Silk DS, Bowman VE, Semochkina D, Dalrymple U, Woods DC. Uncertainty quantification for epidemiological forecasts of COVID-19 through combinations of model predictions.
Stat Methods Med Res 2022;
31:1778-1789. [PMID:
35799481 PMCID:
PMC9272045 DOI:
10.1177/09622802221109523]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Scientific advice to the UK government throughout the COVID-19 pandemic has been
informed by ensembles of epidemiological models provided by members of the
Scientific Pandemic Influenza group on Modelling. Among other applications, the
model ensembles have been used to forecast daily incidence, deaths and
hospitalizations. The models differ in approach (e.g. deterministic or
agent-based) and in assumptions made about the disease and population. These
differences capture genuine uncertainty in the understanding of disease dynamics
and in the choice of simplifying assumptions underpinning the model. Although
analyses of multi-model ensembles can be logistically challenging when
time-frames are short, accounting for structural uncertainty can improve
accuracy and reduce the risk of over-confidence in predictions. In this study,
we compare the performance of various ensemble methods to combine short-term
(14-day) COVID-19 forecasts within the context of the pandemic response. We
address practical issues around the availability of model predictions and make
some initial proposals to address the shortcomings of standard methods in this
challenging situation.
Collapse