Variability in plasma rifampicin concentrations and role of SLCO1B1, ABCB1, AADAC2 and CES2 genotypes in Ethiopian patients with tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Rifampicin, a key drug against tuberculosis (TB), displays wide between-patient pharmacokinetics variability and concentration-dependent antimicrobial effect. We investigated variability in plasma rifampicin concentrations and the role of SLCO1B1, ABCB1, arylacetamide deacetylase (AADAC) and carboxylesterase 2 (CES-2) genotypes in Ethiopian patients with TB.

METHODS

We enrolled adult patients with newly diagnosed TB (n = 119) who had received 2 weeks of rifampicin-based anti-TB therapy. Venous blood samples were obtained at three time points post-dose. Genotypes for SLCO1B1 (c.388A > G, c.521T > C), ABCB1 (c.3435C > T, c.4036A > G), AADACc.841G > A and CES-2 (c.269-965A > G) were determined. Rifampicin plasma concentration was quantified using LC-MS/MS. Predictors of rifampicin Cmax and AUC0-7 h were analysed.

RESULTS

The median rifampicin Cmax and AUC0-7 were 6.76 µg/mL (IQR 5.37-8.48) and 17.05 µg·h/mL (IQR 13.87-22.26), respectively. Only 30.3% of patients achieved the therapeutic efficacy threshold (Cmax>8 µg/mL). The allele frequency for SLCO1B1*1B (c.388A > G), SLCO1B1*5 (c.521T > C), ABCB1 c.3435C > T, ABCB1c.4036A > G, AADAC c.841G > A and CES-2 c.269-965A > G were 2.2%, 20.2%, 24.4%, 14.6%, 86.1% and 30.6%, respectively. Sex, rifampicin dose and ABCB1c.4036A > G, genotypes were significant predictors of rifampicin Cmax and AUC0-7. AADACc.841G > A genotypes were significant predictors of rifampicin Cmax. There was no significant influence of SLCO1B1 (c.388A > G, c.521T > C), ABCB1c.3435C > T and CES-2 c.269-965A > G on rifampicin plasma exposure variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Subtherapeutic rifampicin plasma concentrations occurred in two-thirds of Ethiopian TB patients. Rifampicin exposure varied with sex, dose and genotypes. AADACc.841G/G and ABCB1c.4036A/A genotypes and male patients are at higher risk of lower rifampicin plasma exposure. The impact on TB treatment outcomes and whether high-dose rifampicin is required to improve therapeutic efficacy requires further investigation.

A validated method for the determination of hematocrit in dried blood spots using image analysis

Aim: To develop a nondestructive method for the estimation of hematocrit (HCT) in dried blood spots (DBSs). Materials & methods: Standards and controls were created (HCT range: 0.20-0.50 l/l) and DBS scanned using a flatbed scanner. Gray values and pixel areas were analyzed with open-source software to estimate HCT and volume, respectively. HCT obtained in whole blood using hematological analyzer was compared with DBS scanner method (n = 50). Results: Between-run precision was 4.7-10.2% and between-run accuracy was 89.6-102.1%. In the hematological instrument comparison, 96% of the patient sample results were within ±15%. Conclusion: The nondestructive method can be used to exclude patient DBS samples with extreme HCT levels from further analysis and avoid bias on measured concentration.

Reproducible Quantification of Unbound Fractions of Four Beta-Lactam Antibiotics: Ultrafiltration Versus Microdialysis of Spiked Healthy Donor Plasma

BACKGROUND

Ultrafiltration (UF) is a conventional method for isolating the protein-unbound plasma fractions of therapeutic drugs. However, the ideal UF conditions for specific compounds remain largely unexplored. By comparing UF-derived unbound concentrations with the corresponding results obtained using a reference method, the authors sought to identify appropriate UF conditions for cefotaxime, cloxacillin, flucloxacillin, and piperacillin.

METHODS

In vitro microdialysis (MD) with a no-net-flux approach was used as a reference method for plasma protein separation, for which UF performance was assessed. Four levels of relative centrifugal force (2500-11,290 g ) and 2 levels of temperature (37 vs. 22°C) during 10 minutes of UF centrifugation were evaluated. Ultrafiltrates and reference microdialysates were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to obtain unbound concentrations. After identifying the appropriate UF conditions in the spiked plasma samples, exploratory analyses of clinical samples (n = 10 per analyte) were performed.

RESULTS

Of the evaluated UF alternatives, the best overall agreement with the MD-derived reference concentrations was obtained with 11,290 g UF performed at 22°C. For cloxacillin specifically, 37°C UF yielded better agreement than 22°C UF at 11,290 g. Clinical sample analyses indicated minimal differences between 22°C and 37°C at 11,290 g UF for cefotaxime and piperacillin. However, consistently lower levels of unbound cloxacillin (median: -23%, IQR: -19% to -24%) and flucloxacillin (median: -27%, IQR: -21 to -34%) were observed after UF at 22°C versus 37°C.

CONCLUSIONS

For the evaluated UF device, 10 minutes of 11,290 g UF at 22°C is appropriate for flucloxacillin, cefotaxime, and piperacillin, and can arguably be justified for cloxacillin as well for laboratory practice purposes. Maintenance of 37°C during high-centrifugal UF may lead to overestimation, particularly for unbound flucloxacillin.