Longitudinal cognitive decline characterizes the profile of non-PD-manifest GBA1 mutation carriers

With disease-modifying treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) associated with variants in the glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA1) under way, the challenge to design clinical trials with non-PD-manifest GBA mutation carriers (GBA1NMC) comes within close reach. To delineate trajectories of motor and non-motor markers as well as serum neurofilament light (sNfL) levels and to evaluate clinical endpoints as outcomes for clinical trials in GBA1NMC, longitudinal data of 56 GBA1NMC carriers and 112 age- and sex-matched GBA1 wildtype participants (GBA1wildtype) with up to 9 years of follow-up was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models (LMEM) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of clinical endpoints for motor and cognitive function. GBA1NMC showed worse performance in Pegboard, 20 m fast walking, global cognition as well as in executive and memory function at baseline. Longitudinally, LMEM revealed a higher annual increase of the MDS-UPDRS III bradykinesia subscore in GBA1NMC compared to GBA1wildtype, but comparable trajectories of all other motor and non-motor markers as well as sNfL. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significantly earlier progression to clinical endpoints of cognitive decline in GBA1NMC. Incidence of PD was significantly higher in GBA1NMC. In conclusion, our study extends data on GBA1NMC indicating early cognitive decline as a potentially characteristic feature. Comprehensive longitudinal assessments of cognitive function are crucial to delineate the evolution of early changes in GBA1NMC enabling a more accurate stratification and allow for a more precise definition of trial design and sample size.

A randomized clinical trial of lipid metabolism modulation with fenofibrate for acute coronavirus disease 2019

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cytotoxicity may involve inhibition of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. Fenofibrate activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro. Whether fenofibrate can be used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in humans remains unknown. Here, we randomly assigned inpatients and outpatients with COVID-19 within 14 d of symptom onset to 145 mg of oral fenofibrate nanocrystal formulation versus placebo for 10 d, in a double-blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was a severity score whereby participants were ranked across hierarchical tiers incorporating time to death, mechanical ventilation duration, oxygenation, hospitalization and symptom severity and duration. In total, 701 participants were randomized to fenofibrate (n = 351) or placebo (n = 350). The mean age of participants was 49 ± 16 years, 330 (47%) were female, mean body mass index was 28 ± 6 kg/m2 and 102 (15%) had diabetes. Death occurred in 41 participants. Compared with placebo, fenofibrate had no effect on the primary endpoint. The median (interquartile range) rank in the placebo arm was 347 (172, 453) versus 345 (175, 453) in the fenofibrate arm (P = 0.819). There was no difference in secondary and exploratory endpoints, including all-cause death, across arms. There were 61 (17%) adverse events in the placebo arm compared with 46 (13%) in the fenofibrate arm, with slightly higher incidence of gastrointestinal side effects in the fenofibrate group. Overall, among patients with COVID-19, fenofibrate has no significant effect on various clinically relevant outcomes ( NCT04517396 ).