Analysis of clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer in patients ≤40 and ≥40 years of age

Objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) in young patients is a troubling clinical problem. The aim of this study was to analyze whether patients ≤40 years of age with GC differ from patients (age >40 years) in terms of clinicopathological and selected genetic factors.Materials and methods: Between 1984 and 2011, data were collected for 840 GC patients diagnosed and treated for GC at the Department of Gastroenterology at Pomeranian Medical University. The following clinicopathological features were compared between two age groups: sex, symptom duration, family history of cancer, tumor site, stage (early vs. advanced), blood group, histology, Helicobacter pylori infection and BRCA2 C572T silent mutation status.Results: A total of 65 (7.7%) patients were age 40 years or younger. GC was predominant in women in the younger group (p < .001). Patients (≤40 years) more frequently reported a positive family history of cancer (p = .01) and a diffuse tumor type was more common in this group (p < .001). The two age groups did not differ significantly regarding symptom duration, tumor location or stage, H. pylori infection, blood group, or BRCA2 C572T silent mutation status. A comparison of male and female patients aged 40 years or less did not reveal sex-based differences in any analyzed features.Conclusion: Patients ≤40 years of age with GC differ from patient >40 years of age in having a predominance of women, diffuse tumor type, and positive family history of cancer. These results offer openings for further investigation of the relevance of these differences.

Immunohistochemical analysis of thymidylate synthase expression in gastric carcinoma: correlation with clinicopathological parameters and survival

The correlation of thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in gastric cancers with tumor histology and prognostic or predictive information remains unclear. Most studies have involved Asian populations, with few conducted in European cohorts. Moreover, all published studies analyze TS expression using semi-quantitative methods. This retrospective study evaluated the association of TS expression in tumor cells with gastric carcinoma histological type, with selected clinicopathological parameters, and with the prognosis of patients who underwent surgical treatment. TS expression was detected using immunochemistry and objectively assessed by computerized image analysis of tumor cells in 100 gastric cancers. We found that high TS expression was significantly more common in intestinal than in diffuse type of gastric cancer according to Lauren classification (P=0.0003); in type I carcinomas compared to type IV according to Goseki classification (P=0.002); and in gastric cancers in men than women (P=0.04). Low TS expression was found more often in carcinomas in the middle and lower third of the stomach than in cancers in the upper third of the stomach (P=0.009 and P=0.001, respectively). In the subgroup of 25 patients without lymph node metastases (stage I+II), high TS expression was associated with better DFS (83% for high TS expression versus 38,5% for low TS expression, P=0.03). The results (1) indicate significant correlation between the Lauren and Goseki histopathological classifications of gastric cancer and TS expression in tumor cells, (2) suggest that high TS expression may be a positive prognostic marker with regard to DFS in patients with gastric cancer without involvement of regional lymph nodes who underwent radical surgical treatment and were not treated with preoperative chemotherapy. Prognostic results need confirmation in larger cohorts.

Cumulative effects of genetic markers and the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasias by population screening

Genetic markers associated with colorectal cancer may be used in population screening for the early identification of patients at elevated risk of disease. We genotyped 3059 individuals with no cancer family history for eight markers previously associated with colorectal cancer. After colonoscopy, the genetic profile of cases with advanced colorectal neoplasia (213) was compared with the rest (2846). rs2066847 and rs6983267 were significantly associated with the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia but with limited effect on their own [odds ratio (OR) 1.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.41; p = 0.033 and OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.02-2.12; p = 0.044, respectively]. Cumulative effects, in contrast, were associated with high risk: the combination of rs2066847, rs6983267, rs4779584, rs3802842 and rs4939827 minimized the number of markers considered, while maximizing the relative size of the carrier group and the risk associated to it, for example, for at least two cumulated risk markers, OR is 2.57 (95% CI 1.50-4.71; corrected p-value 0.0079) and for three or more, OR is 3.57 (95% CI 1.91-6.96; corrected p-value 0.00074). The identification of cumulative models of - otherwise - low-risk markers could be valuable in defining risk groups, within an otherwise low-risk population (no cancer family history).

Synchronous and metachronous neoplasms in gastric cancer patients: a 23-year study

AIM

To determine the prevalence and characteristics of additional primary malignancies in gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS

GC patients (862 total; 570 men, 292 women; mean age 59.8 ± 12.8 years) diagnosed at the Department of Gastroenterology at Pomeranian Medical University over a period of 23 years were included in this retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Mean follow-up time was 31.3 ± 38.6 mo (range 1-241 mo). The following clinicopathological features of patients with synchronous tumors were compared to those with metachronous tumors: age, sex, symptom duration, family history of cancer, tumor site, stage (early vs advanced), histology, and blood group. GC patients with and without a second tumor were compared in terms of the same clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

Of 862 GC patients, 58 (6.7%) developed a total of 62 multiple primary tumors, of which 39 (63%) were metachronous and 23 (37%) synchronous. Four (6.9%) of the 58 multiple GC patients developed two or more neoplasms. The predominant tumor type of the secondary neoplasms was colorectal (n = 17), followed by lung (n = 9), breast (n = 8), and prostate (n = 7). Age was the only clinicopathological feature that differed between GC patients with synchronous vs metachronous malignancies; GC patients with synchronous neoplasms were older than those with metachronous neoplasms (68.0 ± 10.3 years vs 59.9 ± 11.1 years, respectively, P = 0.008). Comparisons between patients with and without a second primary cancer revealed that the only statistically significant differences were in age and blood group. The mean age of the patients with multiple GC was higher than that of those without a second primary tumor (63.4 ± 11.4 years vs 59.5 ± 13.0 years, respectively, P = 0.026). GC patients with a second primary tumor were more commonly blood group O than those without (56.2% vs 31.6%, respectively, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

GC patients may develop other primary cancers; appropriate preoperative and postoperative diagnostic modalities are thus required, particularly if patients are older and blood group O.