Long-term outcomes (beyond 5 years) of liver transplant recipients-A transatlantic multicenter study

The long-term (>5 y) outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) have not been extensively reported. The aim was to evaluate outcomes of LT recipients who have survived the first 5 years. A multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 3 high volume LT centers (Dallas-USA, Birmingham-UK, and Barcelona-Spain) was undertaken. All adult patients, who underwent LT since the inception of the program to December 31, 2010, and survived at least 5 years since their LT were included. Patient survival was the primary outcome. A total of 3682 patients who survived at least 5 years following LT (long-term survivors) were included. Overall, median age at LT was 52 years (IQR 44-58); 53.1% were males; and 84.6% were Caucasians. A total of 49.4% (n=1820) died during a follow-up period of 36,828 person-years (mean follow-up 10 y). A total of 80.2% (n=1460) of all deaths were premature deaths. Age-standardized all-cause mortality as compared to general population was 3 times higher for males and 5 times higher for females. On adjusted analysis, besides older recipients and older donors, predictors of long-term mortality were malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and dialysis. Implementation of strategies such as noninvasive cancer screening, minimizing immunosuppression, and intensive primary/secondary cardiovascular prevention could further improve survival.

Measures of performance and proficiency in robotic assisted surgery: a systematic review

Robotic assisted surgery (RAS) has seen a global rise in adoption. Despite this, there is not a standardised training curricula nor a standardised measure of performance. We performed a systematic review across the surgical specialties in RAS and evaluated tools used to assess surgeons' technical performance. Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for full texts published on or after January 2020-January 2022. Observational studies and RCTs were included; review articles and systematic reviews were excluded. The papers' quality and bias score were assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Score for the observational studies and Cochrane Risk Tool for the RCTs. The initial search yielded 1189 papers of which 72 fit the eligibility criteria. 27 unique performance metrics were identified. Global assessments were the most common tool of assessment (n = 13); the most used was GEARS (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills). 11 metrics (42%) were objective tools of performance. Automated performance metrics (APMs) were the most widely used objective metrics whilst the remaining (n = 15, 58%) were subjective. The results demonstrate variation in tools used to assess technical performance in RAS. A large proportion of the metrics are subjective measures which increases the risk of bias amongst users. A standardised objective metric which measures all domains of technical performance from global to cognitive is required. The metric should be applicable to all RAS procedures and easily implementable. Automated performance metrics (APMs) have demonstrated promise in their wide use of accurate measures.

Flexible Ureteroscopy: Global User Experience Using Disposable Devices

INTRODUCTION

Renal stone treatment through flexible ureteroscopy is widely established and successful. Ureteroscopes can broadly be classified into reusable and single-use disposable devices, each with their own advantages. Disposable scopes are cheaper to buy, maintain, and dispose of but may have a greater environmental impact and long-term cost. To establish the collective views of urologists, we conducted a multicentre, global study to demonstrate users' experience with single-use flexible ureteroscopes.  Methods: An online nine-question survey was distributed to urologists globally through email and social media platforms. Questions focused on user grade, experience, location, general opinion, advantages, disadvantages, and estimated cost of a single-use flexible ureteroscope. All responses were collated over a three-day period and analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 69 responses were received; the majority of responses were from the UK (75%), and most were consultants (64%). Two-thirds of those surveyed had used a single-use scope on a patient, and 95% of them stated they enjoyed using it, citing excellent vision and reduced need for maintenance. The majority (52%) stated that widespread adoption of disposable scopes was limited due to their prohibitive expense, with an average, sterling-converted responder-estimated cost of £991 (£100-£6000) per reusable scope.

CONCLUSION

Most urologists enjoyed using disposable scopes, finding them comparable or better than reusable devices. However, the initial cost can be prohibitive in certain centres. The potential environmental impact is a further concern as this remains largely unknown for now. In the meantime, it is likely that stone units will continue to use a combination of single-use and reusable scopes, considering their individual needs and budgets as well as local availability and price.

Optimising patients with long-term spinal cord injury for nephrectomy: A review of pre-, peri- and post-operative factors to safeguard outcomes

Objectives:

To review the potential challenges a urologist may encounter when embarking on simple/partial/radical nephrectomy in patients with long-term spinal cord injury and propose strategies to pre-empt and manage these.

Materials and methods:

Comprehensive literature review via PubMed, MEDLINE® and Google™ Scholar searching for relevant scientific articles published to date in English. Recommendations for strategies to safeguard surgical outcomes discussed with a panel of experienced upper-tract urologists.

Results:

Pre-operative considerations:  - urethral assessment via flexible cystoscopy due to higher incidence of urethral pathology in spinal cord injury;  - assessing for chronic constipation and distended bowel; and  - considering glomerular filtration rate assessment by radio-isotope techniques, such as 51chromium-EDTA Peri-operative considerations:  - adequate theatre staffing for safe patient transfer; and  - planned choice of incision, due to higher incidence of previous abdominal surgery, stoma bags and/or foreign body devices. Post-operative considerations:  - ensuring attending medical staff are trained to recognise autonomic dysreflexia;  - early re-mobilisation with physiotherapists experienced in treating spinal cord injury; and  - attentive antibiotic stewardship due to higher risk of hospital-acquired or urinary infections

Conclusions:

Patients with long-term spinal cord injury pose significant potential challenges in the pre-, peri- and post-operative stages of nephrectomy. Familiarisation and optimisation of such factors is recommended to safeguard outcomes.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

Intravesical explosions during transurethral endoscopic procedures

Every Urologist, during the course of fulguration treatment of bladder tumours, has at some time or another experienced small intravesical explosions usually manifesting as a "pop". Major intravesical explosions are rare but potentially devastating complications of transurethral endoscopic resections. The damage to the bladder can range from small mucosal tears to bladder rupture, which can either be intraperitoneal (requiring laparotomy and open bladder repair) or extraperitoneal. We review the literature on intravesical explosions to determine the aetiology of these explosions and suggest strategies to prevent these. A comprehensive literature search was performed using Medline and Ovid to obtain information using search terms: intravesical explosions, transurethral procedures, endoscopic procedures, diathermyIntravesical explosions occur due to the production of explosive gases during use of diathermy on human tissues. The most dangerous combination is hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen alone is not explosive and it only becomes explosive when admixed with oxygen. Oxygen is not produced in sufficient quantity during diathermy to cause explosions but can enter into the bladder from the atmosphere during endoscopic procedures. Careful operative technique (correct use of the Ellick evacuator bulb and reducing the frequency of manual irrigations of the bladder) with minimisation of the operative time and using the coagulation current at moderate power as well as judicious coagulation of tissues can reduce the risk of this dangerous complication arising.