A Randomized Thorough QT Study of Apomorphine Sublingual Film in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

A randomized thorough QT study was conducted to assess the effects of apomorphine sublingual film (SL-APO) on corrected QT interval (QTc) and other cardiac conduction parameters in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and "OFF" episodes. Patients were titrated to an SL-APO dose that resulted in FULL "ON," followed by up to two additional doses (maximum 60 mg), then randomized at the highest tolerated dose to a treatment sequence of SL-APO, placebo, and moxifloxacin (400 mg, positive control) in a three-way crossover design. Changes from baseline in time-matched, placebo-adjusted Fridericia-corrected QTc interval (ΔΔQTcF) and Bazett-corrected QTc interval (ΔΔQTcB) were analyzed from postdose electrocardiograms. Forty patients were randomized and received single doses of study treatments. Upper limits of 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ΔΔQTcF of SL-APO were below the 10-millisecond regulatory threshold at all prespecified timepoints, demonstrating no clinically significant effect on QTcF. Lower limits of 90% CIs for ΔΔQTcF of moxifloxacin exceeded the 5-millisecond regulatory threshold at all timepoints up to 3 hours, confirming assay sensitivity. SL-APO had no clinically meaningful effects on QTcB, PR/QRS intervals, heart rate, or electrocardiogram-derived morphology (EudraCT identifier: 2016-001762-29; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03187301).

Dose optimization of apomorphine sublingual film for treating "OFF" episodes in Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Apomorphine sublingual film is approved for the "on-demand" treatment of "OFF" episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients must undergo dose titration to determine their most effective and tolerable dose. We assessed whether higher doses than those that provide an initial "ON" response could yield more effective treatment.

METHODS

Patients with PD were assessed in the "OFF" state and the apomorphine sublingual film dose was titrated to a level that provided a tolerable "ON" response. The dose was then increased by up to two dose levels, if tolerated. A comparison in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III scores was made following administration of the dose that provided the initial "ON" response and following the higher dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events were also reported.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were titrated to higher apomorphine sublingual film doses than those that provided an initial "ON" response. A mean improvement in MDS-UPDRS Part III score was observed compared with the initial dose of 5.6 points (P = 0.034), 4.4 points (P = 0.009), and 3.7 points (P = 0.018) at 30, 60, and 90 min postdose, respectively. Adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved with dose reduction without concomitant treatment.

CONCLUSION

Higher doses of apomorphine sublingual film than those initially perceived to provide an "ON" response can be tolerated and provide additional improvement in motor function in many patients.

Pharmacokinetics and Comparative Bioavailability of Apomorphine Sublingual Film and Subcutaneous Apomorphine Formulations in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and "OFF" Episodes: Results of a Randomized, Three-Way Crossover, Open-Label Study

Introduction

In a pivotal study, apomorphine sublingual film (APL; KYNMOBI^®) was an effective and generally well-tolerated on-demand treatment of “OFF” episodes in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), approved across the dose range of 10–30 mg. Pharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability of APL and two subcutaneous (SC) apomorphine formulations (SC-APO [APOKYN^®] and SC-APO-GO [APO-go^® PEN]) were evaluated in a randomized, three-way crossover, open-label study (NCT03292016).

Methods

Patients with PD and “OFF” episodes received an open-label randomized sequence of single doses of SC-APO and SC-APO-GO at the currently prescribed dose (2/3/4/5 mg) and APL doses with similar plasma exposure (15/20/25/30 mg) with ≥ 1-day washout between formulations. Plasma pharmacokinetics of apomorphine and apomorphine sulfate (major inactive metabolite) were measured 0–6 h postdose.

Results

Median time to maximum plasma concentration (t_max) of apomorphine was 0.63–0.75 h for APL and 0.25–0.38 h for SC-APO and SC-APO-GO. Geometric mean maximum plasma concentration (C_max) of apomorphine was 4.31–11.2 ng/ml across APL doses and was generally lower compared with SC apomorphine formulations within dose groups. Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_∞) was similar across apomorphine formulations within most dose groups. Relative bioavailability of APL was ~ 17% of SC apomorphine by AUC_∞; SC-APO and SC-APO-GO had similar bioavailability (98% and 83% by AUC_∞ and C_max, respectively). Apomorphine sulfate exposure was ~ three-fold higher for APL versus SC-APO and SC-APO-GO by AUC_∞ and C_max.

Conclusion

In patients with PD and “OFF” episodes, APL demonstrated lower C_max and relative bioavailability but similar exposures (AUCs) versus SC apomorphine within the approved dose range.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03292016.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-021-00251-6.

Real-world assessment of the impact of "OFF" episodes on health-related quality of life among patients with Parkinson's disease in the United States

Background

Many patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who receive carbidopa/levodopa experience symptom reemergence or worsening, or “OFF” episodes. This study assessed the association of “OFF” episodes with health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods

US-specific data from the 2017 and 2019 Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for PD, a real-world cross-sectional survey, were used. Neurologists provided data for 10–12 consecutive patients with PD who completed the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) and the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D). Data were grouped by patients who experienced “OFF” episodes versus those who did not and by average hours of daily “OFF” time. Differences between patient groups were assessed for demographics and clinical characteristics; regression analyses were used to model the relationship between HRQoL and “OFF” episodes with age, sex, body mass index, current PD stage on the Hoehn and Yahr scale, and number of concomitant conditions related and unrelated to mobility as covariates.

Results

Data from 722 patients were analyzed. Overall, 321 patients (44%) had “OFF” episodes (mean of 2.9 h of daily “OFF” time). Patients who experienced “OFF” episodes were less likely to work full-time and more likely to live with family members other than their spouse/partner or reside in a long-term care facility than those without “OFF” episodes. The presence of “OFF” episodes, regardless of the average hours of daily “OFF” time, was significantly associated with high scores (reflecting poor HRQoL) on most PDQ-39 dimensions and the summary index and low scores (reflecting poor health status) on the EQ-5D health utility index, visual analog scale (VAS), and all dimensions. Furthermore, increased average hours of daily “OFF” time was significantly correlated with higher scores for all PDQ-39 dimensions and the summary index, as well as with the EQ-5D health utility index and VAS scores. Patients with “OFF” episodes experienced reduced HRQoL even after correcting for potentially confounding variables.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the occurrence of “OFF” episodes in patients with PD is associated with reduced HRQoL and that the impact on HRQoL increased incrementally with increasing average hours of daily “OFF” time.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-021-02074-2.

Real-world assessment of "OFF" episode-related healthcare resource utilization among patients with Parkinson's disease in the United States

AIMS

Within 5 years of initiating carbidopa/levodopa, ∼50% of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience "OFF" episodes; little is known about the cost burden. We investigated the association of "OFF" episodes with patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and healthcare costs.

METHODS

Analyses used neurologist-provided data from the US-specific 2017 and 2019 Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for PD, including duration of "OFF" episodes and HCRU for 10-12 consecutive patients. Patients were grouped by presence/absence of "OFF" episodes and by average hours of daily "OFF" time. Between-group differences were assessed for demographics, personal circumstances, and clinical characteristics. Regression analyses modeled the relationship of "OFF" episodes with HCRU and costs.

RESULTS

Of 1,309 patients, 41% experienced "OFF" episodes, 25% of whom were "OFF" ≥4 h/day. Patients having "OFF" episodes had more severe PD, were diagnosed for longer, and were younger than those without "OFF" (p < .0001). "OFF" episodes were associated with a greater number of prescribed PD drugs (p < .0001). Patients without "OFF" episodes were more likely to have full-time employment and less likely to be retired or unemployed because of PD (p < .001). Patients with and without "OFF" episodes had different living situations (p < .001): patients experiencing "OFF" were less likely to live alone and more likely to live in a nursing home and have a professional caregiver (p < .001). In the past 12 months, the number of hospitalizations, intensive care admissions, and emergency room visits; nights hospitalized; costs of consultations and hospitalizations; and total direct costs were all higher for patients experiencing "OFF" episodes (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with PD and "OFF" episodes had higher HCRU and costs than those without "OFF," suggesting that "OFF" episodes contribute to the economic burden of PD. Further research is warranted to examine the extent that current PD treatments and treatment patterns impact HCRU and costs.