A fact-finding survey on pre-ulcerative lesions of foot in patients with diabetes: analysis using the Diabetes Study from the Center of Tokyo Women's Medical University 2018 (DIACET 2018)

Aims/introduction

We aimed to identify the frequency and risk factors of pre-ulcerative lesions of foot in Japanese individuals with diabetes.

Materials and methods

This was a single-center cross-sectional observational study. We conducted a questionnaire survey of 5029 individuals with diabetes (mean age 63 years; 2185 women; 1015 individuals with type 1 diabetes and 4014 individuals with type 2 diabetes) who (a) participated in the Diabetes Study from the Center of Tokyo Women's Medical University: DIACET 2018, and (b) responded to the presence of pre-ulcerative lesions of foot. A pre-ulcerative lesions of foot was defined as a calluses, ingrown nails, or symptoms of fungal infection. The associations between pre-ulcerative lesions of foot and commonly available clinical information were examined using the logistic regression analysis.

Results

412 of 1015 (40.6%) individuals with type 1 diabetes and 1585 of 4014 (39.5%) individuals with type 2 diabetes reported having any type of pre-ulcerative lesions of foot. The frequency of calluses, ingrown nails, and symptoms of fungal infection, respectively, were 16.8%, 15.8%, and 21.9% in type 1 diabetes and 10.5%, 18.5%, and 24.7% in type 2 diabetes. In the separate analysis by type of diabetes, common risk factors found to be significantly correlated with pre-ulcerative lesions of foot were female gender, numbness in the feet and foot deformation.

Conclusion

Proactive foot screening by health care professionals was considered important, especially in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with advanced complications and foot deformation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-023-00649-7.

Randomized trial of an intensified, multifactorial intervention in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease: Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan (DNETT-Japan)

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the efficacy of multifactorial intensive treatment (IT) on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease (DKD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan (DNETT-Japan) is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial with a 5-year follow-up period. We randomly assigned 164 patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥300 mg/g creatinine, serum creatinine level 1.2-2.5 mg/dL in men and 1.0-2.5 mg/dL in women) to receive either IT or conventional treatment. The primary composite outcome was end-stage kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine or death from any cause, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

The IT tended to reduce the risk of primary end-points as compared with conventional treatment, but the difference between treatment groups did not reach the statistically significant level (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.11; P = 0.13). Meanwhile, the decrease in serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and the use of statin were significantly associated with the decrease in primary outcome (hazard ratio 1.14; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.23, P < 0.001 and hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.998, P < 0.05, respectively). The incidence of adverse events was not different between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of kidney events tended to decrease by IT, although it was not statistically significant. Lipid control using statin was associated with a lower risk of adverse kidney events. Further follow-up study might show the effect of IT in patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease.

Follow-up of monotherapy remitters in the PReDICT study: Maintenance treatment outcomes and clinical predictors of recurrence

OBJECTIVE

This study followed remitted patients from a randomized controlled trial of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). The aims were to describe rates of recurrence and to evaluate 3 clinical predictor domains.

METHOD

Ninety-four treatment-naïve patients (50% female; Mage = 38.1 years; 48.9% White; 30.9% Hispanic) with MDD who had remitted to 12-week monotherapy (escitalopram, duloxetine, or cognitive behavior therapy [CBT]) participated in a 21-month maintenance phase (i.e., continued medication or 3 possible CBT booster sessions per year). Recurrence was assessed quarterly, and the clinical predictors were the following: 2 measures of residual depressive symptoms, 1 measure of lifetime depressive episodes, and 2 measures of baseline anxiety. Survival analysis models evaluated recurrence rates, and regression models evaluated the predictors.

RESULTS

Among all patients, 15.5% experienced a recurrence, and the survival distributions did not statistically differ among treatments. Residual depressive symptoms on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at the end of monotherapy were associated with increased risk for recurrence (hazard ratio = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI: 1.02, 1.67], Wald χ2 = 4.41, p = .036), and not having a comorbid anxiety disorder diagnosis at study baseline reduced the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = .31, 95% CI [.10, .94], Wald χ2 = 4.28, p = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

The study supported the benefits of maintenance treatment for treatment-naïve patients who remitted to initial monotherapy; nevertheless, remitted patients with a comorbid anxiety disorder diagnosis at the beginning of treatment or residual depressive symptoms after initial treatment were at risk for poorer long-term outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record