Heart failure outcomes by left ventricular ejection fraction in a contemporary region-wide patient cohort

AIMS

This study aimed to characterize a contemporary population with subtypes of incident or prevalent heart failure (HF) based on reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced, or preserved (HFpEF) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and to assess how outcomes, healthcare, treatments, and healthcare costs vary between each subtype of incident HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using Swedish data from the CardioRenal and Metabolic disease Heart Failure (CaReMe HF) study, updated to cover a more recent time period, this population-based study characterized patients from Stockholm County, Sweden, with incident HF (patients with a first HF diagnosis between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019) or prevalent HF (patients with a first HF diagnosis before 1 January 2020). Patients with incident HF had LVEF measured by echocardiography within ±90 days of their first HF diagnosis, and patients with prevalent HF within 5 years prior to the index date. The 13 375 patients with prevalent HF (39.2% women, mean age 73.9 years) had multiple comorbidities (cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and cancer). These were already highly prevalent at the time of the first HF diagnosis in the 8042 patients with incident HF (40.5% women, mean age 72.3 years). Patients with incident HFpEF received less specialist HF care at outpatient secondary care facilities following their first HF diagnosis than those with incident HFrEF. Patients with HFrEF had higher risks of complications and exerted a higher burden, in terms of care for and costs of HF, on the healthcare system.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of contemporary patients with incident HF demonstrates that those with HFpEF and HFrEF differ considerably in terms of clinical presentation, prognosis, and care, highlighting a potential to improve HF outcomes.

Effects of exenatide on coronary stent's endothelialization in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. The Rebuild study

BACKGROUND

Subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher risk of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. The activation of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) has been suggested to induce several effects on the vasculature that may reduce the risk of stent failure following an angioplasty. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the GLP-1R agonist exenatide on endothelialization of a modern drug-eluting stent (DES) in subjects with T2D.

METHODS

38 subjects with T2D who were eligible for revascularization with implantation of DES were randomized to treatment with exenatide (once weekly) plus standard treatment, or to standard treatment alone. After 12 weeks, a new coronary angiography was performed to evaluate the percentage of strut coverage (primary endpoint) and the presence of neo-atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. This study was approved by the Stockholm's Ethical Review Board.

RESULTS

The two groups were well balanced regarding baseline clinical characteristics. Strut coverage was 95% (88.7-98.5%) in the exenatide group and 91.4% (88.8-98.5%) in the control group (p = 0.692). There were no significant differences between groups neither in the thickness of neo-intima (0.2 mm in both groups, p = 0.471), nor the maximal in-stent obstruction by neo-intima (15.5% in exenatide group vs 14.7% in control group, p = 0.801). No significant differences were detected in the rate of target lesion revascularization between groups (p = 0.224).

CONCLUSION

Twelve weeks treatment with exenatide did not lead to a significantly better stent coverage in people with T2D. No significant differences in the occurrence of neo-atherosclerosis were detected between groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (Rebuild Study, NCT02621489).

A multi-scale digital twin for adiposity-driven insulin resistance in humans: diet and drug effects

BACKGROUND

The increased prevalence of insulin resistance is one of the major health risks in society today. Insulin resistance involves both short-term dynamics, such as altered meal responses, and long-term dynamics, such as the development of type 2 diabetes. Insulin resistance also occurs on different physiological levels, ranging from disease phenotypes to organ-organ communication and intracellular signaling. To better understand the progression of insulin resistance, an analysis method is needed that can combine different timescales and physiological levels. One such method is digital twins, consisting of combined mechanistic mathematical models. We have previously developed a model for short-term glucose homeostasis and intracellular insulin signaling, and there exist long-term weight regulation models. Herein, we combine these models into a first interconnected digital twin for the progression of insulin resistance in humans.

METHODS

The model is based on ordinary differential equations representing biochemical and physiological processes, in which unknown parameters were fitted to data using a MATLAB toolbox.

RESULTS

The interconnected twin correctly predicts independent data from a weight increase study, both for weight-changes, fasting plasma insulin and glucose levels, and intracellular insulin signaling. Similarly, the model can predict independent weight-change data in a weight loss study with the weight loss drug topiramate. The model can also predict non-measured variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The model presented herein constitutes the basis for a new digital twin technology, which in the future could be used to aid medical pedagogy and increase motivation and compliance and thus aid in the prevention and treatment of insulin resistance.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Zibotentan in Patients with Concurrent Moderate Renal and Moderate Hepatic Impairment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Zibotentan, a selective endothelin A receptor antagonist, is in development for chronic liver and kidney disease. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of zibotentan were previously investigated in patients with either renal impairment or hepatic impairment, but the impact of both pathologies on PK was not evaluated. This study evaluated the PK and tolerability of a single oral dose of zibotentan in participants with concurrent moderate renal impairment and moderate hepatic impairment versus control participants.

METHODS

Twelve participants with moderate renal and hepatic impairment and 11 healthy matched control participants with no clinically significant liver or kidney disease were enrolled in an open-label, parallel-group study design. After administration of a single oral dose of zibotentan 5 mg, blood and urine sampling was performed. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for each of the two cohorts and compared. Comparisons between the cohorts were based on the geometric least squares mean ratio for the primary endpoints, which were area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) and from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUClast), and maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) on Day 1 through 120 h post-dose. Secondary endpoints included apparent total body clearance (CL/F) on Day 1 through 120 h post-dose. Safety endpoints were assessed up to discharge.

RESULTS

In total, 11 participants with concurrent moderate renal and hepatic impairment, and 11 controls, completed the study. Zibotentan was generally well tolerated, and no new clinically significant safety findings were observed. Total exposure (AUC∞ and AUClast) was approximately 2.10-fold higher in participants with concurrent moderate renal and hepatic impairment versus controls, while Cmax and total nonrenal body clearance were similar among all groups. A regression-based post hoc analysis, comparing exposure and CL/F in patients with concurrent impairment to patients with either renal or hepatic impairment alone, showed that CL/F with concurrent impairment was approximately half of that in controls and was positively correlated with reduction of renal function. Inclusion of the data on concurrent moderate renal and hepatic impairment in the regression analysis led to a narrower confidence interval for the predicted mean CL/F in participants with moderate hepatic impairment.

CONCLUSION

The presented findings advance the understanding of the PK of zibotentan in both renal impairment and hepatic impairment, with and without overlapping pathologies, and will thus increase the confidence of dose selection in future studies, particularly in vulnerable patient populations with concurrent renal and hepatic impairment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05112419.