Systemic Impact of Subgingival Infection Control in Periodontitis Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Periodontitis, an infectious inflammatory condition, is a key contributor to sustained systemic inflammation, intricately linked to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of death in developed nations. Treating periodontitis with subgingival mechanical instrumentation with or without adjunctive antimicrobials reduces the microbial burden and local inflammation, while also potentially bringing systemic benefits for patients with both periodontitis and CVD. This review examines systemic effects of subgingival instrumentation with or without antimicrobial products in individuals with periodontitis and CVD, and explores intricate pathogenetic interactions between periodontitis and CVD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

English-language databases (PubMed MEDLINE and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies assessing the effects of nonsurgical periodontal therapies in periodontitis patients with or without CVD.

RESULTS

While the ability of periodontal therapy to reduce mortality- and morbidity-related outcomes in CVD patients with periodontitis remains uncertain, some studies indicate a decrease in inflammatory markers and blood cell counts. Subgingival mechanical instrumentation delivered over multiple short sessions carries lower risks of adverse effects, particularly systemic inflammation, compared to the full-mouth delivery, making it a preferable option for CVD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Subgingival mechanical instrumentation, ideally conducted in a quadrant-based therapeutic approach, to decontaminate periodontal pockets has the potential to reduce both local and systemic inflammation with minimal adverse effects in patients suffering from periodontitis and concurrent CVD.

Changes in DNA Damage Response Markers with Treatment in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is sensitive to upfront chemotherapy, which is likely attributable to defects in DNA damage repair (DDR). Unfortunately, patients relapse and the evolution of DDR competency are poorly described. We examined the expression of proposed effectors in homologous recombination (HR: RAD51, ATM, FANCD2), error-prone non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ: 53BP1), and base excision repair pathways (BER: PAR and PARP1) in a cohort of sequential OC samples obtained at diagnosis, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and/or at relapse from a total of 147 patients. Immunohistochemical (IHC) expression was quantified using the H-score (0-300), where H ≤ 10 defined negativity. Before NACT, a significant number of cases lacked the expression of some effectors: 60%, 60%, and 24% were PAR-, FANCD2-, or RAD51-negative, with a reassuringly similar proportion of negative biomarkers after NACT. In multivariate analysis, there was a poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for cases with competent HR at diagnosis (PRE-NACT 53BP1-/RAD51+, hazard ratio (HR) 3.13, p = 0.009 and HR 2.78, p = 0.024) and after NACT (POST-NACT FANCD2+/RAD51+ HR 1.89, p = 0.05 and HR 2.38, p = 0.02; POST-NACT PARP-1+/RAD51+ HR 1.79, p = 0.038 and HR 2.04, p = 0.034), reflecting proficient DNA repair. Overall, HR-competent tumors appeared to have a dismal prognosis in comparison with tumors utilizing NHEJ, as assessed either at baseline or post-NACT. Accurate knowledge of the HR status during treatment is clinically important for the efficient timing of platinum-based and targeted therapies with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi).