|
1
|
Hancox J, Ayling K, Bedford L, Vedhara K, Roberston JFR, Young B, das Nair R, Sullivan FM, Schembri S, Mair FS, Littleford R, Kendrick D. Psychological impact of lung cancer screening using a novel antibody blood test followed by imaging: the ECLS randomized controlled trial. J Public Health (Oxf) 2023; 45:e275-e284. [PMID: 35285902 PMCID: PMC10273385 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Early CDT®-Lung antibody blood test plus serial computed tomography scans for test-positives (TPGs) reduces late-stage lung cancer presentation. This study assessed the psychological outcomes of this approach. METHODS Randomized controlled trial (n = 12 208) comparing psychological outcomes 1-12 months post-recruitment in a subsample (n = 1032) of TPG, test-negative (TNG) and control groups (CG). RESULTS Compared to TNG, TPG had lower positive affect (difference between means (DBM), 3 months (3m: -1.49 (-2.65, - 0.33)), greater impact of worries (DBM 1m: 0.26 (0.05, 0.47); 3m: 0.28 (0.07, 0.50)), screening distress (DBM 1m: 3.59 (2.28, 4.90); 3m: 2.29 (0.97, 3.61); 6m: 1.94 (0.61, 3.27)), worry about tests (odds ratio (OR) 1m: 5.79 (2.66, 12.63) and more frequent lung cancer worry (OR 1m: 2.52 (1.31, 4.83); 3m: 2.43 (1.26, 4.68); 6m: 2.87 (1.48, 5.60)). Compared to CG, TPG had greater worry about tests (OR 1m: 3.40 (1.69, 6.84)). TNG had lower negative affect (log-transformed DBM 3m: -0.08 (-0.13, -0.02)), higher positive affect (DBM 1m: 1.52 (0.43, 2.61); 3m: 1.43 (0.33, 2.53); 6m: 1.27 (0.17, 2.37)), less impact of worries (DBM 3m: -0.27 (-0.48, -0.07)) and less-frequent lung cancer worry (OR 3m: 0.49 (0.26, 0.92)). CONCLUSIONS Negative psychological effects in TPG and positive effects in TNG were short-lived and most differences were small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Hancox
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Applied Health Research Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD
| | - K Ayling
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Applied Health Research Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD
| | - L Bedford
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - K Vedhara
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Applied Health Research Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD
| | - J F R Roberston
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, DE22 3DT Derby, UK
| | - B Young
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Applied Health Research Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD
| | - R das Nair
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, NG7 2TU Nottingham, UK
| | - F M Sullivan
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, KY16 9TF St Andrews, UK
| | - S Schembri
- Respiratory Medicine, NHS Tayside, DD2 1UB Dundee UK
| | - F S Mair
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, G12 8RZ Glasgow, UK
| | - R Littleford
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, 4072 Saint Lucia, Australia
| | - D Kendrick
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Applied Health Research Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD
| |
Collapse
|