Types and doses of anti-adhesive agents injected into subacromial space do not have an effect on the clinical and anatomical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

PURPOSE

Joint stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a major concern for orthopaedic surgeons. Various antiadhesive agents are commonly administered after rotator cuff repair for its prevention. This study aimed to compare the outcomes among patients injected with different types and amounts of anti-adhesive agents after rotator cuff repair. It was hypothesized that the outcomes might differ depending on the use of the anti-adhesive agent and its type and dose.

METHODS

A total of 267 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without subacromial injection of anti-adhesive agents were enrolled. The first group (group A; 51 patients) were injected with 3 mL of poloxamer/sodium alginate-based anti-adhesive agent. The second group (group B; 93 patients) were injected with 3 mL of sodium hyaluronate-based anti-adhesive agent. The third group (group C; 82 patients) were injected with 1.5 mL of sodium hyaluronate-based anti-adhesive agent. Finally, the last group (group D; 41 patients) who did not use anti-adhesive agents served as the control. The range of motion (ROM) and pain VAS scores were measured preoperatively and at 5 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Functional outcomes were evaluated using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant scores, whereas cuff integrity was assessed via MRI or ultrasonography at least 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

All ROM measurements, pain VAS scores, and functional scores were significantly improved regardless of the use, type, and dose of the anti-adhesive agents. In addition shoulder ROM and rotator cuff healing did not significantly differ among the groups (all n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found in the clinical and anatomical outcomes according to the type and dose of the anti-adhesive agents subacromially injected after rotator cuff repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

TcPO2 Value Can Predict Wound Healing Time in Clinical Practice of CLTI Patients

BACKGROUND

Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) is a noninvasive, nonradiological test to measure local oxygen released from capillaries through the skin. Since it reflects the metabolic state of the lower limb, it can predict wound healing in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of TcPO2 test in evaluating wound healing potential of patients with CLTI.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center, nonrandomized, and observational study. A prospectively registered database of patients who visited Vascular Surgery Department of St. Mary's Hospital for CLTI and underwent TcPO2 tests from October 1, 2015 to July 1, 2021 was reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) those who had amputation only; and (2) those who underwent revascularization procedures. Patients whose wound healing status could not be determined were excluded. The clinical characteristics of patients, patient characteristics related to lower TcPO2 value, treatment success rate, and time for the wound to be healed were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were included in this study. There was no difference in background patient characteristics between the 2 groups despite better survival within 12 months and shorter healing time in the revascularization group. A total of 76 patients survived 12 months after surgery, and 63 patients were healed. Higher HbA1c, higher serum creatinine, history of stroke, and history of coronary artery disease were related to lower TcPO2 value on multiple linear regression. The cutoff value of TcPO2 was determined to be 40 mm Hg for predicting wound healing. This value was similar to those of previous studies. In addition, there was a negative correlation between TcPO2 and wound healing time. Correlations among the anklebrachial index (ABI), toe-brachial index (TBI), and TcPO2 were not determined because ABI and TBI for some patients could not be obtained due to wound condition.

CONCLUSIONS

The TcPO2 value can predict the wound healing process of ischemic lower extremity injury.

Propensity score-matched comparison of oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection

BACKGROUND

Selected studies have reported improved outcomes in laparoscopic compared with open distal pancreatic resection. Concerns regarding failure to achieve proper oncological resection and compromised long-term outcomes remain. This study investigated whether postoperative outcomes and long-term survival after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are comparable to those after an open procedure.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2013, identified from the National Cancer Database. Propensity score nearest-neighbour 1 : 1 matching was performed between patients undergoing laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy based on all relevant co-variables. The primary outcome was overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 1947 eligible patients, 605 (31·1 per cent) underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. After propensity score matching, two well balanced groups of 563 patients each were analysed. There was no difference in overall survival at 3 years after laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy (41·6 versus 36·0 per cent; hazard ratio 0·93, 95 per cent c.i. 0·77 to 1·12; P = 0·457). The overall conversion rate was 27·3 per cent (165 of 605). Patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy had outcomes comparable to those of patients who had an open procedure with regard to median time to chemotherapy (50 versus 50 days; P = 0·342), median number of nodes examined (12 versus 12; P = 0·759); 30-day mortality (1·2 versus 0·9 per cent; P = 0·562); 90-day mortality (2·8 versus 3·7 per cent; P = 0·403), 30-day readmission rate (9·6 versus 9·2 per cent; P = 0·838) and positive margin rate (14·9 versus 18·5 per cent; P = 0·110). However, median duration of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (6 versus 7 days; P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is an acceptable alternative to open distal pancreatectomy with no detriment to survival.

Effects of a good posture belt on buttock pressure during cross-legged sitting

[Purpose] The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of wearing a good posture belt on buttock pressure during cross-legged sitting. [Subjects] The study subjects were 34 adults who were divided into a good posture belt group (7 men, and 10 women) and a control group (7 men, and 10 women), with 17 subjects each. [Methods] Sensor mats were used to measure buttock pressure and changes in the total travel distance of the center of pressure, maximum pressure, and mean pressure. [Results] The good posture belt group showed smaller increments in center of pressure, maximum pressure, and mean pressure than the control group. [Conclusion] The use of the good posture belt during cross-legged sitting is considered to control the increment of buttock pressure, thereby greatly helping the maintenance of efficient postures.

Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The learning curve of robotic gastrectomy has not yet been evaluated in comparison with the laparoscopic approach. We compared the learning curves of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy based on operation time and surgical success.

METHODS

We analyzed 172 robotic and 481 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies performed by single surgeon from May 2003 to April 2009. The operation time was analyzed using a moving average and non-linear regression analysis. Surgical success was evaluated by a cumulative sum plot with a target failure rate of 10%. Surgical failure was defined as laparoscopic or open conversion, insufficient lymph node harvest for staging, resection margin involvement, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

Moving average and non-linear regression analyses indicated stable state for operation time at 95 and 121 cases in robotic gastrectomy, and 270 and 262 cases in laparoscopic gastrectomy, respectively. The cumulative sum plot identified no cut-off point for surgical success in robotic gastrectomy and 80 cases in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Excluding the initial 148 laparoscopic gastrectomies that were performed before the first robotic gastrectomy, the two groups showed similar number of cases to reach steady state in operation time, and showed no cut-off point in analysis of surgical success.

CONCLUSIONS

The experience of laparoscopic surgery could affect the learning process of robotic gastrectomy. An experienced laparoscopic surgeon requires fewer cases of robotic gastrectomy to reach steady state. Moreover, the surgical outcomes of robotic gastrectomy were satisfactory.

The nonhomologous end joining factor Artemis suppresses multi-tissue tumor formation and prevents loss of heterozygosity

Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is a critical DNA repair pathway, with proposed tumor suppression functions in many tissues. Mutations in the NHEJ factor ARTEMIS cause radiation-sensitive severe combined immunodeficiency in humans and may increase susceptibility to lymphoma in some settings. We now report that deficiency for Artemis (encoded by Dclre1c/Art in mouse) accelerates tumorigenesis in several tissues in a Trp53 heterozygous setting, revealing tumor suppression roles for NHEJ in lymphoid and non-lymphoid cells. We also show that B-lineage lymphomas in these mice undergo loss of Trp53 heterozygosity by allele replacement, but arise by mechanisms distinct from those in Art Trp53 double null mice. These findings demonstrate a general tumor suppression function for NHEJ, and reveal that interplay between NHEJ and Trp53 loss of heterozygosity influences the sequence of multi-hit oncogenesis. We present a model where p53 status at the time of tumor initiation is a key determinant of subsequent oncogenic mechanisms. Because Art deficient mice represent a model for radiation-sensitive severe combined immunodeficiency, our findings suggest that these patients may be at risk for both lymphoid and non-lymphoid cancers.

The presence of colorectal hepatic metastases does not preclude pulmonary metastasectomy

Hepatic metastases due to colorectal carcinoma have often been felt to preclude pulmonary metastasectomy. With the recent advances in surgical options, should patients with both liver and lung metastases be considered for surgical resection? The current study reviews the impact of such aggressive management on disease-free and overall survival (OS). The clinical course of 63 patients presenting with colorectal metastasis to the lung alone (group 1, n = 45) or combined hepatic and lung metastases (group 2, n = 18) were reviewed. All patients underwent complete resection of their lung metastases. Surgical control of hepatic tumor burden was achieved by tumor ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and/or resection. All patients in group 1 and group 2 were available for a mean follow-up of 27 and 24 months, respectively. The presence of hepatic metastases, the resectability of hepatic tumor burden, and the disease-free interval after pulmonary metastasectomy did not significantly influence survival. These findings demonstrate that aggressive surgical management of pulmonary metastases in the presence of liver metastases offers a similar benefit as compared to patients with pulmonary metastases alone. Therefore, hepatic metastatic disease does not preclude an attempt at pulmonary metastasectomy if hepatic metastases can be resected or remains responsive to therapy. Such an approach achieves comparable OS and mean survival when compared to pulmonary metastasectomy alone.

The Presence of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Does Not Preclude Pulmonary Metastasectomy

Hepatic metastases due to colorectal carcinoma have often been felt to preclude pulmonary metastasectomy. With the recent advances in surgical options, should patients with both liver and lung metastases be considered for surgical resection? The current study reviews the impact of such aggressive management on disease-free and overall survival (OS). The clinical course of 63 patients presenting with colorectal metastasis to the lung alone (group 1, n = 45) or combined hepatic and lung metastases (group 2, n = 18) were reviewed. All patients underwent complete resection of their lung metastases. Surgical control of hepatic tumor burden was achieved by tumor ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and/or resection. All patients in group 1 and group 2 were available for a mean follow-up of 27 and 24 months, respectively. The presence of hepatic metastases, the resectability of hepatic tumor burden, and the disease-free interval after pulmonary metastasectomy did not significantly influence survival. These findings demonstrate that aggressive surgical management of pulmonary metastases in the presence of liver metastases offers a similar benefit as compared to patients with pulmonary metastases alone. Therefore, hepatic metastatic disease does not preclude an attempt at pulmonary metastasectomy if hepatic metastases can be resected or remains responsive to therapy. Such an approach achieves comparable OS and mean survival when compared to pulmonary metastasectomy alone.