1
|
Vignola S, Donadono V, Cavalli C, Azzaretto V, Casagrandi D, Pandya P, Napolitano R. Use of focus point for plane acquisition to improve reproducibility in fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024; 63:237-242. [PMID: 37519218 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of fetal biometry using a 'focus point' to assist the acquisition of the relevant plane. METHODS This was a study of 80 women with a singleton non-anomalous pregnancy who attended University College London Hospital, London, UK, between 18 and 37 weeks' gestation. Planes to measure head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were obtained four times by two different sonographers with different levels of experience, who were blinded to one another; the first set of images was obtained with reference to a standard image, and the second set of images was obtained using the focus point technique. The focus point was defined as a unique fetal anatomical landmark in each plane (cavum septi pellucidi for HC, two-thirds of the umbilical vein for AC and one of the two extremities of the diaphysis for FL). Once identified, the focus point was maintained in view while the sonographer rotated the probe along three axes (x, y, z) to acquire the relevant plane. Sonographers were either in training or had > 3000 scans worth of experience. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility were assessed using Bland-Altman plots, and absolute values and percentages for mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were reported. RESULTS Overall reproducibility was good, with all 95% LoA < 8%. Reproducibility was improved by use of the focus point compared with the standard technique for both intraobserver comparison (95% LoA, < 4% vs < 6%) and interobserver comparison (95% LoA, < 7% vs < 8%). These findings were independent of sonographer seniority and plane acquired. CONCLUSIONS Reproducibility of fetal biometry assessment is improved with use of the focus point for plane acquisition, regardless of sonographer experience. We propose that this method should be implemented in clinical practice and training programs in fetal biometry. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Vignola
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Donadono
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Cavalli
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- ASTT Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - V Azzaretto
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- ASTT Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - D Casagrandi
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - P Pandya
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - R Napolitano
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peasley R, Rangel LAA, Casagrandi D, Donadono V, Willinger M, Conti G, Seminara Y, Marlow N, David AL, Attilakos G, Pandya P, Zaikin A, Peebles D, Napolitano R. Management of late-onset fetal growth restriction: pragmatic approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62:106-114. [PMID: 36864542 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is limited prospective evidence to guide the management of late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) and its differentiation from small-for-gestational age. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively a novel protocol in which ultrasound criteria were used to classify women with suspected late FGR into two groups: those at low risk, who were managed expectantly until the anticipated date of delivery, and those at high risk, who were delivered soon after 37 weeks of gestation. We also compared the outcome of this prospective cohort with that of a historical cohort of women presenting similarly with suspected late FGR, in order to evaluate the impact of the new protocol. METHODS This was a prospective study of women with a non-anomalous singleton pregnancy at ≥ 32 weeks' gestation attending a tertiary hospital in London, UK, between February 2018 and September 2019, with estimated fetal weight (EFW) ≤ 10th centile, or EFW > 10th centile in addition to a decrease in fetal abdominal circumference of ≥ 50 centiles compared with a previous scan, umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index > 95th centile or cerebroplacental ratio < 5th centile. Women were classified as low or high risk based on ultrasound and Doppler criteria. Women in the low-risk group were delivered by 41 weeks of gestation, unless they subsequently met high-risk criteria, whereas women in the high-risk group (EFW < 3rd centile, umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index > 95th centile or EFW between 3rd and 10th centiles (inclusive) with abdominal circumference drop or abnormal Dopplers) were delivered at or soon after 37 weeks. The primary outcome was adverse neonatal outcome and included hypothermia, hypoglycemia, neonatal unit admission, jaundice requiring treatment, suspected infection, feeding difficulties, 1-min Apgar score < 7, hospital readmission and any severe adverse neonatal outcome (perinatal death, resuscitation using inotropes or mechanical ventilation, 5-min Apgar score < 7, metabolic acidosis, sepsis, and cerebral, cardiac or respiratory morbidity). Secondary outcomes were adverse maternal outcome (operative delivery for abnormal fetal heart rate) and severe adverse neonatal outcome. Women managed according to the new protocol were compared with a historical cohort of 323 women delivered prior to the implementation of the new protocol, for whom management was guided by individual clinician expertise. RESULTS Over 18 months, 321 women were recruited to the prospective cohort, of whom 156 were classified as low risk and 165 were high risk. Adverse neonatal outcome was significantly less common in the low-risk compared with the high-risk group (45% vs 58%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.6 (95% CI, 0.4-0.9); P = 0.022). There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse maternal outcome (18% vs 24%; aOR, 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4-1.2); P = 0.142) or severe adverse neonatal outcome (3.8% vs 8.5%; aOR, 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-1.3); P = 0.153) between the low- and high-risk groups. Compared with women in the historical cohort classified retrospectively as low risk, low-risk women managed under the new protocol had a lower rate of adverse neonatal outcome (45% vs 58%; aOR, 0.6 (95% CI, 0.4-0.9); P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS Appropriate risk stratification to guide management of late FGR was associated with a reduced rate of adverse neonatal outcome in low-risk pregnancies. In clinical practice, a policy of expectantly managing women with a low-risk late-onset FGR pregnancy at term could improve neonatal and long-term development. Randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the effect of an evidence-based conservative management protocol for late FGR on perinatal morbidity and mortality and long-term neurodevelopment. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Peasley
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - L A Abrego Rangel
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Mathematics, University College London, London, UK
| | - D Casagrandi
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Donadono
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Willinger
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Conti
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Y Seminara
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Marlow
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - A L David
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - G Attilakos
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Pandya
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Zaikin
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Mathematics, University College London, London, UK
| | - D Peebles
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - R Napolitano
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Napolitano R, Molloholli M, Donadono V, Ohuma EO, Wanyonyi SZ, Kemp B, Yaqub MK, Ash S, Barros FC, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Noble JA, Oberto M, Purwar M, Pang R, Cheikh Ismail L, Lambert A, Gravett MG, Salomon LJ, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, Villar J, Papageorghiou AT. International standards for fetal brain structures based on serial ultrasound measurements from Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of INTERGROWTH-21 st Project. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56:359-370. [PMID: 32048426 DOI: 10.1002/uog.21990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To create prescriptive growth standards for five fetal brain structures, measured using ultrasound, in healthy, well-nourished women at low risk of impaired fetal growth and poor perinatal outcome, taking part in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study (FGLS) of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. METHODS This was a complementary analysis of a large, population-based, multicenter, longitudinal study. The sample analyzed was selected randomly from the overall FGLS population, ensuring an equal distribution among the eight diverse participating sites and of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound volumes across pregnancy (range: 15-36 weeks' gestation). We measured, in planes reconstructed from 3D ultrasound volumes of the fetal head at different timepoints in pregnancy, the size of the parieto-occipital fissure (POF), Sylvian fissure (SF), anterior horn of the lateral ventricle, atrium of the posterior horn of the lateral ventricle (PV) and cisterna magna (CM). Fractional polynomials were used to construct the standards. Growth and development of the infants were assessed at 1 and 2 years of age to confirm their adequacy for constructing international standards. RESULTS From the entire FGLS cohort of 4321 women, 451 (10.4%) were selected at random. After exclusions, 3D ultrasound volumes from 442 fetuses born without a congenital malformation were used to create the charts. The fetal brain structures of interest were identified in 90% of cases. All structures, except the PV, showed increasing size with gestational age, and the size of the POF, SF, PV and CM showed increasing variability. The 3rd , 5th , 50th , 95th and 97th smoothed centiles are presented. The 5th centiles for the POF and SF were 3.1 mm and 4.7 mm at 22 weeks' gestation and 4.6 mm and 9.9 mm at 32 weeks, respectively. The 95th centiles for the PV and CM were 8.5 mm and 7.5 mm at 22 weeks and 8.6 mm and 9.5 mm at 32 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We have produced prescriptive size standards for fetal brain structures based on prospectively enrolled pregnancies at low risk of abnormal outcome. We recommend these as international standards for the assessment of measurements obtained using ultrasound from fetal brain structures. © 2020 Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Napolitano
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Molloholli
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - V Donadono
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - E O Ohuma
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Z Wanyonyi
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - B Kemp
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M K Yaqub
- Department of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Ash
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - F C Barros
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Comportamento, Universidade Católica de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
| | - M Carvalho
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Y A Jaffer
- Department of Family & Community Health, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
| | - J A Noble
- Department of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Oberto
- S.C. Ostetricia 2U, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Italy
| | - M Purwar
- Nagpur INTERGROWTH-21st Research Centre, Ketkar Hospital, Nagpur, India
| | - R Pang
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - L Cheikh Ismail
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Department, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - A Lambert
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M G Gravett
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - L J Salomon
- Department of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Z A Bhutta
- Center for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - S H Kennedy
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Villar
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - A T Papageorghiou
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cavallaro A, Ash ST, Napolitano R, Wanyonyi S, Ohuma EO, Molloholli M, Sande J, Sarris I, Ioannou C, Norris T, Donadono V, Carvalho M, Purwar M, Barros FC, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Pang R, Gravett MG, Salomon LJ, Noble JA, Altman DG, Papageorghiou AT. Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21 st Project. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52:332-339. [PMID: 28718938 DOI: 10.1002/uog.18811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2017] [Revised: 07/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess a comprehensive package of ultrasound quality control in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project, a large multicenter study of fetal growth. METHODS Quality control (QC) measures were performed for 20 313 ultrasound scan images obtained prospectively from 4321 fetuses at 14-41 weeks' gestation in eight geographical locations. At the time of each ultrasound examination, three fetal biometric variables (head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL)) were measured in triplicate on separately generated images. All measurements were taken in a blinded fashion. QC had two elements: (1) qualitative QC: visual assessment by sonographers at each study site of their images based on specific criteria, with 10% of images being re-assessed at the Oxford-based Ultrasound Quality Unit (compared using an adjusted kappa statistic); and (2) quantitative QC: assessment of measurement data by comparing the first, second and third measurements (intraobserver variability), remeasurement of caliper replacement in 10% (interobserver variability), both by Bland-Altman plots and plotting frequency histograms of the SD of triplicate measurements and assessing how many were above or below 2 SD of the expected distribution. The system allowed the sonographers' performances to be monitored regularly. RESULTS A high level of agreement between self- and external scoring was demonstrated for all measurements (κ = 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-0.99) for HC, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99) for AC and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98) for FL). Intraobserver 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of ultrasound measures for HC, AC and FL were ± 3.3%, ± 5.6% and ± 6.2%, respectively; the corresponding values for interobserver LoA were ± 4.4%, ± 6.0% and ± 5.6%. The SD distribution of triplicate measurements for all biometric variables showed excessive variability for three of 31 sonographers, allowing prompt identification and retraining. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative and quantitative QC monitoring was feasible and highly reproducible in a large multicenter research study, which facilitated the production of high-quality ultrasound images. We recommend that the QC system we developed is implemented in future research studies and clinical practice. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Cavallaro
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S T Ash
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - R Napolitano
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Wanyonyi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - E O Ohuma
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Molloholli
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Sande
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - I Sarris
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - C Ioannou
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - T Norris
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - V Donadono
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Carvalho
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - M Purwar
- Nagpur INTERGROWTH-21st Research Centre, Ketkar Hospital, Nagpur, India
| | - F C Barros
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Comportamento, Universidade Católica de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
| | - Y A Jaffer
- Department of Family & Community Health, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
| | - E Bertino
- Dipartimento di Scienze Pediatriche e dell'Adolescenza, Cattedra di Neonatologia, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - R Pang
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - M G Gravett
- Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (GAPPS), Seattle, WA, USA
| | - L J Salomon
- Maternité Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - J A Noble
- Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D G Altman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - A T Papageorghiou
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Napolitano R, Donadono V, Ohuma EO, Knight CL, Wanyonyi SZ, Kemp B, Norris T, Papageorghiou AT. Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48:80-5. [PMID: 27158767 PMCID: PMC5113683 DOI: 10.1002/uog.15956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Revised: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/29/2016] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the standard methods for ultrasound measurement of fetal head circumference (HC) and biparietal diameter (BPD) (outer-to-outer (BPDoo) vs outer-to-inner (BPDoi) caliper placement), and compare acquisition of these measurements in transthalamic (TT) vs transventricular (TV) planes. METHODS This study utilized ultrasound images acquired from women participating in the Oxford arm of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project. In the first phase of the study, BPDoo and BPDoi were measured on stored images. In the second phase, real-time measurements of BPD, occipitofrontal diameter (OFD) and HC in TT and TV planes were obtained by pairs of sonographers. Reproducibility of measurements made by the same (intraobserver) and by different (interobserver) sonographers, as well as the reproducibility of caliper placement and measurements obtained in different planes, was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS In Phase I, we analyzed ultrasound images of 108 singleton fetuses. The mean intraobserver and interobserver differences were < 2% (1.34 mm) and the 95% limits of agreement were < 5% (3 mm) for both BPDoo and BPDoi. Neither method for measuring BPD showed consistently better reproducibility. In Phase II, we analyzed ultrasound images of 100 different singleton fetuses. The mean intraobserver and interobserver differences were < 1% (2.26 mm) and the 95% limits of agreement were < 8% (14.45 mm) for all fetal head measurements obtained in TV and TT planes. Neither plane for measuring fetal head showed consistently better reproducibility. Measurement of HC using the ellipse facility was as reproducible as HC calculated from BPD and OFD. OFD by itself was the least reproducible of all fetal head measurements. CONCLUSIONS Measurements of BPDoi and BPDoo are equally reproducible; however, we believe BPDoo should be used in clinical practice as it allows fetal HC to be measured and compared with neonatal HC. For all head measurements, TV and TT planes provide equally reproducible values at any gestational age, and HC values are similar in both planes. Fetal head measurement in the TT plane is preferable as international standards in this plane are available; however, measurements in the TV plane can be plotted on the same standards. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Napolitano
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - V. Donadono
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - E. O. Ohuma
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Botnar Research CentreUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - C. L. Knight
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - S. Z. Wanyonyi
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - B. Kemp
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - T. Norris
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - A. T. Papageorghiou
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Di Cresce M, Maruotti G, Mazzarelli L, Milanes GM, Simioli S, Sirico A, Saviano R, Esposito G, Donadono V, Martinelli P. W186 OBSTETRICAL MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH PORTAL CAVERNOMA. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(12)61911-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
7
|
Di Cresce M, Maruotti G, Mazzarelli L, Tessitore G, Saviano R, Volo M, Esposito G, Donadono V, Sirico A, Martinelli P. W028 NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY ALTERATION IN FETUS WITH THE CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITY 48, XXYY. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(12)61753-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
8
|
Esposito G, Donadono V, Morlando M, Sarno L, Di Cresce M, Saviano R, Sirico A, Milanes GM, Migliucci A, Martinelli P. W179 MANAGEMENT OF A WOMAN HOMOZYGOUS FOR FII20210A WITH IUGR COMPLICATED BY HELLP SYNDROME. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(12)61904-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
9
|
Donadono V, Esposito G, Morlando M, Sarno L, Di Cresce M, Volo M, Saviano R, Sirico A, Migliucci A, Martinelli P. W196 MANAGEMENT OF A PREGNANCY COMPLICATED BY BLEEDING EPULIS. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(12)61921-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|