Registry of the Spanish Network for Systemic Sclerosis: Survival, Prognostic Factors, and Causes of Death

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, multisystem disease showing a large individual variability in disease progression and prognosis. In the present study, we assess survival, causes of death, and risk factors of mortality in a large series of Spanish SSc patients. Consecutive SSc patients fulfilling criteria of the classification by LeRoy were recruited in the survey. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to analyze survival and to identify predictors of mortality. Among 879 consecutive patients, 138 (15.7%) deaths were registered. Seventy-six out of 138 (55%) deceased patients were due to causes attributed to SSc, and pulmonary hypertension (PH) was the leading cause in 23 (16.6%) patients. Survival rates were 96%, 93%, 83%, and 73% at 5, 10, 20, and 30 years after the first symptom, respectively. Survival rates for diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and limited cutaneous SSc were 91%, 86%, 64%, and 39%; and 97%, 95%, 85%, and 81% at 5, 10, 20, and 30 years, respectively (log-rank: 67.63, P < 0.0001). The dcSSc subset, male sex, age at disease onset older than 65 years, digital ulcers, interstitial lung disease (ILD), PH, heart involvement, scleroderma renal crisis (SRC), presence of antitopoisomerase I and absence of anticentromere antibodies, and active capillaroscopic pattern showed reduced survival rate. In a multivariate analysis, older age at disease onset, dcSSc, ILD, PH, and SRC were independent risk factors for mortality. In the present study involving a large cohort of SSc patients, a high prevalence of disease-related causes of death was demonstrated. Older age at disease onset, dcSSc, ILD, PH, and SRC were identified as independent prognostic factors.

Systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma and limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: similarities and differences

OBJECTIVES

To compare a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma (ssSSc) vs. patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc).

METHODS

Forty-five patients with ssSSc and 186 patients with lcSSc were investigated. Demographic, clinical and immunologic features and survival were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between ssSSc and lcSSc in gender, age at onset and interval between onset and diagnosis. ssSSc patients fulfilled the ACR criteria for SSc less than lcSSc patients (13%/77%, p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in articular involvement, myopathy, tendon friction rubs and gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac and renal involvements. There was a trend to higher prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in ssSSc patients (29%/19%) but not reach significant difference. The prevalence of antinuclear and anticentromere antibodies and slow capilaroscopic pattern was similar. Sicca syndrome (13%/30%; p=0.024), digital ulcers (16%/50%; p<0.0001), calcinosis (11%/26%; p=0.047) and acroosteolysis (0% /10%; p=0.028) were more frequently in lcSSc. Survival at 5, 10, and 15 yr was not different in ssSSc and lcSSc patients (100%/98%, 100%/98%, and 92%/89%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

ssSSc and lcSSc patients share demographic, clinical and immunologic features. Survival is also similar in both groups. Differences are mainly due to peripheral vascular manifestations. However, despite great similarities, we believe that ssSSc patients should be considered as a different subset in order to avoid misdiagnosis. ssSSc patients should be truly differentiated from early SSc using sensitive and specific studies looking for any asymptomatic organ involvement.

Intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in the treatment of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease: a long term study

OBJECTIVE

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) frequently complicates systemic sclerosis (SSc). Cyclophosphamide (CYC) is a promising immunosuppressive therapy for SSc-related ILD. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of an intravenous CYC (iv CYC) pulse regime in SSc-related ILD during treatment and thereafter.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study ten consecutive patients with SSc-related ILD were treated with iv CYC in a pulse regime lasting from 6 to 24 months. Clinical status, pulmonary functional testing (PFT) and high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest were evaluated at enrolment and 6, 12 and 24 months thereafter. After treatment withdrawal, patients were followed up every 6 months with PFT and chest HRCT to monitor lung disease.

RESULTS

Clinical improvement was apparent in 8 out of 10 patients. The median values of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) as well as ground-glass pattern on HRCT did not change significantly after 6, 12 and 24 months of therapy. The follow-up continued in 8 out of 10 patients after treatment withdrawal for a median of 26.5 months (range: 12-48 months). The final median FVC was 54.5% of predicted value (interquartile range, IQR= 31.6%-94%). Only one patient suffered a FVC deterioration greater than 10%, even though less than 160 ml. The final median DLCO was 68% of predicted value (IQR=38.3-83.6%). Only 2 patients who developed pulmonary arterial hypertension deteriorated their DLCO values of more than 15%.

CONCLUSIONS

An iv CYC pulse regimen over 24 months may stabilize pulmonary activity in patients with SSc-related ILD during the course of treatment and for a median of 26.5 months thereafter.

Clinical significance of antinuclear antibodies in malignant diseases: association with rheumatic and connective tissue paraneoplastic syndromes

Our objective was to determine the prevalence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) in patients with malignancies and to investigate if their presence might be related with development of musculoskeletal symptoms or paraneoplastic rheumatic syndromes. Antinuclear antibodies were determined by indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells in 274 neoplastic patients and in a control group of 140 age-adjusted healthy subjects. Antinuclear antibody specificities (anti-DNA and anti-ENA) were investigated in patients with rheumatological symptoms and positive ANA. Antinuclear antibodies were detected in 76 of 274 (27.7%) patients with malignancies and in nine of 140 (6.4%) healthy subjects. Twenty patients reported paraneoplastic rheumatic symptoms or syndromes. Two of them developed clinical symptoms mimicking rheumatoid arthritis (rheumatoid-like arthropathy), one systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus-like syndrome), one dermatomyositis and four cutaneous vasculitides. Musculoskeletal symptoms and paraneoplastic rheumatic symptoms and syndromes were both more frequently observed in patients with positive ANA. Antinuclear antibody specificities were found in only two cases. We can conclude that there is an increased incidence of antinuclear antibodies in malignant conditions. Musculoskeletal symptoms and rheumatic paraneoplastic symptoms and syndromes seem to be more frequent in patients with cancer-related positive ANAs. The failure to find ANA specificities (anti-ENA, anti-DNA) in patients with malignancies and positive ANAs in our study may simply reflect molecular differences between the autoantigens involved in cancer and those characteristically involved in the systemic autoimmune diseases.