Effect of high-dose vitamin D supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors in subjects with metabolic syndrome: a randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial

PURPOSE

The evidence in support of the effect of vitamin D deficiency on cardiovascular diseases is inconsistent. The objective of this randomized, controlled, double-blind study was to assess the effect of high-dose vitamin D supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors in subjects with metabolic syndrome.

METHODS

Eighty subjects were randomized to receive 50,000 IU vitamin D or matching placebo weekly for 16 weeks. Fasting blood sugar, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity (Quicki), serum lipid profiles (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol), anthropometric factors and blood pressure were assessed before and after intervention. Dietary intake and sun exposure were also determined. The trial was registered at http://www.irct.ir (code: IRCT201409033140N14).

RESULTS

Participants were 40.49 ± 5.04 years and 49 % male. All of the intervention group and 97 % of placebo group were vitamin D deficient or insufficient (25-hydroxyvitamin D <75 nmol/L). After intervention, serum 25(OH)D concentration was increased by 61.93 nmol/L in intervention group, while it was decreased in placebo group (p < 0.001). There was a significant change in TG concentration after 4 months (p < 0.001). Other metabolic or anthropometric factors did not change significantly (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Supplementation with high-dose vitamin D for 4 months improved vitamin D status and decreased TG levels in subjects with metabolic syndrome. However, it did not have any beneficial effects on other cardiometabolic risk factors; this might be due to the inadequate vitamin D status attained in this study which was conducted in a severely deficient region.

Predictors of functional improvement among patients with hip fracture at a rehabilitation ward

To determine possible predictors of FIM scores in patients with hip fracture at discharge a prospective cohort study of 117 patients with either DHS or hip arthroplasty admitted to a rehabilitation service was done. They were classified into four subgroups of underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal (18.5 < BMI < 24.9), overweight (25 < BMI < 29.9) and obese (30 < BMI < 35). Functional evaluations using FIM score as well as sitting, standing, walking days and length of stay for each patient were assessed by a highly skilled therapist at rehabilitation admission; discharge and a post discharge follow up. Recovery was significant in terms of motor subscale. No significant correlation was evident between hospitalization and discharge time with respect to cognitive subscale. The study showed only the age and FIM score at hospitalization to be the independent predictors of total FIM score at discharge. Elevated BMI has not adverse effect on FIM gains in patients with hip fractures. Simple surgery methods such as DHS revealed earlier recovery time than complicated procedures.

Clinical, electrodiagnostic and pedobarographic assessments of leprotic patients with trans-tibial amputation

The aim of present study was to investigate clinical, electrodiagnostic and pedobarographic findings of non-amputee limb in chronic leprotic patients with unilateral trans-tibial amputation to determine neuropathy and plantar foot pressure in non-amputee limb. During the present prospective cross-sectional study, 10 chronic leprotic patients with unilateral trans-tibial amputation were evaluated. The study was conducted in Tabriz Bababaghi and Imam Reza Hospitals at summer of 2008. Sensory nerve conduction (SNAP) and Compound Motor Action Potentials (CMAP) studies were performed in association with pedobarographic assessment. No reliable response was detected from tested sensory and motor nerves, except a very low amplitude finding in deep preoneal nerve of one patient. In comparing with healthy group, static total plantar area, dynamic total plantar area, static rarefoot peak pressure and dynamic rarefoot peak pressure were lower in leprotic patients (p = 0.047, p = 0.004, p = 0.029 and p < 0.001), while static forefoot peak pressure and dynamic forefoot peak pressure were higher in these patients (p = 0.011 and p = 0.031). All of leprotic patients with unilateral trans-tibial amputation suffered from severe neuropathy. Also, these patients have high plantar pressure under the forefoot. Collectively, severe neuropathy and abnormal plantar foot pressure expose in non-amputee foot expose leprotic patients to the higher risk of secondary amputation.

Comparison of outcome and quality of life: haemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Ever since peritoneal dialysis (PD) was introduced as a form of renal replacement therapy, its efficacy and complications have been compared with that of haemodialysis (HD). The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and outcome of PD in comparison to HD in our region.

METHODS

We compared 60 patients on PD with 60 matched patients on HD in Tabriz's Sina Hospital during the period 2004-2006. The technique, patients' survival and quality of life were compared by means of a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire (GHQ-28).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mean age and duration of dialysis between patients on PD and HD. Survival of diabetic patients was better with HD than PD, but in non-diabetic patients, there was no difference in the survival rates between the two groups. Among patients on PD, diabetics had a 25 percent higher mortality rate and non-diabetic patients had a three percent higher mortality rate than their corresponding counterparts on HD. In all four axes of the questionnaire, i.e. psychophysical dysfunction, stress and sleep disorders, social dysfunction and major depression, PD patients had lower scores than HD patients (p-values are less than 0.001, less than 0.001, equal to 0.002 and less than 0.001, respectively), indicating that patients on PD had a better quality of life compared to those on HD.

CONCLUSION

In this study, technique, patients' survival and their quality of life were better on PD than on HD. However, survival and mortality of diabetic patients on HD were better than those on PD.