Depression, anxiety, fatigue, and quality of life in a large sample of patients suffering from head and neck cancer in comparison with the general population

BACKGROUND

Treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) often leads to visible and severe functional impairments. In addition, patients often suffer from a variety of psychosocial problems, significantly associated with a decreased quality of life. We aimed to compare depression, anxiety, fatigue and quality of life (QoL) between HNC patients and a large sample of the general population in Germany and to examine the impact of sociodemographic, behavioral and clinical factors on these symptoms.

METHODS

We assessed data of HNC patients during the aftercare consultation at the Leipzig University Medical Center with a patient reported outcome (PRO) tool named "OncoFunction". Depression, anxiety, fatigue and QoL were assessed using validated outcome measures including the PHQ-9, the GAD-2, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 817 HNC patients were included in our study and compared to a sample of 5018 individuals of the general German population. HNC patients showed significantly higher levels of impairment in all dimensions assessed. Examination of association between depression, anxiety, fatigue and QoL and clinical as well as sociodemographic variables showed significant relationships between occupational status, ECOG-state, body mass index and time since diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

HNC patients suffer significantly from psychological distress. The used questionnaires are suitable for the use in daily routine practice and can be helpful to increase the detection of depression, anxiety and fatigue and therefore can improve HNC aftercare.

[Introduction of the Screening Tool OncoFunction for Functional Follow-up of Head and Neck Patients]

INTRODUCTION

The follow-up for head and neck cancer (HNC) focussed on therapy control. Accessory long term functionality is important. Impairment of function is observed, but a comparable documentation is not established. Additional we frequently see psychooncological comorbidities, what complicates the assessment. This was the reason why Tschiesner et al. developed on the base of the "ICF Core set for head and neck cancer" a guideline for the Assessment of Function in HNC. In consequence of good results in other tumour entities we developed an electronic version (OncoFunction).

METHODS

In a proof of concept study all patients of our follow up consultation from 07/13 to 03/14 were included. OncoFunction was given to patients in a digital form using tablet computers. The results were visible to the physician in a concentrated form before consultation and were supplemented by a physician questionnaire. Furthermore we evaluated the usability in 202 patients.

RESULTS

We had 682 patient contacts. 530 patient contacts (77, 7%) used the questionnaire. The physician questionnaire was answered in 470 times. Finally there are from 69.8% of the patient contacts full datasets available. Between users and non-users of the questionnaire we see no difference.

CONCLUSION

The use of a computer-based screening and feedback system (OncoFunction) in clinical use is feasible and excellent assessed by patients. The patient data are visible in a compact form for the physician and problems can clear addressed to the patient. One more benefit is the standardized follow up documentation and the use of comparable data in research.