Decreased self-reported appetite following insular cortex resection in patients with epilepsy

Entrenched deep within the Sylvian fissure, the insula has long been considered one of the least understood regions of the human brain, in part due to its restricted accessibility. However, recent evidence suggests that the insula plays a key role in gustation, interoception, cognitive and emotional processes, and likely integrates these different functions to contribute to the homeostatic control of food intake. In the past decade, our team has identified the insula as a potential site of epileptogenicity, which can be successfully treated by microsurgical resection. While most surgeries are successful in controlling insular epileptic seizures and lead to few postoperative deficits, the subtle changes that may occur in food-related experiences are still unknown. Using a self-report questionnaire, the present study sought to fill this gap by assessing changes in appetite in patients who underwent unilateral partial or complete insular resections (n = 17) as part of their epilepsy surgery. We compared them to a group of patients who underwent temporal lobe epilepsy surgery (n = 22) as a lesion-control group. A majority (59%) of the insular patients reported an alteration in appetite, with most of these changes being characterized by a persistent reduction. Such changes were rarely reported following temporal lobectomy (14%). While they significantly differed in terms of appetite changes, both groups were similar when examining post-surgical changes in weight, diet, exercise and eating habits. Insular patients with altered appetite also showed behavioral signs of dysfunctional interoceptive and gustatory functions, corroborating the idea that these systems play a role in the regulation of feeding behaviours. This research pushes our understanding of the mechanisms underlying food intake and could lead to avenues for the treatment of eating disorders.

Psychological status after insulo-opercular resection in patients with epilepsy: Depression, anxiety, and quality of life

Insular epilepsy is increasingly recognized in epilepsy surgery centers. Recent studies suggest that resection of an epileptogenic zone that involves the insula as a treatment for drug-resistant seizures is associated with good outcomes in terms of seizure control. However, despite the existing evidence of a role of the insula in emotions and affective information processing, the long-term psychological outcome of patients undergoing these surgeries remain poorly documented. A group of 27 adults (18 women) who underwent an insulo-opercular resection (in combination with a part of the temporal lobe in 10, and of the frontal lobe in 5) as part of epilepsy surgery at our center between 2004 and 2019 completed psychometric questionnaires to assess depression (Beck Depression Inventory - 2nd edition; BDI-II), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait Version; STAI-T), and quality of life (Patient Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy; QOLIE-10-P). Scores were compared to those of patients who had standard temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery with similar socio-demographic and disease characteristics. Seizure control after insular epilepsy surgery was comparable to that observed after TLE surgery, with a majority of patients reporting being seizure free (insular: 63.0%; temporal: 63.2%) or having rare disabling seizures (insular: 7.4%; temporal: 18.4%) at the time of questionnaire completion. Statistical comparisons revealed no significant group difference on scores of depression, anxiety, or quality of life. Hemisphere or extent of insular resection had no significant effect on the studied variables. In the total sample, employment status and seizure control, but not location of surgery, significantly predicted quality of life. Self-reported long-term psychological status after insulo-opercular resection as part of epilepsy surgery thus appears to be similar to that observed after TLE surgery, which is commonly performed in epilepsy surgery centers.

Sensory profile alterations in patients with insular epilepsy surgery: Preliminary findings

The insular cortex is now well-established as a potential site of epileptogenesis in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, and its resection has been associated with good outcomes in terms of seizure control. However, given the role of the insula in sensory processing and in visceral information integration, it remains unclear whether insular cortex epilepsy and its surgery are associated with disturbances in sensory information processing and visceral sensation processes as experienced in daily life. In the present study, we examined such sensory disturbances in a group of patients (n = 17) who underwent epilepsy surgery involving a resection of the insula and compared them to a lesion-control group of patients with temporal epilepsy surgery (n = 22) and a healthy control group (n = 29) matched for age, gender, and education. Participants were assessed on the self-report "Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile" questionnaire at least four months after surgery. Our series of one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed that insular and temporal resections in patients with drug-refractory epilepsy were associated with a low "sensation seeking" behavior reflecting a lack of engagement with sensory inputs from the environment. Furthermore, insular resections were associated with impairments in the "active behavioral responses" for the gustatory/olfactory modalities. These preliminary findings suggest that insular resections may be associated with mild to moderate alterations in sensory processing.

The effects of insular and mesiotemporal lesions on affective information processing: Preliminary evidence from patients with epilepsy surgery

Depressive symptoms and anxiety are common complaints in patients who have had epilepsy surgery. Recent studies have reported disturbances in emotional memory, facial and vocal emotion recognition, and affective learning after temporal lobe and/or insular resection for drug-resistant seizures, suggesting that these regions may be involved in emotional processes underlying psychological symptoms. The insula is a core component of the salience network and is thought to be involved in processing emotions such as disgust, and the role of mesial temporal lobe structures in affective processing is well established. However, to our knowledge, no study has yet investigated whether attentional processing of affective information is altered when these structures are resected as part of an epilepsy surgery. The present study examined the interference control capacity and attentional biases for emotional information in adult patients with epilepsy who underwent temporal lobe resections including the amygdala and hippocampus (n = 15) and/or partial or complete insular resections (n = 16). Patients were tested on an Emotional Stroop test and on a Dot-Probe task using fearful and disgusting pictures and were compared with a healthy control group (n = 30) matched for age, gender, and education. Repeated-measures analyses of variances revealed a significant effect of emotional words on color naming speed in the Emotional Stroop task among insular patients, which was not observed in the other groups. By contrast, the groups did not differ on Dot-Probe task performance. These preliminary findings suggest that insular damage may alter emotional interference control.

Two studies of menstrual synchrony: negative results

In 1971 McClintock reported menstrual synchrony in pairs and groups of women who spent time together. The two studies reported herein, based on the methods and research design introduced by McClintock, fail to replicate her results. The first study is of a sample of 132 women who were sorority members or roommates of sorority members living on the campus of a large coeducational state university. The second study is of a sample of 24 women who were members of a cooperative house near the same university. In the subjects from both studies, the final mean onset absolute difference is greater than the initial mean onset absolute difference, and there are more nonsynchronous pairs of subjects than synchronous pairs. The sample from the sorority study was progressively reduced to exclude those subjects with irregular menstrual cycle lengths and those pairs in which one subject was taking oral contraceptives. Menstrual synchrony did not emerge in the reduced sample. Thus, whether or not menstrual synchrony occurs among women who spend time together should still be considered a hypothesis requiring further investigation.