Former long-term use of combined hormonal contraception and glucose metabolism disorders in perimenopausal women: A prospective, population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Current use of combined hormonal contraceptives worsens glucose tolerance and increases the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus at late fertile age, but the impact of their former use on the risk of glucose metabolism disorders is still controversial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective, longitudinal birth cohort study with long-term follow-up consisting of 5889 women. The cohort population has been followed at birth, and at ages of 1, 14, 31 and 46. In total, 3280 (55.7%) women were clinically examined and 2780 also underwent a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at age 46. Glucose metabolism indices were analyzed in former combined hormonal contraceptive users (n = 1371) and former progestin-only contraceptive users (n = 52) and in women with no history of hormonal contraceptive use (n = 253).

RESULTS

Compared with women with no history of hormonal contraceptive use, those who formerly used combined hormonal contraceptives for over 10 years had an increased risk of prediabetes (odds ratio [OR] 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-9.2) but not of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Former progestin-only contraceptive use was not associated with any glucose metabolism disorders. The results persisted after adjusting for socioeconomic status, smoking, alcohol consumption, parity, body mass index and use of cholesterol-lowering medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Former long-term use of combined hormonal contraceptives was associated with a significantly increased risk of prediabetes in perimenopausal women, which potentially indicates a need of screening for glucose metabolism disorders in these women.

Association of accelerometer-measured physical activity, back static muscular endurance and abdominal obesity with radicular pain and non-specific low back pain

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide and often associated with lifestyle factors. However, studies further examining the role of these lifestyle factors in non-specific low back pain in comparison with radicular pain are sparse. The aim of this cross sectional study was to investigate how diverse lifestyle factors are associated with LBP. The study population of 3385 middle aged adults with and without low back pain was drawn from a large Birth 1966 Cohort. Outcome measures were steps per day, abdominal obesity, physical activity and endurance of the back muscles. Back static muscular endurance, abdominal obesity and physical activity were measured by means of the Biering-Sørensen test, waist circumference and a wrist worn accelerometer, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was applied to estimate associations of back static muscular endurance, abdominal obesity and accelerometer-measured physical activity with non-specific low back pain and radicular pain. An additional 1000 steps per day were associated with 4% lower odds of having non-specific low back pain. Participants with abdominal obesity had 46% higher odds of having radicular pain, whereas increases of 10 s in back static muscular endurance and 10 min in daily vigorous physical activity were associated with 5% and 7% lower odds of having radicular pain, respectively. In this population-based study, non-specific low back pain and radicular pain were associated with different lifestyle and physical factors at midlife. Non-specific low back pain was associated only with the average daily number of steps, whereas abdominal obesity was the strongest determinant of radicular pain, followed by vigorous physical activity and back static muscular endurance. The findings of this study contribute to better understand the role of lifestyle factors in both non-specific low back pain and radicular pain. Future longitudinal studies are required to explore causality.