Effect of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy on Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

INTRODUCTION

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was revolutionary in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Although TKIs were generally considered to be safe, they can be associated with renal injury. We evaluated the effect of TKIs on renal functions in a cohort of patients with long-term follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients with chronic phase CML treated with TKIs. We analyzed the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of patients from the initiation of TKI to the last follow-up. eGFR values of CML patients were compared to those of patients with stage 1 or 2 chronic kidney disease (CKD).

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients with CML and 138 patients with CKD were examined. eGFR decline was 1.556 ml/min/1.73m2/year for patients with CML (P = .221). Patients receiving second-generation TKIs (2GTKI) were estimated to have 0.583 ml/min/1.73m2 higher eGFR value than that of the imatinib group, but it was not significant (P = .871). eGFR of patients who had used bosutinib had a downward trend. Duration of TKI therapy, age, and hypertension were found to be significant factors in eGFR decline for CML patients. Lower baseline GFR was associated with an increased risk of CKD development.

CONCLUSION

Imatinib could result in a decline in eGFR which was clinically similar to early-stage CKD patients. We did not observe significant kidney function deterioration in patients receiving 2GTKIs including dasatinib and nilotinib. We recommend close renal function monitoring in patients receiving imatinib, especially for elderly patients with lower baseline eGFR and hypertension.

A comparison of antibody response in kidney transplant recipients and healthcare workers who had PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection

BACKGROUND

Data on antibody response following COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients is scarce. This crosssectional study aims to investigate the antibody response to COVID-19 among kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

We recruited 46 kidney transplant recipients with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 and 45 recipients without COVID-19 history. We also constructed two control groups (COVID-19 positive and negative) from a historical cohort of healthcare workers. We used age and sex-based propensity score matching to select the eligible subjects to the control groups. We measured the SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels quantitatively using the Abbott ARCHITECT system. An antibody level above 1.4 S/C was defined as positivity.

RESULTS

Transplant recipients with COVID-19 had a higher BMI, and COVID-19 history in a household member was more common than that of the transplant recipient without COVID-19. IgG seropositivity rate (69.6% vs. 78.3%, p = 0.238) and the median IgG level (3.28 [IQR: 0.80-5.85] vs. 4.59 [IQR: 1.61-6.06], p = 0.499) were similar in COVID-19-positive transplant recipients and controls. Kidney transplant recipients who had a longer duration between RT-PCR and antibody testing had lower antibody levels (r = -0.532, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

At the early post-COVID-19 period, kidney transplant recipients have a similar antibody response to controls. However, these patients' antibody levels and immunity should be closely monitored in the long term.

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on mood status: A comparison of hemodialysis and oncology patients

INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus related lockdown measures had a severe psychological toll. We investigated the effects of population-wide infection control measures on hemodialysis (HD) and oncology patients' mood statuses.

METHODS

An electronic survey was used to collect data. We used the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to measure the mood statuses.

RESULTS

The study groups composed of 400 HD, 234 oncology patients, and 276 controls. HADS anxiety and total POMS scores were significantly higher in the control group than that of both HD and oncology patients, a finding consistent with a worse mood status. In multivariate models, the male gender and the perception of having received appropriate medical support during the pandemic period were independent predictors of better POMS and HADS-anxiety and depression scores.

CONCLUSION

HD and oncology patients appear to be less affected by the psychological stress induced by social distancing and lockdown periods.