4
|
Jahanzeb M, Tripathy D, Rugo H, Swain S, Kaufman PA, Mayer M, Hurvitz S, O'Shaughnessy J, Mason G, Yardley DA, Brufsky A, Chu L, Antao V, Beattie M, Yoo B, Cobleigh M. Abstract P5-08-27: Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with hormone receptor (HR)+ HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and low vs high levels of HR positivity from the SystHERs Registry. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p5-08-27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction In 2010, the cutoff for HR positivity in breast cancer was established as ≥1% of cells staining HR+, previously having varied from 1% to 10%. The impact of this change on treatment patterns and outcomes is poorly understood. SystHERs is a prospective, observational cohort registry of patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that commenced enrollment in 2012. To our knowledge, SystHERs is the largest registry to collect and analyze data for the HER2+ subgroup. We report baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and early outcomes by %HR+ (1–9% vs 10–100%).
Methods SystHERs enrolled pts aged ≥18 years and within 6 months of HER2+ MBC diagnosis. For pts with locally-determined HR+ disease, defined as HR+ in primary or metastatic tissue, %HR+ is the highest percentage of ER+ or PR+ tissue in early breast cancer or MBC. The percentage of ER+ or PR+ cells was not reported for pts considered HR– by the investigator. Median overall survival (OS; Kaplan–Meier) and hazard ratios (Cox regression) were estimated.
Results As of Feb 1, 2016, data were available for 872 eligible pts with known HR status, of whom 608 (70%) had HR+ disease. Of the 608 pts, 53 (9%) had 1–9%HR+ and 496 (82%) had 10–100%HR+; %HR+ was not reported for 59 pts. Baseline characteristics were similar between %HR+ subgroups (Table 1).
As shown in Table 2, the 1–9%HR+ subgroup was less likely to receive first-line hormonal therapy (26%) than the 10–100%HR+ subgroup (56%). 87% and 79% of pts received chemotherapy, respectively.
Median time from MBC diagnosis was 16.5 months (range, 0.4–49.4 months). Median OS was not reached at the data cutoff. The number of deaths was 13 (25%) in the 1–9%HR+ subgroup, and 68 (14%) in the 10–100%HR+ subgroup (log-rank P=0.025). The OS hazard ratio (0.514, 95% CI 0.283–0.931) favored the 10–100%HR+ subgroup. OS did not differ significantly between pts with 1–9%HR+ vs HR– disease (log-rank P=0.582, hazard ratio 1.185, 95% CI 0.647–2.169).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics 1-9%HR+ (n=53)10-100%HR+ (n=496)HR– (n=264)Age at MBC diagnosis, median yrs (range)54 (30–86)57 (21–86)55 (28–88)Race, % White838372Black151320Premenopausal, %282522ECOG performance status, % 04654441463942≥2878MBC diagnosis type, % De novo404958Recurrent605142Visceral, %*686275*Non-hepatic abdominal, ascites, CNS, liver, lung, or pleural effusion sites of metastasis
Table 2. First-line treatment 1-9%HR+ (n=53)10-100%HR+ (n=496)HR– (n=264)HER2-targeted therapy, %969391Chemotherapy, %877989Hormonal therapy, %26564
Conclusions These preliminary observational data suggest potential differences in treatment patterns and survival outcomes in low vs moderate/high HR+ expressers, with the former being less likely to receive hormonal therapy (26% vs 56%). Furthermore, low HR positivity was associated with poorer OS and was similar to OS observed in pts with HR– disease.
Citation Format: Jahanzeb M, Tripathy D, Rugo H, Swain S, Kaufman PA, Mayer M, Hurvitz S, O'Shaughnessy J, Mason G, Yardley DA, Brufsky A, Chu L, Antao V, Beattie M, Yoo B, Cobleigh M. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with hormone receptor (HR)+ HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and low vs high levels of HR positivity from the SystHERs Registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-27.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jahanzeb
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - D Tripathy
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - H Rugo
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - S Swain
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - PA Kaufman
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - M Mayer
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - S Hurvitz
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - G Mason
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - DA Yardley
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - A Brufsky
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - L Chu
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - V Antao
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - M Beattie
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - B Yoo
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - M Cobleigh
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Robert N, Goertz HP, Asmar L, Tseng WY, Jiao X, Portera C, Yoo B, Patt D, Antao V. Abstract P4-14-13: Pertuzumab (P) use in first-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in US community oncology practices: Treatment patterns and outcomes. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p4-14-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Pertuzumab was FDA-approved in 6/2012 for use in first-line in combination with trastuzumab (H) and docetaxel for patients (pts) with HER2-positive mBC. This retrospective study investigated the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, safety, and outcomes for pts with HER2-positive mBC who received a P-containing regimen in first-line in US community oncology practices.
Methods: This study utilized iKnowMed electronic health records, Claims Data Warehouse, and Social Security Death Index. Pts with HER2-positive mBC, who received a P-containing regimen between 6/2012 and 6/2014 and were followed through 12/2014, had ≥2 visits within the McKesson Specialty Health/US Oncology Network, and were not on clinical trials during the study period, were eligible.
Results: Of the 322 pts who received a P-containing regimen in the first-line setting, 25% were ≥65 years of age, 63% were post-menopausal, 61% had hormone receptor-positive mBC, 84% had a performance status of 0 or 1, and 76% had a Charlson Comorbidities Index of 0. Twenty-one percent of pts had 1 site of metastasis noted, 32% had 2 sites, and 47% had 3 or more sites. Pts with de novo mBC made up 40% of this cohort. Of the pts with recurrent mBC, over 60% received H in the early-stage BC setting. In the first-line mBC setting, 93% of the 322 pts received H+P+taxane, and 7% received H+P with other chemotherapy agent(s). Common adverse events reported included: fatigue (49%), diarrhea (44%), nausea (33%), peripheral neuropathy (33%), neutropenia (24%), and rash (22%). Further analyses including outcomes of these 322 pts will be presented.
Conclusions: First-line P was given in combination with H and chemotherapy agent(s) (93% taxane). No new safety signals were observed. More details on the clinical characteristics, specific treatment patterns, and safety will be presented, along with the progression-free survival of these pts receiving first-line P-containing therapy in a real-world setting.
Citation Format: Robert N, Goertz H-P, Asmar L, Tseng W-Y, Jiao X, Portera C, Yoo B, Patt D, Antao V. Pertuzumab (P) use in first-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in US community oncology practices: Treatment patterns and outcomes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-14-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Robert
- US Oncology Research Inc., Houston, TX; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - H-P Goertz
- US Oncology Research Inc., Houston, TX; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - L Asmar
- US Oncology Research Inc., Houston, TX; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - W-Y Tseng
- US Oncology Research Inc., Houston, TX; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - X Jiao
- US Oncology Research Inc., Houston, TX; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - C Portera
- US Oncology Research Inc., Houston, TX; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - B Yoo
- US Oncology Research Inc., Houston, TX; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - D Patt
- US Oncology Research Inc., Houston, TX; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - V Antao
- US Oncology Research Inc., Houston, TX; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Inbred mouse strains vary in susceptibility or resistance to dietary induced atherosclerosis. To investigate the effect of polyunsaturated fat feeding on postprandial serum cholesterol levels, in C57BL/67 (B6) and BALB/cJ inbred mice, we fed by stomach gavage previously fasted mice, a mixture containing 30% sunflower oil, 5% cholesterol, 2% sodium cholate and 0.5% choline chloride. The most significant difference in serum cholesterol levels between B6 and BALB/cJ mouse strains was observed at 2 h postfeeding. Susceptible B6 strain mice had a 41% postprandial increment in serum cholesterol. The resistant BALB/cJ strain had an insignificant 16% rise in serum cholesterol, at 2 h. We next examined eight other inbred mouse strains, to identify the gene(s) that regulate the observed 2 h postprandial hypercholesterolemia response, in the susceptible B6 mouse strain. Only the C57BR/cdJ and C57L/J strains developed postprandial hypercholesterolemia, at 2 h. The C57BR/cdJ strain had a 20% increase and the C57L/J strain a 62% increase in postprandial serum cholesterol levels. From this result, we found that the postprandial hypercholesterolemic response to an acute polyunsaturated fat-cholesterol feed, cosegregated with the a allele at the Gpd-1 and Ahd-1 loci, on mouse chromosome 4. In this study, non-responsiveness cosegregated with the b allele at the Gpd-1 and Ahd-1 loci. Thus polyunsaturated fat-cholesterol induced postprandial hypercholesterolemia appeared to be genetically determined by a gene located between the Gpd-1 and Ahd-1 loci, in mice. The putative gene regulating polyunsaturated fat-cholesterol induced post-absorptive hypercholesterolemia was designated Phc-2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Vaithilingam
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|