Rehospitalization Rates Among Patients with Psychotic Disorders During Covid-19 Pandemic: Oral Versus Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics

Objective

The superiority of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) versus oral antipsychotics is often emphasized, even in terms of adherence and rehospitaliza-tion rates. As such, LAIs are particularly recommended during the COVID-19 pandemic. The goal of our research was to determine whether there are differences in the number of rehospitalizations in patients treated for schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, and delusional states (psychotic disorders) with LAI antispychotics versus oral antispychotics.

Method

Subjects with schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders and delusional states participated in our retrospective study. 124 subjects were treated with oral anti-psychotics, while 72 received LAIs along with oral antipsychotics. We collected their sociodemographic data and psychiatric history data. Our main outcome measure was the number of rehospitalizations.

Results

Statistical analysis showed that the studied groups did not differ according to sociodemographic parameters, except that in the group of patients with LAIs there was a significantly higher percentage of men (65 (52.4) vs 50 (69.4), p=0.029)). Also, the groups do not differ according to the psychiatric history data. There is no difference in the duration of the current hospitalization nor in the composition of the patients, considering the order of the current hospitalization. The difference in the number of rehospitalizations is not significant neither in the first year of follow-up (p=0.144), nor in the second (p=0.142), nor after two years of follow-up (p=0.083).

Conclusions

Our research has shown that there is no difference in the number of rehospitalizations in patients with schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders and delusional states, considering whether they take oral antipsychotics or they also take LAIs along with them. We can therefore conclude that it is particularly important to work on improving patient adherence. We must make psychiatrists aware that the pandemic, like other threats, can be our ally in improving adherence ("perceived threat as a health belief").

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Diabetes Mellitus among War Veterans Seeking Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders. However, we should not neglect the somatic aspects of PTSD. Associations with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are particularly concerning because PTSD was associated with an even 53% higher risk for CVD. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of several CVD risk factors, especially diabetes mellitus among PTSD patients divided into three groups according to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk stratification (low, intermediate, and high). This cross-sectional study included one hundred male PTSD veterans. The mean age was 53 (40-67) years. The estimated OSA risk was 95% for the whole cohort, and 53% were in the high-risk group. Median HbA1c was 5.6 (4.6-10)%. The hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels showed that 34 patients were in the prediabetes group, and 20 of them fulfilled the criteria for diabetes. However, only 13 of them were aware of their previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. In testing knowledge about diabetes, 62% and only 23% of patients knew the correct definition of HbA1c and level of fasting plasma glucose, respectively. Diabetic patients had insufficient knowledge about diabetic complications and treatment. A higher level of PTSD symptoms in veterans was associated with a higher prevalence of OSA. The results strongly support further research and education into early detection of CVD risk factors associated with PTSD.

Violence without a Face: the Analysis of Testimonies of Women Who Were Sexually Assaulted During the War in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina

BACKGROUND

This study examined testimonies of women who were sexually assaulted multiple times by multiple unknown offenders. In these testimonial narratives, it is possible to detect specific modalities of traumatic event expression. This expression lacks any spatial, temporal, auditory or emotional determinants of the event.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

These fourteen women (out of 17) were imprisoned and forcefully isolated in detention camps or private houses in the occupied territories of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, during the war. At the same time, some of these women were raped by the offenders that were previously known to them. The average length of detention was 141 days among the seventeen victims (range of 7 to 395 days), while the average time from the first day of imprisonment to the first day of testimony was 311 days (range of 30 to 889 days).

RESULTS

Based on the narrative descriptions of the events acquired from these testimonies, our analysis showed that these expressions differed when the offender was known to the victim, contrasted to the situation when the offender was completely unknown. This finding has a significant implication in victim's testimony at judicial hearings. Specifically, women that were raped by unknown perpetrator(s) were often unable to provide persuasive testimony and their recollection of the events was deemed insufficient for the further prosecution. Testimonies in these cases substantially lacked in vividness and were devoid of visuospatial determinants of the rape event. Consequently, this often resulted in the case's dismissal.

CONCLUSION

The unusual and problematic expression of these traumatic memories might indicate that these events were not properly stored in the conceptual form of memory. Ultimately, victims could not make any coherent recollection or reconstruct the cascade of events by using perceptual information. We argue that this could be due to an aberrant mechanism of memory storage and difficulties that emerge on the level of sensory input. This problem needs to be further examined and correspondingly accounted for since it can exert significant influence on judicial outcomes in the domain of sexual assault cases worldwide.