1
|
Ratneswaren T, Chan N, Aeron-Thomas J, Sait S, Adesalu O, Alhawamdeh M, Benger M, Garnham J, Dixon L, Tona F, McNamara C, Taylor E, Lobotesis K, Lim E, Goldberg O, Asmar N, Evbuomwan O, Banerjee S, Holm-Mercer L, Senor J, Tsitsiou Y, Tantrige P, Taha A, Ballal K, Mattar A, Daadipour A, Elfergani K, Barker R, Chakravartty R, Murchison AG, Kemp BJ, Simister R, Davagnanam I, Wong OY, Werring D, Banaras A, Anjari M, Rodrigues JCL, Thompson CAS, Haines IR, Burnett TA, Zaher REY, Reay VL, Banerjee M, Sew Hee CSL, Oo AP, Lo A, Rogers P, Hughes T, Marin A, Mukherjee S, Jaber H, Sanders E, Owen S, Bhandari M, Sundayi S, Bhagat A, Elsakka M, Hashmi OH, Lymbouris M, Gurung-Koney Y, Arshad M, Hasan I, Singh N, Patel V, Rahiminejad M, Booth TC. COVID-19 Stroke Apical Lung Examination Study 2: a national prospective CTA biomarker study of the lung apices, in patients presenting with suspected acute stroke (COVID SALES 2). Neuroimage Clin 2024; 42:103590. [PMID: 38513535 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Apical ground-glass opacification (GGO) identified on CT angiography (CTA) performed for suspected acute stroke was developed in 2020 as a coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19) diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in a retrospective study during the first wave of COVID-19. OBJECTIVE To prospectively validate whether GGO on CTA performed for suspected acute stroke is a reliable COVID-19 diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and whether it is reliable for COVID-19 vaccinated patients. METHODS In this prospective, pragmatic, national, multi-center validation study performed at 13 sites, we captured study data consecutively in patients undergoing CTA for suspected acute stroke from January-March 2021. Demographic and clinical features associated with stroke and COVID-19 were incorporated. The primary outcome was the likelihood of reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction swab-test-confirmed COVID-19 using the GGO biomarker. Secondary outcomes investigated were functional status at discharge and survival analyses at 30 and 90 days. Univariate and multivariable statistical analyses were employed. RESULTS CTAs from 1,111 patients were analyzed, with apical GGO identified in 8.5 % during a period of high COVID-19 prevalence. GGO showed good inter-rater reliability (Fleiss κ = 0.77); and high COVID-19 specificity (93.7 %, 91.8-95.2) and negative predictive value (NPV; 97.8 %, 96.5-98.6). In subgroup analysis of vaccinated patients, GGO remained a good diagnostic biomarker (specificity 93.1 %, 89.8-95.5; NPV 99.7 %, 98.3-100.0). Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to have higher stroke score (NIHSS (mean +/- SD) 6.9 +/- 6.9, COVID-19 negative, 9.7 +/- 9.0, COVID-19 positive; p = 0.01), carotid occlusions (6.2 % negative, 14.9 % positive; p = 0.02), and larger infarcts on presentation CT (ASPECTS 9.4 +/- 1.5, COVID-19 negative, 8.6 +/- 2.4, COVID-19 positive; p = 0.00). After multivariable logistic regression, GGO (odds ratio 15.7, 6.2-40.1), myalgia (8.9, 2.1-38.2) and higher core body temperature (1.9, 1.1-3.2) were independent COVID-19 predictors. GGO was associated with worse functional outcome on discharge and worse survival after univariate analysis. However, after adjustment for factors including stroke severity, GGO was not independently predictive of functional outcome or mortality. CONCLUSION Apical GGO on CTA performed for patients with suspected acute stroke is a reliable diagnostic biomarker for COVID-19, which in combination with clinical features may be useful in COVID-19 triage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Ratneswaren
- Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - N Chan
- Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - S Sait
- King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - M Benger
- King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - L Dixon
- Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - F Tona
- Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - E Taylor
- Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - E Lim
- Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - N Asmar
- Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - J Senor
- Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - P Tantrige
- Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, UK
| | - A Taha
- Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, UK
| | - K Ballal
- Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, UK
| | - A Mattar
- Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, UK
| | - A Daadipour
- Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, UK
| | - K Elfergani
- Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, UK
| | - R Barker
- Frimley Park Hospital, Surrey, UK
| | | | | | - B J Kemp
- John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - O Y Wong
- University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Werring
- Comprehensive Stroke Service, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Stroke Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - A Banaras
- University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Anjari
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - R E Y Zaher
- Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - V L Reay
- Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - M Banerjee
- Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | | | - A P Oo
- Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - A Lo
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - P Rogers
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - T Hughes
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - A Marin
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Mukherjee
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - H Jaber
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - E Sanders
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Owen
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - S Sundayi
- Watford General Hospital, Watford, UK
| | - A Bhagat
- Watford General Hospital, Watford, UK
| | - M Elsakka
- Watford General Hospital, Watford, UK
| | - O H Hashmi
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - M Lymbouris
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | | | - M Arshad
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - I Hasan
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - N Singh
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - V Patel
- St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - T C Booth
- King's College Hospital, London, UK; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsitsiou Y, Calle-Toro JS, Zouvani A, Andronikou S. Diagnostic decision-making tool for imaging term neonatal bowel obstruction. Clin Radiol 2020; 76:163-171. [PMID: 33097229 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Term neonatal bowel obstruction is common, and absence of treatment is potentially catastrophic. There is a relatively narrow differential diagnosis, with causes categorised as either low or high bowel obstruction. The commonest causes of low bowel obstruction include anorectal malformations (ARM), Hirschsprung's disease, ileal atresia, meconium ileus, meconium plug, and colonic atresia. The commonest causes of high bowel obstruction include duodenal atresia, duodenal stenosis/web, jejunal atresia, and malrotation with volvulus (and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis usually presenting in slightly older infants). Diagnosis can be decided using a step-wise binary decision tool that includes the appropriate imaging steps and evaluation of bowel calibre. This paper presents the decision-making tool from the presenting features, through plain radiographic findings and, where necessary, the additional radiological investigations to assist the general radiologist, novice paediatric radiologist and paediatric surgeon. The tool is pictorial, with the radiological findings accompanied by eight schematics, serving as a simplified visual aid for memorizing the imaging patterns of the differential diagnosis. The imaging and decision-making steps allow for a rapid, simplified diagnosis that can benefit patients by recommending when to perform surgery, when to perform further imaging, and when imaging can act in a therapeutic manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Tsitsiou
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
| | - J S Calle-Toro
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - A Zouvani
- School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
| | - S Andronikou
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| |
Collapse
|