The Microalbuminuria Education Medication and Optimisation (MEMO) study: 4 years follow-up of multifactorial intervention in high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

The Microalbuminuria Education Medication and Optimisation (MEMO) study, revealed improved cardiovascular risk and glycaemic control with 18 months of intensive multifactorial intervention in high-risk people with type 2 diabetes, without any increase in severe hypoglycaemia. Our aim was to assess longer-term outcomes at 4-year follow-up in these participants.

METHODS

Some 189 individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria were recruited from a multi-ethnic population in Leicestershire, UK. The intervention group (n = 95) received multifactorial intervention with self-management education, and the control group (n = 94) received usual care. The primary outcome was change in HbA_1c , and secondary outcomes were blood pressure (BP), cholesterol, microalbuminuria, estimated GFR, cardiovascular risk scores and major adverse cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

Some 130 participants (68.7%), mean (sd) age 60.8 (10.4) years, duration of diabetes 11.5 (9.7) years, completed 4 years of follow-up. Mean change [95% confidence intervals (CI)] in HbA_1c over 4 years was greater with intensive intervention compared with control (-3 mmol/mol, 95% CI -4.95,-1.11; -0.4%, 95% CI -0.67,-0.15; P = 0.002). Significant improvements over the 4 years were also seen in systolic BP (-7.3 mmHg, 95% CI -11.1, -3.5; P < 0.001), diastolic BP (-2.9 mmHg, 95% CI -5.4, -0.3; P = 0.026), cholesterol (-0.3 mmol/l, 95% CI -0.52,-0.12; P = 0.002), and 10-year coronary heart disease (-5.3, 95% CI -8.2,-2.3; P < 0.001) and stroke risk (-4.4, 95% CI -7.5, -1.3; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Multifactorial intervention with structured diabetes self-management education compared with usual diabetes care has benefits for cardio-metabolic risk factor profile. There was no increase in severe hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular mortality despite intensive glycaemic control, although the study was not powered to assess these outcomes.

New insulins and newer insulin regimens: a review of their role in improving glycaemic control in patients with diabetes

The legacy effect of early good glycaemic control in people with diabetes shows it is associated with reduction of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Insulin therapy is essential and lifesaving in individuals with type 1 diabetes and beneficial for those with type 2 diabetes who fail to achieve optimal glycaemic targets with other classes of glucose-lowering therapies. Since the introduction of insulin analogues, insulin management has changed. This follow-up review attempts to update our earlier publication from 2009 and discusses the role of new insulin analogues and newer insulin regimens. Recognising the advent of new quality and economic initiatives both in the UK and worldwide, this paper reviews current insulin prescribing and the pros and cons of prescribing analogues in comparison to the human insulins that are now gaining more acceptance in everyday clinical practice.

Multifactorial intervention in individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria: the Microalbuminuria Education and Medication Optimisation (MEMO) study

AIMS

To determine whether tighter cardiovascular risk factor control with structured education in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and microalbuminuria benefits cardiovascular risk factors.

METHODS

Participants from a multiethnic population, recruited from primary care and specialist clinics were randomised to intensive intervention with structured patient (DESMOND model) education (n=94) or usual care by own health professional (n=95).

PRIMARY OUTCOME

change in HbA1c at 18months.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

changes in blood pressure (BP), cholesterol, albuminuria, proportion reaching risk factor targets, modelled cardiovascular risk scores.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age and diabetes duration of participants were 61.5 (10.5) and 11.5 (9.3) years, respectively. At 18months, intensive intervention showed significant improvements in HbA1c (7.1(1.0) vs. 7.8(1.4)%, p<0.0001), systolic BP (129(16) vs. 139(17) mmHg, p<0.0001), diastolic BP (70(11) vs. 76(12) mmHg, p<0.001), total cholesterol (3.7(0.8) vs. 4.1(0.9) mmol/l, p=0.001). Moderate and severe hypoglycaemia was 11.2 vs. 29.0%; p=0.001 and 0 vs. 6.3%; p=0.07, respectively. More intensive participants achieved ≥3 risk factor targets with greater reductions in cardiovascular risk scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive intervention showed greater improvements in metabolic control and cardiovascular risk profile with lower rates of moderate and severe hypoglycaemia. Intensive glycaemic interventions should be underpinned by structured education promoting self-management in T2DM.

New insulins and new insulin regimens: a review of their role in improving glycaemic control in patients with diabetes

Effective glycaemic control can reduce and potentially prevent the microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Insulin is the mainstay of treatment for type 1 diabetes and is indicated in patients with type 2 diabetes who do no achieve optimal glycaemic control despite the use of oral hypoglycaemic agents. The advent of the so-called "designer" insulins, the insulin analogues, has offered new opportunities in the clinical management of diabetes. This review examines the efficacy of the different analogue insulins introduced thus far and goes on to explain their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. The review also examines the different types of insulin regimen currently used in clinical practice and discusses some of the factors that influence the choice of a particular insulin regimen. Further, irrespective of the insulin regimen used, the importance of prompt initiation and ongoing titration of insulin treatment to achieve optimal glycaemic targets is emphasised.

Insulin U-500 in severe insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Some patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are profoundly insulin resistant and require large insulin doses to achieve optimal glycaemic control. However, large volumes of subcutaneous conventional U-100 insulin can cause discomfort at the injection site, resulting in poor concordance with insulin therapy. One therapeutic option is the use of U-500 insulin, thus reducing the insulin volume by 80%. This review will address the practical issues associated with the use of U-500, clinical efficacy and safety aspects of this concentrated insulin, which has an important role in a subgroup of patients with T2DM.