Intensive Environmental Sampling and Whole Genome Sequence-based Characterization of Listeria in Small- and Medium-sized Dairy Facilities Reveal Opportunities for Simplified and Size-appropriate Environmental Monitoring Strategies

Small- and medium-sized dairy processing facilities (SMDFs) may face unique challenges with respect to controlling Listeria in their processing environments, e.g., due to limited resources. The aim of this study was to implement and evaluate environmental monitoring programs (EMPs) for Listeria control in eight SMDFs in a ∼1-year longitudinal study; this included a comparison of pre-operation (i.e., after cleaning and sanitation and prior to production) and mid-operation (i.e., at least 4 h into production) sampling strategies. Among 2,072 environmental sponge samples collected across all facilities, 272 (13%) were positive for Listeria. Listeria prevalence among pre- and mid-operation samples (15% and 17%, respectively), was not significantly different. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) performed on select isolates to characterize Listeria persistence patterns revealed repeated isolation of closely related Listeria isolates (i.e., ≤20 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism [hqSNP] differences) in 5/8 facilities over >6 months, suggesting Listeria persistence and/or reintroduction was relatively common among the SMDFs evaluated here. WGS furthermore showed that for 41 sites where samples collected pre- and mid-operation were positive for Listeria, Listeria isolates obtained were highly related (i.e., ≤10 hqSNP differences), suggesting that pre-operation sampling alone may be sufficient and more effective for detecting sites of Listeria persistence. Importantly, our data also showed that only 1/8 of facilities showed a significant decrease in Listeria prevalence over 1 year, indicating continued challenges with Listeria control in at least some SMDFs. We conclude that options for simplified Listeria EMPs (e.g., with a focus on pre-operation sampling, which allows for more rapid identification of likely persistence sites) may be valuable for improved Listeria control in SMDFs.

Gram-negative postpasteurization contamination patterns of single-serve fluid milk produced in 4 different processing facilities

An analysis of historic data on high temperature, short time (HTST) fluid milk quality showed higher total bacterial counts and lower sensory defect judging scores at d 14 postprocessing for milk packaged in single-serve containers as compared with milk packaged in half-gallon containers from the same processing facilities. As postpasteurization contamination with gram-negative bacteria is likely a major contributor to an increased spoilage risk associated with milk packaged in single-serve containers, we performed a comprehensive assessment of the microbial quality and shelf life of 265 commingled single-serve HTST fluid milk samples (including white [unflavored] skim, white [unflavored] 1%, chocolate skim, and chocolate 1%) collected over 2 visits to 4 commercial fluid milk processing facilities. Over 2 initial sampling visits, the frequency of gram-negative spoilage ranged from 14 to 79% of the product collected from the 4 facilities, with significant differences of gram-negative spoilage frequency between sampling visits, facilities (sampling visit 1, sampling visit 2, and both sampling visits combined), milk types (sampling visit 2), and filler lanes (sampling visit 2). We found no significant differences in the frequency of gram-negative spoilage between sampling time points (e.g., beginning, middle, and end of production run). Across facilities, single-serve containers of milk with gram-negative contamination showed significantly higher bacterial counts on d 7 and 14 and significantly lower sensory scores as compared with those without gram-negative contamination. Follow-up investigations, based on in-facility surveys that identified carton forming mandrels as filler components that frequently failed quality assurance ATP swab checks, found that bacterial genera, including Pseudomonas and Bacillus, isolated from single-serve milk samples were also frequently isolated from mandrels. Although interventions aimed at improving cleaning and sanitation of mandrels did not lead to significant reduction of gram-negative spoilage frequency in a comparison of 398 control and 400 intervention samples, our data still suggest that the unhygienic design of single-serve fillers is likely a root cause of gram-negative contamination of single-serve milk.

Microbacterium represents an emerging microorganism of concern in microfiltered extended shelf-life milk products

Growing interest in the manufacture of extended shelf-life (ESL) milk, which is typically achieved by a high-temperature treatment called ultra-pasteurization (UP), is driven by distribution challenges, efforts to reduce food waste, and more. Even though high-temperature, short-time (HTST) pasteurized milk has a substantially shorter shelf life than UP milk, HTST milk is preferred in the United States because consumers tend to perceive UP milk as less desirable due to the "cooked" flavor associated with high-temperature processing. While ESL beyond 21 d may be possible for HTST, the survival and outgrowth of psychrotolerant aerobic spore-forming bacteria can still be a limitation to extending shelf life of HTST milk. Microfiltration (MF) is effective for reducing vegetative microorganisms and spores in raw milk, but it is unclear what the effects of membrane pore size, storage temperature, and milk type (i.e., skim vs. whole) are on the microbial shelf life of milk processed by both MF and HTST pasteurization. To investigate these factors, raw skim milk was MF using different pore sizes (0.8 or 1.2 μm), and then MF skim milk and standardized whole milk (MF skim with heat-treated [85°C for 20 s] cream) were HTST pasteurized at 75°C for 20 s. Subsequently, milk was stored at 3°C, 6.5°C, or 10°C and total bacteria counts were measured for up to 63 d. An ANOVA indicated that mean bacterial concentrations between storage temperatures were significantly different from each other, with mean maximum observed concentrations of 3.67, 5.33, and 8.08 log10 cfu/mL for storage temperatures 3°C, 6.5°C, and 10°C, respectively. Additionally, a smaller difference in mean maximum bacterial concentrations throughout shelf life was identified between pore sizes (<1 log cfu/mL), but no significant difference was attributed to milk type. An unexpected outcome of this study was the identification of Microbacterium as a major contributor to the bacterial population in MF ESL milk. Microbacterium is a psychrotolerant, thermoduric gram-positive, non-spore-forming rod with a small cell size (∼0.9 μm length and ∼0.3 μm width), which our data suggest was able to permeate the membranes used in this study, survive HTST pasteurization, and then grow at refrigeration temperatures. While spores continue to be a key concern for the manufacture of MF, ESL milk, our study demonstrates the importance of other psychrotolerant, thermoduric bacteria such as Microbacterium to these products.

Development and deployment of a supply-chain digital tool to predict fluid-milk spoilage due to psychrotolerant sporeformers

Psychrotolerant sporeformers pose a challenge to maintaining fluid milk quality. Dynamic temperature changes along the supply chain can favor the germination and growth of these bacteria and lead to fluid milk spoilage. In this study, we aim to expand on our previous work on predicting milk spoilage due to psychrotolerant sporeformers. The key model innovations include (1) the ability to account for changing temperatures along the supply chain, and (2) a deployed user-friendly interface to allow easy access to the model. Using the frequencies and concentrations of 8 Bacillales subtypes specific to fluid milk collected in New York, the model simulated sporeformer growth in half-gallons of high-temperature, short-time (HTST) pasteurized fluid milk transported from processing facility to retail store and then to consumer. The Monte Carlo simulations predicted that 44.3% of half-gallons of milk were spoiled (defined as having a bacterial concentration >20,000 cfu/mL, a conservative estimate that represents the Pasteurized Milk Ordinance regulatory limit) after 21 d of refrigerated storage at consumer's home. Model validations showed that the model was the most accurate in predicting the mean sporeformer concentration at low temperatures (i.e., at 3°C and 4°C; compared with higher temperatures at 6°C and 10°C) within the first 21 d of consumer storage, with a root mean square error of 0.29 and 0.34 log10 cfu/mL, respectively. Global sensitivity analyses indicated that home storage temperature, facility-to-retail transportation temperature, and initial spore concentration were the 3 most influential factors for predicting milk spoilage on d 21 of shelf life. What-if scenarios indicated that microfiltration was predicted to be the most effective strategy to reduce spoilage. The implementation of this strategy (assumed to reduce initial spore concentration by 2.2 log10 cfu/mL) was predicted to reduce the percentage of spoiled milk by 17.0 percentage points on d 21 of storage and could delay the date by which 50% of half-gallons of milk were spoiled, from d 25 to 35. Overall, the model is readily deployed as a digital tool for assessing fluid milk spoilage along the supply chain and evaluating the effectiveness of intervention strategies, including those that target storage temperatures at different supply chain stages.