1
|
Meyblum L, Chevaleyre C, Susini S, Jego B, Deschamps F, Kereselidze D, Bonnet B, Marabelle A, de Baere T, Lebon V, Tselikas L, Truillet C. Local and distant response to intratumoral immunotherapy assessed by immunoPET in mice. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007433. [PMID: 37949616 PMCID: PMC10649793 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the promising efficacy of immune checkpoint blockers (ICB), tumor resistance and immune-related adverse events hinder their success in cancer treatment. To address these challenges, intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies has emerged as a potential solution, aiming to mitigate side effects through reduced systemic exposure while increasing effectiveness by enhancing local bioavailability. However, a comprehensive understanding of the local and systemic distribution of ICBs following intratumoral administration, as well as their impact on distant tumors, remains crucial for optimizing their therapeutic potential.To comprehensively investigate the distribution patterns following the intratumoral and intravenous administration of radiolabeled anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and to assess its corresponding efficacy in both injected and non-injected tumors, we conducted an immunoPET imaging study. METHODS CT26 and MC38 syngeneic colorectal tumor cells were implanted subcutaneously on both flanks of Balb/c and C57Bl/6 mice, respectively. Hamster anti-mouse CTLA-4 antibody (9H10) labeled with zirconium-89 ([89Zr]9H10) was intratumorally or intravenously administered. Whole-body distribution of the antibody was monitored by immunoPET imaging (n=12 CT26 Balb/c mice, n=10 MC38 C57Bl/6 mice). Tumorous responses to injected doses (1-10 mg/kg) were correlated with specific uptake of [89Zr]9H10 (n=24). Impacts on the tumor microenvironment were assessed by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. RESULTS Half of the dose was cleared into the blood 1 hour after intratumoral administration. Despite this, 7 days post-injection, 6-8% of the dose remained in the intratumoral-injected tumors. CT26 tumors with prolonged ICB exposure demonstrated complete responses. Seven days post-injection, the contralateral non-injected tumor uptake of the ICB was comparable to the one achieved through intravenous administration (7.5±1.7% ID.cm-3 and 7.6±2.1% ID.cm-3, respectively) at the same dose in the CT26 model. This observation was confirmed in the MC38 model. Consistent intratumoral pharmacodynamic effects were observed in both intratumoral and intravenous treatment groups, as evidenced by a notable increase in CD8+T cells within the CT26 tumors following treatment. CONCLUSIONS ImmunoPET-derived pharmacokinetics supports intratumoral injection of ICBs to decrease systemic exposure while maintaining efficacy compared with intravenous. Intratumoral-ICBs lead to high local drug exposure while maintaining significant therapeutic exposure in non-injected tumors. This immunoPET approach is applicable for clinical practice to support evidence-based drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Meyblum
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, INSERM UMR1281, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale Paris Saclay (BioMaps), Orsay, France
- Département d'Anesthésie, Chirurgie et Interventionnel (DACI), Service de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Céline Chevaleyre
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, INSERM UMR1281, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale Paris Saclay (BioMaps), Orsay, France
| | - Sandrine Susini
- Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Immunothérapie (LRTI), INSERM U1015, Villejuif, France
- BIOTHERIS, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM U1428, Villejuif, France
| | - Benoit Jego
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, INSERM UMR1281, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale Paris Saclay (BioMaps), Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Deschamps
- Département d'Anesthésie, Chirurgie et Interventionnel (DACI), Service de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- BIOTHERIS, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM U1428, Villejuif, France
| | - Dimitri Kereselidze
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, INSERM UMR1281, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale Paris Saclay (BioMaps), Orsay, France
| | - Baptiste Bonnet
- Département d'Anesthésie, Chirurgie et Interventionnel (DACI), Service de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- BIOTHERIS, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM U1428, Villejuif, France
| | - Aurelien Marabelle
- Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Immunothérapie (LRTI), INSERM U1015, Villejuif, France
- BIOTHERIS, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM U1428, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris Saclay, Saint Aubin, France
| | - Thierry de Baere
- Département d'Anesthésie, Chirurgie et Interventionnel (DACI), Service de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- BIOTHERIS, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM U1428, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris Saclay, Saint Aubin, France
| | - Vincent Lebon
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, INSERM UMR1281, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale Paris Saclay (BioMaps), Orsay, France
| | - Lambros Tselikas
- Département d'Anesthésie, Chirurgie et Interventionnel (DACI), Service de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Immunothérapie (LRTI), INSERM U1015, Villejuif, France
- BIOTHERIS, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM U1428, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris Saclay, Saint Aubin, France
| | - Charles Truillet
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, INSERM UMR1281, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale Paris Saclay (BioMaps), Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|