Chemo-predictive assay for targeting cancer stem-like cells in patients affected by brain tumors

Administration of ineffective anticancer therapy is associated with unnecessary toxicity and development of resistant clones. Cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) resist chemotherapy, thereby causing relapse of the disease. Thus, development of a test that identifies the most effective chemotherapy management offers great promise for individualized anticancer treatments. We have developed an ex vivo chemotherapy sensitivity assay (ChemoID), which measures the sensitivity of CSLCs as well as the bulk of tumor cells to a variety of chemotherapy agents. Two patients, a 21-year old male (patient 1) and a 5-month female (patient 2), affected by anaplastic WHO grade-III ependymoma were screened using the ChemoID assay. Patient 1 was found sensitive to the combination of irinotecan and bevacizumab, which resulted in a prolonged disease progression free period of 18 months. Following recurrence, the combination of various chemotherapy drugs was tested again with the ChemoID assay. We found that benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) greatly increased the chemosensitivity of the ependymoma cells to the combination of irinotecan and bevacizumab. After patient 1 was treated for two months with irinotecan, bevacizumab and supplements of cruciferous vegetable extracts containing BITC, we observed over 50% tumoral regression in comparison with pre-ChemoID scan as evidenced by MRI. Patient 2 was found resistant to all treatments tested and following 6 cycles of vincristine, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin in various combinations, the tumor of this patient rapidly progressed and proton beam therapy was recommended. As expected animal studies conducted with patient derived xenografts treated with ChemoID screened drugs recapitulated the clinical observation. This assay demonstrates that patients with the same histological stage and grade of cancer may vary considerably in their clinical response, suggesting that ChemoID testing which measures the sensitivity of CSLCs as well as the bulk of tumor cells to a variety of chemotherapy agents could lead to more effective and personalized anticancer treatments in the future.

Analysis of pooled data from two pivotal controlled trials on the efficacy of topiramate in the prevention of migraine

CONTEXT

A substantial proportion of the patient population with migraine headache should be considered for preventive treatment based on the frequency and disability associated with this disorder. Use of the anticonvulsant topiramate was previously examined in two large, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of a subset of patients who have 3 to 12 migraine episodes per month.

OBJECTIVE

To better characterize the efficacy of topiramate for prevention of migraine, with or without aura, by pooling and analyzing data from the two large clinical trials.

METHODS

The pooled intent-to-treat population included 937 patients receiving topiramate at one of three dosages (50 mg/d, 100 mg/d, 200 mg/d) or placebo. Outcome measures included change in mean monthly migraine frequency and categorical responder rate throughout the 26-week doubleblind phase.

RESULTS

At daily doses of 100 and 200 mg, topiramate was associated with significant reductions in mean monthly migraine frequency throughout the double-blind phase compared with placebo (P<.001). Significantly more patients treated with these topiramate doses exhibited high-percentage reductions in monthly migraine frequency (>/=50% [P<.001], >/=75% [P<.001], 100% [P=.049]) versus placebo. The most common adverse events included anorexia, cognitive deficits, diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and paresthesia. Topiramate (100 mg/d, 200 mg/d) was associated with significant and sustained reductions in mean monthly migraine frequency beginning as early as 1 week into therapy.

CONCLUSION

Pooled efficacy data from two large, similarly designed, placebo-controlled migraine-prevention trials demonstrated that a statistically significant proportion of patients using topiramate met or exceeded two main outcome guidelines recommended by the International Headache Society (>/=50% and >/=75% reduction in frequency of monthly attacks). Based on efficacy and tolerability, topiramate at a dosage of 100 mg per day (50 mg twice daily) should be the target dosage for most patients with migraine.

Topiramate improves health-related quality of life when used to prevent migraine

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures among patients receiving topiramate (TPM) 100 mg/d in two divided doses for migraine prevention in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 26-week trials with similar protocols and study populations.

BACKGROUND

Migraine substantially impairs HRQoL and work productivity before, during, and after attacks. Approximately 50% of patients with migraine could be recommended for preventive therapies, yet only 3% to 5% of patients receive them. TPM is an effective and generally well-tolerated migraine prophylactic (preventive) therapy for adults, as demonstrated in several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. The most common adverse events in double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of TPM in migraine prevention are paresthesia, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, taste alteration, and diarrhea.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The Migraine-Specific Questionnaire (MSQ, version 2.1) was used to assess the effect of TPM 100 mg/d on the functionality and HRQoL of randomized intent-to-treat (ITT) and study-completer populations pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. MSQ scores (0 to 100, higher score indicates better functioning) were assessed for the following three domains: role restriction (examines the degree to which performance of daily activities is limited by migraine), role prevention (examines the degree to which performance of daily activities is interrupted by migraine), and emotional function (examines feelings of frustration and helplessness due to migraine). Between-group differences from baseline in mean MSQ domain scores for TPM 100 mg/d and placebo were compared using a mixed-effects model with piecewise linear regression. Effect sizes were calculated to estimate the magnitude of change in HRQoL that can be associated with TPM therapy.

RESULTS

TPM 100 mg/d significantly improved all three MSQ domains compared with placebo for both the ITT (TPM, n = 372; placebo, n = 362) and study-completer (TPM, n = 220; placebo, n = 216) populations (P < .001 for all three domains, both populations). Effect sizes for TPM 100 mg/d varied from 0.40 to 0.78, indicating that the changes in MSQ scores for TPM 100 mg/d were moderate and may be clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

TPM 100 mg/d has been shown to be effective in the prevention of migraine headache in adults. As the MSQ results from the three randomized, placebo-controlled trials indicate, HRQoL is significantly improved for up to 6 months following initiation of treatment.

Time Course of Adverse Events in Patients with Localization-related Epilepsy Receiving Topiramate Added to Carbamazepine

PURPOSE

To explore the time course of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) during topiramate (TPM) adjunctive therapy.

METHODS

Post hoc analyses were performed by using data from a large (264 subjects) multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 200 mg/day TPM was added to carbamazepine (CBZ) with or without another antiepileptic drug (AED) in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. The daily incidence and mean duration of the most common (> or =5% incidence) AEs were calculated for patients completing the 12-week study.

RESULTS

The daily incidence of somnolence, headache, loss of appetite, nervousness, fatigue, dizziness, upper respiratory tract infection, and vertigo peaked during titration and declined to rates similar to that of placebo after the target TPM dose had been reached. In contrast, the daily incidence of paresthesia increased during titration and was maintained for the study duration. Relatively few patients had cognitive symptoms (9% with TPM, 5% with placebo), but these were the most common AEs associated with treatment discontinuation. Patient/investigator reports of weight loss increased gradually over the course of the trial, corresponding with the pattern of change in weight measured at study visits.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that most of the more common AEs with TPM adjunctive therapy are transient. Patients can be counseled that most AEs emerging when TPM is initially added to CBZ can be expected to diminish with continued therapy.

Topiramate in painful diabetic polyneuropathy: findings from three double-blind placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with moderate to extreme pain (0-4 Categorical Pain Scale score > or = 2) were randomized to placebo or topiramate (100, 200, or 400 mg/day) in three similar double-blind trials. The primary efficacy analysis was pain reduction from final visit to baseline in the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for the intent-to-treat populations.

RESULTS

After 18-22 weeks of double-blind treatment, pain reductions were numerically greater with topiramate in two studies but differences between topiramate and placebo in VAS scores or in the secondary efficacy endpoints did not reach statistical significance in any of the three studies. Across all studies, 24% of topiramate-treated patients and 8% of placebo-treated patients discontinued due to adverse events; groups did not differ in the occurrence of serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

These studies did not find topiramate to be significantly more effective than placebo in reducing pain scores in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Several design features may have precluded the studies from having sufficient sensitivity to differentiate effective and ineffective treatments. The study design and results are instructive for other investigators designing future clinical studies in neuropathic pain.

Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis

Topiramate (TPM) has shown efficacy in migraine prophylaxis in two large placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trials. We conducted a randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of topiramate vs placebo for migraine prophylaxis, with propranolol (PROP) as an active control. Subjects with episodic migraine with and without aura were randomised to TPM 100 mg/d, TPM 200 mg/d, PROP 160 mg/d (active control), or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the change in mean monthly migraine frequency from the baseline phase relative to the double-blind treatment phase. Five hundred and seventy-five subjects were enrolled from 61 centres in 13 countries. TPM 100 mg/d was superior to placebo as measured by reduction in monthly migraine frequency, overall 50% responder rate, reduction in monthly migraine days, and reduction in the rate of daily rescue medication use. The TPM 100 mg/d and PROP groups were similar with respect to reductions in migraine frequency, responder rate, migraine days, and daily rescue medication usage. TPM 100 mg/d was better tolerated than TPM 200 mg/d, and was generally comparable to PROP. No unusual or unexpected safety risks emerged. These findings demonstrate that TPM 100 mg/d is effective in migraine prophylaxis. TPM 100 mg/d and PROP 160 mg/d exhibited similar efficacy profiles.

Topiramate in Migraine Prevention

BACKGROUND

Open-label trials and small controlled studies report topiramate's efficacy in migraine prevention.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of topiramate as a migraine-preventive therapy.

DESIGN

A 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Outpatient treatment at 49 US clinical centers. Patients Patients were aged 12 to 65 years, had a 6-month International Headache Society migraine history, and experienced 3 to 12 migraines per month, but had 15 or fewer headache days per month during the 28-day baseline period.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to placebo or topiramate, 50, 100, or 200 mg/d, titrated by 25 mg/wk to the assigned dose or as tolerated in 8 weeks; maintenance therapy continued for 18 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy assessment was a reduction in mean monthly migraine frequency across the 6-month treatment phase. Secondary end points were responder rate, time to onset of action, mean change in migraine days per month, and mean change in rescue medication days per month.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty-seven patients were randomized, and 469 composed the intent-to-treat population. The mean +/- SD monthly migraine frequency decreased significantly for the 100-mg/d group (from 5.4 +/- 2.2 to 3.3 +/- 2.9; P <.001) and the 200-mg/d group (from 5.6 +/- 2.6 to 3.3 +/- 2.9; P <.001) vs the placebo group (from 5.6 +/- 2.3 to 4.6 +/- 3.0); improvements occurred within the first treatment month. Significantly more topiramate-treated patients (50 mg/d, 35.9% [P =.04]; 100 mg/d, 54.0% [P <.001]; and 200 mg/d, 52.3% [P <.001]) exhibited a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine frequency than placebo-treated patients (22.6%). Adverse events included paresthesia, fatigue, nausea, anorexia, and taste per version.

CONCLUSION

Topiramate, 100 or 200 mg/d, was effective as a preventive therapy for patients with migraine.

Topiramate for migraine prevention: a randomized controlled trial

CONTEXT

Small open-label and controlled trials suggest that the antiepileptic drug topiramate is effective for migraine prevention.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of topiramate for migraine prevention in a large controlled trial.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

A 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted during outpatient treatment at 52 North American clinical centers. Patients were aged 12 to 65 years and had a 6-month history of migraine (International Headache Society criteria) and 3 to 12 migraines a month but no more than 15 headache days a month during a 28-day prospective baseline phase.

INTERVENTIONS

After a washout period, patients meeting entry criteria were randomized to topiramate (50, 100, or 200 mg/d) or placebo. Topiramate was titrated by 25 mg/wk for 8 weeks to the assigned or maximum tolerated dose, whichever was less. Patients continued receiving that dose for 18 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in mean monthly migraine frequency. Secondary efficacy measures included responder rate (proportion of patients with > or =50% reduction in monthly migraine frequency), reductions in mean number of monthly migraine days, severity, duration, and days a month requiring rescue medication, and adverse events. The month of onset of preventive treatment action was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 483 patients randomized, 468 provided at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment and comprised the intent-to-treat population. Mean monthly migraine frequency decreased significantly for patients receiving topiramate at 100 mg/d (-2.1, P =.008) and topiramate at 200 mg/d (-2.4, P<.001) vs placebo (-1.1). Statistically significant reductions (P<.05) occurred within the first month with topiramate at 100 and 200 mg/d. The responder rate was significantly greater with topiramate at 50 mg/d (39%, P =.01), 100 mg/d (49%, P<.001), and 200 mg/d (47%, P<.001) vs placebo (23%). Reductions in migraine days were significant for the 100-mg/d (P =.003) and 200-mg/d (P<.001) topiramate groups. Rescue medication use was reduced in the 100-mg/d (P =.01) and 200-mg/d (P =.005) topiramate groups. Adverse events resulting in discontinuation in the topiramate groups included paresthesia, fatigue, and nausea.

CONCLUSION

Topiramate showed significant efficacy in migraine prevention within the first month of treatment, an effect maintained for the duration of the double-blind phase.

Topiramate, carbamazepine, and valproate monotherapy: double-blind comparison in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy

In a novel double-blind trial, topiramate was compared with the investigator's choice of carbamazepine or valproate as first-line therapy in patients as young as 6 years of age with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Among 613 patients enrolled in the trial, 119 (19%) were children or adolescents (6-16 years of age). No differences between fixed doses of topiramate (100 and 200 mg/day) and carbamazepine (600 mg/day) or valproate (1250 mg/day) were observed in efficacy measures: time to exit, time to first seizure, and the proportion of patients who were seizure free during the last 6 months of treatment. Topiramate 100 mg/day (2.0 mg/kg/day in this study population) was associated with the fewest discontinuations owing to side effects. Based on efficacy and tolerability, the recommended target dose for topiramate as first-line therapy in children and adolescents is 100 mg/day.

A pooled analysis of adjunctive topiramate in refractory partial epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of different dosages of topiramate (TPM) add-on to stable antiepileptic therapy for refractory partial epilepsy in adults.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Pooled intention-to-treat analysis of six similarly designed double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, including 481 patients treated with doses of TPM 200, 400, 600 and 800 mg/day, and 265 patients receiving placebo.

RESULTS

Seizures were reduced by >/=50% from baseline in 41% of TPM-treated patients and 15% of placebo-treated patients (P < 0.001); 5 and 0.8%, respectively, were seizure-free (P < 0.003). TPM was significantly better than placebo regardless of gender, age, baseline seizure rate as well as number and type of concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Efficacy was statistically significant in favour of TPM at all dose levels: at least 50% seizure reduction was achieved in 40% of patients with 200 mg, 41% with 400 mg, 44% with 600 mg and 41% with 800 mg TPM when compared with 15% with placebo (P </= 0.001 for each dosage arm vs placebo). The median reduction in monthly seizure frequency was 38%, 42%, 45% and 38% vs 8%, respectively (P </= 0.001). Moreover, response to TPM was significantly superior to placebo at each of the dose levels tested for most of the baseline variables. The total percentage of withdrawals increased with the dosage, and the withdrawals caused by adverse events increased from 3% with placebo to 7% with 200 mg TPM (not significant vs placebo), 15% with 400 mg TPM (P = 0.08), 16% with 600 mg TPM (P = 0.002) and 15% with 800 mg TPM (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of TPM add-on in partial epilepsy is consistent across efficacy endpoints and independent of study population characteristics. The response at 200 mg TPM is similar to the response at higher doses, but as drop-outs caused by adverse events are more frequent above the 200 mg dose, this pooled analysis supports that 200 mg daily is a good target dose for add-on therapy in most patients with partial epilepsy, showing an excellent balance between efficacy and tolerability.

Topiramate, carbamazepine and valproate monotherapy: double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

To compare topiramate (TPM) with investigator's choice of carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproate (VPA) for initial treatment in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In patients with epilepsy diagnosed within previous 3 months, investigators selected CBZ (600 mg/day) or VPA (1250 mg/day) as preferred therapy based on the patient's clinical presentation. Based on investigators' treatment choice, patients (n=613) were assigned to the CBZ or VPA treatment branch. Within each branch, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with the traditional antiepileptic drugs (CBZ or VPA), TPM 100 mg/day, or TPM 200 mg/day. Patients continued double-blind treatment until exiting the study or until 6 months after last patient randomized.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences between fixed doses of TPM and CBZ or VPA were observed in efficacy measures: time to exit, time to first seizure, and the proportion of patients seizure-free during the last 6 months of treatment. TPM 100 mg/day was associated with the fewest discontinuations due to adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy, an initial target dose of TPM 100 mg/day is at least as effective as therapeutic doses of CBZ and VPA.

A dose-comparison trial of topiramate as monotherapy in recently diagnosed partial epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate topiramate as monotherapy in adults and children with recently diagnosed, localization-related epilepsy, comparing two dosages of topiramate in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.

METHODS

Adults and children (>/=3 years of age) were eligible if the maximum interval since epilepsy diagnosis was 3 years and patients had one to six partial-onset seizures during a 3-month retrospective baseline. At study entry, patients (N = 252) were untreated or receiving one antiepileptic drug for less than 1 month. After randomization to 50 or 500 mg/d topiramate (25 or 200 mg/d if weight </= 50 kg), patients remained in the study until 4 months after the last patient was randomized or until patients met seizure-related exit criteria (e.g., had two seizures). The primary efficacy outcome was a univariate analysis of time-to-exit, which was time to second seizure in 96% of patients.

RESULTS

The time-to-exit (median, 422 days vs 293 days) favored the higher dose of topiramate, but this difference was not significant. When time-to-exit was analyzed with time-to-first-seizure as a covariate, the difference between dosage groups was significant (p = 0.01), reflecting the higher seizure-free rates (54% vs 39%, p = 0.02) and longer time-to-first-seizure (median 317 days vs 108 days; p = 0.06) in patients receiving 200 or 500 mg/d topiramate. Higher plasma concentration was associated with increased time-to-first seizure (p < 0.01). Dose-related adverse events included paresthesia, weight loss, diarrhea, and hypoesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the primary efficacy analysis was negative, time-to-exit analyses that included time-to-first-seizure as a covariate, between-group differences in seizure-free rates, and longer time-to-first-seizure with higher serum concentration provide evidence that topiramate is effective as monotherapy in patients with localization-related epilepsy.

Low-dose topiramate in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures

OBJECTIVES

Based on dose predictions from animal and human volunteer studies, most patients enrolled in initial randomized controlled trials of topiramate as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures were randomized to >or= 600 mg/day topiramate. Subsequent experience suggests that dosage needs were overestimated. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated 200 mg/day topiramate in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures receiving a concurrent enzyme-inducing antiepileptic agent (carbamazepine).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After a 4-week baseline, 263 adults receiving carbamazepine who had at least three partial-onset seizures during the baseline period were randomized to placebo or one of two topiramate 200 mg/day treatment arms: topiramate escalated weekly 25 mg/day(8-week escalation) or 50 mg/day(4-week escalation). Therapy was then maintained for the remainder of the 12-week double-blind study.

RESULTS

Median percent reduction in seizure frequency from baseline to study end was 44% with topiramate and 20% with placebo (P <or= 0.001). A significant therapeutic effect was present at 2 weeks with a dose of 100 mg/day. The most common adverse events (>or=10% incidence in topiramate-treated patients) were somnolence, fatigue, paresthesia, nervousness and anorexia; 8% of topiramate-treated patients and 2% of placebo-treated patients discontinued because of adverse events. As a result of the low incidence of adverse events, differences between titration rates in terms of tolerability were not detected.

CONCLUSION

Topiramate 200 mg/day is an appropriate target dose as adjunctive therapy in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures, even when receiving an enzyme-inducing agent; 100 mg/day also appears to be effective. A significant therapeutic effect may be seen in the second week of treatment with a dose of 100 mg/day.

Catalepsy and hypolocomotion induced by a nitric oxide donor: attenuation by theophylline

Nitric oxide (NO) promotes adenosine release in the striatum and hippocampus. Behavioral effects of the nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside were studied in mice and included an examination of spontaneous locomotion and catalepsy, which are behaviors modulated by adenosine. Sodium nitroprusside caused a dose-dependent (2, 4 and 6 mg/kg) decrease in locomotor activity and catalepsy at the dose of 6 mg/kg. These effects were substantially attenuated by pretreatment with the non-selective adenosine receptors antagonist theophylline (10 and 30 mg/kg). Moreover, combined treatment with theophylline (30 mg/kg) and sodium nitroprusside (6 mg/kg) induced limbic seizures in 23% of animals. The pretreatment with the selective adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1, 3-dimethylxanthine (CPT) (1.2 mg/kg) caused no effect on the spontaneous or sodium nitroprusside-induced behavior. These data suggest that these behavioral effects of sodium nitroprusside are at least partially mediated by adenosine in the striatum and hippocampus, probably via adenosine A(2A) receptors.

A multicentre, double-blind, randomised study comparing the efficacy and safety of oral levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial in Latin America compared oral levofloxacin 500 mg once daily for 7 days with oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days in 272 patients with uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections. Among 253 subjects evaluable for clinical efficacy (129 levofloxacin, 124 ciprofloxacin), clinical success (cure and improvement) was observed in 96.1% of levofloxacin-treated patients and in 93.5% of ciprofloxacin-treated patients. Overall, bacteriological eradication rates by pathogen were 93.2% and 91.7%, respectively. Levofloxacin eradicated 94% (66/70) of Staphylococcus aureus and 94% (17/18) of Streptococcus pyogenes isolates, compared with 93% (70/75) and 92% (12/13) for ciprofloxacin. Microbiological eradication rates by subject were approximately 93% and 90% for the levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin groups, respectively. Drug-related adverse events were reported by 8.9% of those receiving levofloxacin and 8.2% of those administered ciprofloxacin. Findings support the efficacy of oral levofloxacin for uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections due to S. aureus and S. pyogenes.