnosed with an ipsilateral local recurrence, 1 outside of the target volume and 1 true recurrence/marginal miss. One patient was diagnosed at 8 months and the other was diagnosed at 11 months. Both of these ipsilateral failures were DCIS. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index of these 2 patients was 9 and 8, respectively. Data collected showed the mean age at placement was 60.8 y, mean tumor size was 10.6 mm, mean actual closest surgical margin was 6.8 mm (range, .1-40 mm), a re-excision rate of 35%, postlumpectomy placement was 71%, and the mean skin-to-balloon surface distance was 13 mm with 89% > or =7 mm. No serious adverse events were reported. The infection rate was 4.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated partial breast irradiation delivered with the MammoSite balloon was clinically successful in patients entered into a phase II clinical study with pure DCIS, with results comparable with other studies reported in the literature that have evaluated use of the MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for delivery of radiation therapy in early breast cancers. Inadequate skin distance and poor cavity conformance were the main factors limiting the use of the MammoSite device. Cosmetic results were good to excellent in 98%. There have been 2 ipsilateral breast recurrences.

Cetuximab, paclitaxel, carboplatin and radiation for esophageal and gastric cancer

4029

Background: Cetuximab is an IgG1, chimerized, monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the epidermal growth factor receptor. Cetuximab improves survival when combined with radiation for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the addition of cetuximab to concurrent chemoradiation for patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell cancer of the esophagus or stomach without distant organ metastases were eligible. Patients with locally advanced disease from mediastinal, celiac, portal and gastric lymphadenopathy were eligible. Surgical resection was not required. Clinical complete response was defined as no tumor on postreatment endoscopic biopsy. Patients received cetuximab, 400mg/m2 week #1 then 250 mg/m2/week for 5 weeks, paclitaxel, 50 mg/m2/week, and carboplatin, AUC =2 weekly for 6 weeks, with concurrent 50.4 Gy radiation. Results: Thirty-seven patients have been entered. The median age was 61 (range of 30–87). Thirty-four have esophageal cancer and 3 have gastric cancer. Of the patients with esophageal cancer, twenty-five have adenocarcinoma and nine have squamous cell cancer. Thus far, 30 patients have completed treatment and are evaluable for toxicity. There have been no grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities and 1 pt had grade 4 neutropenia (3%). Six patients (20%) had grade 3 esophagitis. Other grade 3 toxicities included dehydration (n=5), rash (n=9), and paclitaxel/cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions (n=2). Eighteen of 27 patients (67%) have had clinical complete response. Seven pts out of 16 (43%) who have gone to surgery have had a pathologic CR. Conclusions: Cetuximab can be safely administered with chemoradiation for patients with esophageal cancer. Consistent with the data in head and neck cancer, cetuximab increases cutaneous toxicity but does not increase mucositis/esophagitis when combined with chemoradiation. Further evaluation is ongoing.

[Table: see text]

Multimodality treatment of esophageal cancer: A review of the current status and future directions

Surgical resection will cure only 15% to 20% of patients with seemingly localized esophageal cancer. Multimodality therapy has the potential to increase the cure rate by improving locoregional control and preventing systemic relapse. Randomized trials demonstrate that chemoradiation followed by surgery decreases local relapse as compared with surgery alone; however, the effect on overall survival remains uncertain. The additional impact of surgery following chemoradiation also remains unclear, with two randomized trials demonstrating an improvement in locoregional control without a benefit in survival. Morbidity and mortality of trimodality therapy have limited potential gains. Incorporation of docetaxel, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin into chemotherapy regimens prior to chemoradiation or as adjuvant therapy may decrease systemic recurrence. New radiation sensitizers may improve locoregional control. Biologic agents, such as cetuximab, trastuzumab, erlotinib, and bevacizumab, may enhance chemoradiation and target systemic micrometastases. Advances in radiation oncology and surgery may decrease morbidity and mortality from trimodality therapy, improving patient outcome.

Gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase I trial

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and concurrent radiation for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were studied. The initial dose level was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks. Concurrent radiation to 50.4 Gy was delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions. The radiation fields included the primary tumor, plus the regional peripancreatic, celiac, and porta hepatis lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhea, dehydration, nausea, and anorexia occurred in 3 of 3 patients at the second dose level of gemcitabine, 150 mg/m(2)/week. An intermediate dose level of gemcitabine, 110 mg/m(2)/week, was added, but gastrointestinal toxicity and pulmonary pneumonitis were encountered. The MTD therefore was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and concurrent radiation. Two of 11 patients treated at the MTD had Grade 3/4 toxicity. Four of 10 assessable patients treated at the MTD responded (40%), including one pathologic complete response.

CONCLUSION

The maximum tolerated dosage of gemcitabine is 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and conventional 50.4 Gy radiation fields. A Phase II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study is under way.

Emergence of increased cerebral metastasis after high-dose preoperative radiotherapy with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In recent years, combined modality induction therapy has defined a new standard of care in the treatment of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, providing improved local control and improved disease-free survival. However, the majority of Stage III patients still die of recurrent disease.

METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients with AJCC Stage IIIA/IIIB nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who were undergoing induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection of the primary NSCLC tumor between December 1, 1987 and September 1, 1999 were analyzed for resectability, survival, and patterns of disease failure. These patients received cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) on Days 1 and 22 and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 2, and 3, and Days 22, 23, and 24 together with 5940 centigrays (cGy) of radiation in 180-cGy fractions delivered over 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of the 42 patients (74%) underwent surgical resection of the primary lung tumor and mediastinal lymph nodes after chemoradiotherapy. No surgical deaths were reported. The median survival of these 31 patients was 52 months. The 5-year survival estimate using the Kaplan-Meier method was 49.9%. The local control rate was 80%. The incidence of distant metastases other than in the brain was reduced. The most frequently involved site of isolated first recurrence was the brain. The median time to brain recurrence was 7.5 months from the time of surgical resection. All brain metastases were detected within 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The high incidence of isolated brain metastasis after induction chemoradiotherapy and curative resection and their response to treatment suggest that routine scans of the brain may be indicated in the follow-up of patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-four patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were studied. Patients received paclitaxel, 50 mg/m(2) by 3 h i.v. (IV) infusion, weekly, on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29. Radiation was administered concurrently to a total dose of 50.4 Gy, in 1.80 Gy fractions, for 28 treatments.

RESULTS

Nausea and vomiting were the most common toxicities, Grade 3 in five patients (12%). Two patients (5%) had Grade 4 hypersensitivity reactions to their first dose of paclitaxel. Of 42 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 26%. The median survival was 8 months, and the 1-year survival was 30%.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent paclitaxel and radiation demonstrate local-regional activity in pancreatic cancer. Future investigations combining paclitaxel with other local-regional and systemic treatments are warranted.

A non-invasive immobilization system and related quality assurance for dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy of intracranial and head and neck disease

PURPOSE

To develop and implement a non-invasive immobilization system guided by a dedicated quality assurance (QA) program for dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of intracranial and head and neck disease, with IMRT delivered using the NOMOS Corporation's Peacock System and MIMiC collimator.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thermoplastic face masks are combined with cradle-shaped polyurethane foaming agents and a dedicated quality assurance program to create a customized headholder system (CHS). Plastic shrinkage was studied to understand its effect on immobilization. Fiducial points for computerized tomography (CT) are obtained by placing multiple dabs of barium paste on mask surfaces at intersections of laser projections used for patient positioning. Fiducial lines are drawn on the cradle along laser projections aligned with nasal surfaces. Lateral CT topograms are annotated with a crosshair indicating the origin of the treatment planning and delivery coordinate system, and with lines delineating the projections of superior-inferior field borders of the linear accelerator's secondary collimators, or with those of the fully open MIMiC. Port films exposed with and without the MIMIC are compared to annotated topograms to measure positional variance (PV) in superior-inferior (SI), right-left (RL), and anterior posterior (AP) directions. MIMiC vane patterns superposed on port films are applied to verify planned patterns. A 12-patient study of PV was performed by analyzing positions of 10 anatomic points on repeat CT topograms, plotting histograms of PV, and determining average PV.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A 1.5+/-0.3 mm SD shrinkage per 70 cm of thermoplastic was observed over 24 h. Average PV of 1.0+/-0.8, 1.2+/-1.1, and 1.3+/-0.8 mm were measured in SI, AP, and RL directions, respectively. Lateral port films exposed with and without the MIMiC showed PV of 0.2+/-1.3 and 0.8+/-2.2 mm in AP and SI directions. Vane patterns superimposed on port films consistently verified the planned patterns.

CONCLUSION

The CHS provided adequately reproducible immobilization for dynamic IMRT, and may be applicable to decrease PV for other cranial and head and neck external beam radiation therapy.