Chronic kidney disease, worsening renal function and outcomes in a heart failure community setting: A UK national study

BACKGROUND

Routine heart failure (HF) monitoring and management is in the community but the natural course of worsening renal function (WRF) and its influence on HF prognosis is unknown. We investigated the influence of routinely monitored renal decline and related comorbidities on imminent hospitalisation and death in the HF community population.

METHODS

A nested case-control study within an incident HF cohort (N = 50,114) with 12-years follow-up. WRF over 6-months before first hospitalisation and 12-months before death was defined by >20% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Additive interactions between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and comorbidities were investigated.

RESULTS

Prevalence of CKD (eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2) in the HF community was 63%, which was associated with an 11% increase in hospitalisation and 17% in mortality. Both risk associations were significantly worse in the presence of diabetes. Compared to HF patients with eGFR,60-89, there was no or minimal increase in risk for mild to moderate CKD (eGFR,30-59) for both outcomes. Adjusted risk estimates for hospitalisation were increased only for severe CKD(eGFR,15-29); Odds Ratio 1.49 (95%CI;1.36,1.62) and renal failure(eGFR,<15); 3.38(2.67,4.29). The relationship between eGFR and mortality was U-shaped; eGFR, ≥90; 1.32(1.17,1.48), eGFR,15-29; 1.68(1.58,1.79) and eGFR,<15; 3.04(2.71,3.41). WRF is common and associated with imminent hospitalisation (1.50;1.37,1.64) and mortality (1.92;1.79,2.06).

CONCLUSIONS

In HF, the risk associated with CKD differs between the community and the acute HF setting. In the community setting, moderate CKD confers no risk but severe CKD, WRF or CKD with other comorbidities identifies patients at high risk of imminent hospitalisation and death.

Development of an international comorbidity education framework

CONTEXT

The increasing number of people living with multiple chronic conditions in addition to an index condition has become an international healthcare priority. Health education curricula have been developed alongside single condition frameworks in health service policy and practice and need redesigning to incorporate optimal management of multiple conditions.

AIM

Our aims were to evaluate current teaching and learning about comorbidity care amongst the global population of healthcare students from different disciplines and to develop an International Comorbidity Education Framework (ICEF) for incorporating comorbidity concepts into health education.

METHODS

We surveyed nursing, medical and pharmacy students from England, India, Italy and Sweden to evaluate their understanding of comorbidity care. A list of core comorbidity content was constructed by an international group of higher education academics and clinicians from the same disciplines, by searching current curricula and analysing clinical frameworks and the student survey data. This list was used to develop the International Comorbidity Education Framework.

RESULTS

The survey sample consisted of 917 students from England (42%), India (48%), Italy (8%) and Sweden (2%). The majority of students across all disciplines said that they lacked knowledge, training and confidence in comorbidity care and were unable to identify specific teaching on comorbidities. All student groups wanted further comorbidity training. The health education institution representatives found no specific references to comorbidity in current health education curricula. Current clinical frameworks were used to develop an agreed list of core comorbidity content and hence an International Comorbidity Education Framework.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on consultation with academics and clinicians and on student feedback we developed an International Comorbidity Education Framework to promote the integration of comorbidity concepts into current healthcare curricula.

Impact of non-cardiovascular disease comorbidity on cardiovascular disease symptom severity: a population-based study

Objectives

Non-cardiovascular comorbidity is common in cardiovascular disease (CVD) populations but its influence on chest pain (CP) and shortness of breath (SOB) symptom-specific physical limitations is unknown. We wanted to test the a priori hypothesis that an unrelated comorbidity would influence symptom-specific physical limitations and to investigate this impact in different severities of CVD.

Method and results

The study was based on 5426 patients from ten family practices, organised into eight a priori exclusive severity groups: (i) no CVD or osteoarthritis (OA) (reference), (ii) index hypertension, ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and heart failure (HF) without OA, (iii) index OA without CVD and (iv) same CVD groups with comorbid OA. The measure of CP physical limitations was Seattle Angina Questionnaire and for SOB physical limitations was the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Adjusted baseline associations between the cohorts and symptom-specific physical limitations were assessed using linear regression methods. In the study population, 1443 (27%) reported CP and 2097 (39%) SOB. CP and SOB physical limitations increased with CVD severity in the index and comorbid groups. Compared with the respective index CVD group, the CP physical limitation scores for comorbid CVD groups with OA were lower by: − 14.7 (95% CI − 21.5, 7.8) for hypertension, − 5.5 (− 10.4, − 0.7) for IHD and − 22.1 (− 31.0, − 6.7) for HF. For SOB physical limitations, comorbid scores were lower by: − 9.2 (− 13.8, − 4.6) for hypertension, − 6.4 (− 11.1, − 1.8) for IHD and − 8.8 (− 19.3, 1.65) for HF.

Conclusions

CP and SOB are common symptoms, and OA increases the CVD symptom-specific physical limitations additively. Comorbidity interventions need to be developed for CVD specific health outcomes.

•

The study was based on 5426 patients from 10 general practices in the UK.

•

A priori exclusive groups included index CVD severity groups with and without OA.

•

Increasing CVD severity and comorbid OA are associated with CVD symptom limitation.

•

Comorbid OA in CVD groups increases symptom physical limitations additively.

•

Comorbidity interventions need to be developed for CVD specific health outcomes.

Statin use and clinical osteoarthritis in the general population: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

One hypothesis has posited whether abnormal lipid metabolism might be a causal factor in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA). Routine statin use in clinical practice provides the basis for a natural experiment in testing this hypothesis.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that statins reduce the long-term occurrence of clinically defined OA.

DESIGN

Cohort design with a 10-year follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS

16,609 adults cardiovascular disease cohorts aged 40 years and over from the UK General Practice Research Database with data available to 31 December 2006.

INTERVENTION

Statins were summarised as annual mean daily dose and dose change over two-year time periods.

MAIN MEASURES

Incident episode of clinically defined osteoarthritis was assessed within 2 years, and at 4-year and 10-year follow-up time periods, using Cox and discrete time survival analysis. Covariates included age, gender, deprivation, body mass index, cholesterol level, pain-modifying drug co-therapies, and duration and severity of cardiovascular disease.

KEY RESULTS

Higher therapeutic dose of statin, with a treatment duration of at least 2 years was associated with a significant reduction in clinical OA compared to non-statin users in the follow-up time period. The estimated adjusted rate ratios were as follows: lowest statin dose quartile 1: 2.5 (95 % CI 2.3, 2.9); quartile 2: 1.3 (1.1, 1.5); quartile 3: 0.8 (0.7, 0.95); and highest statin dose quartile 4: 0.4 (0.3, 0.5). The largest statin dose increments were associated with significant reductions estimated at 18 % in OA outcome within 2 years and 40 % after 4 years, compared to non-statin users.

CONCLUSIONS

This longitudinal study from a national clinical practice setting provides evidence that higher statin dose and larger statin dose increments were associated with a reduction in clinically defined OA outcome.

Clinical multimorbidity and physical function in older adults: a record and health status linkage study in general practice

BACKGROUND

Multiple chronic conditions occurring in the same individual are associated with adverse health outcomes. In family practice, individuals are seen who, over time, may experience many different symptoms, illnesses and chronic diseases. Measures for defining multimorbidity, which incorporate the diverse range of health problems seen in population-based family practice, remain to be developed. We have investigated whether routinely collected consultation data could be used as the basis for a simple classification of multimorbidity that reflects an individual's overall health status.

METHODS

Morbidity consultation data for 9,439 English patients aged 50 years and over in an 18-month time period were linked to their self-reported physical health status measured by Short-Form 12 at the end point. Associations between physical function and all-cause multimorbidity counts were estimated relative to single morbidity only, and between physical function and morbidity severity (185 morbidities categorized on four ordinal scales of severity) relative to persons who had not consulted about any of the 185.

RESULTS

In the 18-month period, 19% had consulted for a single morbidity and 23% for six or more (a high multimorbidity count). An estimated 24% of poor physical function in the family practice consulting population may be attributable to high multimorbidity. There was an increasing strength of association between poor physical function and increasing severity of multimorbidity on all four severity scales. Estimated associations (adjusted odds ratios) of the most severe morbidity categories with poor physical function were, for each of the four scales, respectively, 5.6 for chronicity [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4-7.1], 7.0 for time course (4.5-10.6) and 3.6 for health care use (2.0-6.6) and for patient impact (6.7; 5.2-8.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Multimorbidity defined by using routinely collected family practice consultation data and classified by count and by severity was associated with poorer physical function. This approach offers the potential for systematic use of routine records to classify multimorbidity and to identify groups with high likelihood of poor physical status for needs assessment and targeted intervention.

Clinical comorbidity in patients with osteoarthritis: a case-control study of general practice consulters in England and Wales

OBJECTIVES

To determine patterns of clinical comorbidity in general practice consulters with OA and compare them with comorbidity in consulters without OA.

METHODS

A case-control study nested in a one-year prevalence survey of consultations in 60 general practices in England and Wales. Cases were 11 375 subjects aged 50 and over who had consulted with OA during the study year. Controls were 11 780 subjects matched for age and sex who had consulted during the study year, but not for OA. Morbidity outcomes were based on a standard clinical classification system.

RESULTS

After adjusting for age, sex, and social class, cases were significantly more likely to have high levels of comorbidity than controls (2.35; 2.16 to 2.55). Significant OA comorbid associations with other musculoskeletal conditions included arthropathies (OR 2.26; 99% CI 1.50 to 3.41), upper limb sprain (2.04; 1.38 to 3.00), synovial and tendon disorders (2.03; 1.54 to 2.68), and other joint disorders (2.00; 1.71 to 2.32). OA non-musculoskeletal associations were with obesity (2.25; 1.73 to 2.92), gastritis (1.98; 1.46 to 2.68), phlebitis (1.80; 1.28 to 2.52), diaphragmatic hernia (1.80; 1.29 to 2.51), ischaemic heart disease (1.73; 1.13 to 2.66) and intestinal diverticula (1.63; 1.20 to 2.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidity for OA was extensive, with musculoskeletal as well as non-musculoskeletal conditions. Age, sex, and social class did not explain this comorbidity but propensity to consult may be a part explanation. An important question remains as to whether comorbidity in general practice significantly adds to the disability or further impairs the health of patients with OA.

Use of a cross-sectional survey to estimate outcome of health care: the example of anxiety and depression

Our study proposes that a population-based cross-sectional survey can be used to estimate the outcome of health care by linking general practice morbidity records to the survey. Using the example of anxiety and depression to test this idea, we conducted a survey of an adult population registered with one general practice in the UK. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire was used to identify cases and controls. After mailing to a randomly selected adult population of 4002, there was an adjusted response rate of 66% (n = 2,606), with 416 (16%) high-score cases, 506 (19%) medium-score cases, and 1684 (65%) low-score controls. All cases were compared with a sample of controls (n = 450). In the 12 months before the survey, the high-score case group had experienced significantly higher GP contacts (n = 377 [91%] versus 354 [79%]), diagnoses for anxiety or depression (119 [29%] versus 21 [5%]), and related drug treatments (111 [27%] versus 22 [5%]) compared with the control sample. Most of the diagnoses and drug treatments had been initiated at least 9 months before the survey. The linkage between the survey and the clinical records suggested that the health outcome of previously identified anxious and depressed patients was poor, with an estimated two-thirds who will not have fully recovered within an average of 9 months. This study demonstrates the potential for using cross-sectional population surveys to estimate not only the need for health care but also the outcome of health care.

A qualitative study of patients' views on anxiety and depression

BACKGROUND

In the management of patients with anxiety and depression in general practice, the emphasis has been on improving detection and appropriate use of drug therapies by health professionals. Patients' own perceptions of their problems and what services they would prefer have not often been sought.

AIM

To explore patient perspectives in relation to their healthcare needs in anxiety and depression.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Semi-structured individual and focus group interviews.

SETTING

A total of 27 patients from an urban four-partner group general practice who were identified as having anxiety and depression by a practice population questionnaire survey.

METHOD

All interviews were transcribed and the major themes were summarised using grounded theory analysis.

RESULTS

Patients seek many different ways of coping with their problems but view their general practice as a focal point for help. Their experiences are dominated by the struggle to control unwelcome and intrusive thoughts and to live in a hostile and threatening world. They also have distinct preferences regarding their health needs and there is universal scepticism about drug therapies.

CONCLUSION

Patients describe personal and professional barriers to seeking help and have particular views on the treatment options. This perspective contrasts with the current professional emphasis on detection and drug use. This view is therefore central to informing the debate on management of neurotic disorders in primary care and on improving the care of these patients.