Boster JM, Moore Iii WJ, Stoffel ST, Anderson JT, Gonzales MA, Houle MC, Walter RJ, Morris MJ. Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Cytology of Deployed Military Personnel With Chronic Respiratory Symptoms From the STAMPEDE III Study.
Mil Med 2024:usae056. [PMID:
38430524 DOI:
10.1093/milmed/usae056]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/04/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Deployed military personnel may be at risk for developing acute and chronic lung disease. Prior studies of this patient population have revealed that unexplained exertional dyspnea is the most common diagnosis despite an extensive evaluation. There is a concern that an occult disorder may be affecting this population. This study evaluated the role for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid analysis in the evaluation of chronic deployment-associated dyspnea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Military personnel who reported chronic respiratory symptoms were evaluated as part of the Study of Active Duty Military for Pulmonary Disease Related to Environmental Deployment Exposures III study. Participants underwent bronchoscopy with BAL as part of a standardized evaluation.
RESULTS
A total of 308 patients with a mean age of 38 ± 8.6 years underwent bronchoscopy with BAL. BAL cell-count percentages of macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils were: 76.2 ± 17.0%, 16.3 ± 13.4%, 6.6 ± 8.9%, and 0.9 ± 3.2%, respectively. There was no clear differentiation between groups based on increases in lymphocyte counts (P = .640), although lymphocyte values were more elevated (21.4 ± 12.1%) in the interstitial lung disease category. Neutrophil counts (6.6 ± 8.9%) were elevated compared to the reported normal reference values and were increased in the isolated pulmonary function test abnormality (9.4 ± 11.6%), large airway disorder (10.0 ± 7.5%), miscellaneous (10.9 ± 20.2%), and obstructive lung disease (11.0 ± 15.6%) groups. Eosinophil counts were within normal limits (0.9 ± 3.2%) and showed no differences between groups (P = .545); asthma patients trended higher (1.6 ± 5.7%). BAL counts for the exertional dyspnea group were within normal reference values and showed no differences from the entire cohort.
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of BAL cytology did not help differentiate those patients with unexplained dyspnea from other etiologies.
Collapse