Could Prognostic Nutritional Index be a new criteria for active surveillance of prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the importance of the Prognotic Nutritional Index(PNI) value for patient selection of active surveillance(AS) in prostate cancer.

METHODS

Between September 2020 and June 2022, the data of 125-patients who underwent Robot-Assisted-Laparoscopic-Prostatectomy(RALP) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were suitable for AS preoperatively. Using the pathological results of RALP, patients have been divided two groups. Patients who met the criteria for AS were defined as the first group, others were defined second. Demographic datas, PNI values and hematological parameters of the groups were compared.

RESULTS

38% (n:48) patients were found suitable for the group1, and 62%(n:77) were found suitable for the group 2. Upgrading and upstaging were found at 76 patients (61%) and 26(21%), respectively. There is no significant difference between groups on age, BMI, PSA, PSA-density, prostate volume, and PIRADS. PNI value was found higher at first group. The value of 49.45 was calculated by ROC analysis as the ideal PNI cut-off value for predicting upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer (P < ,001). According to the both univariate and multivariate regression analysis, PNI was found a predictor for exclusion from AS (P < ,001).

CONCLUSION

Upgrading and upstaging are detected at a higher rate in patients with low PNI values. The use of PNI value in the selection of patients to AS will increase the success rate of ideal patient selection.

Effect of skeletal muscle area and prognostic nutritional index in periampullary tumors

INTRODUCTION

The skeletal muscle area (SMA) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are both considered as predictive parameters for mortality and morbidity for various type of cancer. In this study, we aimed to identify the effects of pre-operative SMA and PNI values on post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients with periampullary region tumors (PRT).

METHODS

Patients between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups according to SMA and PNI cutoff values. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to find potential risk factors.

RESULTS

The mean age was 65.94 ± 11.242 and 54 (60.6%) of the patients were male. Hypertension was found a reducing factor for morbidity in both univariate and multivariate analysis (p = 0.039; p = 0.045). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and low PNI were found as factors affecting mortality in univariate analysis (p = 0.046; p = 0.014). However, only low PNI was found as an enhancing factor for mortality in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Although SMA is not a risk factor for post-operative morbidity and mortality, PNI can be considered as a risk factor for mortality in patients with PRT.

Prognostic nutritional index is an independent prognostic factor for treatment response, survival and drug choice in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide

PURPOSE

We designed this study to identify the prognostic value of baseline prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide.

METHODS

101 mCRPC patients were included. PNI was calculated using formula 10 x serum albumin value (gr/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3). ROC analysis was used for determining prognostic PNI value.

RESULTS

The statistically significant cut-off value for PNI was 46.62. Initial PSA response and PSA kinetics (early PSA response and 30 %-50%-90% PSA response at any time) were much better in PNI > 46.62 group than the PNI ≤ 46.62 group (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, baseline PNI level >46.62 was an independent predictor of PSA-PFS (HR: 0.42, p < 0.01), radiologic PFS (HR: 0.53, p < 0.01), and OS (HR: 0.42, p < 0.01). In the PNI ≤ 46.62 group, median OS was 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.1-10.7) for the abiraterone acetate subgroup vs. 17.6 months (95% CI: 10.1-25.1) for enzalutamide subgroups (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

PNI is a useful, independent prognostic marker for mCRPC patients treated with either abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. Using pre-treatment PNI may help clinicians in the prediction of survival and decision making based on abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide.